cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Iyah Faniyah
Contact Email
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Phone
+6285263256164
Journal Mail Official
editor.unesreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
JL. Bandar Purus No.11, Padang Pasir, Kec. Padang Barat, Kota Padang
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Unes Law Review
Published by Universitas Ekasakti
ISSN : 26543605     EISSN : 26227045     DOI : https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1019
Core Subject : Health, Science, Education, Social,
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences
UNES Law Review adalah Jurnal Penelitian Hukum yang dikelola oleh Magister Hukum Pascasarjana, Universitas Ekasakti Padang. Penelitian yang dimuat merupakan pendapat pribadi peneliti dan bukan merupakan pendapat editor. Jurnal terbit secara berkala 4 (empat) kali dalam setahun yaitu September, Desember, Maret, dan Juni. UNES Law Review mulai Volume 4 Nomor 3 Tahun 2022 sampai Volume 9 Nomor 2 Tahun 2027 Reakreditasi Naik Peringkat dari Peringkat 5 ke Peringkat 4 sesuai nomor Akreditasi : 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 Oktober 2022 UNES Law Review is a Legal Research Journal managed by Postgraduate Law Masters, Ekasakti University, Padang. The published research is the personal opinion of the researcher and is not the opinion of the editor. The journal is published periodically 4 (four) times a year, namely September, December, March and June. UNES Law Review Volume 4 Number 3 of 2022 to Volume 9 Number 2 of 2027 Reaccreditation Raised Rank from Rank 5 to Rank 4 according to Accreditation number: 204/E/KPT/2022, 3 October 2022
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 3,910 Documents
 83   84   85   86   87 
Pelaksanaan Asimilasi Narapidana dalam Rangka Pencegahan dan Penanggulangan Penyebaran Covid-19 di Wilayah Hukum Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas IIA Padang Indah Ikhwan; Elwi Danil; Fadillah Sabri
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1101

Abstract

The government implemented the policy to prevent the Covid-19 virus in correctional institutions by issuing Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 2020 concerning Requirements for Providing Assimilation and Integration Rights for Prisoners and Children in the Context of Preventing and Controlling the Spread of Covid-19 which was later changed to Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2021 concerning the Second Amendment to the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia Number 32 of 2020 concerning Conditions for Providing Assimilation and Integration Rights for Prisoners and Children in the Context of Preventing and Controlling the Spread of Covid-19 . The existence of this policy of providing home assimilation has become a social controversy in society because of the repetition of criminal acts committed by prisoners while undergoing the home assimilation program. The research method used is empirical juridical. This research utilizes primary data and secondary data. The results of the research show that the implementation of home assimilation is in accordance with the applicable SOP, although there are still those who repeat criminal acts which cause their home assimilation to be revoked. Implementing home assimilation is one way to reduce overcapacity in correctional institutions. Supervision of the implementation of home assimilation is carried out by visiting clients' homes, via telephone and video calls. In implementing home assimilation, the obstacles faced are influenced by five factors in law enforcement.
Tradisi Mangompa Manuk dalam Pesta Adat Pernikahan Masyarakat Mandailing Natal Perspektif Urf Lisca Anggina Nst; Irwan Irwan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1102

Abstract

The tradition of Mangompa Manuk at wedding ceremony in the Mandailing Natal community has been a tradition passed down from generation to generation. Indigenous people regard that if they do not carry out this tradition, their marriage is invalid. The aim of this research is to determine the customs and traditions of Mangompa Manuk in carrying out weddings in Gunung Tua Village, Panyabungan District, Mandailing Natal Regency. Beside that, it aims to find out how the mangompa manuk tradition began, the purpose of mangompa manuk and why it still develops in the middle of Gunung Tua Village’s civilations, Panyabungan District, Mandailing Natal Regency and how about the society’s view if they don’t carry out this tradition, what are their motives when carrying out the mangompa manuk tradition, how is mangompa manuk tradition in the urf perspectife, is it appropriate with islamic law? or whether it is contrary to islamic law. The method of research is qualitative method that used to produced descriptive data in the Form, of written or spoken words from traditional figures, such as Hatobangan, traditional society, Religious Leaders, Muhammadiyah, figures and head MUI in Gunung Tua Village, Panyabungan district, Mandailing Natal Regency.
Penilaian Kinerja Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) Berdasarkan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 175K/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2021 Jessica Jessica; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1105

Abstract

The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is a semi-court institution that has the authority to resolve and decide disputes between consumers and business actors on a non-litigation basis. Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection or commonly known as UUPK is a regulatory basis used by BPSK in deciding consumer disputes because UUPK is a law that overshadows all laws that intend to provide protection to consumers. In practice, BPSK is often referred to as an institution that has the authority to examine, resolve, and decide a dispute with a final and binding decision. However, in one example of a case in the Supreme Court decision Number 175K / Pdt.Sus-BPSK / 2021, BPSK decided to impose sanctions on perpetrators outside the authority of BPSK. This is a problem of how to assess the performance of BPSK in deciding consumer disputes. The research method used is normative juridical with a case approach. To improve the performance of BPSK in deciding consumer disputes, it is necessary to update the contradictory UUPK regulations so that BPSK decisions do not cause legal uncertainty for protected consumers. The role burden borne by BPSK is also not balanced with existing Human Resources, so it needs to be improved so that BPSK's performance in deciding consumer disputes can be more careful without overriding applicable laws.
Effectiveness of Legal Aid For The Poor Communities of Makassar City Muhammad Rinaldy Bima
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1106

Abstract

This research aims to find out and analyze what factors influence the implementation of legal assistance for the poor in the city of Makassar. This research uses empirical research methods using data collection methods and studying legal assistance. Then data is obtained from interviews and observations to produce what is expected and conclusions about the problem. The results of this research show that there are factors that influence the implementation of legal assistance for the poor in the city of Makassar. The legal factor itself (law) where the implementation of legal aid itself must be clear in accordance with applicable law. The factor of law enforcement officers/enforcers is very influential in the judicial process in order to assist in the process of implementing legal aid. Community factors in order to be able to help the community in legal aid as a system of institutions or apparatus/law enforcement should pay more attention to several things, for example: providing legal education to people who are not legally competent so that they know more, providing legal counseling
Urgensi Pemeriksaan Substantif Sengketa Merek KasoMax dengan Merek Kaso dalam Rangka Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Natasha Pritama; R. Rahaditya
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1107

Abstract

Trademark registration in Indonesia refers to a constitutive system with the first-to-file principle. First to file is a trademark registration process that is only granted to the party who submits the application for the first time. The state is not permitted to grant registration to other parties who have a mark that contains similarities to a previous mark that was registered earlier. Trademark registration must go through substantive examination stages so as not to violate other people's rights, considering that registration is a process of granting rights, not granting permission. The purpose of this article is to determine the compliance opinion of appeal commission trademark law related to a trademark dispute involving Kasomax and Kaso, and also know the DJKI responsibilities in this dispute. The research method used is normative legal research with data analysis techniques based on deductive reasoning, which analyzes the considerations of the Mark Appeal Commission Council in connection with the provisions contained in Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning marks and geographical indications relating to the purchase of the KasoMax with the Kaso and its form of responsibility for the two brand struggles. Based on the research conducted, it can be concluded that the application of substantive examination in brand assessment has not been fully implemented, and the responsibility given is in the form of the cancellation of the KasoMax as a form of implementation of the Commercial Court decision.
Analisis Penegakan Hukum dengan Penggunaan Alat Bukti dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Minyak Goreng No. 15/Kppu-I/2022 Meylani Anggraini; Richard C. Adam
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1110

Abstract

This research discusses the use of evidence, including circumstantial evidence, in the process of examining the Cooking Oil case No. 15/KPPU-I/2022 by the Business Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU). This case involves alleged cartel practices in the cooking oil industry in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the extent to which indirect evidence contributes to proving cartel practices in this case and how this evidence is used in law enforcement. The research method used is an in-depth case study, by collecting and analyzing data from various relevant sources. The research results show that indirect evidence plays an important role in building cases of cartel practices and contributes significantly to the enforcement of business competition law. The KPPU's decision in this case was supported by strong evidence, and the use of circumstantial evidence has helped uncover violations of business competition law. This decision has a direct impact on business competition practices in the cooking oil industry and encourages compliance with business competition laws in the future
Relevansi Governing Law Terkait Praktek Unfair Calling pada Kontrak Jaminan Perbankan Internasional Demand Guarantee dalam Transaksi Bisnis Internasional Denny Tendra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1104

Abstract

There are two types of Bank Guarantees related to international buying and selling that are widely applicable internationally and recognized by international civil law, namely: Standby Letter of Credit (SBLC) & Demand Guarantee (DG). SBLC is a guarantee/guarantee issued by a bank, which results in the bank's obligation to pay the party receiving the confirmation (beneficiary) in the event of a default/default, or an obligation to pay from the guaranteed party (applicant). DG refers to international civil law URDG 758. The Demand Guarantee adheres to the principle of independence and the principle of document attachment, so there are two elements of risk in agreeing to the Demand Guarantee, First, namely: Disbursement of the Demand Guarantee is based only on a written claim letter from the Beneficiary to Issuing Bank. Second, namely: A clear expiration date must be stated in the Demand Guarantee. The act of claiming unilaterally by the beneficiary (the party receiving the guarantee) that the Applicant is in default even though the underlying contract conditions have been fulfilled, this is also called the practice of Unfair Calling. The URDG does not contain provisions regarding this matter. Therefore, it relies on jurisprudence and national legal laws applicable in a country (Governing Law) to determine in which case a request for disbursement of the Demand Guarantee is considered a default and unfair.
Pengaruh Kebijakan Migrasi Terhadap Integrasi Sosial dan Budaya: Kasus Migran di Asia Tenggara Shafira Evelyn Azzahra; Raski Musyafa; Muhammad Dimas Furqan
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1109

