cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Prima Dewi Kusumawati
Contact Email
jnpstrada@gmail.com
Phone
+6285748959055
Journal Mail Official
jnpstrada@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Manila Street Number 37, Sumberece Kediri, East Java Indonesia 64133
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Journal Of Nursing Practice
Published by Universitas Strada Indonesia
ISSN : 26143488     EISSN : 26143496     DOI : 10.30994
Core Subject : Health,
Nursing
The Journal Of Nursing Practice focuses its article in the field of nursing, which is the branch of health sciences. The scope of this journal articles are: • Medical and Surgical Nursing • Emergency • Maternity And Pediatric Nursing • Psychiatric • Family and Community Nursing • Geriatric Nursing • Education and Management in Nursing
Arjuna Subject : Keperawatan - Keperawatan (Lain-Lain)
Articles 25 Documents
 1   2   3 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July" : 25 Documents clear
Digital Based Education and Counseling on Self-Care Behaviors in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus as a Prevention Strategy for Neuropathy Complications Asnuddin; Yenny Puspitasari; Prima Dewi Kusumawati; Yammar
Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : Universitas STRADA Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30994/jnp.v8i4.701

Abstract

Background: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is the most common type of diabetes, accounting for approximately 90% of all diabetes cases. It is characterized by insulin resistance, where the body fails to adequately respond to insulin. Complications can include macrovascular and microvascular damage, as well as diabetic neuropathy, which can occur in both newly diagnosed and long-standing patients. Purpose: This study aims to explain the influence of digital-based education and counseling on self-care behaviors in patients with T2DM as a prevention strategy for neuropathy complications. Methods: This study used a quasi-experimental design with a two-group pretest posttest design, where the pretest was implemented before treatment digital education and counseling, the posttest was implemented after treatment digital education and counseling. the posttest was implemented after treatment digital education and counseling. This study was conducted with pretest observation before education on self-care for patients with T2DM was implemented. Results: The study population consisted of 194 patients with T2DM in the Lawawoi Community Health Center area, from which 32 respondents were selected via purposive sampling. Data were collected through questionnaires The Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities (SDSCA) Reliabilitas: Cronbach’s alpha antara 0.62 – 0.91 Validated by experts with a score of CVI (Content Validity Index) > 0.80, Level of knowledge validated by experts, CVI > 0.80. Reliabilitas: Cronbach’s alpha berkisar antara 0.70 – 0.85, shows good internal consistency, and analyzed using paired t-tests and independent samples t-tests. Conclusion: The findings revealed that the digital education group’s knowledge obtained a sig. (2 tailed) value on the pretest and posttest of 0.000 <0.05, the digital education group’s skills obtained a sig. (2 tailed) value on the pretest and posttest of 0.000 <0.05, the counseling group’s knowledge obtained a sig. (2 tailed) value on the pretest and posttest of 0.000 <0.05, while the counseling group’s skills obtained a sig. (2 tailed) value on the pretest and posttest of 0.000 <0.05. There is a significant influence of digital-based education and counseling on the knowledge and skills of patients with T2DM.
Enhancing Knowledge of Clinical Preceptors Towards Role Modeling Using Online Role Modeling Training Lisa Musharyanti; Wulan Noviani; Jezyl Cempron Cutamora
Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : Universitas STRADA Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30994/jnp.v8i4.859

Abstract

Background: Role models play a significant role in shaping the character and professionalism of nursing students in clinical settings. Strengthening the impact of preceptors requires robust support and collaboration from educational institutions to ensure effective mentorship and professional development. Purpose: The aim of this study was to carry out role model training for clinical preceptors as an effort to increase knowledge their role as a role model in clinical education. Methods: This study employed a pre-experimental one group pretest-posttest design. A purposive sampling technique was used to recruit 33 clinical preceptors from six affiliated home-based hospitals. The training was conducted via Zoom  and included structured material presentations and small group discussions. Multiple-Choice Questionnaire were administered to participants in before  and after the last session of the training. Paired sample  t-test were used to analyze the mean differences of preceptors’ knowledge before and after the training. Results: The results showed that the majority of respondents demonstrated a good level of knowledge following the role modeling training, with 22 participants (66.7%) falling into the 'good knowledge' category, while only 1 participant (3.0%) remained in the 'poor knowledge' category. A statistically significant improvement was observed in the knowledge levels before and after the training, as indicated by p-value 0.000 (<0.05). Conclusion: Online role modeling training is an effective faculty-led initiative that has been proven to enhance clinical preceptors’ knowledge and awareness of their role as professional role models in clinical settings.
Analysis of Providing Stretching and Postural Physiotherapy Education during Handling of Upper Cross Syndrome, Neck Pain and Sleep Quality in Physiotherapists at PT Indo Sehat Indasah; Surahman Sukron Rosyadi; Prima Dewi Kusumawati
Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : Universitas STRADA Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30994/jnp.v8i4.706

