cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Agung Suharyanto
Contact Email
agungsuharyanto@staff.uma.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jiph@uma.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum
Published by Universitas Medan Area
ISSN : 2355987X     EISSN : 2622061X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum is a Journal of Law for information and communication resources for academics, and observers of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law. The published paper is the result of research, reflection, and criticism with respect to the themes of Business Law, International law, Criminal law, and Civil law
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 312 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
KEKERASAN TERHADAP ANAK DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KRIMINOLOGI DIKAITKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG HAM (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 1.141/Pid.B.2011/PN.Mdn) Suhatrizal, Suhatrizal; Wahyuni, Windy Sri; Ibrahim, Ahmad
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (550.667 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v1i2.1856

Abstract

The law provides for the protection of children who receivedomestic violence by asking legal liability to the perpetrators of crimes ofviolence against children. Legal liability of actors give due to theperpetrators may be subject to criminal sanction in the form ofimprisonment or fine or both at once.
Perbandingan Kedudukan Penyidik Tindak Pidana Narkotika Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika Dan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Hutagaol, Ramses
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (841.149 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2727

Abstract

The existence of Authority between Investigators of the National Narcotics Agency and the Republic of Indonesia Police Article 81 of Law Number 35 Year 2009 concerning Narcotics, especially in the field of investigation, causes a dualism in the investigation of narcotics crime. The authority of the Narcotics Agency in Law Number 35 of 2009 has a greater portion than the Police Discipline. The regulatory authority for the investigation of the National Narcotics Agency in Law Number 35 Year 2009 concerning National Narcotics in the context of preventing the development of increasingly organized narcotics crime. In addition good coordination needs to be continued between the police and PPNS BNN. In order for the Government to make laws and regulations governing the limits of authority between law enforcement agencies such as the PPNS National Narcotics Agency and the National Police so that there are no differences in interpretation and investigation dualism.
Keabsahan Putusan Pengadilan yang Belum Inkracht sebagai Novum dalam Pengajuan Peninjauan Kembali Salim, Hardy; Halim, Yoefanca; Tirayo, Adriel Michael
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (855.169 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2961

Abstract

A judicial institution has criteria that must be met, namely principles that are open, corrective, and recordive. The broadest opportunity to submit corrections and recordings of decisions that have permanent legal force (inkracht) deemed unfair by justice seekers can be done through a Judicial Review. However, the Judicial Review is very limitative, one of them with the requirement for novum. But the regulation of conditions can be said to be a condition as a novum not strictly regulated. By looking at this matter, the research is carried out with the aim of finding out the validity of court decisions which have not been inkracht as novum in the submission for reconsideration. This study is using a normative research method. In conclusion, court decisions that have not been inkracht as novum in submitting judicial review are valid because they need to prioritize the value of justice and truth before legal certainty. As long as the prerequisites in Article 263 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code have been fulfilled, and one of the requirements in paragraph (2) has been fulfilled.
Analisis Hukum Perkara Jaminan Fidusia dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Padang Nomor 38/Pdt.G/2018/PN Pdg Ardo, Febi Kinanti
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (809.297 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2730

Abstract

The occurrence of the agreement on a vehicle financing agreement with the transfer of ownership rights fiduciary between PT. Pro Car International Finance (creditor) with a debtor No. No. 0450001897 dated May 31, 2014. The Debtor has not fulfilled its obligations since the 32nd installment due on December 31, 2016. The reason the debtor did not fulfill the obligation because the debtor has committed a crime. Upon the situation of the debtor, the PT. Pro Car International Finance states that the debtor has violated Article 1365 and Article 1366 of the Civil Code. The purpose of this study is first, to find out the form of acts against the law in Case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg, second, to find out the basis for judges' consideration of acts against the law in Case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg. This research method is normative juridical with qualitative analysis and presented descriptively. The results obtained, firstly, that the form of acts against the law in case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg in the form, acts that are contrary to their own legal obligations. The second result, that the basis for consideration of the Judge gave a decision on a lawsuit against the law in case number: 38 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN Pdg is the debtor has been proven to have committed an unlawful act and the judge granted part of the demand for the Defendant to pay a loss of Rp 82,745 .681.00 with interest and penalties.
SUATU TINJAUAN TERHADAP SISTEM PELAYANAN BAGI MASYARAKAT MISKIN SERTA CARA PENANGGULANGANYA BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NO.23 TAHUN 1992 Harahap, Irfan Afdoli; Siregar, Taufik; Harahap, Abi Jumroh
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (629.636 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v3i2.1946

Abstract

The discussion of this thesis is about a review of the service system for the poor as well as how to overcome them based on law no.23 of 1992. The health care system for the poor in the sei rengas village is very efficient, because the sei rengas village collaborates with the puskesmas in the kelurahan that. And sei rengas residents who are able to help provide donors to underprivileged people in health.
Tanggung Jawab Notaris terhadap Ketidaksesuaian Akta Salinan dengan Minuta Akta Halim, Yoefanca; Sudewo, Fricky; Fidelia, Tyas
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (826.687 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2962

Abstract

Notary as a general official has authorization in making an authentic deed and have other powers as referred to in this law or under other laws, as described in the Department of Law Notary. In carrying out his position, a notary is obliged to act as a trustee, honest, equitable, independent, immutated, and keep the interests of the parties and to make the deed Minuta. In addition, a notary is obliged to issue the Grosse deed, copy of the deed, or Deed citation based on Minuta deed, such matters are governed by Law No.2 of 2014 as has been amended by Law No. 30 of 2004 on the Department of notary. It means that a notary is supposed to carry out obligations. But in fact, the notary can still be found that does not carry out obligations as stipulated in the notary law. By looking at this raises an issue about, "What is Notary's responsibility for the inconsistency of the Copy act with the Minuta deed?". In general, the responsibilities of notary public can be examined in the public, criminal, notary LAW, and responsibility for performing the duties of the department under the notary Code of Ethics. Civil liability regarding material truth in the deed made and can be categorized as making false documents in criminal terms. While the responsibilities according to the LAW and the Code of Ethics Department notary, notary may be subject to sanctions in the form of oral warning, letters, temporary stops, and stops with respect or disrespect. 
Tanah Grant Sultan Melayu Deli menurut Teori Positivistik Rafiqi, Rafiqi
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (805.444 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2289

Abstract

"Grant Sultan" land certificate is not the basis of rights. The certificate only explained that the land was Grant Sultan's previous right. The Sultan Grant Certificate is a guide for the National Land Agency to see the basis for land ownership. In accordance with the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) No. 5/1960, land that is certified by Grant Sultan will be converted to land, either direct or indirect conversion, further consideration and assessment needs to be done. From the background of this writing the problem is formulated How Legal Certainty Land Registration holders of Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay Customary Community, how Grant Sultan Land in Deli Malay society is seen from Positivistic Theory The research method used in this writing is a regulatory approach and concept. Legal Certainty Land Registration of Grant Sultan Land holders in the Deli Malay Customary community if seen from the positivistic school of thought that Grant Sultan's land must be registered by Grant Sultan holders to ensure legal certainty. Grant Sultan's land in the Deli Malay community is seen from the Positivistic Theory. According to the Pound the law is a Social Engineering conflict with interests compared to the others. From positivistic theory Grant holders must immediately register Grant land in accordance with Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.
Tinjauan Yuridis Penjatuhan Hukuman terhadap Bidan yang Melakukan Tindakan Pidana Aborsi Abidin, Sanjaya; Gustin, Fiony; Pasaribu, Andre Hakim; Batubara, Sonya Airini
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (805.273 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2741

Abstract

Pregnancy is a very happy situation for every partner who has been legitimate. In connection with this we still often encounter couples who do not value pregnancy so take the decision to do inhumane actions, one of which is abortion. Abortion is a form of criminality that is still very difficult to be handled by the public or the government, this is because there are still gaps for the perpetrators to carry out these actions and the deterrent effect is still lacking for abortion. This study aims to determine the legal arrangements and accountability for abortionists. This study uses normative juridical research methods, to address abortion problems that occur without looking at it from one perspective, but comprehensively. The results showed that the legal arrangements for the crime of abortion have been regulated in the law adjustment for abortion has been regulated ib article 194 law number 36 year 2009, about a midwife who help those who committed abortion is included in criminal code article 349
Diversi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Studi Pada Polres Stabat , Kejaksaan Negeri Stabat dan Pengadilan Negeri Stabat) Fatmawati, Irma; Hasibuan, Lidya Rahmadani
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (743.395 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v3i1.1893

Abstract

Anak sebagai generasi penerus bangsa kadangkala tidak dapat menghindar dari pengaruh lingkungan berupa faktor-faktor sosial yang mengakibatkan seorang anakmelakukan tindak pidana yang dapat merugikan banyak pihak. Anak yang melakukanpelanggaran hukum atau tindak kriminal sangat dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor di luardirinya. Oleh sebab itu haruslah dijadikan pertimbangan jika seorang anak pelaku tindakpidana bukanlah semata-mata pihak yang harus dihukum dengan proses peradilan.Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 1997 tentang Pengadilan Anak dalam hal ini belummengatur tentang konsep restorative justice dan diversi dalam Pengadilan Anak. Konseprestorative justice dan diversi merupakan konsep yang memberikan perlindungan danasas kepentingan yang terbaik bagi anak. UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak secara substantiftelah mengatur konsep restorative justice dan diversi untuk anak yang berhadapan denganhukum. Dalam pasal 7 ayat (2) UU No. 11 Tahun 2012 menyatakan bahwa penegakhukum wajiban melakukan diversi dengan pendekatan restorative justice terhadap anakyang berhadapan dengan hukum. Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini menitik beratkan padaproses peradilan pidana anak oleh para penegak hukum sebagaimana diamanatkan olehUU No. 11 Tahun 2012. Penegak hukum yang menjadi sasaran sekaligus menjadi lokasipenelitian adalah Polres Stabat, Kejaksaan Negeri Stabat dan Pengadilan Negeri Stabat.
Analisis Vienna Convention 1969 Mengenai Ketentuan Pembatalan, Pengakhiran dan Penundaan Atas Suatu Perjanjian Internasional Fidelia, Fidelia; Koni, Syahmin Awaludin; Zawawi, Dedeng
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (837.237 KB) | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v6i2.2749

Abstract

In the 1969 Vienna Convention on International Treaties, the provisions concerning the conditions for suspension, invalidity, termination of an international treaty turned out to contain provisions exceeding one third or 40 percent of the total number of the total Convention as many as 31 articles out of 85 articles starting from article 42 to article 72. where the provisions -these provisions have led to disputes and differences of opinion so that consensus is difficult to achieve at the time. This study aims to reveal the background or reasons why so many provisions regarding suspension, invalidity, and termination in the 1969 Vienna Convention are needed that can actually reduce the binding power of international treaties. This research is a normative juridical study, and is analytical descriptive. After careful research, it was found that the International Law Committee which formulated this convention had deliberately arranged it in such a way that it would cancel, terminate or suspend the implementation of an international treaty, no longer looking for reasons other than based on the reasons specified in The 1969 Vienna Convention.

Page 8 of 32 | Total Record : 312

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2014 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol. 11 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol. 10 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol. 9 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol 9, No 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 8, No 2 (2021): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol 8, No 1 (2021): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 7, No 2 (2020): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol 7, No 1 (2020): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 6, No 2 (2019): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 6, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 5, No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol 5, No 2 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM DESEMBER Vol 5, No 1 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 5, No 1 (2018): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 4, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 4, No 1 (2017): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 4, No 1 (2017): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 3, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 3, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 2, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 2, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 1, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Desember Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni Vol 1, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Juni More Issue