Abstract

Migrasi manusia telah menjadi fenomena global yang tak terhindarkan. Di Asia Tenggara, migrasi telah menjadi bagian penting dalam dinamika sosial dan budaya. Kebijakan migrasi yang diterapkan oleh negara-negara di wilayah ini memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap integrasi sosial dan budaya para migran. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh kebijakan migrasi terhadap integrasi sosial dan budaya para migran di Asia Tenggara. Artikel ini juga menggambarkan bagaimana komunitas migran dan bahasa lokal memainkan peran penting dalam integrasi budaya. Secara keseluruhan, kebijakan migrasi dan integrasi budaya di Asia Tenggara adalah faktor penting dalam membentuk dinamika migrasi di wilayah ini dan mendukung mobilitas penduduk yang lebih teratur dan aman.
Implementation of The Trias Politica Concept and The Prospects For Establishing New High State Institutions in Indonesia Demson Tiopan; Agus Setiawan; Kevin Alim Rabbani
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1111

Abstract

State institutions play a significantly central role in the implementation of governance. The doctrine of trias politica has been implemented in the structure of the Indonesian state, establishing a division of powers among three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. Nevertheless, over time, Indonesia has expanded the trias politica doctrine by incorporating a novel branch of power, namely the examinative institution operated by the The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia. The high state institutions established in accordance with the constitution enjoy robust and enduring positions and authorities. On the other hand, state institutions formed through legislation tend to possess comparatively weaker and non-permanent positions and authorities, as they are susceptible to amendments or even dissolution by the House of People’s Representatives (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, DPR), which holds legislative functions. The Ombudsman and Corruption Eradication Commission (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi or KPK), as auxiliary state institutions playing pivotal roles in the governance system, face vulnerability due to their establishment being founded on statutory laws. Consequently, there arises an urgent necessity and opportunity for the establishment of a new high state institution by elevating the Ombudsman and KPK to the status of high state institutions. However, there are inherent challenges that must be navigated, specifically the requirement for an amendment to the 1945 Indonesian Constitution, contingent upon the political will of the members of the People's Consultative Assembly (Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat or MPR).
Perbedaan Putusan Bpsk Dan Pengadilan Negeri Atas Perjanjian Pembiayaan Dengan Penyerahan Hak Milik Secara Fidusia Kea Ezzati Ascarya Kusumonegoro; Gunawan Djajaputra
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1112

Abstract

Penelitian ini membandingkan penyelesaian sengketa antara Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dan Pengadilan Negeri dalam kasus perjanjian pembiayaan dengan jaminan fidusia. Dalam konteks perubahan kehidupan manusia yang memerlukan tambahan sumber dana, pinjam-meminjam dengan jaminan fidusia umumnya digunakan. Rumusan masalah penelitian adalah perbandingan dalam penyelesaian sengketa antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif dengan analisis data berdasarkan undang-undang, regulasi, putusan pengadilan, dokumen akademik, dan literatur terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan dalam kekuatan hukum putusan antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri. Pengadilan Negeri memiliki kekuatan eksekusi langsung, sedangkan BPSK mengandalkan kesepakatan sukarela. Selain itu, pendekatan penentuan kompensasi juga berbeda, dengan Pengadilan Negeri cenderung memberikan kompensasi lebih tegas. Dalam konteks perjanjian pembiayaan dengan jaminan fidusia, pemilihan metode penyelesaian harus mempertimbangkan karakteristik sengketa dan tujuan pihak yang bersengketa. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa pemilihan antara BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri perlu mempertimbangkan kebutuhan dan kompleksitas sengketa yang bersangkutan. Pihak ketiga yang terpengaruh juga harus melindungi hak-hak mereka sesuai dengan hukum yang berlaku. Saran penelitian adalah untuk mempertimbangkan karakteristik sengketa dengan cermat. Jika penyelesaian dengan kekuatan hukum dan eksekusi diperlukan, Pengadilan Negeri mungkin menjadi pilihan yang lebih sesuai. Namun, jika sengketa bersifat lebih fleksibel dan lebih memilih kesepakatan sukarela, maka BPSK bisa menjadi alternatif yang baik, memungkinkan para pihak untuk mencapai kesepakatan yang moderat.

Page 85 of 391 | Total Record : 3910

 83   84   85   86   87 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026) Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2024) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2023) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023) Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023) Vol 5 No 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 5 No 1 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2022) Vol 4 No 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2022) Vol 4 No 3 (2022): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2022) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022) Vol. 4 No. 3 (2022) Vol 4 No 2 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2021) Vol 4 No 1 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2021) Vol 3 No 4 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2021) Vol 3 No 3 (2021): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2021) Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2021) Vol 3 No 2 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2020) Vol 3 No 1 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2020) Vol 2 No 4 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Juni 2020) Vol 2 No 3 (2020): UNES LAW REVIEW (Maret 2020) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2020) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020) Vol 2 No 2 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2019) Vol 2 No 1 (2019): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2019) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2019) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018) More Issue