cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Mathematics
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 347 Documents
 22   23   24   25   26 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN STAD ( STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS) PADA MATERI POKOK PERBANDINGAN DAN FUNGSI TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KOTA MADIUN Wahyu Astuti Budi; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Mardiyana Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the  effect of learning models (STAD, Jigsaw, and conventional) on mathematics achievement viewed from  learning motivation. The type of research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3x3. The population was the students in grade X Senior High School in Madiun City. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research consisten of 257 students. Instruments used to collect data were prior knowledge test, mathematics achievement test, and motivation quetioner. The trial of instrument test includes of content validity, difficullty level, discrimination power, and reliability. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogenity test used the Bartlett test. The Balance test used unbalance one way analysis of variance. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) the STAD and Jigsaw learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics and both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model. (2) the learning achievement in mathematics toward high motivation and low one were equally well, high achievement motivation  learning was better than low motivation. (3) for students who taugh by cooperative learning model of STAD, Jigsaw and conventional, the learning achievement in mathematics toward high motivation and low one were equally well, high achievement motivation  learning was better than low motivation. (4) in the each motivation learning the students with high, medium, and low,  the STAD and Jigsaw learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics and both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model. Keywords: STAD, Jigsaw, Conventional, learning motivation
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI PECAHAN DALAM BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII DI SMP NEGERI 2 ADIMULYO KABUPATEN KEBUMEN TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Savitri, Maria Endah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to: (1) identify the occurrence of misconceptions in the eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence, and (2) describe the occurrence of misconceptions eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence. This research used a descriptive qualitative  method with a case study. Subjects of this research are eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Adimulyo academic year 2013/2014. The sample of the research was taken by using the snowball sampling technique. The identification of the existence of misconceptions was done by using misconception diagnostic test. While the identification of the students' cognitive styles was conducted by using student cognitive style questionnaire instrument. Data validity used the source of triangulation method. Analysis of data use the model of Miles and Huberman. The results of this research indicate that: (1) misconceptions that occur in the FD students more likely to misconceptions on the concept of understanding the elements of the algebra and the terms of a fraction is called fractional form algebra, the concept of canceling, the concept of operating powers, and understand the properties the concept of distributive, (2) the highest misconceptions experienced by the FI students in understanding the concept of distributive properties, as well as understanding the elements of the algebra the condition is referred to as a fraction in the form of algebraic fractions, (3) causes of the misconceptions students FD is dominated by reasoning is not complete and students who lack of ability to process and memorize course, (4) factors causing of misconceptions students FI dominated by reasoning is not complete.Keywords: Misconceptions, algebraic fractions, cognitive style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DENGAN GUIDED NOTE TAKING (GNT) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG DITINJAU DARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI Se-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2013/2014 Dyah Susilawati; Budi Usodo; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstrac: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of the learning models on the learning achievement in Mathematics viewed from learning activities of the students. The learning models compared were the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) with Guided Note Taking (GNT) learning model, the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model, and conventional learning model. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of state Junior Secondery  School of the Klaten regency in Academic Year 2013/2014. Instruments used to collect data were mathematics achievement test and the learning activities questionnaire. The data were analyzed using unbalanced two ways ANOVA. The results of the research are as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in a better learning achievement in Mathematics than the  cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model, whereas cooperative learning model of TAI result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the learning model conventional. 2) The students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as  the moderate learning activities. The students with the high and moderate learning activitiy have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with low learning activities. 3) In the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI, the students with the high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate activities and the students with high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. In the conventional learning model, the students with high learning activities have the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as those with the moderate learning activities, whereas the high and moderate learning activities have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those with the low learning activities. 4) For the students with the high and moderate learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI and the conventional learning model. The student with the low learning activities, the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT result in the same good learning achievement in Mathematics as the cooperative learning model of TAI, whereas the cooperative learning model of TAI with GNT and TAI result a better learning achievement in Mathematics than those the conventional learning model.Keywords: Team Assisted Individualization (TAI), Guided Note Taking (GNT), conventional learning, Learning Activities, Learning Mathematics Achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN 4Ex2 DAN LC 5E PADA MATERI PLSV DAN PtLSV DITINJAU DARI SIKAP SISWA TERHADAP MATEMATIKA Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna; Mardiyana Mardiyana; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from the students attitude towards mathematics. The learning model compared were 4Ex2, LC 5E and conventional learning model. Data analysis techniques used to test the hypothesis was two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of the research were as follows. 1) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students exposed to the 4Ex2 learning model are better than LC 5E learning model and conventional learning model, and  the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students exposed to the LC 5E learning model are better than conventional learning model. 2) The learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high attitudes toward Mathematics are better than that of the students with the medium and low attitudes toward Mathematics, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the medium attitudes toward Mathematics are better than that of the students with the low attitudes toward Mathematics. 3) In the 4Ex2 learning model, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high attitudes toward Mathematics are better than medium and low attitudes toward Mathematics, and the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the medium attitudes toward Mathematics are better than low attitudes toward Mathematics. In the LC 5E learning model, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high attitudes toward Mathematics are better than medium and low attitudes toward Mathematics, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the medium attitudes toward Mathematics are the same as low attitudes toward Mathematics. In the conventional learning model, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high attitudes toward Mathematics are the same as medium attitudes toward Mathematics, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students with the high and medium attitudes toward Mathematics are better than low attitudes toward Mathematics. 4) In the students with the high attitudes toward Mathematics the learning achivement of the students exposed to the LC 5E learning model are the same as 4Ex2 learning model and the conventional learning model, the learning achievement in Mathematics of the students exposed to the 4Ex2 learning model are better than conventional learning model, and both in the students with the medium attitudes toward Mathematics and in those with the low attitudes toward Mathematics, students exposed to the 4Ex2 learning model, LC 5E learning model, and conventional learning model result in the same learning achievement in Mathematics.Keywords: Learning model, 4Ex2, LC 5E, attitudes toward Mathematics, learning achievement in Mathematics.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRAN BELAJAR Brilliyanti, Fanny; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one gives better mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD), model Problem Based Learning (PBL), or model classical with scientific approach;  (2) which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low of self regulated learning; (3) for each learning model, which one has better  mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or lowof self regulated learning; (4) For each category of self regulated learning, which one gives better mathematics achievement, STAD, PBL, or classical with scientific approach. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMP N 2 Surakarta, SMP N 15 Surakarta and SMP N 24 Surakarta. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self regulated learning questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than STAD with scientific approach, and STAD with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have medium and low self regulated learning and students who have medium self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning (3) For STAD and PBL with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning. Students who have medium and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self regulated learning, STAD with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement with PBL and classical with scientific approach but PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For students who have medium and low self regulated learning, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Student Team Achievment Division (STAD), Problem Based Learning (PBL), classical, scientific approach, self regulated learning (SRL)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SCIENTIFIC PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KARANGANYAR Hendry Putra; Budiyono Budiyono; Dewi Retno Sari S
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning model (LM) toward learning outcomes (LO) in mathematics viewed from the learning styles (LS). The learning models of this research were cooperative LM of the NHT with Scientific, the cooperative LM of the TPS with Scientific, and the classical learning with Scientific. This research used the quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3 x 3. Its population was all of the students in Grade VIII of State Junior Secondary Schools of Karanganyar. The instruments used to gather the data were test of LO in Mathematics and questionnaire of LS. The proposed hypotheses of the research were tested by using the two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research were as follows: 1) the students instructed NHT had a better LO in Mathematics than those instructed TPS and those instructed the classical learning. Furthermore, the students instructed TPS had a better LO in Mathematics than those instructed the classical learning. 2) the LO in Mathematics of the students with the auditory LS was better than that of the students with the visual LS and that of the students with the kinesthetic LS. In addition, the LO in Mathematics of the students with the visual LS was better than that of the students with the kinesthetic LS. 3) on model of the NHT, the students with the visual LS had the same LO in Mathematics as the students with the auditory LS. Moreover, the students with the visual and auditory LS had a better LO in Mathematics than those the students with the kinesthetic LS. On model of the TPS and the classical learning results in the same LO in each of LS. 4) the students with the visual and auditory LS, NHT and the classical learning results in the same LO in Mathematics as TPS. Furthermore, NHT results in a better LO in Mathematics than the classical learning. The students with the kinesthetic LS had the same LO in each of LM.Keywords: NHT with Scientific, TPS with Scientific, learning outcomes, learning styles.
ANALISIS BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA PADA MATERI PELUANG DITINJAU DARI GENDER SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA NEGERI 1 KOTA BANJARBARU KALIMANTAN SELATAN Nina Nurmasari; Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi; Riyadi Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research used qualitative approach which aims to describe the factors of student’s creative thinking in mathematical problem solution on probability for male students and female students. The methods used in this study were interviews and tests. The data validation has done by triangulation. The data was obtained from interviews and tests of creative thinking skills in mathematics learning. This tests was composed of five categories: fluency, flexibility, originality,  elaboration, and redefinition which are the factors of the creativity. The research was conducted in SMA Negeri 1 Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan in October until November 2013. The task-based interviews and tests were conducted to collect data from the 11th grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan grade XI Program IPA. Selection of subjects was based on male student and female student. Snowball method was used to determine subject research. Subjects were seven students grade XI Program IPA on SMA Negeri 1 Banjarbaru City, South Kalimantan academic year 2013/2014. The result showed that the male students had the factors of creative thinking ability on fluency, flexibility, originality, and redefinition. The male students did not have enough the factor of creative thinking ability on elaboration. The female students had the factors of creative thinking ability on fluency, flexibility and originality. The female students did not have the factors of creative thinking ability on elaboration and redefinition.Keywords:  student’s creative thinking, factors of creative thinking, gender.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SAVI DAN RECIPROCAL TEACHING PADA MATERI OPERASI HITUNG BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN Mahmudah Titi Muanifah; Budiyono Budiyono; Sri Subanti
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The objective of research was to find out: (1) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with SAVI, those with Reciprocal teaching or those with direct learning model in the topics of algebraic arithmetic operation l, (2) which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with visual, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style, (3) in each learning model, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those with visual, those with auditory or those with kinesthetic learning style, and (4) in each learning style, which students had the better mathematics learning achievement, those treated with SAVI, those with Reciprocal teaching or those with direct learning model in the topics of algebraic arithmetic operation.This study was a quasi experimental research with a 3 × 3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the VII graders of Junior High Schools in Sleman Regency. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The sample consisted of 285 students: 96 for the experiment 1 class, 94 for the experiment 2 class, and 95 for the control class. Considering the hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with SAVI learning model, Reciprocal Teaching learning model and direct learning model was equally good. (2) The learning achievement of the students with visual learning style was better than that of those with kinesthetic one. But, that of those with visual learning style was as good as that of those with auditory one, and that of those with auditory was as good as that of those with kinesthetic one. (3) In SAVI, reciprocal teaching, and direct learning models, the learning achievement of the students with visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning styles was equally good. (4) In the categories of visual, auditory and kinesthetic learning style, the learning achievement of the students treated with SAVI, reciprocal teaching and direct learning was equally good. Keywords: Somatic, Auditory, Visual and Intellectual (SAVI), Reciprocal Teaching (RT), Student Learning Style.
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN OPEN-ENDED PADA POKOK BAHASAN LOGARITMA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BERPIKIR DAN KREATIVITAS PESERTA DIDIK KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN GUNUNG KIDUL TAHUN PELAJARAN 2012/2013 Mella Yuliani
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:The aim of the research was to determine and comparecooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach and STAD viewed from the thinking style and the creativity of toward learners student mathematics learning achievement.This research used the quasi-experimental research method with the factorial design of 2 x 2 x 2. Its population was all of the students in Grade X of State Senior Secondary Schools in Gunungkidul in Academic Year 2012/2013.Based on the results of the data analyses, the conclusions were as follows. 1) The cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended resulted in a better learning achievement than the STAD type. 2) The students with the sequential thinking style have a better learning achievement than those with the random thinking style. 3) The students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity. 4)(a) In the sequential thinking style, the students treated to the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach have the same learning achievement as those treated with the STAD type; and (b) In the random thinking style, students treated to the cooperativelearning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach have a better learning achievement than those treated with the STAD type. 5)(a) in the high creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach results in a better learning achievement than that of the STAD type; and (b) in the low creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach results in the same learning achievement as that of the STAD type. 6) (a) In the high creativity, the students with the sequential thinking style have a better learning achievement than those with the random thinking style; (b) In the low creativity, the students with the sequential thinking style have the same learning achievement as those with the random thinking style; (c) in the sequential thinking style, the students with the high creativity have a better learning achievement than those with the low creativity; and (d) In the random thinking style, the students with the high creativity have the same learning achievement as those with the low creativity. 7) In the sequential thinking style with the high creativity and the low creativity and in the random thinking style with the low creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with the open-ended approach results in the same learning achievement as that of the STAD type,and in the random thinking style with the high creativity, the cooperative learning model of the STAD type with theopen-ended approach results in a better learning achievement than thatof the STAD type.Keywords: Learning achievement in Mathematics, STAD, open-ended, thinking style, and creativity.
PENGEMBANGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS INTUISI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI 2 SRAGEN Lestari, Mulyaningrum; Riyadi, Riyadi; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to product model of learning based on intuition to improve the creative thinking ability in solving mathematics problems in the students of SMA N 2 Sragen validly, practically, and effectively. The learning model produced included syntax and learning tools such as teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet. This type of the research was a Research and Development (R&D). Subjects of this research were students class of X MS (Mathematic Science) 4 and class X MS 5 of SMA N 2 Sragen, Central Java. The process of developing an learning model based on intuition referred to development model of Plomp and Borg & Gall including : (1) studying and collecting information in preliminary investigation stage, (2) designing an learning model based on intuition, created learning tools (teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet), (3) realizing model and learning tools organized into first draft, (4) validating the first draft against validator, revising, and then trying out the model, and revising again, and (5) holding FGD to evaluate the results of tryout that had been conducted and revising it for the next tryout. This research  produced syntax and learning tools (teaching material, lesson plan, worksheet, and problem sheet) of learning model based on intuition to improve the creative thinking ability in solving  mathematics problems of students validly, practically, and effectively. The procedure of syntax in an learning model based on intuition: (1) The teacher made introduction such as preparing the students psychically and physically, apperception, providing motivation and learning objectives, (2) Teacher divided the students heterogeneously into some groups of two, (3)The students were given worksheet to discuss in group and there were five activities observing; questioning; exploring; associating; and communicating, (4) The students were given problems individually in the problem sheet to work on with stages that could appear intuition and improve their creative thinking ability including beginning, incubation, illumination, and verification, (5) Closing such as included reflection and homework.Keywords : model development, learning model, intuition, creative thinking ability

Page 24 of 35 | Total Record : 347

 22   23   24   25   26 

Filter by Year

2013 2018


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 5, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 5, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 1 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 7 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 6 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 5 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 4 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 3 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 2 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 1 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 10 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 9 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 8 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 7 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 6 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 5 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 6 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 5 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 2 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 1 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika More Issue