cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Analisa Pembatalan Perkawinan Poligami Akibat Pernyataan Palsu: Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 2530/Pdt. G/2019/PA.Mdn Siti Nurhaliza Dalimunthe; Mia Hadiati
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1195

Abstract

This research aims to analyze cases of cancellation of polygamous marriages due to false statements, with a focus on Case Study Decision Number 2530/Pdt. G/2019/PA.Mdn. The research background involved a lawsuit filed by a man regarding the marriage of Defendant I and Defendant II which was carried out without the knowledge of the Plaintiff as the legal guardian. The research method used is normative qualitative by collecting secondary data from relevant laws and judicial decisions. The results of the research show that the marriage of Defendant I and Defendant II was declared null and void because they did not meet the requirements for a legal guardian, which was linked to the Plaintiff's disagreement as the biological father of Defendant I. This analysis is based on Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law , and supported by documentary evidence such as a marriage certificate. The research conclusion confirms that court decisions reflect the judge's thoroughness in implementing applicable legal provisions, protecting individual rights, and upholding the validity of marriage. These results contribute to the development of legal precedent regarding the annulment of polygamous marriages due to false statements in the future.
Praktik Poligami di Kalangan Pegawai Negeri Sipil Wanita yang Menjadi Istri Kedua Ricca Anindya Putri
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1198

Abstract

Female civil servants are not allowed to become the second, third or fourth wife in Article 4 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990, but before the existence of Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990, female civil servants could become the second, third or fourth wife of a man who was not a civil servant. Initially, the regulation of PP No. 10 of 1983 was amended by PP No. 45 of 1990 to include a prohibition on female civil servants becoming the second, third or fourth wife of either male civil servants or non-civil servants. There are several decisions in the Religious Courts, where judges decide on requests for polygamy permits that do not comply with the regulations regarding polygamy. Some of these decisions include Decision Number 0085/Pdt.G/2019/PA.Sel, 0306/Pdt.G/2017/PA.Gtlo and 0102/Pdt.G/2016/PA.Dgl. In the decision on the polygamy permit application, there was a discrepancy between the provisions of Article 4 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 and the three judge's decisions above. The existence of a polygamy permit granted which is not based on the provisions contained in Article 4 paragraph (2) of PP Number 45 of 1990, namely the second wife candidate of the applicant who applies for a polygamy permit has a status as a Civil Servant. The result of this study is the judge's consideration in granting the applicant's request for permission to polygamy with a woman who is a civil servant is by submitting a statement letter ready to bear the risks caused by his marriage to the applicant. The judge overruled Article 4 Paragraph 2 of Government Regulation Number 45 of 1990 on the condition that the parties make a statement to bear the risk. The risk in question is dishonorable dismissal as a civil servant and the marriage can be annulled by the relevant agency or official. The parties must know and understand the risks they will face in applying for a polygamy license where the second wife is a woman who is a civil servant.
Urgensi Pembuatan Perjanjian Penerbitan Surat Utang Berjangka (Medium Term Notes) oleh Notaris Maena Vianny; Antarin Prasanthi Sigit
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1199

Abstract

Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) mengeluarkan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (POJK) No.30/POJK.04/2019 tentang Penerbitan Efek Bersifat Utang dan/atau Sukuk yang Dilakukan Tanpa Melalui Penawaran Umum (selanjutnya disebut POJK EBUS) sebagai payung hukum terhadap perjanjian penerbitan Surat Utang Berjangka atau Medium Term Notes (selanjutnya disebut MTN). Namun dalam kenyataannya, gagal bayar terhadap MTN masih sering terjadi pada saat ini. Terlebih, di dalam POJK EBUS tidak ada ketentuan yang menjelaskan tentang pembuatan Perjanjian Penerbitan MTN oleh notaris pasar modal sedangkan dalam Surat Edaran No. SE-0005/DIR-EKS/KSEI/1121 perihal Mekanisme Pendaftaran Efek Bersifat Utang dan/atau Sukuk di PT Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia (KSEI) (selanjutnya disebut SE KSEI tentang Pendaftaran EBUS) dijelaskan tentang kewajiban untuk dibuatnya perjanjian tersebut oleh notaris pasar modal yang telah terdaftar pada OJK. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis ketentuan yang berlaku di Indonesia tentang Perjanjian Penerbitan MTN, dan kewenangan notaris dalam pembuatan Perjanjian Penerbitan MTN. Penelitian doktrinal ini mengumpulkan data sekunder melalui studi kepustakaan, yang selanjutnya dianalisis secara kualitatif. Dari hasil analisis dapat dijelaskan bahwa terdapat beberapa faktor yang mendorong terjadinya gagal bayar MTN yakni adanya pandemi Covid-19, perusahaan penerbit efek pailit serta adanya manipulasi laporan keuangan dari perusahaan penerbit efek. Adapun Perjanjian Penerbitan MTN itu sendiri semestinya dibuat dalam bentuk akta autentik di hadapan notaris guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan kepada para pihak karena akta autentik tersebut merupakan alat pembuktian yang sempurna apabila terjadi sengketa di kemudian hari.
Implikasi Hukum Risalah Fiktif Akta Pernyataan Keputusan Rapat Terhadap Upaya Hukum Pemulihan Jabatan Notaris John Tiel Gosan; Rasji Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1201

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out the legal implications of fictitious minutes of the deed of statement of meeting decisions on legal efforts to restore the position of notary. This article uses normative legal research, with a statute approach and conceptual approach and descriptive qualitative research analysis with deductive thinking method. The legal implications of making fictitious minutes of the deed of meeting decision statement can be in the form of civil violations with the implication that the deed of meeting decision statement is declared cancelled and the notary will bear the material losses incurred, then the Notary can be charged with a crime, namely in the falsification of document data with the implication of imprisonment, and the last is charged with the code of ethics of the notary position which has implications for reprimands to dishonorable dismissal from the position of notary by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights as having the authority to appoint and dismiss notaries. The legal remedies that can be taken by notaries can only be done for violations of the code of ethics, namely by filing an objection or administrative appeal against the decision of the Ministry of Law and Human Right.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Revenge Porn dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam Kamarul Hidayat; Syofiaty Lubis
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1204

Abstract

Criminal acts continue to develop along with developments in time and technology, but the law does not keep up with these developments, ultimately creating legal loopholes or the irrelevance of the law to criminal acts. In this study, the approach used is a normative juridical approach. The normative juridical approach is a legal research method that involves analysis of library material or secondary data as the main source to be researched through investigation of regulations and literature related to the issue being investigated. Based on the results of the study, the criminal act of revenge porn based on a judge's decision is prohibited in Islamic criminal law because of the act of adultery and bringing oneself closer to adultery and spreading disgrace with punishments of stoning and whipping as well as ta'zir.
Keabsahan Akta Notaris yang Menggunakan Cyber Notary Sebagai Akta Otentik Ahmad Zaenul Islam; Kurniawan Kurniawan; Hirsanuddin Hirsanuddin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1206

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology can enable Notaries in carrying out their positions to interact indirectly with interested parties. This research is normative legal research which aims to analyze the concept of cyber notary as an authentic deed in Indonesia and the validity of notarial deeds that use cyber notary as authentic deeds. The results of this research are: The cyber notary concept is a concept that utilizes technological advances for notaries in carrying out their duties, such as: digitizing documents, signing deeds electronically, holding General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) via teleconference. The validity of notarial deeds using Cyber ​​Notary is based on Article 16 paragraph (1) letter m UUJN in its explanation that the Notary must be physically present and sign the deed simultaneously with the presenters and witnesses. So the validity of the cyber notary as an authentic deed cannot yet be said to be authentic.
Upaya Hukum yang Dilakukan Korban Kejahatan Dikaji dari Perspektif Sistem Peradilan Pidana dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Muhammad Ridwan Lubis
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1210

Abstract

The state, via the Institute for the Protection of Witnesses and Victims (LPSK), leads the way in addressing crime victim compensation as a means of fulfilling state obligations and securing the welfare of the populace. LPSK stands for the Witness and Victim Protection Agency, an organization mandated with safeguarding the rights and safety of witnesses and/or victims. In accordance with the Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Witness and Victim Protection, LPSK guarantees equal legal certainty. Compensation is regulated in Law Number 13 of 2006 jo. Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution emphasizes that "Everyone has the right to recognition, guarantees, protection, fair legal certainty, and equal treatment before the law." Law Number 31 of 2014, PERMA (Chief Regulation) Number 1 of 2022, Government Regulation (PP) Number 8 of 2014, and PP Number 7 of 2018 are designed to provide state protection for the rights of crime victims in the UK. However, it's important to note that compensation is only available in certain cases. Additionally, the form of non-monetary compensation guaranteed by state regulation doesn't have a clear monetary value. Providing compensation to victims is a challenging task due to the lack of clarity concerning the form and scope of compensation. This will aid in ensuring that crime victims obtain certainty in their compensation rights. The state has a responsibility to revise or create regulations related to the implementation of non-monetary compensation to overcome the obstacles in resolving compensation issues. This is a study involving descriptive-analytical methods in normative legal research. The findings reveal a regulatory gap that exists in the explanation of non-monetary compensation in compensation payments. This gap creates complexity and uncertainty for the victims. The LPSK, an institution of the state, should establish a standard value as a benchmark to guarantee that victims receive proper compensation. However, compensation is not always in monetary form. The state, through LPSK, is obliged to provide compensation to protect victims' rights. To ensure consistency in payment and guarantee the protection of crime victims' rights beyond statutory classification, the government must adhere to assessments presented in various journals.
Pengembalian Aset (Aset Recovery) Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Gomgom TP Siregar
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1212

Abstract

Corruption is a special crime with distinct characteristics that differentiate it from general crimes, including non-compliance with formal criminal or procedural laws. In Indonesia, corruption still reigns as the most prevalent form of criminal activity. This study is a descriptive analytical research, focused on the presentation of phenomena and circumstances related to the financial returns and/or state assets affected by acts of corruption. The research excludes subjective evaluations unless marked as such, and emphasizes clear, concise sentences and logical structure. Technical term abbreviations are defined upon first use. The paper adheres to conventional academic sections and formatting, including clear and factual titles. The language is objective, neutral and grammatically correct. The text maintains a formal register, avoiding contractions, colloquialisms, and unnecessary jargon. Causal connections between statements are made clear, while biased language is avoided. Precise, subject-specific vocabulary is employed when applicable. In addition, the document adheres to language-specific spellings, grammar, and style. Law Number 20 from 2001 addresses corruption as a criminal offence. Article 18 discusses additional crimes to recover state finances. Law Number 7 from 2006 ratifies the United Nations Convention Against Corruption of 2003 which details how assets seized from corrupt criminals can occur through both criminal and civil channels. Law Number 1 of 2006, governing mutual assistance in criminal matters, serves as the basis for the Indonesian government's provision of as well as requests for mutual assistance. It also provides guidelines for entering agreements in criminal matters with foreign countries. Several channels/instruments are available for reclaiming assets from corruption crimes, including criminal, civil, and administrative means.
Pengaturan Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai di Kota Malang (Studi Peraturan Walikota Nomor 6 Tahun 2020 Tentang Petunjuk Teknis Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai Daerah) Haru Permadi; Oppy Pramudya Wisnu Wardhana
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1213

Abstract

The Non-Cash Food Assistance Program is a government initiative that aims to provide monthly food assistance to eligible families, followed by Sub-District Social Welfare Workers. The program has been implemented in 514 districts and cities in Indonesia, including one special city. The location in question is Malang City. The research methodology used in this study is descriptive qualitative. The descriptive qualitative approach is used as a means to investigate and analyze observations and findings within a particular domain or discipline. The research findings show that the Non-Cash Food Assistance Program has provided assistance to a total of 7,226 beneficiary families, as reported by the Ministry of Social Affairs. Malang City consists of 57 urban villages spread across 5 sub-districts. The outcome measures from this study have proven to be very important in helping beneficiaries effectively reduce daily expenditures, thus allowing the organization to generate higher profits that can be utilized to meet additional needs. Indirectly, this can be interpreted as an indication of their improved social welfare. Therefore, it can be said that this program has had a significant impact on poverty reduction efforts in the Malang urban area.
Tinjauan Prinsip Itikad Baik dalam Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Sengketa Merek (Studi Putusan Nomor 3/Pdt.Sus.Hki/Merek/2022/PN Niaga Mdn) Nadya Enjelin Kusuma; R. Rahaditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1218

Abstract

Merek adalah tanda pengenal yang digunakan untuk membedakan barang atau jasa yang diproduksi oleh orang dalam kegiatan perdagangan barang atau jasa. Merek merupakan hal yang sangat penting karena peran merek digunakan sebagai identitas yang dapat memberikan perbedaan terhadap asal-usul suatu barang atau jasa. Namun di Indonesia sering terjadi kasus sengketa merek, padahal hak atas adalah hak eksklusif yang diberikan oleh negara kepada pemilik merrk yang terdaftar. Namun masih banyak terdapat sengketa merek, salah satunya sengketa merek antara “Indorent” dan “Indorental”. Kedua merek tersebut terlibat sengketa merek. Oleh dimana penyelesaian persengketaan merek dagang “Indorent” dan “Indorental” ditempuh melalui jalur litigasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dan berpendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah penyelesaian sengketa ini dilakukan di Pengadilan Niaga. Gugatan penggugat di pengadilan ditolak oleh majelis hakim dengan alasan bahwa tidak terdapat kesamaan merek karena nama merek bersifat umum dan unsur itikad tidak baik tidak terpenuhi karena merek “Indorent” telah dilakukan pemererikasaan oleh turut tergugat. First to file system dan implementasi itikad baik merupakan suatu bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi perlindungan merek.

Page 3 of 76 | Total Record : 758

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue