cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 744 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)" : 744 Documents clear
Kepastian Hukum Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah dengan Dasar Penerbitan Surat Palsu (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Batusangkar Nomor 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk) Yodi Nugraha; Rembrandt Rembrandt; Syofirman Sofyan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.968

Abstract

The case of a land dispute with the object of the dispute being a certificate of land rights issued using a fake document is the Decision of the Class II Batusangkar District Court Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk which has obtained permanent legal force. The dispute in this case is located in Jorong Baruah, Nagari Padang Magek, Rangkat District, Tanah Datar Regency. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach. The findings in this research, namely that certificates of land rights issued using fake documents, certainly do not provide legal certainty. This certificate can be categorized as a genuine but fake certificate. This kind of certificate must of course be canceled and declared invalid and withdrawn from circulation after being proven through a process in the District Court. To prevent the occurrence of genuine but fake certificates, this is by increasing the accuracy of the authorities who process the creation and issuance of land title certificates. The consideration of the Panel of Judges in the Decision of the Batusangkar District Court Number 67/Pid.B/2021/PN Bsk is that the Defendant was legally and convincingly proven at trial to fulfill the criminal elements charged by the Public Prosecutor, namely Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. So the Panel of Judges sentenced the Defendant to imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 6 (six) months.
Kewenangan Hakim untuk Melakukan Intervensi dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perjanjian Kredit Bank yang Bertentangan Dengan Nilai-Nilai Keadilan dan Asas Keseimbangan Berkontrak Mohammad Kamil Ardiansyah; Dahlil Marjon; Yussy Adelina Mannas
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.969

Abstract

Dalam persidangan perdata, hakim terkadang menemukan perjanjian kredit yang isinya bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai keadilan dan asas keseimbangan berkontrak. Dalam situasi ini hakim dihadapkan pada dua kemungkinan yaitu apakah hakim akan bersikap aktif untuk melakukan intervensi ke dalam perjanjian untuk turut membantu menciptakan keadilan dan keseimbangan kepada kedua belah pihak, atau hakim harus tetap tunduk pada isi perjanjian kredit, karena secara normatif dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata mengatur bahwa setiap perjanjian mengandung asas kebebasan berkontrak dan asas pacta sunt servanda, sekalipun isi perjanjian tersebut bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai keadilan dan keseimbangan yang mengkibatkan salah satu pihak dirugikan. Metode peneltian yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah penelitian normatif, dengan menggunakan pendekatan pendekatan undang-undang, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual sesuai dengan materi yang dibahas dalam artikel ini. Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan serta kesimpulan dalam artikel ini diantaranya yaitu Hakim berwenang untuk melakukan intervensi terhadap perjanjian kredit bank yang bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai keadilan dan asas keseimbangan berkontrak karena penerapan asas kebebasan berkontrak dan asas pacta sunt servanda harus dibatasi dan tidak boleh bertentangan dengan asas keadilan dan asas keseimbangan berkontrak, selain itu hakim juga memiliki kewenangan untuk melakukan judicial activism melalui proses penemuan hukum.
Akibat Hukum Transaksi Jual Beli Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Validasi Pajak Daerah Oleh Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan Dan Aset Daerah Kabupaten Pelalawan Suhendar Suhendar; Yuslim Yuslim; Syofiarti Syofiarti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.970

Abstract

Pelalawan district often finds that the price of buying and selling transactions for land and buildings that occur during the transfer of rights does not match the actual transaction price, this creates an imbalance that can be detrimental to taxpayers and local government agencies themselves, such as buying and selling transactions that occur far away. below the actual market price used as the basis for NPOP in calculating BPHTB. If this is done intentionally, then the action can be categorized as tax evasion. The approach used in this research is an empirical juridical approach. The data used in this research are secondary data and primary data. All data and materials obtained from research results are compiled and analyzed qualitatively, and presented in qualitative descriptive form. From the research results, it can be explained that: First, the implementation of buying and selling transactions in relation to regional tax validation by the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency of Pelalawan Regency has no authority to validate price determination that exceeds the price of buying and selling transactions that have been made by the parties and there are no regulations. which requires validation of pricing determinations. The Pelalawan Regency Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency only has the authority to check the payment of tax deposits in the transfer of rights to land and buildings, as well as ensuring whether the tax deposits have been paid by the parties in the sale and purchase transaction for the transfer of rights to land and buildings. Second, the legal consequences of buying and selling transactions in relation to the validation of regional taxes by the Regional Financial and Asset Management Agency of Pelalawan Regency, where the Notary as PPAT must wait for the day, date and time to be included when the parties appear. The inclusion of the day, date, month, year and time when the parties appear will only be included at the beginning of the Sale and Purchase Deed after the validation process is complete. The notary as PPAT for this action violates the UUJN, because there is an element of falsification in that the inclusion of the day, date, month, year and time when appearing does not correspond to the reality that occurred when the parties appeared. The action of the Notary as PPAT to include false information in the authentic deed results in the deed becoming null and void. A notary as a PPAT can be punished for false information stated in the deed.
Kekuatan Hukum Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Perumahan yang Tidak Terlaksana Sebagaimana Mestinya Kasran Harefa; Busyra Azheri; Hengki Andora
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.971

Abstract

The legal force against the PPJB housing that is done by the P.T.Mutiara Peace made not in front of a notary in the form of a standard contract is weak and does not have a perfect legal force as the authentic act made in the presence of the notary. Such an agreement shall remain in force in that it is not contrary to the provisions of the law, the law and the common order. When the property is in the court of justice and because of its nature under the hand, then the proof is relative, that is, when the property has been admitted by the parties to its existence, the PPJB has the full legal force of proof, while for the party that does not admitt it then the power of evidence is handed over to the judge's consideration. And for them the parties of the Peace Mutiara with its buyer who perform PPJB in the presence of a notary in the form of an authentic act then the legal force is very binding and the value of the proof is perfect before the court. The position of PPJB in the sale of housing transactions between PT.Mutiara Peace with its buyer: First, that is made not in the presence of a notary in the form of a standard contract is already an agreement but its position is a preliminary agreement under the hand or called as the Preliminary Agreement for Sale of Sale. Second, for those parties that make the PPGB before the notary then the position is as an act whose nature is authentic in accordance with Article 1868 of the KUHPerdata or which is referred to as a contract of binding sale of sale.
Analisis Kepatuhan Regulasi Perlindungan Konsumen dalam E-Commerce di Indonesia Sri Lestari Poernomo
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.972

Abstract

In Indonesia, e-commerce has experienced significant growth and provides a convenient platform for consumers to shop and transact online. However, the rapid expansion must be balanced with certainty regarding consumer protection. This study aims to analyze e-commerce regulatory compliance from the point of view of business actors and consumers. By examining the challenges faced by businesses and consumer experiences, this study describes the effectiveness of existing regulations and identifies potential for improvement. This study combines qualitative interviews and surveys with a diverse sample of e-commerce merchants and consumers. The research findings show that while regulations exist to protect consumers, their enforcement remains a major challenge. Business actors face complex compliance requirements, causing discrepancies in ensuring consumer safety and trust. On the other hand, consumer awareness of their rights is relatively low, which hinders the use of protective measures. In addition, this research also reveals that the current dispute resolution mechanism needs to be improved to facilitate a speedy and fair resolution. On that basis, it is recommended for the government to simplify existing regulations and educate business actors. A multi-stakeholder approach is also highly recommended to ensure better compliance so consumers can be protected.
Perlindungan HAM Dari Perbudakan Modern Bagi ABK Indonesia di Kabupaten Tegal (Studi Pada ABK yang Tergabung Di Komunitas INFISA) Satriya Aldi Putrazta; Caesar Dimas Edwinarta; Annas Rasid Musthafa; Nur Alifia Fitriani; Dzakirah Najyala Fakhirani El-difra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.973

Abstract

The protection of human rights for crew of vessels, which is one of the professions in the seafaring and maritime sector, has become an urgency after the increasing cases of modern slavery in Indonesia. Therefore, this research will examine the implementation and optimization of human rights protection for Indonesian crew of vessels, especially those from Tegal Regency. This research uses an empirical legal research method using a descriptive qualitative approach to examine the problems and strategies for optimizing human rights protection for Indonesian crew of vessels. Based on the results of this research, it explains that the practice of modern slavery that often occurs with Indonesian crew of vessels includes exploitation of workers by forcing them to work for 18 hours or more a day, inadequate work wages, a workplace atmosphere that is not conducive, and a lack of supporting facilities for the comfort and welfare of workers. In addition, there are other findings that explain that the protection of the human rights of crew of vessels is regulated in Indonesian legislation and international conventions that have obliged all levels of society to participate in providing human rights protection to Indonesian crew of vessels.
Aturan Non Fungible Token (NFT) dalam Hukum di Indonesia Muhammad Alief Bayu Syahputra; Rahandy Rizki Prananda
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.974

Abstract

Crypto assets, especially non-fungal tokens (NFT), have now become a trend for the public to be traded. This brings a lot of influence, both the acquisition of large profitability by business people and the large losses from these business people. Regulations related to NFTs are still very limited which has led to the development of perspectives to regulate NFTs in a comprehensive manner. The study that will be carried out is a type of normative law through the study of literature and other legal materials, for example principles, rules and also legal norms. The results of the study show that there are no specific rules regarding unified NFTs, they cannot be used as the main motive for making new regulations related to NFTs. This is because new drafting rules cannot provide a clear solution for every problem and can sometimes be detrimental to NFT practices which tend to be dynamic. This can arise if regulatory arrangements are not based on a philosophical, economic, juridical or sociological basis.
Tinjauan Yuridis Penerbitan Sertifikat Tanah tanpa Surat Pernyataan Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah (SPPHT) dari Pemilik Tanah Sebelumnya Muhammad Fandi Asnan; Siti Mahmudah
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.975

Abstract

There was a land dispute problem in Parit Village which led to a fight over land ownership by the first party as the owner of the land certificate without being accompanied by a Statement of Relinquishment of Land Rights (SPPHT) from the second party as the previous owner. The purpose of this research is to find out the procedures for land registration using the SPPHT from the previous owner and the legal consequences that arise as a consequence of the absence of the SPPHT in making certificates. In this study, the research method used is juridical-normative. The data collection technique used in this research is literature study, namely by focusing on appropriate legal sources. The results of the study show that in the procedure for registering land certificates for the transfer of land rights, the SPPHT has an important position as one of the conditions that must be met by both parties. The existence of SPPHT is necessary to ensure the validity and legal certainty in making land certificates. However, if the SPPHT is not included in the process of making land certificates, it can result in the issuance of multiple certificates. This can have an impact on the existence of sanctions given to the parties involved in the problem.
Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Hak dan Kewajiban Notaris dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Puspa Anggraini; Aju Putrijanti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.976

Abstract

If signed in front of a notary, an authentic deed is a letter in a format determined by law and can be used as evidence that is flawless. The notary concerned must assume full responsibility for the situation if there is a problem with the deed he signed, whether it is related to civil, criminal, UUJN, or code of ethics issues. The notary will be released from this obligation if he has resigned from his job. The purpose of this study is to discuss and examine the obligations of a notary in making authentic deeds and to clarify what these rights are. Descriptive research combined with normative legal analysis methods. The notary can still be held accountable even though his term of office has ended or after the notary retires if an original deed drawn up before a notary turns out to be invalid and is detrimental to the parties.
Keabsahan Tanda Tangan Elektronik oleh Notaris Louis Figgo; Bambang Eko Turisno
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.977

Abstract

This research examines legal studies related to the validity of electronic signatures by Notaries in Indonesia. A notary is a public official who is responsible for making a deed. If in carrying out their profession it is proven that they have committed mistakes and misuse, the notary will be subject to sanctions, both civil, administrative and criminal sanctions.The research method used is normative juridical study, namely research studies originating from legal sources such as laws and regulations, and expert opinion to research studies related to the title chosen by the researcher. The result of this research is that it is known that as a public official, a notary has a position in making authentic deeds. The rapid development of information technology has affected the legal profession, one of which is the notary profession. The influence on the notary profession can be seen with the concept of a cyber notary. Electronic signatures already have provisions in the ITE Law. This is reinforced by UUJN-P Article 15 paragraph 3 which gives authority to certify electronic transactions. However, it is continued in Article 16 paragraph 1 which states that at the time of signing this, the notary must be physically present. This makes the notary's signature electronically receive recognition from the law, it's just that no law regulates it specifically and in detail.

Page 18 of 75 | Total Record : 744

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue