Articles
90 Documents
<![CDATA[EKSEKUSI IKRAR TALAK MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 50 TAHUN 2009 PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1989 TENTANG PERADILAN AGAMA ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdul Rokhim, Latifatul Fajriyah dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i1.4732
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out why the decision on divorce application submitted by the husband is not final and how the role of Judges of the Religious Court in the execution of the divorce pledge. This type of research used in this study uses the Normative Juridical research method, namely by analyzing the articles in the legislation regarding the problem under study.The results of the research show that the final decision of a judge regarding divorce divorce is when all the procedures in filing for divorce divorce have been fulfilled legally. That is still in need of the pronunciation of divorce pledge made by the husband in front of the trial of the Religious Court. If the husband has pledged his divorce then the marriage is broken with all the legal consequences. In divorce divorce cases the judge's role is to guide the petitioner in pledging his divorce to the respondent, as well as witnessing the pronouncement of the divorce pledge.]]>
<![CDATA[PERANAN PEMERINTAH DALAM MEMBERANTAS PENYALAHGUNAAN DAN PERDAGANGAN OBAT-OBATAN TERLARANG ]]>
<![CDATA[Nomensen Freddy Siahaan, Reine Rofiana dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i2.5885
<![CDATA[The existence of illegal drugs is getting worse day by day. There areso many ways that irresponsible parties use in an effort to smuggle theseillegal drugs. Even the role of this drug smuggler.Even more worrying, these illegal drugs have entered the territory ofthe nation's future generations (students). This can be seen from the newsquoted by the author regarding drug trafficking at the Faculty of CulturalSciences (FIB) of the University of North Sumatra (USU). Of course, thisincident made my heart cut and teary eyed because the youngergeneration, who was expected to be the baton for the next generation ofthe backbone of the country, was infiltrated by irresponsible parties in thecirculation of these illegal drugs. The news is as below.Parents and Educators (Teachers and Lecturers) each have a veryimportant role in the growth and development of children. This is theclosest person the child meets every day and can understand the child'spersonality.The role of the government in this case is represented by the NationalNarcotics Agency (BNN) taking an equally important role in eradicatingthe abuse and circulation of illegal drugs because BNN has a lot ofexperience in handling various drug cases.There should be a synergy among parents, educators, and thegovernment in eradicating the circulation of illegal drugs in order to savethe future of the nation's next generation.]]>
<![CDATA[PENGARUH PANDEMI COVID-19 TERHADAP PERJANJIAN KERJA ANTARA PEKERJA DENGAN PENGUSAHA MENGENAI PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ony Rosifany, Justitis Cesar dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i1.5627
<![CDATA[Awal Maret 2020 Indonesia mengonfirmasi kasus pertama infeksi virus corona penyebab pandemi Covid-19. Pemerintah Indonesia telah menyatakan bahwa pandemi Covid-19 berupa penyakit menular yang dan harus dilakukan penanggulangan terhadap pandemi covid-19. Pandemi covid-19 sangat berdampak pada para pekerja serta pengusaha.Jenis penelitian yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris, yaitu suatu metode penelitian hukum yang menggunakan aturan-aturan dalam peraturan perundang-udangan dan mencari langsung data di lapangan.Pengaruh pandemi covid-19 terhadap perjanjian terdapat di pengurangan upah sebesar 50%, waktu kerja, libur mingguan, insentif yang ditiadakan, dan pekerja yang dirumahkan. Tidak adanya pemutusan hubungan kerja, karena pengusaha lebih memilih merumahkan pekerjanya. Penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial bisa di lakukan dengan penyelesaian diluar pengadilan seperti mediasi terlebih dahulu untuk mendapatkan kesepakatan antara dua belak pihak, jika tidak ditemukan maka menggunakan jalur pengadilan sesuai yang di atur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian  Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.Melihat kondisi saat ini pengusaha harus lebih berinovasi dalam sistem pemasaran produk agar antara pengusaha dan pekerja sama-sama mendapat keuntungan. Pekerja yang dirumahkan lebih aktif lagi untuk inisatif mengarahkan perusahaan untuk melakukan penjualan secara online.]]>
<![CDATA[HAK IMUNITAS ADVOKAT BERDASARKAN PASAL 16 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG ADVOKAT JO PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 26/PUU-XI/2013, TANGGAL 14 MEI 2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Imron, Imron]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i2.5033
<![CDATA[Advocates are people who work in providing legal services, both inside and outside the court, advocates are also a noble or honorable profession, advocates have a role that is no less important than other law enforcers and has the same position as a law enforcer so that it is natural for lawyers to have the right of immunity, namely the right of immunity to the work of his profession.Advocates in carrying out their profession, cannot be prosecuted both civil and criminal in carrying out their professional duties in good faith for the benefit of the client's defense outside or in court, but in practice there are many cases involving advocates when carrying out their profession in the field up to the verdict until the verdict criminal.The problem raised in this paper is whether the lawyer is immune to the law with the existence of an advocate's immunity rights and how the legal protection of the advocate's immunity rights in carrying out his profession. This type of research is normative juridical research, library research with the problem approach used in writing this thesis is the statute approach.With the enactment of laws and regulations governing the rights of advocates of immunity, that advocates are not immune from the law but because the tasks or work done by advocates constitute the work or noble profession, then he is given special authority, namely the right of immunity or the right to immunity in law carrying out his professional duties]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA TV KABEL MENDIRIKAN USAHA PADA SARANA FASILITAS UMUM DI KOTA SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ekawati, Eni Rahmawati dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i1.4728
<![CDATA[This research was conducted at Samarinda City, East Kalimantan Province, Indonesia. This study aims to determine the regulation and legal liability of cable TV business operators who establish businesses in public facilities in Samarinda City. The method that used in this research is a normative legal method that is studying document studies, using various legal materials such as statutory regulations, non-legal materials and in the form of opinions from scholars. The legal material in this study is sourced from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and non-legal materials.From the results of this study it can be concluded that the legal arrangements for businesses that set up cable TV businesses in public facilities in Samarinda City are contained in Law No.30 of 2009 concerning Electricity Article 48 Paragraph (1). The legal responsibility of cable TV business operators who establish businesses in public facilities in Samarinda against the Samarinda city government is that if an adverse incident occurs that results in pollution and / or environmental damage is considered an illegal act. To overcome various legal issues regarding cable TV business operators, the Samarinda City Regional Government should make a regional regulation specifically regulating the supervision of Cable TV business licensing in Samarinda City because with the regional regulation it is expected to minimize the number of violations of the law, and should Cable TV business operators no longer use electricity network supporting poles which are public facilities owned by the city government, it is far better if cable cable business operators are planted on the ground level, so as to minimize the existence of electrical zippers, fires due to short electrical current and do not disturb the aesthetic of this city.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS KONTEN BELAJAR ILMU HUKUM PADA MEDIA SOSIAL INSTAGRAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Camelia Verahastuti, Sarwo Eddy Wibowo dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i2.5863
<![CDATA[Aktivitas menggunakan Media sosial merupakan aktivitas keseharianmanusia sebagai makhluk sosial yang tidak dapat hidup tanpa orang lain.Media sosial merupakan sebuah terobosan dan terus mengalamipembaharuan seiring dengan kebutuhan pengguna (user) dalammelakukan aktivitas sosial dan membaginya kepada pihak lain. Penelitimengkaji mengenai akun media sosial instagram belajar ilmu hukumsebagai sumber informasi dan istilah yang ada di dunia hukum yangberguna bagi masyarakat Indonesia yang notabene awam atau tidakmengenyam pendidikan hukum.]]>
<![CDATA[MERINTANGI PENGUBURAN JENAZAH COVID-19 DITINJAU BERDASARKAN PASAL 178 KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA ]]>
<![CDATA[Syamsudin, Muhammad Rezky Rinaldy dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i2.5115
<![CDATA[Indonesia and even the world now feel the impact of the Corona virus outbreak (covid-19), in connection with it hindering the burial of the bodies of victims who died. The phenomenon of corpse rejection of corona virus patients (covid-19) continues to occur in various regions. In fact, the body must be buried immediately no later than 4 hours after being declared dead. The main reason people are reluctant to accept the bodies of patients co-19 because of fear of contracting. While the medical ensure that the body will not transmit the virus. The body in the coffin has been wrapped and declared sterile. The type of research used in this study is the type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results of the study showed that obstructing officers who will carry out official burials could indeed be convicted. Law enforcement officials can use Article 178 of the Criminal Code. not a complaint offense. Law enforcement officials can immediately take action without anyone complaining. "If the incident fulfills the elements contained in Article 178 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrators can be charged. However, it must look at intentions and actions as a condition for imposing a crime on someone.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS ATAS GUGURNYA HAK UNTUK MENUNTUT PIDANA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM ]]>
<![CDATA[Syamsul Bahri, Nur Cahya Dian Sahputra dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i1.4743
<![CDATA[In order to complete studies at the University of Law Faculty of August 17, 1945 Samarinda, one of the tasks that must be completed is scientific writing, this imiah writing is entitled: "Juridical Review of the Fall of the Right to Prosecute under the Criminal Law Act". This scientific research method uses normative juridies.The violation of the right to sue is regulated in Chapter VII of the Criminal Code, while the violation of the right to sue is regulated in the Criminal Code, namely:The principle of "Ne bis in idem" (Article 76 of the Criminal Code).Death of the perpetrator (Article 77 of the Criminal Code).Expiry (Article 78 of the Criminal Code).Settlement of cases outside court trials (Article 82 of the Criminal Code).Amnesty and Abolition from the President (Article 14 of the 1945 Constitution).There are no complaints on complaints offenses.This provision contained in the Criminal Code is to provide legal certainty for the community specifically the perpetrators of criminal acts. Provisions for the cancellation of the right to sue are the duties and functions of the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia based on Law 16 of 2004.The fall of the right to sue is caused by: 1) natural causes, 2) causes of human actions, and 3) legal causes It is hoped that the rules on the cancellation of the right to sue can be further emphasized in the new draft Law on Criminal Law (RKUHP) to provide legal certainty to the public. Likewise, cases of minor criminal acts (tipiring) should be resolved outside the court to avoid the accumulation of cases in court and the excess capacity of State Detention Centers or Penitentiaries.]]>
<![CDATA[PENANGGUHAN PENAHANAN DALAM PROSES PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCABULAN TERHADAP ANAK DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRES METRO DEPOK (Studi Kasus Pencabulan Anak di Panti Asuhan Kencana Bejana Rohani, Depok) ]]>
<![CDATA[Reine Rofiana, William Putra Daniel, Ridwan, dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i2.5886
<![CDATA[Kejahatan merupakan persoalan yang dialami manusia dari waktu kewaktu. Kejahatan tidak hanya menyangkut kejahatan terhadap nyawa,harta benda akan tetapi kejahatan terhadap kesusilaan. Kejahatankesusilaan yang sangat mencemaskan adalah kejahatan yangkorbannya anak, sebab hal ini akan mempengaruhi perkembanganfisik, mental dan intelektual anak yang menimbulkan trauma, karnapada masa perkembangan tersebut setiap anak sedang berusahamengenal dan mempelajari nilai-nilai yang berlaku di masyarakat sertaberusaha meyakini sebagai bagian dari dirinya. Salah satunyakejahatan asusila terhadap anak sebagai korban adalah tindak pidanapencabulan yang terjadi di daerah Depok, pelaku dengan nama lengkapLucas Lucky Ngalngola alias Bruder Angelo. Penanganan terhadapkasus Bruder Angelo ditangani oleh Unit Perlindungan Perempuan danAnak Polres Metro Depok. Kasus Bruder Angelo dijerat dengan Pasal82 Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atasUndang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.Proses penyidikan yang dilakukan terhadap tersangka dalampenahanannya diakhiri dengan dikabulkannya permohonanpenangguhan penahanan kepada pihak tersangka dengan syarat wajiblapor dan disertai dengan jaminan orang sebagaimana yang diaturdalam Pasal 31 KUHAP. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitianyuridis normatif dengan melakukan pendekatan kasus dan pendekatanperaturan perundang-undangan. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitianini adalah data sekunder ditunjang dengan data primer berupawawancara dengan Kepolisian Ressort Metro Depok, yang kemudiandianalisis secara deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukanbahwa penegakan hukum pidana terhadap kasus Bruder Angelomengalami berbagai kendala yang antara lain Kendala pengetahuanpenyidik, tidak menjalankan kewajiban untuk melakukan koordinasi dengan pihak-pihak lain dalam proses penegakan hukum terhadapperkara anak mengenai tidak meminta laporan sosial dari PekerjaSosial Profesional, Tidak melakukan Visum Et Repertum kepada saksikorban, korban tidak mau disidik atau tidak mau melakukan prosespemeriksaan ditingkat penyidikan, dan sumber daya penyidik yangterbatas. Sehingga atas kendala tersebut, penyidik melaluikewenangannya memberikan penangguhan penahanan kepadatersangka Bruder Angelo terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencabulan Anakyang dilakukan di Panti Asuhan Kencana Bejana Rohani.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP KEBERADAAN HUKUM ADAT DI KOTA SAMARINDA ]]>
<![CDATA[Dina Paramitha Hefni Putri, Maria Noviyani dan]]>
<![CDATA[ LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i1.5628
<![CDATA[Masyarakat hukum adat adalah komunitas manusia yang patuh pada peraturan atau hukum yang mengatur tingkah laku manusia dalam hubungannya satu sama lain berupa keseluruhan dari kebiasaan dan kesusilaan yang benar-benar hidup karena diyakini dan dianut, dan jika dilanggar pelakunya mendapat sanksi dari penguasa adat.Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode penelitian hukum yuridis empiris. Adapun data yang digunakan yaitu data primer dan data sekunder, data primer diperoleh dari wawancara dan data sekunder dikumpulkan melalui studi pustaka. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah analisis secara kualitatif.Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa bagaimana penerapan hukum adat di kota samarinda dan bagaimana implementasi peraturan daerah provinsi kalimantan timur nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang pedoman pengakuan dan perlindungan masyarakat hukum adat di kalimantan timur terhadap hukum adat di kota samarinda.Penerapan Hukum Adat di kota samarinda yang masih menjaga dan menerapkan tradisi serta adat istiadat leluhurnya adalah masyarakat yang bermukim di Desa Pampang yang masih melestarikan adat kebudayaan nenek moyang terdahulu sepeti adanya upacara adat perkawinan dan bentuk proses perceraian secara Lembaga hukum adat itu sendiri. Sedangkan mengenai peraturan daerah Provinsi Kalimantan Timur nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang pedoman pengakuan dan perlindungan masyarakat hukum adat di Kalimantan Timur yang sangat membantu dalam melindungi hak-hak adat serta kewajiban masyarakat hukum adat di kota Samarinda.]]>