Abstract

Background: Neck pain and upper cross syndrome (UCS) are common complaints among physiotherapists, often exacerbated by poor posture and repetitive tasks. These conditions can negatively impact sleep quality and overall work performance. Stretching and postural education are simple, non-invasive interventions that may reduce symptoms. Purpose:  This study aimed to determine the effects of neck stretching and postural education on neck pain, upper cross syndrome, and sleep quality among physiotherapists at PT Indo Sehat. Methods: A true experimental, descriptive-analytical study was conducted over four weeks in four PT Indo Sehat clinics. Using proportional random sampling, 60 physiotherapists with a history of neck pain and poor sleep quality were selected and divided into intervention and control groups. Interventions included stretching routines and postural correction education. Data were collected through questionnaires and observation, and analyzed using paired and independent sample t-tests. Results: The intervention group showed statistically significant improvements in neck pain (p = 0.004), sleep quality (p = 0.000), and upper cross syndrome symptoms (p = 0.000). The control group showed limited or no significant improvement, especially in UCS (p = 0.061). Comparative analysis between groups showed meaningful differences pre- and post-intervention across all three variables (p < 0.005). Conclusion: Stretching and neck posture education significantly reduce neck pain and improve sleep quality and UCS symptoms in physiotherapists. These simple interventions are effective workplace strategies and are recommended for broader implementation.
Physical Status Relationship American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) with Time to Achieve Bromage Score 2 in Spinal Anesthesia Patients in the IBS Recovery Room of Dr Iskak Tulungagung Hospital Novita Ana Anggraini; Annisa Ary Saifutri; Nurma Afiani; Rahmania Ambarika
Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : Universitas STRADA Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30994/jnp.v8i4.871

Abstract

Background: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification is used to assess a patient’s overall health and predict potential complications related to spinal anesthesia. The Bromage score is commonly used to evaluate motor block recovery following spinal anesthesia, with the achievement of Bromage score 2 indicating partial motor function return. Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the relationship between ASA physical status and the time required to achieve Bromage score 2 in patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in the recovery room of Dr. Iskak Tulungagung Hospital. Methods: This research employed a cross-sectional design. The study population included all spinal anesthesia patients in the hospital’s recovery room, totaling 250 individuals. A sample of 38 respondents was selected using simple random sampling. Data were collected using observation sheets and analyzed with the Spearman Rho test at a 95% confidence level (α = 0.05). Results: The results showed that the majority of respondents (57.9%) had an ASA status of 2, and most (60.5%) achieved Bromage score 2 within 120–149 minutes. Statistical analysis revealed a p-value of 0.017 (<0.05), indicating a significant relationship between ASA physical status and time to achieve Bromage score 2. Conclusion: Higher ASA classifications are associated with more severe systemic conditions, which may slow the body's response to anesthetic drugs, resulting in a longer time to reach motor recovery.
Towards A Resilient Healthcare: Experiential Insights on Vaccination Importance among Rural Communities in Indonesia and Philippines Hamidah; Joel A Roy; Deasy Silvya Sari; Nursiswati
Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July
Publisher : Universitas STRADA Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30994/jnp.v8i4.877

Abstract

Background: People's perceptions of the need for COVID-19 vaccine boosters are influenced by a variety of psychosocial, demographic, and informational factors. Indonesia and Philipines data might be show difference people’s perception to response the important of booster vaccinations. Purpose: This study aims to describe the differences between two difference population from two countries namely Indonesia and the Philipines. This is descriptive study with two datasets from respondents in Indonesia anad the Philipines. Methods: This research explore perceptions on vaccination and the willingness to get second shoots of covid-19 vaccination. A total 101 respondent from Indonesia and 400 respondents from the Philipines included in this study. Sample method was consecutive. Results: The result showed that 57% received covid-19 booster, while 43 43% have not received the Covid 19 booster vaccine. From the Philipines’data, 29% of respondents have received the Covid 19 booster vaccine, while 71% have not received the Covid 19 vaccine. Indonesian data shows that 76% think that booster vaccines can increase body immunity, extend the period of protection against the virus and help reduce the spread of the Covid 19 virus. Conclusion: Meanwhile, Filipino data shows various perceptions underlying the willingness to do the covid-19 booster vaccine, namely the existence of local government policies in providing vaccines as much as 93%, the adequacy of vaccine supply 76%, It is concluded that percentage of covid 19 booster participation among two countries quiet difference and the perception show based on people perception on resilience during pandemi and support from health care system.

Page 3 of 3 | Total Record : 25

 1   2   3 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): October Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): July Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): April Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): January Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): October Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): April Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): October Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): April Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): April Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): October Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol 2 No 2 (2019): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 2 No. 1 (2018): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol 2 No 1 (2018): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol 1 No 2 (2018): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol 1 No 1 (2017): Journal Of Nursing Practice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2017): Journal Of Nursing Practice More Issue