cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota adm. jakarta timur,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas
Published by Universitas Jayabaya
ISSN : 14118564     EISSN : 25025511     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) is published duo-annually in May and November, and aimed to provide research articles in order to have a significant implication to the world of law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas (JPHL) provides cutting-edge and comprehensive analysis of gap between theory and practice as well as the significant implications of the legal world. The scope of this journal has become essential for criminal law, civil, constitutional and international law. The Journal is highly relevant to all professionals, directors, managers, entrepreneurs, professors, academic researchers and graduate students in the field of Law studies.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 54 Documents
 2   3   4   5   6 
IMPLEMENTASI ASSESSMENT CENTER DALAM MEMBANGUN KOMPETENSI POLRI SESUAI PERKAP NOMOR 5 TAHUN 2016 Riantanti, Diah Ika; Supriyatno, Budi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 18, No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v18i1.272

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan proses Assessment Center dalam membangun kompetensi personel Polri sesuai dengan amanah Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia (Perkap) Nomor 5 Tahun 2016. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Data dikumpulkan melalui penelusuran data digital di internet dengan pilihan topik “evaluasi Assessment Center”. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi Assessment Center dapat efektif dalam membangun kompetensi Polri. Melalui proses evaluasi yang komprehensif, Assessment Center mampu mengidentifikasi potensi, kemampuan, dan kompetensi individu secara objektif. Pembahasan dalam artikel ini meliputi konsep dan prinsip dasar Assessment Center, komponen yang terlibat dalam pelaksanaan dan teknik evaluasi yang digunakan. Selain itu, artikel ini juga menganalisis manfaat dari implementasi Assessment Center dalam pengembangan kompetensi Polri serta tantangan yang dihadapi dalam proses penyelenggaraan. Assessment Center dapat memberikan gambaran yang akurat tentang kemampuan individu dan membantu identifikasi kebutuhan pengembangan kompetensi. Implementasi Assessment Center dapat meningkatkan akuntabilitas seleksi, penempatan dan pengembangan personel yang sesuai dengan tugas dan tanggung jawab kepolisian. Artikel ini juga memberikan rekomendasi strategis untuk memastikan keberhasilan implementasi Assessment Center dalam konteks organisasi Polri.
Pengambilalihan Flight Information Region (FIR) Singapura Atas Kepulauan Riau Dan Natuna Drajat, Harwita Sari
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 17, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v17i2.268

Abstract

The existence of an FIR between Singapore and Indonesia should strengthen sovereignty by prioritizing national interests. However, this was not achieved. This prompted the author to conduct research with the aim of analyzing the position of Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022 concerning Ratification of the Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Republic of Singapore Regarding the Adjustment of Boundaries Between the Flight Information Region of Jakarta and the Flight Information Region of Singapore Regarding the Implementation of the Flight Information Region (FIR) as well as analyzing the position of Indonesian sovereignty after the takeover of Singapore's FIR by Indonesia with the issuance of Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022 concerning Ratification of the Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Republic of Singapore Regarding Boundary Adjustments between the Jakarta Flight Information Region and the Singapore Flight Information Region. The approach method uses normative juridical. The data collection technique that will be used in this research is document study. The data analysis method is normative qualitative. The conclusion that can be obtained based on the results of the analysis is that it does not indicate a complete and complete takeover of Indonesia's air space as mandated in Article 458 of Law Number 1 of 2009, which will be taken over in 2024. Apart from that, it becomes stronger with the existence of the takeover scheme being carried out. guided by the national interests of Indonesian sovereignty. This indicates that Presidential Regulation Number 109 of 2022 concerning Ratification of the Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Indonesia and the Government of the Republic of Singapore Regarding Boundary Adjustments Between the Flight Information Region of Jakarta and the Flight Information Region of Singapore has a position to strengthen the schematization of national interests, both in terms of sovereignty and national resilience. as well as the economy so that Indonesia's sovereignty is strong
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENGGUNA JASA TRANSPORTASI UDARA AKIBAT DELAY MANAGEMENT MASKAPAI NIAGA BERJADWAL Hafidz, Aufa Ahla; Widijowati, Dijan; Halim, Anriz Nazaruddin
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 17, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v17i2.269

Abstract

The Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number PM 89 of 2015 concerning Handling of Flight Delays (Delay management) in Scheduled Commercial Air Transport Business Entities in Indonesia explains that airlines as air transportation service providers must pay a certain amount of compensation to passengers (consumers). However, in practice there is still management negligence on the flight, causing losses to passengers, due to delay management by the carrier. This research is a normative juridical research with a statutory approach, a case approach, a conceptual approach and an analytical approach. The source of legal materials in this study is only secondary data using the technique of collecting legal materials from literature. The analysis of legal materials used are grammatical, systematic, historical and teleological interpretations. The results show that the legal protection of air transportation service users in the event of flight schedule delays caused by airlines management factors, namely air transportation service users who are disadvantaged are entitled to compensation from the airline for flight delays that occur and also for losses that have been experienced. This is as stated in the Regulation of the Minister of Transportation Number 89 of 2015 concerning Handling of Flight Delays which can be proven by airplane tickets.
Implementasi Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Direksi BUMN Muhammad, Ogan
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Legalitas Vol 19, No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Jayabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31479/jphl.v19i1.285

Abstract

This research examines the implementation of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) as a legal safeguard for directors of state-owned enterprises (BUMN) in Indonesia. Although normatively recognized under Article 97(5) of Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies and reinforced by Government Regulation No. 23 of 2022, its application remains hindered by legal dualism and judicial inconsistency. Through a normative juridical approach, the study finds that the broad interpretation of “state financial losses” under the Anti-Corruption Law obscures the distinction between business risks and unlawful acts. To ensure legal certainty and corporate accountability, the study recommends harmonizing corporate and public law, issuing judicial guidelines by the Supreme Court, and strengthening Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practices within state-owned enterprises

Page 6 of 6 | Total Record : 54

 2   3   4   5   6 

Filter by Year

2015 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 19, No 1 (2025) Vol 18, No 2 (2024) Vol 18, No 1 (2024) Vol 17, No 2 (2023) Vol 17, No 1 (2023) Vol 16, No 1 (2022) Vol 14, No 2 (2020) Vol 15, No 2 (2021) Vol 15, No 1 (2021) Vol 14, No 1 (2020) Vol 13, No 1 (2019) Vol 11, No 1 (2017) Vol 10, No 2 (2016) Vol 10, No 1 (2016) Vol 9, No 2 (2015) Vol 9, No 1 (2015) More Issue