cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Muhammad Subchan
Contact Email
wajahhukum.unbari@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
wajahhukum.unbari@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota jambi,
Jambi
INDONESIA
WAJAH HUKUM
Published by Universitas Batanghari Jambi
ISSN : -     EISSN : 2598604X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Wajah Hukum ISSN 2598-604X (Online) adalah peer-review jurnal akses terbuka yang bertujuan untuk berbagi dan diskusi mengenai isu dan hasil penelitian yang lagi hangat pada saat ini. Jurnal ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Batanghari Jambi, Wajah Hukum memuat hasil-hasil penelitian, artikel review, kajian ilmiah dari akademisi praktisi hukum meliputi berbagai bidang ilmu hukum yaitu hukum pidana, hukum perdata, hukum administrasi, hukum tata negara, hukum bisnis dan hukum islam dan bidang kajian lain yang berkaitan dengan hukum dalam arti luas. Jurnal ini diterbitkan dua kali setahun (april dan oktober), naskah yang masuk hendaknya bukan hasil dari plagiat dan naskah artikel akan direview oleh reviewer yang memiliki kompetensi di bidangnya masing-masing, naskah yang lolos akan dipublikasikan secara on-line.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 575 Documents
 54   55   56   57   58 
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Penerapan Sanksi Pidana pada Kasus Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Irawan, Agus; Paturahmat, M. Rezky; Timur, Ratno; Rustandi, Tantan; Ternando, Albi; Rustandi, Reanto Agam
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2110

Abstract

Indonesia, based on Pancasila as a state based on law, affirms the principle of the supremacy of law as stated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. Domestic violence (KDRT) is a legal violation that often affects women as victims. Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence (KDRT) aims to provide legal protection and establish strict criminal sanctions for perpetrators. This study aims to analyze the legal review of criminal sanctions in cases of domestic violence and assess whether the sanctions imposed have met the objectives of law enforcement and a sense of justice for victims. The method chosen is normative legal research that prioritizes legal principles and analyzes statutory regulations. The results of the study indicate that criminal sanctions in cases of domestic violence are in accordance with the objectives of law enforcement to protect victims. Law No. 23 of 2004 is designed to provide a deterrent effect on perpetrators. However, the effectiveness of sanctions is highly dependent on consistent law enforcement and support for victims and the rehabilitation of perpetrators. A holistic approach is needed to overcome systemic barriers and achieve justice.
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Kecelakaan yang Menyebabkan Matinya Orang di Perlintasan Sebidang Rel Kereta Api yang tidak Memiliki Palang Taufiq, Muhammad; Hariyadi, Wicaksono Putra; Saputra, Angga
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2083

Abstract

Road users must give trains precedence at level crossings between railway lines and highways, according to Law Number 23 of 2007 concerning Railways, Article 124. This implies that at certain level crossings, train drivers must prioritize trains. However, in practice, many level crossings lack safety barriers, increasing the likelihood of train accidents. The high number of accidents near railway crossings is also caused by various other reasons. The research methodology of this journal is normative. To understand, clarify, and assess legal concepts or principles, normative scholars examine legal documents, regulations and provisions, court decisions, legal theories, and legal literature. Train drivers who make mistakes, whether intentional or not, are subject to criminal sanctions as outlined in Article 361 of the Criminal Code, Article 358 of the Criminal Code, and Article 360 of the Criminal Code.
Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 Tentang Cipta Kerja terhadap Izin Usaha Perkebunan Kelapa Sawit di Kawasan Hutan Panjaitan, Rifqi Muda; Syahrin, Alvi; Robert, Robert
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2040

Abstract

The enactment of the Job Creation Law has currently sparked much controversy, especially among plantation entrepreneurs. The purpose of this study is to analyze the validity of oil palm plantation permits and the factors that hinder the implementation of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation. The research method used in this study is empirical, namely research that aims to examine the law in society. The results of the study state that the validity of oil palm plantation business permits that have been established within forest areas after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation is threatened with no longer being valid. What factors hinder the implementation of Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Job Creation for oil palm plantation business permits that have been established in forest areas consist of several factors, namely: legal substance factors, legal structure factors, legal culture factors. Procedures for resolving oil palm plantations that have been established and have business permits within forest areas that can be applied to resolve this problem can be achieved in two ways: non-litigation and litigation.
Pemenuhan Meaningful Participation Sebagai Standar Konstitusional Good Governance Pininta, Agniski; Nurcahyono, Arinto
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2114

Abstract

The principle of good governance requires democratic, transparent, and accountable governance, one of the ways to achieve which is through public involvement in public decision-making. In Indonesia, public participation is often still merely formalistic and has not yet resulted in substantial public involvement. Therefore, this article aims to analyze meaningful participation as a constitutional standard in the implementation of good governance. This study employs a normative legal methodology using a legislative, conceptual, and case-specific approach particularly analyzing Constitutional Court rulings regarding public participation in the formation and qualitative- normative analysis of such participation. The findings indicate that meaningful participation has become a constitutional standard demanding the fulfillment of the public’s right to be heard, considered, and provided with explanations regarding their opinions. This standard not only serves as a principle of procedural democracy but also as a tool for testing the constitutionality of the exercise of state power. Thus, strengthening meaningful participation is a primary requirement for realizing good governance that is in harmony with the principles of popular sovereignty and a democratic rule of law, as mandated by the 1945 Constitution.
Tumpang Tindih Kewenangan Penyidikan dalam Reformasi Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana dan Kejaksaan Berdasarkan Analisis Jus Constituendum Silalahi, Frans Edward; Sari, Retno Dewi Pulung
Wajah Hukum Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v10i1.2066

Abstract

The reform of Indonesia's criminal law through the drafting of the Criminal Procedure Code Bill (RUU KUHAP) and the Prosecutor’s Office Bill (RUU Kejaksaan) has raised a serious issue concerning the overlapping authority of criminal investigation between the Indonesian National Police (Polri) and the Attorney General’s Office (Kejaksaan). While RUU KUHAP stipulates that the authority to investigate lies with the police, RUU Kejaksaan grants prosecutorial investigators the power to conduct investigations in specific cases without clear limitations. This regulatory disharmony leads to legal uncertainty, potential institutional conflicts, and the risk of abuse of power. This research is a normative juridical study using statutory and conceptual approaches. The data consist of primary legal materials such as the draft bills, relevant legislation, and secondary sources including academic journals, legal doctrines, and mainstream news reports. The analysis is conducted qualitatively with a descriptive-analytical method. The results of this study indicate that the lack of clear boundaries in investigative authority creates functional dualism and undermines the principle of due process of law. Therefore, normative and institutional reforms are necessary to emphasize functional differentiation, strengthen inter-institutional coordination, and ensure legal certainty, effective law enforcement, and the protection of human rights.

Page 58 of 58 | Total Record : 575

 54   55   56   57   58 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 10, No 1 (2026): April Vol 9, No 2 (2025): Oktober Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April Vol 8, No 2 (2024): Oktober Vol 8, No 1 (2024): April Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober Vol 7, No 1 (2023): April Vol 6, No 2 (2022): Oktober Vol 6, No 1 (2022): April Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Oktober Vol 5, No 1 (2021): April Vol 4, No 2 (2020): Oktober Vol 4, No 1 (2020): April Vol 3, No 2 (2019): Oktober Vol 3, No 1 (2019): April Vol 2, No 2 (2018): Oktober Vol 2, No 1 (2018): April Vol 1, No 1 (2017): Oktober More Issue