cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 758 Documents
 46   47   48   49   50 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)" : 758 Documents clear
Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dan Akibat Hukum Dalam Menolak Gugatan Cerai Yang Tidak Dapat Diterima (Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard) Di Pengadilan Dilihat Dari Perspektif Hukum Acara Perdata Putra, Raynaldo Handojo; Hadiati, Mia
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1298

Abstract

This research aims to carry out an in-depth analysis of the judge's basic considerations and legal consequences in rejecting an unacceptable divorce claim (niet ontvankelijk verklaard) in court, seen from the perspective of Civil Procedure Law. This study explores various legal aspects that form the basis of a judge's consideration in rejecting a divorce lawsuit and the legal implications for the parties involved. The research method used involves legal text analysis, case studies, and a comparative legal approach to understand the legal framework that supports the judge's decision to reject an unacceptable divorce lawsuit. The results of this research provide in-depth insight into the legal process involving judge deliberations in this context and its impact on both parties
Urgensi Pembuatan Perjanjian Penerbitan Surat Utang Berjangka (Medium Term Notes) oleh Notaris Vianny, Maena; Prasanthi Sigit, Antarin
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1299

Abstract

The Financial Services Authority (OJK) issued Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) No.30/POJK.04/2019 concerning the Issuance of Debt Securities and/or Sukuk Conducted Without a Public Offering (from now on referred to as POJK EBUS) as a legal umbrella for issuance agreements Term Debt Securities or Medium Term Notes (from now on referred to as MTN). However, in reality, defaults on payments to MTN still occur frequently at this time. Moreover, in POJK EBUS there are no provisions explaining the making of an MTN Issuance Agreement by a capital market notary whereas in Circular Letter No. SE-0005/DIR-EKS/KSEI/1121 concerning the Mechanism for Registration of Debt Securities and/or Sukuk at PT Kustodian Sentral Efek Indonesia (KSEI) (hereinafter referred to as SE KSEI concerning EBUS Registration) explains the obligation to make the agreement by a capital market notary which has been registered with the OJK. The purpose of this research is to analyze the provisions in force in Indonesia regarding MTN Issuance Agreements, and the authority of notaries in making MTN Issuance Agreements. This doctrinal research collects secondary data through literature study, which is then analyzed qualitatively. From the results of the analysis, it can be explained that there are several factors that led to MTN's default, namely the Covid-19 pandemic, the bankruptcy of the securities issuing company and manipulation of the financial reports of the securities issuing company. The MTN Issuance Agreement itself should be made in the form of an authentic deed before a notary to guarantee legal certainty and protection for the parties because the authentic deed is a perfect means of proof if a dispute arises in the future.
Sistem Diversi Pada Tindak Pidana Narkotika oleh Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum Mutiara Adival, Julisya; Firmansyah, Hery
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1300

Abstract

The crime of narcotics abuse in camping continues to grow, with trafficking involving children. The status of children who are vulnerable to unlawful acts means that the justice system must also consider the child's condition. Therefore, in the Indonesian justice system, the term 'juvenile criminal justice' is known, which is specifically applied to criminal acts committed by children. This also means that various criminal acts, such as narcotics crimes committed by children, must also be tried appropriately. As happened to the child defendant in decision no. 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/Pn JKT.SEL. In this case study, children were involved as intermediaries in buying and selling narcotics. Based on this background, the aim of this research was to understand the criminal justice process in narcotics crimes against children, as well as the laws that can be used as a basis for justice applied to children. The research was carried out as a normative type of research, with a statutory and case study approach. The results of this research show that the administration of juvenile justice in Indonesia for narcotics crimes that make children suspects is carried out using a restorative justice approach with a diversion system. Even so, the judge still takes into account the demands of the prosecutor, and also the legal conditions that occurred. So that the judicial process can be relevant to the diversion that has been implemented. Meanwhile, the laws used as the basis for determining punishment consist of the Law on Narcotics, the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia concerning judicial power.
Praktik Nominee dalam Pranata Hukum Perseroan Terbatas di Indonesia (Analisis Sinkronisasi Undang-Undang Perseroan Terbatas, Undang-Undang Penanaman Modal, dan Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang) Ramadina, Mutia; Latumeten, Pieter E.
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1301

Abstract

Development in Indonesia emphasizes the need for funds for productive projects, including foreign investments. However, limitations on share ownership have led to the practice of nominees in limited liability companies. This research analyzes the validity of nominee agreements and the synchronization of relevant regulations in Indonesia. The research method employed is descriptive analytics with a normative juridical approach. The findings indicate that the nominee practice, despite its common use, may violate regulations, particularly prohibitions on agreements declaring share ownership on behalf of others. In conclusion, this research highlights the complexity and challenges of regulating nominee practices within the existing regulatory framework in Indonesia.
Analisis Putusan Eksekusi Jaminan Debitur Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Hutang Piutang (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Nomor 238/Pdt.G/2020/Pt.Dki) Rahmah, Salma Yustia; Djajaputera, Gunawan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1302

Abstract

The execution of collateral can be carried out when there is a court decision that takes into consideration whether there has been a breach of contract. This study employs a normative juridical approach as the basis for analyzing this legal issue. The research findings indicate that the debtor is legally entitled to execute the collateral concerning the breach of a debt agreement in the Decision of the High Court Number 238/Pdt.G/2020/PT.DKI. This is because both parties have a legally valid relationship to enter into a debt agreement, which was done by the plaintiff with the defendant I and II, with collateral in the form of a Certificate of Ownership for an Apartment Unit (SHMSRS) No. 3548/XXII/RIO DE JANEIRO, which has undergone the transfer process at the National Land Agency (BPN) in North Jakarta, registered in the name of the Defendant I, in this case, PT. Xiongji International Imp. & Exp. Group. The court decision to cancel the collateral seizure execution, which was previously determined as a result of the breach of contract by Defendant I in the Decision of the High Court Number 238/Pdt.G/2020/PT.DKI, is incorrect. This is because the petitioner of the collateral seizure has not paid the fees to the North Jakarta District Court until now. However, the judge ruled that Defendant I was at fault for the breach of contract, yet, on the other hand, the judge has canceled the collateral seizure execution against the collateral object guaranteed in the agreement.
Akibat Hukum Penggunaan Akta Kuasa Mutlak Sebagai Dasar Akta Jual Beli Mustika, Devana
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1303

