cover
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
-
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
-
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota samarinda,
Kalimantan timur
INDONESIA
LEGALITAS
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : -
Core Subject : Education,
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 90 Documents
PERAN KANTOR IMIGRASI KELAS IA SAMARINDA DALAM PENGAWASAN DAN PENINDAKAN ORANG ASING BERDASARKAN UNDANG – UNDANG NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2011 Dina Paramitha Hefni Putri, Yenny Meilyana dan
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i2.5035

Abstract

In the implementation of surveillance and enforcement of foreigners in the East Kalimantan Region, Samarinda's Class I Immigration Office experienced a few obstacles including the presence, activities of foreigners, and abuse of residence permits of foreigners in the Samarinda area.  The real weaknesses in the surveillance system do not lie solely on rules because the existing regulatory system is quite complete and clear, but lies in the limited number of officers possessed by the Class I Immigration Office A samarinda.  Based on the background above, the writer wants to choose the title "The Role of Class I A Samarinda Immigration Office in Supervision and Enforcement of Foreigners Based on Law Number 6 Year 2011".  In this study the authors use the empirical juridical method, based on the results of the author's research and the discussion that has been described then the following conclusions can be drawn.  Regarding foreigners' supervision, it is carried out in stages with regard to foreigners who enter or reside in Samarinda, so it is quite clearly specified and what provisions have been set by the Immigration Office.  Suggestions for conducting oversight to increase the number of officers in each district / city area to be more efficient in the future.
PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENGRUSAKAN BARANG DALAM AKSI UNJUK RASA Irman Syahriar, Alex Subagyo dan
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i1.4729

Abstract

Basically the damage to other people's belongings is very detrimental to the owner of the damaged goods only partially or completely so that the owner of the goods can no longer use his belongings, other than that the goods that have been damaged are valuable to the owner by damaging the goods very disturbing the peace of the owner of the goods . How is the application of the law to the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstration and how is the criminological point of view of the crime of destruction of goods in a demonstrationThis type of research used in this study is a type of normative legal research, which is a legal research method that uses a statutory approachThe results showed that the threat of punishment in article 170 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, regarding legal sanctions for perpetrators of violence against people or goods in public is threatened with imprisonment for five years and six months, whereas in Article 406 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code with the same result, namely violence against goods, the perpetrators were threatened with imprisonment for up to two years and eight months or a maximum fine of four Rp. 4,500 (four thousand and five hundred). Every human being has an interest, where interests are divided into three namely individual interests, group interests and general interests. Crime, violence and "mass vandalism" in Indonesia are products of social systems with various values that are not mutually harmonious, and are not always compatible, harmonious and balanced.
PERAN AKTIF MASYARAKAT DALAM UPAYA PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI YANG MERUPAKAN KEJAHATAN LUAR BIASA Farahwati, Farahwati
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i2.5864

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi sebagai perbuatan pidana yang dapat dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan yang luar biasa (extra ordinary crime).Unsur menyalah gunakan kewenangan karena jabatannya ataukedudukannya sebagai penyelenggara negara serta menguntungkan dirisendiri atau orang lain atau suatu badan, yang sangat menghambatpertumbuhan perekonomian Negara, merusak sendi-sendi kehidupanbermasyarakat, berbangsa dan bernegara, timbulnya krisis di berbagaibidang pembangunan serta membahayakan eksistensi Negara.Penyelenggara Negara mempunyai peranan yang sangat menentukanmewujudkan masyarakat yang adil dan makmur. Dalam menjalankantugas dan fungsinya penyelenggara Negara harus secara sungguh-sungguhdan penuh tanggung jawab, perlu diletakkan asas-asas penyelenggaraanNegara yang bersih dan bebas korupsi. Peran serta masyarakat bermaksuduntuk memberdayakan masyarakat dalam rangka mewujudkanpenyelenggaraan negara yang bersih dari korupsi. Dengan hak dankewajiban yang dimiliki, diharapkan masyarakat lebih bersemangat untukmelaksanakan kontrol sosial secara optimal terhadap penyelenggaraanNegara dengan tetap mentaati aturan-aturan yang berlaku.Metode penulisan jurnal ilmu hukum ini menggunakan metodenormatif, tujuan penulisan untuk mengkaji praktek-praktek korupsi yangdapat dikategorikan sebagai kejahatan yang luar biasa yangmenyalahgunakan kekuasannya atau jabatan ataupun kedudukannyaselaku penyelenggara Negara. Peran serta masyarakat dalam rangkamewujudkan penyelenggaraan Negara yang bersih dan bebas dari korupsidengan memperhatikan hak dan kewajiban sesuai dengan peraturan hukumyang berlaku.
PERALIHAN HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH YANG BERASAL DARI WARISAN Slamet, Amin
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i2.5166

Abstract

The purpose of this research is: First, to find out the implementation of the transfer of ownership of the inherited land in Samarinda. Second, to find out the inhibiting factors in the registration of the transfer of title to inherited land in Samarinda. To find out the purpose above, then determined the research method is The Qualitative Descriptive Method, with sampling techniques by purposive sampling. Data collection techniques such as interviews with observations and study documents relevant to the problem under study.Therefore it is hoped that the National Land Agency as the only body that regulates land in Indonesia is expected to be able to better socialize land regulations so that people can better understand the importance of registering land rights transfers using deeds to provide legal certainty and protection for right holders. as well as the main purpose of land registration itself.Keywords: Land Ownership, Inheritance
KETENTUAN PENGATURAN KAWIN KONTRAK DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DI INDONESIA Sukindar, Sukindar
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i1.4751

Abstract

Contract marriages are one of the 3 types of marriages known in Indonesia. As it is known that contract marriages are marriages made by certain parties with specific aims and objectives and within a certain period of time. So the marriage is actually a marriage that is not appropriate and deviates from the noble purpose of the actual marriage, which is to form an eternal household and only seek the pleasure of God, in accordance with the provisions as regulated in applicable laws in Indonesia.Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to find out the actual arrangements related to the practice of contract marriages which are still widely practiced in Indonesia.This type of research used in this study is normative juridical type of research, namely research conducted based on the legal scientific character of the normative side.The results of the study showed that the practice of contract marriages that were carried out was not appropriate and violated the provisions of the legislation that acted as positive law in Indonesia. This is due to the contract marriage there are several things that were promised such as, a number of assets that must be issued and the deadline for the end of the marriage has been determined, then obviously such a marriage is a marriage arranged by the parties themselves and ignores the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations. While the regulations that specifically regulate contract marriages have not yet existed in Indonesia.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP CALON PENUMPANG YANG MENGGUNAKAN DAUR ULANG ALAT RAPID TEST ANTIGEN COVID-19 DI BANDARA KUALANAMU Siahaan, Nomensen Freddy
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i2.5887

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic does bring a variety of phenomena that occurs in the community, ranging from the social, economic, health, and others. One of the phenomena that occurs in the community is in the north Sumatra area. According to the news published, the North Sumatra Regional Police has appointed five employees at PT Kimia Farma Diagnostika as suspects in the case of recycling covid-19 antigen rapid test equipment at Kualanamu Airport.The method which was used in this Scholar Paper was Qualitative Research Method, a kind of Normative Legal Writing which was based on prescriptive library research concerning study of positive law. For the Primary Legal Materials, Scholar used references such as Act Number 8 Year 1999 regarding to Consumer Protection, etc. And for Secondary Legal Material, Scholar uses books, journals, papers, newspapers, and report of legal writing. Then, for Tertiary Legal Materials, Scholar used references such as legal dictionary, dictionary Indonesian-English dictionary and vice versa, etc.Consumer has rights that must be protected from legal perspectives.  Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection Article 1 point (2) states that consumers are every user of goods and or services available in society, whether for the benefit of themselves, family, others, or other living beings and not for trading. It is crystal clear as regulated by our legislation, Consumer Protection must have a guarantee of legal certainty given to consumers in this case is passengers as consumers of covid-19 antigen rapid test equipment recycling does not get guaranteed legal certainty because the Covid-19 antigen rapid test tool they receive is used goods, unhygienic anymore.Try to imagine if the rapid test tool that has been used is used by passengers whose health condition is not good (in a sick condition orcarrying certain viruses or bacteria) and it transmits to the next passenger who uses the recycling of the Covid-19 antigen rapid test tool. No one can guarantee this because it is the act of selling recycling tools rapid test antigen Covid-19 is an illegal act (unlawful or not justified according to the law).Related to this case, the Government should internalize the production and distribution process of the swab tool in order to ensure the quality of its products so as not to defect or used. Moreover, this product is distributed in large quantities and in the pandemic period also so that it must be extra supervision so as not to be misused by irresponsible parties so that points can be met properly.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS MENGENAI PERMOHONAN PAILIT PERUSAHAAN BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA YANG BERBENTUK PERSEROAN TERBATAS Benhard Kurniawan Pasaribu, Julivia Nur Prisintyas, Elvi Yanti Dwi Mas, dan
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i1.5629

Abstract

UUK dan PKPU sudah mengatur tentang kepailitan BUMN namun hal tersebut masih terbatas pada BUMN yang bergerak dibang kepentingan publik. Pengertian BUMN yang bergerak dibidang kepentingan publik hampir sama dengan pengertian Perum. Terlepas dari hal tersebut, BUMN Persero sangat berbeda dangan Perum. BUMN Persero sebagimana disebutkan dalam Pasal 1 angka 2, adalah BUMN yang berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas yang modalnya terbagi dalam saham yang seluruhnya atau paling sedikit 51% sahamnya dimiliki oleh negara yang tujuan utamanya mengejar keuntungan. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini, bagaimana landasan yuridis terkait dengan permohonan pailit terhadap perusahaan BUMN yang berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas dan bagaimana akibat hukum jika perusahaan BUMN yang berbentuk Perseroan Terbatas dipailitkan. Metode penelitian yang penulis gunakan merupakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa bila BUMN tersebut berbentuk Persero adalah tidak harus Menteri Keuangan yang mengajukan permohonan pailit akan tetapi dapat oleh debitor itu sendiri atau kreditornya sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 2 Ayat (1) UUK dan PKPU. Akibat hukum yang timbul dari kepailitan adalah debitor kehilangan hak menguasai kekayaannya tetapi terhadap perbuatan hukum dalam bidang keperdataan tidak berhenti.
PENERAPAN PERATURAN MENTERI PEKERJAAN UMUM DAN PERUMAHAN RAKYAT NOMOR 11/PRT/M/2019 TENTANG SISTEM PERJANJIAN PENDAHULUAN JUAL BELI RUMAH Wesley Liano Hutasoit, Khairunnisah dan
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i2.5109

Abstract

During its development, a house sale and purchase agreement made by the parties by a notary public creates rights and obligations as well as risks for the parties later. Before the agreement is agreed upon, the parties express their wishes or wishes so that the objectives of the house sale and purchase agreement are achieved, so that when the agreement is implemented, all of these rights and obligations must be fulfilled by the parties to fulfill each other's wishes. The House Sale and Purchase Agreement when viewed from the latest legal rules, namely, the Regulation of the Minister of Public Works and Public Housing (PUPR) of the Republic of Indonesia, issued a Ministerial Regulation (Permen) PUPR Number 11 / PRT / M / 2019 concerning the Preliminary House Buying Agreement System. This regulation was signed by the Minister of PUPR, M. Basuki Hadimuljono, on July 12, 2019. This regulation regulates the sale of houses or flats by developers to the community. The issues raised in this paper are how the legal protection for home buyers is based on the Ministerial Regulation (Permen) PUPR Number 11 / PRT / M / 2019 and what are the legal requirements that home developers must have in selling their products based on Ministerial Regulation (Permen) PUPR Number 11 / PRT / M / 2019. The type of research used is juridical normative, which is research conducted based on legal materials and by collecting data, studying books in the library and the laws and regulations related to this research. The results of research by developers or housing developers that are legal entities who sell single houses, row houses and flats that are sold to the community by means of cash or credit, in terms of credit, there are many problems caused in terms of payments, broken promises, and inadequacy of development.
KAJIAN KRIMINOLOGI TERHADAP KEJAHATAN BEGAL DI KOTA SAMARINDA Dina Paramitha Hefni Putri, Muhammad Laksamana dan
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v5i1.4730

Abstract

Begal motor action in the city of Samarinda increasingly disturbing the public, they acted not knowing the time and place. The intensity has also increased sharply. However, there has been no preventive efforts by the police on a large scale to ensure that Samarinda is free from the "colonialism" of thugs. What factors caused the crime of begal in Samarinda City.How is the effort made by law enforcers to deal with the crime of begal in Samarinda City The type of research used in this study is empirical legal research, which is a legal research method that looks directly at the field dataThe results of the research and discussion of the factors causing the occurrence of begal are, Economic Factors (perpetrators want to pay off debts to their own families), Factors of Reason Weaknesses Weaknesses reasoning power of perpetrators who make them choose the wrong choice between two choices. Weak perpetrators' reasoning power, which is sometimes found perpetrators still a student, Weaknesses Faith Factors Lack of planting religious values by parents towards children from an early age and the environment that is less supportive makes a child, especially teenagers at school age, very vulnerable to moral development or akhlaknya, Drug Addiction Factor some Actors said he always felt restless and could not concentrate properly when not consuming methamphetamine. There are three ways that countermeasures can be made against crime, namely, pre-emptive, preventive and repressive
JUAL BELI UANG DENGAN UANG BERDASARKAN TINJAUAN HUKUM ISLAM, PERATURAN DAERAH DAN SURAT EDARAN WALIKOTA SAMARINDA Mahmud, Raudah
LEGALITAS : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31293/lg.v6i2.5865

Abstract

Penggunaan uang kertas sebagai alat tukar menukar sudah menjadikebiasaan yang ada di dalam masyarakat. Pada zaman Rasulullah SAW,uang kertas belum hadir menjadi suatu alat tukar seperti saat ini,kemunculannya menimbulkan berbagai permasalahan baru yang perlu danharus dibahas secara Islami dan maqashid Syariah sehingga tidakmelenceng dari ajaran-ajaran agama Islam. Fenomena jual beli uang dengan uang ini sering terjadi ketika mendekati hari-hari besar sepertilebaran Idul Fitri umat Islam. Bisnis jual beli uang dengan uang denganalasan apapun tidak dibenarkan, meskipun transaksi antara kedua belahpihak tersebut dilakukan secara ridha, ikhlas dan tidak ada paksaan daripihak manapun, tetap saja ketentuan hukum tidak dapat berubah, transaksitersebut tetap statusnya riba. Hal ini diperkuat dengan Surat edaranwalikota Samarinda No 186.6/1074/012.01 terkait larangan perdaganganuang yang ditandatagani pejabat Wali Kota Samarinda pada 24 Mei 2018.Edaran ini diterbitkan untuk mencegah terjadinya pelanggaran aturanagama tentang riba dan peraturan daerah tentang Ketertiban Umum, tidakada larangan dan sanksi khusus terkait kegiatan jual beli uang denganuang seperti pada fenomena praktik penukaran uang. Hanya saja mengaturketertiban umum bagi para pengusaha-pengusaha penukar uang agarkegiatannya tidak mengganggu ketertiban umum di daerah tersebut.