Articles
12 Documents
Search results for
, issue
"Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum"
:
12 Documents
clear
<![CDATA[Tafsir Hakim Judex Facti dan Judex Juris Terkait Batas Maksimal Upaya Administratif ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhtar Said]]>;
<![CDATA[Erfandi Erfandi]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.4021
<![CDATA[To administrative effort in the form of an objection, a maximum time of 21 working days is given. However, there are differences in the application of these administrative efforts between judex facti judges and judex juris judges. Judex facti judges through decisions number 21/G/2020/PTUN and 76/B/2021/PT.TUN JKT implementing administrative measures are mandatory, this decision was upheld by judges at the State Administrative High Court. However, the decision was annulled by the judge judex juris (Supreme Court level) through decision number 420 K/TUN/2021. The basis for the judex juris to cancel the judex facti decision is based on the phrase "can" as stated in Article 75 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. So that administrative efforts through objections or administrative appeals are an option, not mandatory. Administrative efforts are efforts to realize the principles of Pancasila into the settlement of administrative problems, namely in the resolution of administrative problems so that they are first resolved through deliberation and consensus. If consensus deliberation cannot find a point of peace, it can be resolved through the State Administrative Court]]>
<![CDATA[Matarumah Parentah Oleh Saniri Negeri Rumahtiga Sebagai Tindakan Administrasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Heillen M.Y Tita]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhammad Irham]]>;
<![CDATA[Julista Mustamu]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.3507
<![CDATA[Ringkasan Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menemukan perspektif hukum administrasi negara terkait penetapan Matarumah Parentah di Negeri Rumahtiga Kota Ambon. Seperti diketahui Saniri Negeri Rumahtiga sampai saat ini belum melanjutkan proses pembentukan Peraturan Negeri dalam rangka Penetapan Matarumah Parentah, padahal tahapan penetapan sudah dilalui sesuai dengan aturan yang berlaku. Melalui penelitian yuridis normatif didapatkan hasil bahwa sikap Saniri Negeri Rumahtiga merupakan tindakan administrasi pemerintah yang dapat diuji keabsahannya dan dapat dikategorikan sebagai sikap diam Pemerintah serta sebagai tindakan pemerintah berupa keputusan yang mencakup tindakan faktual sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Kata Kunci: Penetapan, Matarumah Parentah, Hukum Administrasi Negara.]]>
<![CDATA[Korban Kekerasan Rumah Tangga: Adat Dayak Uud Danum dan Hukum Nasional ]]>
<![CDATA[Kartika Agus Salim]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.3615
<![CDATA[Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence and the 2001 Uud Danum Dayak Customary Law Book have provided protection for wives who are victims of domestic violence by their husbands. The protection provided by Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence is provided from the time the victim makes a police report, when he is questioned and arrives at a court decision. Legal protection provided by Tomakung to wives who are victims of violence (hotuhui) by husbands by paying fines and implementing siro sahkik to restore conditions damaged by violence (hotuhui) between husband and wife. Factors that cause domestic violence by husbands are caused by internal and external factors. Internal factors are caused by wives who cheat, wasteful with money, lazy to cook. Internal factors in husbands are due to being lazy to work, not having a job, having an affair, gambling and being an alcoholic drink addict. The government should provide jobs for all levels of education that are evenly distributed from villages to cities. The government should, in helping the poor, not provide social assistance in the form of direct cash assistance because a small nominal amount of money is only enough to buy alcohol and play gambling. The increase in domestic violence is not solely the fault of the citizens but due to a lack of community awareness raising by the central and regional governments that is right on target because today the Government is building more infrastructure than building the mental and spiritual Indonesian people themselves.]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Administratif Sengketa Antara Pegawai Negeri Sipil dengan Pemerintahan Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung ]]>
<![CDATA[Lezi Fitri]]>;
<![CDATA[Jeanne Darc Noviayanti Manik]]>;
<![CDATA[Ita Rosdiana]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.3649
<![CDATA[Stages of administrative dispute resolution as regulated in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, article 58 paragraph (6) bring about changes in the state administrative justice system in Indonesia, which are related to administrative efforts. This study aims to analyze administrative efforts that should be in line with what is stated in Supreme Court Regulation No. 6 of 2018 which discusses guidelines for resolving government administrative disputes after taking administrative measures with Law No. 51 of 2009 Second Amendment to Law no. 5 of 1986. In practice, there are several problems related between object of dispute and administrative efforts, first: whether administrative measures must be taken first before filing a claim for a state administrative dispute to the State Administrative Court, second, whether there are legal consequences if no administrative efforts are carried out by the plaintiff, third, whether If a difference is made in the deadline for filing a lawsuit, administrative efforts can increase the effectiveness of the ongoing legal process. Systematically this research uses a normative juridical approach. This research will obtain formulations of norms that can provide effective legal protection for the parties concerned in matters of state administrative disputes and analyze the effectiveness of applying different time limits in administrative efforts.]]>
<![CDATA[Dialektika Unsur Merintangi Kegiatan Usaha Pertambangan Dengan Prinsip Demokrasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Haryadi]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Rahayu]]>;
<![CDATA[Ndaru Satrio]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.4063
<![CDATA[The element of "obstructing or interfering with mining business activities" is the focus of this article, because the editorial has multiple interpretations. Its existence derives two problem formulations, namely (1) What are the problems with elements hindering or interfering with mining business activities?: (2) What is the reformulation that reflects democratic principles? The analytical knife used to examine existing problems through democratic principles. This study uses normative juridical research methods. There are several conclusions related to the problematic presence of elements hindering or interfering with mining business activities, including: first, elements hindering or interfering with mining activities can be directed to actions that can be interpreted differently. Second, these elements can be directed to certain interests. Third, these elements can be subjective. Fourth, it is counterproductive to provisions for environmental fighters who cannot be sued criminally or civilly. The reformulations that are expected to better reflect democratic principles include: first, providing a more detailed explanation regarding the redaction of elements hindering or disrupting mining activities. Second, changing the editorial elements hinders or disrupts mining business activities. Third, remove the redaction elements that hinder or interfere with this mining business activity.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Konsumen Jasa Parkir Pusat Perbelanjaan ]]>
<![CDATA[Yatini Yatini]]>;
<![CDATA[Mieke Yustia Ayu Ratna Sari]]>;
<![CDATA[Ahmad Zazili]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.4038
<![CDATA[The implementation of parking at Samarinda City Mall is carried out using the parking model and parking space leases, with variations in standard clauses. Potential disputes between the parties in this legal relationship can occur due to damage or loss caused by the actions of third parties, which have an impact on consumer losses. Variations in the implementation of parking have an impact on legal uncertainty which results in non-optimal legal protection for consumers of parking services. The research method used is empirical juridical supported by factual data obtained from research at the Samarinda City Mall. The results of the study show that the management and arrangement of parking at the Samarinda Mall is constructed as a parking agreement, the manager is responsible for damage and loss of vehicles using parking services. The standard clause on parking tickets is an exoneration clause, while the standard clause on parking space leases is not an exoneration clause. Even though BPSK Kota Samarinda has supervisory authority for standard clauses, its implementation is less effective. Supervision can be carried out by the permit giver for effective guidance and administrative sanctions. The implementation of parking space leases at the Samarinda Mall must be disciplined, because it is an avoidance of the responsibility of business actors, as an effort to optimize consumer protection.]]>
<![CDATA[Matarumah Parentah Oleh Saniri Negeri Rumahtiga Sebagai Tindakan Administrasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Tita, Heillen M.Y]]>;
<![CDATA[Irham, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[Mustamu, Julista]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.3507
<![CDATA[Ringkasan Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menemukan perspektif hukum administrasi negara terkait penetapan Matarumah Parentah di Negeri Rumahtiga Kota Ambon. Seperti diketahui Saniri Negeri Rumahtiga sampai saat ini belum melanjutkan proses pembentukan Peraturan Negeri dalam rangka Penetapan Matarumah Parentah, padahal tahapan penetapan sudah dilalui sesuai dengan aturan yang berlaku. Melalui penelitian yuridis normatif didapatkan hasil bahwa sikap Saniri Negeri Rumahtiga merupakan tindakan administrasi pemerintah yang dapat diuji keabsahannya dan dapat dikategorikan sebagai sikap diam Pemerintah serta sebagai tindakan pemerintah berupa keputusan yang mencakup tindakan faktual sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan. Kata Kunci: Penetapan, Matarumah Parentah, Hukum Administrasi Negara.]]>
<![CDATA[Korban Kekerasan Rumah Tangga: Adat Dayak Uud Danum dan Hukum Nasional ]]>
<![CDATA[Salim, Kartika Agus]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.3615
<![CDATA[Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence and the 2001 Uud Danum Dayak Customary Law Book have provided protection for wives who are victims of domestic violence by their husbands. The protection provided by Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence is provided from the time the victim makes a police report, when he is questioned and arrives at a court decision. Legal protection provided by Tomakung to wives who are victims of violence (hotuhui) by husbands by paying fines and implementing siro sahkik to restore conditions damaged by violence (hotuhui) between husband and wife. Factors that cause domestic violence by husbands are caused by internal and external factors. Internal factors are caused by wives who cheat, wasteful with money, lazy to cook. Internal factors in husbands are due to being lazy to work, not having a job, having an affair, gambling and being an alcoholic drink addict. The government should provide jobs for all levels of education that are evenly distributed from villages to cities. The government should, in helping the poor, not provide social assistance in the form of direct cash assistance because a small nominal amount of money is only enough to buy alcohol and play gambling. The increase in domestic violence is not solely the fault of the citizens but due to a lack of community awareness raising by the central and regional governments that is right on target because today the Government is building more infrastructure than building the mental and spiritual Indonesian people themselves.]]>
<![CDATA[Upaya Administratif Sengketa Antara Pegawai Negeri Sipil dengan Pemerintahan Provinsi Kepulauan Bangka Belitung ]]>
<![CDATA[Fitri, Lezi]]>;
<![CDATA[Manik, Jeanne Darc Noviayanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Rosdiana, Ita]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.3649
<![CDATA[Stages of administrative dispute resolution as regulated in Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration, article 58 paragraph (6) bring about changes in the state administrative justice system in Indonesia, which are related to administrative efforts. This study aims to analyze administrative efforts that should be in line with what is stated in Supreme Court Regulation No. 6 of 2018 which discusses guidelines for resolving government administrative disputes after taking administrative measures with Law No. 51 of 2009 Second Amendment to Law no. 5 of 1986. In practice, there are several problems related between object of dispute and administrative efforts, first: whether administrative measures must be taken first before filing a claim for a state administrative dispute to the State Administrative Court, second, whether there are legal consequences if no administrative efforts are carried out by the plaintiff, third, whether If a difference is made in the deadline for filing a lawsuit, administrative efforts can increase the effectiveness of the ongoing legal process. Systematically this research uses a normative juridical approach. This research will obtain formulations of norms that can provide effective legal protection for the parties concerned in matters of state administrative disputes and analyze the effectiveness of applying different time limits in administrative efforts.]]>
<![CDATA[Tafsir Hakim Judex Facti dan Judex Juris Terkait Batas Maksimal Upaya Administratif ]]>
<![CDATA[Said, Muhtar]]>;
<![CDATA[Erfandi, Erfandi]]>
<![CDATA[ PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Vol 17 No 1 (2023): PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Bangka Belitung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33019/progresif.v17i1.4021
<![CDATA[To administrative effort in the form of an objection, a maximum time of 21 working days is given. However, there are differences in the application of these administrative efforts between judex facti judges and judex juris judges. Judex facti judges through decisions number 21/G/2020/PTUN and 76/B/2021/PT.TUN JKT implementing administrative measures are mandatory, this decision was upheld by judges at the State Administrative High Court. However, the decision was annulled by the judge judex juris (Supreme Court level) through decision number 420 K/TUN/2021. The basis for the judex juris to cancel the judex facti decision is based on the phrase "can" as stated in Article 75 paragraph (1) of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration. So that administrative efforts through objections or administrative appeals are an option, not mandatory. Administrative efforts are efforts to realize the principles of Pancasila into the settlement of administrative problems, namely in the resolution of administrative problems so that they are first resolved through deliberation and consensus. If consensus deliberation cannot find a point of peace, it can be resolved through the State Administrative Court]]>