Abstract

A deed is a writing that is deliberately made to be used as evidence of an event (deed, agreement, or decree) and is signed. In carrying out an act, a person can give authority to another person to carry out the matter, namely to an institution of power. The existence of a power of attorney makes human life easier, but not all matters can be done with power of attorney, there are things that are prohibited by statutory regulations, one of which is the use of power of attorney in the transmission of land rights. The problem raised in this research is the legal consequences of transferring land rights through a sale and purchase based on an absolute power of attorney deed. To answer this problem, the research method used is juridical-normative. The data collection tool in this research is through document study obtained from various regulatory sources that apply in Indonesia. The final part of this research concluded that the legal consequences of using an absolute power of attorney deed in the process of changing the name of a certificate are null and void, this is because the debt acknowledgment letter which is an inseparable unit with the absolute power of attorney deed does not have an executorial title and does not meet the objective requirements of the validity of an agreement.
Kajian Kelangkaan Minyak Goreng Akibat Penimbunan Terjadinya Penimbunan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Abdi Nugroho, Muhammad Falih; Sally, Jean N
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1304

Abstract

One of the problems that often occurs in Indonesia is the problem of food shortages, one of which is cooking oil. This has a negative impact on the Indonesian people because their basic needs are decreasing. This is caused by many business actors hoarding cooking oil and reselling it at high prices to make a profit. Hoarding is defined as buying something and saving it so that the item decreases in society so that the price will increase and people will have difficulty meeting their basic needs. This kind of hoarding is prohibited because it is a crime and evidence of moral badness and makes it difficult for people to fulfill their daily needs. Humans in this case are focused on the continuity of consumer life in fulfilling their basic life needs. The researcher applies a normative juridical legal research approach, namely an approach that uses the legal positivist concept, which views law as identical to written norms created and promulgated by authorized institutions or officials. This legal concept is a normative system that is independent, closed, and apart from real social life.
Urgensi Pengaturan Sanksi bagi Perusahaan yang Tidak Melaksanakan Corporate Social Responsibility Rahmania, Auliya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1305

Abstract

One of the company's obligations is to carry out a corporate social responsibility (CSR) program, where this obligation contains sanctions for companies that do not carry out CSR. The aim of this research is to determine the urgency of regulating sanctions for companies that do not implement Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia. The research method used is normative legal research which is carried out to look for legal problems or issues and existing legal problems. The research results show that the urgency of regulating sanctions for companies that do not implement TJSL, which departs from the basic understanding that the implementation of TJSL which is a legal obligation (legal mandatory) basically confirms that TJSL is no longer interpreted as voluntary, but as a legal obligation ( legal mandatory) to be implemented.
Perubahan Pidana Minimal Khusus Terhadap Delik Korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Axel Putra, Muhammad; Adhari, Ade
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1306

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi dikatakan sebagai extraordinary crime karena dampaknya merugikan finansial juga perekonomian negara dan orang lain, delik korupsi diatur dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU Tipikor). Namun, karena perkembangan produk hukum menjadikan beberapa acuan pasal yang sebelumnya diatur dalam UU Tipikor diubah ke dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Bagian Ketiga (UU KUHP). Perubahannya salah satunya terkait mengganti strafmaat pidana minimal khusus, permasalahan yang diangkat dalam artikel ini adalah bagaimana perubahan dan kelemahan pidana minimal khusus terhadap delik korupsi dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Selain itu, metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif yang dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data sekunder, hasil kajian menunjukan bahwa penjatuhan pidana minimal khusus dinilai tidak selaras dengan konsideran dalam UU KUHP yang menyatakan bahwa harus menyesuaikan pada salah satunya keadaan, perkembangan kehidupan di masyarakat. Akan tetapi faktanya dalam acuan pasal yang baru penjatuhan pidana minimal khusus menjadi semakin ringan, dampaknya tidak dapat memberikan efek jera kepada pelaku.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Notaris Terhadap Pemalsuan Akta Autentik Givanti, Dofana; Rasji, Rasji
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1308

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to be able to know and analyse how the notary's liability for forgery of authentic deeds. This article uses normative research type with statutory research approach and conceptual approach, and uses descriptive qualitative data analysis with deductive thinking method. Criminal offences by notaries for the act of forgery of authentic deeds can be subject to sanctions contained in the Criminal Code with applicable provisions, in this case, namely the criminal act of forgery. Notaries who commit criminal offences must be punished, and the Criminal Code in general can be applied to the Notary in accordance with the principle of lex specialis derogate legi generali which is interpreted a contrario, namely as long as there is no regulation regarding criminal sanctions in the UUJN specifically, the provisions of general criminal sanctions (Criminal Code) will apply. Criminal responsibility carried out by the Notary, namely for the criminal act of forgery of authentic deeds, namely by going through the process in the Criminal Justice System related to the submission of allegations of forgery of authentic deeds starting from the investigation process to the trial. Falsification of an authentic deed made by a notary has implications for the authentic deed to be null and void.

Page 48 of 76 | Total Record : 758

 46   47   48   49   50 

Filter by Year

2023 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue