cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Hardianto Djanggih
Contact Email
lawcriminal.journal@gmail.com
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
lawcriminal.journal@gmail.com
Editorial Address
-
Location
,
INDONESIA
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law
Published by Institute for Learning Innovation and Counseling
ISSN : 26569922     EISSN : 2684916X     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Indonesia Journal of Criminal Law adalah peer-review ilmiah yang diterbitkan oleh Intitute for Learning Innovation and Counseling (ILIN Institute) yang diterbitkan setiap 6 (Enam) Bulanan yaitu pada bulan Juni dan Desember, sebagai sarana dalam menyebarkan gagasan atau pemikiran yang dihasilkan melalui kegiatan akademik dalam pengembangan di bidang Hukum Pidana, Kriminologi dan Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 87 Documents
 5   6   7   8   9 
Pengadopsian Konsep Extended Femicide Ke Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Sebagai Upaya Mengisi Kekosongan Hukum Perlindungan Perempuan Sultan Arkana Razaqa; Bella Adiratna Humaira Diani Supnadi; Karina Anugrah Putri Indra Kusumawati; Khairunisa Tiara Arifin
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v7i2.3274

Abstract

Femicide is the most extreme form of gender-based violence within patriarchal societies, where women often become victims of unequal power relations. This research departs from the fact that Indonesian criminal law has not specifically recognized acts of femicide, namely the killing of women both in intimate and non-intimate relationships that is motivated by gender. Using a socio-legal approach and a normative juridical method, this study examines the legal vacuum through analysis multiple court decisions containing elements of femicide. The findings show that most judges still view the killing of women as an ordinary criminal act, without considering the dimension of gender inequality underlying it, while others have identified traits of what constitutes femicide, though inconsistently. Judicial reasoning predominantly focuses on normative reasoning, diminishing the importance of the context of gender-based violence. This condition indicates that gender sensitivity has not yet been formed in Indonesia’s judicial practice and legal system. This research emphasizes the importance of a legal instrument to fill the gap, one of the possibilities being the establishment of a Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) that provides guidance for judges to identify and consider elements of femicide in cases involving the killing of women.
Cyber Fraud pada Transaksi Game Online melalui Perantara dalam Perspektif UU ITE Ayugaez, Femanoa Zakia; Luthfillah Arrizqi Zainsyah
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v7i2.3309

Abstract

The development of information technology in the digital age has brought significant changes to people's activities, including in the fields of entertainment and internet-based economic transactions. Online games now serve not only as a medium for recreation, but also as part of the digital economy through the buying and selling of accounts, items, and virtual currencies. This development has encouraged the emergence of third parties as transaction intermediaries, but at the same time has increased vulnerability to cybercrime, particularly cyber fraud, such as fraud in the sale and purchase of Mobile Legends accounts using illegal escrow services. This study applies a normative legal method with a legislative, conceptual, and case study approach, referring to Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions and the Criminal Code in analyzing the perpetrator's responsibility. The findings of the study indicate that cyber fraud in online game transactions through illegal intermediaries can be subject to sanctions based on Article 28 paragraph (1) in conjunction with Article 45A paragraph (1) of the ITE Law and Article 378 of the Criminal Code. However, challenges in digital evidence, categorizing cyber activities, and determining the liability of intermediaries remain obstacles in law enforcement. Therefore, strengthening technical regulatory mechanisms, enhancing digital literacy, and adopting more adaptive legal interpretations are necessary to ensure optimal user protection.
Problematika Kedudukan dan Kekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Digital dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia Helmi Al Mutawakkil; M. Maulana Khaqim; Rifki Fadillah; Yanti, Yanti Rohmatin; David Nugraha Saputra
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v8i1.3375

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kedudukan dan kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti digital dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia serta mengidentifikasi berbagai permasalahan yang muncul dalam penerapannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif terhadap bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang relevan dengan topik penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa alat bukti digital telah diakui sebagai alat bukti yang sah dan memiliki kedudukan mandiri dalam sistem pembuktian, seiring dengan perkembangan hukum acara pidana yang lebih adaptif terhadap teknologi. Namun demikian, kekuatan pembuktian alat bukti digital sangat bergantung pada legalitas perolehan serta keaslian dan integritas data. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menemukan adanya berbagai permasalahan, antara lain potensi manipulasi data, keterbatasan kemampuan aparat penegak hukum, belum adanya standar teknis yang seragam, serta disharmonisasi pengaturan hukum yang berdampak pada ketidakpastian dalam praktik peradilan pidana.
Kejahatan Kolektif dan Distorsi Kognitif Individu Analisis Penjarahan Rumah Anggota DPR RI Thamrin, Dian Anggreni; Fikry Fathurrahman; Andi Mardaya; Sitti Nurhabiba
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v8i1.3384

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics of individual perspectives in analyzing the August 2025 looting cases targeting the homes of Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR RI) members, namely Ahmad Sahroni, Eko Patrio, Uya Kuya, and Nafa Urbach. Using a phenomenological qualitative approach, this study traces events triggered by controversial allowance increases, viral videos of legislators dancing during official sessions, and the death of Affan Kurniawan, a ride-hailing driver killed by police tactical vehicles. The research analyzes perspectives of perpetrators, victims, observers, law enforcement, activists, media, and academics, as well as the role of hoaxes and social media in escalating violence. Findings indicate that each perspective provides partial yet valuable insights into collective action and political violence. The Ethics Council (MKD) decision to sanction Sahroni and Patrio while exonerating Uya Kuya reflects an institutional effort to balance accountability with recognition of disinformation's role.
Rekodifikasi Delik Korupsi dalam KUHP 2023 Dan Implikasinya di Indonesia Ady Irawan; Deni Setya Bagus Yuherawan
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v8i1.3415

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis rekodifikasi Pasal 2 dan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU Tipikor) ke dalam KUHP 2023 melalui Pasal 603 dan Pasal 604, dengan fokus pada konfigurasi norma yang timbul serta memberdayakannya terhadap efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi. Penelitian baru terletak pada pemetaan kesesuaian normatif secara eksplisit antara kedua rezim hukum tersebut, termasuk identifikasi perubahan unsur frase kerugian negara dan perbedaan sistem pemidanaan yang berpotensi memicu penerapan asas lex mitior dan lex specialis systematis secara tidak konsisten. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan-undangan dan konteks. Data diperoleh melalui kajian kepustakaan sistematis terhadap norma primer dan literatur ilmiah yang relevan, kemudian dijelaskan menggunakan interpretasi gramatikal, sistematis, dan teleologis. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa rekodifikasi menghasilkan koeksistensi dua rezim hukum dengan unsur delik yang sebagian besar sama namun berbeda pada frasa kerugian negara (“dapat merugikan” versus “merugikan”) dan sanksi struktur. Perbedaan ini menimbulkan konflik norma horizontal yang berpotensi memicu pasal forum shopping dan inkonsistensi penegakan hukum. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa harmonisasi normatif melalui revisi UU Tipikor, penerbitan pedoman Mahkamah Agung, dan pedoman pengusiran KPK serta Kejaksaan merupakan langkah yang mendesak.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Kejahatan Siber di Era Digital Jumanudin Juku; Zum Noversa Riala
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v8i1.3462

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has significantly transformed social, economic, and legal activities. Alongside these developments, cybercrime has emerged as one of the most challenging forms of crime in the digital era. This study aims to analyze criminal liability for cybercrime perpetrators within the Indonesian legal system and identify challenges in law enforcement amid digital transformation. This research employs normative legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and comparative analysis. The findings indicate that criminal liability for cybercrime perpetrators is based on the fulfillment of criminal elements, culpability, criminal capacity, and the absence of justifying or excusing grounds. Existing regulations, particularly the Electronic Information and Transactions Law and the new Criminal Code, provide a legal framework for prosecuting cybercrime offenders. However, challenges remain regarding digital evidence, cross-border jurisdiction, anonymity, and technological advancement. Strengthening regulations, digital forensic capabilities, and international cooperation are necessary to improve cybercrime law enforcement effectiveness.
Kedudukan Hukum dan Tanggung Jawab Perdata Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) Generatif dalam Perjanjian Elektronik: Tantangan Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda di Era Digital Anugrah Ryandra Fahlevi; Muhammad Saddam Safa
Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : ILIN Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31960/ijocl.v8i1.3463

Abstract

The rapid development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has significantly transformed electronic transactions and digital contracting practices. AI systems are increasingly involved in drafting, negotiating, and executing electronic agreements, raising legal questions regarding their legal standing and civil liability. This study aims to analyze the legal position of Generative AI in electronic contracts and examine the challenges posed to the principle of pacta sunt servanda in the digital era. The research employs normative legal methods using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The findings indicate that Generative AI does not possess legal personality and therefore cannot independently bear legal rights and obligations. Civil liability arising from AI-generated actions remains attached to developers, service providers, business actors, or users depending on the circumstances. Furthermore, the increasing autonomy of AI systems creates challenges in determining consent, accountability, and contractual validity. The study concludes that Indonesian law requires adaptive legal frameworks to ensure legal certainty and protection for parties involved in AI-assisted electronic contracts.

Page 9 of 9 | Total Record : 87

 5   6   7   8   9 

Filter by Year

2019 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026) Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2020): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2020): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law More Issue