cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE SNOWBALL THROWING DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA Safa’udin, Muhamad; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, ST, and direct learning. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade VIII junior high school in Nganjuk City on academic year of 2014/2015. The size of the sample was 274 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follow. (1) Mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning and Snowball Throwing gave better than they taught by direct learning, and mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning and Snowball Throwing was produce the same learning achievement (2) The learning styles of visual, auditory or kinesthetic was not have an influence on learning achievement. (3) In each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in mathematics; (4) In each learning style, mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning provide the same learning achievement with cooperative Throwing Snowball, and mathematics achievement of students taught by Problem Based Learning and Snowball Throwing was better than they taught by direct learning.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Snowball Throwing, Direct Learning, Learning Style and Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN METODE SNOWBALL DRILLING TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR Eka Fitria Ningsih; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Gatut Iswahyudi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from self regulated learning. The learning models compared were cooperative learning model of the TAI type with the snowball drilling method, model of the TAI and the direct learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary Schools of North Lampung regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. They consisted of 326 students from State Junior Secondary School 1 of South Abung, State Junior Secondary School 2 of South Abung, and State Junior Secondary School 2 of Abung Semuli. The samples were divided into three classes, namely: 109 in Experimental Class 1, 107 in Experimental Class 2, and 110 in Control Class. The instruments to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and questionnaire of self regulated learning. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclutions of this research were as follows. (1) The cooperative learning model of the TAI type with the snowball drilling method resulted in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TAI type and the direct learning model, and the cooperative learning model of the TAI type resulted in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the direct learning model. (2) The students with the high self regulated learning had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low self regulated learning categories, and the students with the moderate self regulated learning had a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low self regulated learning. (3) There was an interaction among learning models and the categories of self regulated learning on learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords : TAI, snowball drilling, self regulated learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION GUIDE NOTE TAKING (TAI GNT) DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Muhammad Gazali; Riyadi Riyadi; Mania Roswitha
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics learning achievement viewed from students independence learning. The learning models compared were cooperative learning model of TAI GNT, cooperative learning model of TAI, and conventional model. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the tenth grade students of senior high school at East Lombok in the first semester of the academic year 2012/2013. The size of the sample was 104 students is given the cooperative learning model of TAI GNT type, 106 students is given the cooperative learning model of TAI type, 105 students is given model of conventional type. The instruments used were documentation, questionnaire, and test methods. The data was analyzed using two way analysis of variance. The results of this research are as follows. (1) The TAI GNT model gives better mathematics learning achievement than TAI and conventional model, besides, TAI model gives better mathematics learning achievement than conventional model. (2) The students with high independence learning have better mathematic learning achievement than students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have the same mathematics learning achievement as the students with low independence learning. (3) In each level of independence learning (high, medium, and low), TAI GNT model gives better mathematics learning achievement than TAI and conventional model, besides, TAI model gives better mathematic learning achievement than conventional model. (4) In each learning models (TAI GNT, TAI and conventional), the students with high independence learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the students with medium and low independence learning, and the students with medium independence learning have the same mathematics learning achievement as the students with low independence learning.Keywords: cooperative learning, team assisted individualization, guide note taking, independence learning.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI) PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA Faqihi, Ahmad; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

models on learning achievement viewed from learning style types of the students. The learning models compared were PBL, GI, and classical with scientific approach model. The type of the research was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of this research was the students in grade X1 higher Secondary School in Lombok East on academic year of  2014/2015. The size of the sample was 282 students, which was taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used for data collection were learning style questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The hypothesis test used unbalance two ways analysis of variance. The results of the research were as follows. (1) the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach. (2) the student with the high, medium, and ow independent learning levels have equal learning achievement. (3) in each of the learning models, the high, medium, and, low independent learning levels, result in the equal learning achievement. (4) in each of the independent learning levels, the problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type with scientific approach result in equal learning achievement in mathematics, buth both problem based learning model (PBL) and the cooperative learning model of the  group investgation (GI) type give better result in learning achievement in mathematics than the classical with scientific approach.Keywords: : learning model, PBL, GI, Classical learning model, Scientific Approach,  independent learning levels, Achievement.
ANALISIS KESALAHAN SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL PERSAMAAN KUADRAT BERDASARKAN TAKSONOMI SOLOPADA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 1 PLUS DI KABUPATEN NABIRE – PAPUA Ronald Manibuy; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to describe the position of errors, kind of errors and factor that caused students’ errors in answering quadratic equation questions based on SOLO taxonomy on the X grade students of SMA with high, moderate and low mathematics ability. This research was a descriptive qualitative. This research was carried out on the X grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Plus Nabire – Papua. The written data were taken from the result of mathematics ability test and first problem solving test (M1: linear/quadratic pattern) and the second problem (M2: functional concept), the oral forms data were taken from the result of interview which were conducted to the subject of the research to get valid data 1 and valid data 2. Afterwards, the valid data were analyzed to find out the constant level of consistency achievement of SOLO level, in order to meet reliable data from the chosen research subjects 2 students with high mathematics ability, 3 students with moderate mathematics ability and 2 students with low mathematics ability. The valid and reliable data were used to analyze students’ errors based on SOLO taxonomy. The result of the research showed that: (a) the students with high mathematics ability were reached unistructural–relational level, (b) the students with moderate mathematics ability were reached unistructural–multistructural level, (c) the students with low mathematics ability were almost reached unistructural level. Errors made by the research subjects: (1) all of students conducted the same errors in answering the mathematics model of the quadratic equation questions, they did not provide the answer correctly and they did not understand the concept of the questions properly, (2) kinds of errors including: (a) misconception, not comprehending about quadratic concept, this error existed in all mathematics ability levels. Whereas errors on the concept of variable, which is used to form the mathematics quadratic equation, was conducted by moderate and low level subject; (b) error on the principle, the application of the mathematics rules and formulas incorrectly in answering the quadratic equation questions, was conducted by high, moderate and low levels; (c) operational error was often conducted by low, moderate and high deals with the operational of algebra, especially on the calculation of negative integer operation, (3) the factors that caused errors for the research subjects of high, moderate and low levels were low comprehension on mathematics’ concept, principle and operation.  Keywords: errors analysis, quadratic equation, SOLO taxonomy
PROSES BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA SMP DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN SISWA Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research is aimed at describing the creative thinking process of students with rational personality type, idealist personality type, guardian personality type, and  artisan personality type in solving mathematics problems. It was a descriptive qualitative research. The subject of this research was taken by using a purposive sampling. The subject of this research were 4 of the eighth grade students at SMP Negeri 2 Jenar, Sragen Regency, consisting of 1 student with rational personality type, 1 student with idealist personality type, 1 student with guardian personality type, and 1 student with artisan personality type. The techniques of collecting the data in this research were questionnaire, written test, and interview on plane geometri subject. The techniques of validating the data were time triangulation and sufficient references. The technique of analyzing the data was Miles and Huberman concept, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings of the research show that (1) the student with rational personality type has creative thinking process level 1 (less creative); (2) the student with idealist personality type has creative thinking process level 3 (creative); (3) the student with guardian personality type has creative thinking process level 3 (creative); (4) the student with artisan personality type has creative thinking process level 0 (not creative). Keywords: Creative Thinking Process, Mathematics Problem Solving, Personality Type
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN CONCEPT MAPS PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Faizati, Khamsatul; Budiyono, Budiyono; Sari Saputro, Dewi Retno
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

using PBL with concept maps (CM), PBL, or classical learning, (2) which one gives better mathematics learning achievement, student with high, medium, or low emotional intelligence (EI) types, (3) which one is more effective for each learning model, student with high, medium, or low EI types,  (4) which one is more effective for each EI type of students, using PBL with CM, PBL, or classical learning. This research used quasi experimental method with its population included all of students of state junior high school in Sukoharjo Regency. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The size of the sample was 282 students. The data collection technique was the document that was national test in elementary school for initial capability data before the experiment, achievement test for mathematics student achievement data, and questionnaire of EI. The data were analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) Mathematics achievement using PBL with CM is better than using PBL or classical learning. Likewise, mathematics achievement using PBL is as same as using classical learning. (2) Students with high EI have mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low EI. Likewise, students with medium and low EI have the same as mathematics achievement. (3) For each learning model, students with high EI have mathematics achievement better than students with medium or low EI. Likewise, students with medium and low EI have the same as mathematics achievement. (4) For each EI type of students, mathematics achievement using PBL with CM is better than using PBL or classical learning. Likewise, mathematics achievement using PBL is as same as using classical learning.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, concept maps, and emotional intelligence.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL LEARNING CYCLE 7E DENGAN PROBLEM POSING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN MESUJI LAMPUNG Agus Setiawan; Budiyono Budiyono; Imam Sujadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was investigate the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the mathematics learning Creativities. This research used the quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Mesuji regency. The samples were State Junior Secondary School 1 of East Mesuji, State Junior Secondary School 1 of Way Serdang and State Junior Secondary School 1 of Simpang Pematang The instruments used to gather the data of the research were test of learning achievement in Mathematics and questionnaire of Mathematics learning creativity of the students The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows: 1) The students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model with the problem posing have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model and the direct learning model. In addition, the students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the direct learning model. 2) The students with the high Mathematics learning creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the moderate and low Mathematics learning creativities, and the students with the moderate Mathematics learning creativity have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low Mathematics learning creativity. 3) In the Learning Cycle 7E model with problem-posing, the Learning Cycle 7E model, and the direct learning model, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high Mathematics learning creativity is better than those of the students with the moderate and low Mathematics learning creativities. And the learning achievement of the students with the moderate Mathematics learning creativity is better than that of the students with the low Mathematics learning creativity. 4) In the high, moderate, and low Mathematics learning creativities, the students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model with problem-posing have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model and the direct learning model, and the students instructed with the Learning Cycle 7E model have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those instructed with the direct learning model.Keywords: Learning Cycle 7E, problem posing, and Mathematics learning creativity  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TPS DENGAN PENDEKATAN CTL PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATERI BANGUN DATAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VII MTs KABUPATEN KEDIRI TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Zainal Arifin; Budi Usodo; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which learning model of the TPS with CTL approach, TPS or conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; (2) which students of those with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have a better learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each learning style, which learning model of the TPS with CTL approach, the TPS, and the conventional learning results in a better learning achievement in mathematics; and (4) in each learning model, which learning style of the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles results in a better learning achievement in mathematics. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VII of Islamic Junior Secondary Schools in Kediri regency. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research consisted of 269 students; 86 students belonged to experiment class one, 92 students belonged to experiment class two, and 91 students belonged to control class. The data of the research were gathered through multiple choice test of learning achievement and questionnaire of learning style. The data of the research were analyzed by using the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance at the significance level of 5%. The results of the research are as follows: (1) the TPS with CTL approach and TPS learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (2) the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in mathematics; (3) in each learning style, the TPS with CTL approach and TPS learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics, but both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model; (4) in each learning model, the students with the visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles have an equal learning achievement in Mathematics.   Keywords: learning model, TPS with CTL approach, TPS, conventional, learning style  
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DENGAN WRITING ACTIVITIES DAN MODEL CREATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) PADA MATERI BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMK SE-KOTA TEGAL TAHUN AJARAN 2014/2015 Yuliana, Tri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Sujadi, Imam
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: Problem solving ability was main objective in this mathematic’s learning. So this research intends to know the students’ achievement of mathematics which was better (1) students were taught by Problem Based Learning (PBL) with Writing Activities (WA), students were taught by Creative Problem Solving (CPS) or students were taught by Direct Learning, (2) students with high creativity, students with medium creativity, or srudents with low creativity, (3) in each category creativities, the students’ achievement of mathematics was better among the students were learnt by PBL with WA, CPS or direct learning models (4) in each model, the students’ achievement of mathematics was better among the students with high creativity, students with medium creativity, students with low creativity. This research used a quasi-experimental research with the population of tenth grade of High Schools in Tegal city in the Academic Year of 2014/2015. The sampling technique used stratified cluster random sampling and three schools were selected namely SMK N 1 Tegal, SMK N 2 Tegal, and SMK N 3 Tegal. Two-way variance’ analysis was used to test the hypothesis, followed by Scheffe’ technique.  The results of analysis  were as follows. (1) The students’ achievement by PBL with WA were better than by CPS and direct learning. The students’ achievement by CPS were better than by direct learning. (2) The students’ achievement with high creativities were better than with medium and low creativity. The students’ achievement with medium creativity were better than with low creativity. (3) In every category of creativities (high, medium and low), the students’ achievement by PBL with writing activities were better than CPS and direct learning. The students’ achievement by CPS were better than direct learning. (4) In every model of learnings (PBL with WA, CPS, and direct learning), the students’ achievement with high creativity were better than medium creativity and low creativity. The students’achievement with medium creativity were better than with low creativity.Keywords: Problem Based Learning with Writing Activities, Creative Problem Solving, Creativities, achievement of mathematics.

Page 21 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue