cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
redaksi.representamen@untag-sby.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jalan Semolowaru no 45 Surabaya
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Jurnal Representamen
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
ISSN : 24433942     EISSN : 26847663     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 202 Documents
 17   18   19   20   21 
Detik.com and Tempo.co in Framing the Persecution of Papuan Citizen by TNI Tarigan, Inggit Yulis Sutari; Mulyani, Henny Sri; Aunillah, Rinda
representamen Vol 11 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Representamen Volume 11 No 01 April 2025
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/representamen.v11i01.12720

Abstract

A video depicting a Papuan citizen, Definus Kogoya, being brutally beaten by members of the Indonesian National Armed Forces inside a water drum went viral on the social media platform X on March 22, 2024. This incident quickly attracted widespread public attention and became a major topic of discussion in Indonesia. Among the various media outlets covering the issue, Detik and Tempo emerged as the most prominent, publishing a combined total of 41 news reports. The objective of this research is to analyze the messages conveyed through the framing of news coverage by these two media organizations. The study employs the framing analysis approach developed by Gamson and Modigliani, which focuses on how media select and present news stories, including the choice of words, images, and the overall focus of reporting. A qualitative approach is utilized to enable a more comprehensive and in-depth exploration of the issue. Gamson and Modigliani’s framework distinguishes between framing devices—such as metaphors, catchphrases, exemplars, depictions, and visual images—and reasoning devices, which include identifying root causes, appeals to principle, and highlighting consequences. Primary data for this research were collected from online news articles, while secondary data were sourced from relevant books and academic journals. The research sample consists of 13 news reports, with 6 articles from Detik.com and 7 from Tempo.co. The findings reveal significant differences in how the two media outlets frame the incident. Detik.com tends to present the persecution of Definus Kogoya as an event triggered by allegations of arson at a local health center, focusing on the immediate context of the incident. In contrast, Tempo.co frames the event as part of a longstanding, deep-rooted conflict in Papua, attributing the violence to the government’s failure to take decisive action in resolving the broader conflict. These findings highlight how media framing can shape public understanding of sensitive issues and underscore the importance of critical analysis in interpreting news coverage within a wider socio-political context. Keywords: Definus Kogoya, Framing, Gamson and Modigliani, Detik.com, Tempo.co.
Akurasi Visual Proklamasi Kemerdekaan Republik Indonesia di Mata Chat GPT Ambat, Yeremia Tulude; Khusyairi, Jhony Alfian; Arimbi, Diah Ariani
representamen Vol 11 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Representamen Volume 11 No 01 April 2025
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/representamen.v11i01.12781

Abstract

In today's era, Artificial Intelligence is increasingly entering into the layers of society, including the historical aspect. This study aims to analyze the accuracy of the illustration of the Proclamation of Indonesian Independence 1945 produced by ChatGPT using a qualitative research approach with Ferdinand de Saussure's semiotic analysis research method. This study found that the illustrations produced by AI were historically inaccurate, both in the depiction of the proclaimer, clothing, crowds, and main symbols such as the red and white flag. In addition, although some aspects, such as people's clothing, are close to the facts, most of the illustrations show deficiencies in conveying the true meaning of history. This distortion creates hyperreality, where the resulting visual elements reflect the algorithm's interpretation more than historical facts. This study also highlights that the inaccuracy is due to the limitations of AI in understanding cultural and historical contexts in depth. AI illustrations tend to function as symbolic metaphors rather than factual representations, obscuring the original meaning of events. That makes AI categorized as popular culture, which makes it inauthentic and unoriginal. It shows that AI still requires human intervention to ensure cultural and historical accuracy. This study concludes that the use of AI in representing historical events requires critical oversight to prevent the spread of biased or misleading information. The study emphasizes the need for collaboration between technology and human interpretation to maintain the accuracy of historical information.

Page 21 of 21 | Total Record : 202

 17   18   19   20   21 

Filter by Year

2015 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 11 No 01 (2025): Jurnal Representamen Volume 11 No 01 April 2025 Vol 10 No 02 (2024): Jurnal Representamen Volume 10 No 02 Oktober 2024 Vol 9 No 02 (2023): Jurnal Representamen Volume 9 No 02 Oktober 2023 Vol 9 No 01 (2023): Jurnal Representamen Volume 9 No 01 April 2023 Vol 8 No 01 (2022): Jurnal Representamen Volume 8 No 01 April 2022 Vol 8 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Representamen Volume 8 No 02 Oktober 2022 Vol 7 No 02 (2021): Jurnal Representamen Volume 7 No 02 Oktober 2021 Vol 7 No 01 (2021): Jurnal Representamen Volume 7 No 01 April 2021 Vol 6 No 02 (2020): Jurnal Representamen Volume 6 No 02 Oktober 2020 Vol 6 No 01 (2020): Jurnal Representamen Volume 6 No 01 April 2020 Vol 5 No 02 (2019): Jurnal Representamen Volume 5 No 02 Oktober 2019 Vol 5 No 1 (2019) Vol 4 No 02 (2018) Vol 4 No 01 (2018) Vol 3 No 02 (2017) Vol 3 No 01 (2017) Vol 2 No 02 (2016) Vol 2 No 01 (2016) Vol 1 No 02 (2015) Vol 1 No 01 (2015) More Issue