Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
RECHTSREGEL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum : merupakan jurnal ilmiah yang berisikan gagasan dan pengetahuan hukum yang berasal dari akademisi, peneliti dan praktisi dibidang hukum, atas fenomena hukum yang jamak terjadi di masyarakat. fenomana hukum yang tercipta dari proses pembentukan undang-undang hingga proses pelaksanaan undang-undang tersebut.
Articles
167 Documents
<![CDATA[Zona Integritas dan Pengendalian Gratifikasi dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah pada Kantor Pertanahan di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Siti Chadijah]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Kusumo Wardhani]]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Hayy Nasution]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (196.431 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12663
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the problems of public services in the land office and to analyze the efforts made to control gratification in the Land Office. The research method used is Socio Legal, the effect of legal rules on certain social problems, in this case analyzing the legal rules of public services and the eradication of corruption associated with the implementation of public services at land offices in Indonesia with a case-based approach.The results in this study, on the one hand, found a form of problematic public services at the land office, namely the massive gratification carried out by officials / ASN. However, on the other hand, efforts have been made to control gratuities, including the Head of BPN regulation Number 15 of 2013 concerning Gratuity Control, which still has weaknesses in its application, so that further efforts are needed to create an Integrity Zone in land offices in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Netralitas Perangkat Desa dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemilihan Kepala Desa (Pilkades) ]]>
<![CDATA[Fikri Jamal]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (125.534 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12668
<![CDATA[Desa merupakan kesatuan masyarakat hukum yang memiliki batas wilayah yang berwenang untuk mengatur dan mengurus urusan pemerintahan serta kepentingan masyarakat setempat berdasarkan prakarsa masyarakat, hak asal usul, dan/ atau hak tradisional yang diakui dan dihormati dalam sistem pemerintahan Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia (Pasal 1 ayat 1 Undang-Undang nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang Desa). Pemilihan Kepala Desa merupakan perwujudan demokrasi desa dalam rangka menentukan kepemimpinan desa yang berkualitas. Setelah keluarnya Undang- Undang Nomor 6 tahun 2014 tentang desa yang menggantikan undang- undang nomor 32 tahun 2004, dalam pasal 31 ayat 1 dan 2 maka pemilihan Kepala Desa dilaksanakan secara serentak di seluruh wilayah Kabupaten/Kota. Pemilihan Kepala Desa merupakan kesempatan bagi rakyat untuk menunjukkan kesetiaan dan preferensi lokal mereka. Sementara itu menurut Permendagri Nomor 112 Tahun 2014 pasal 1 (5), Pemilihan kepala desa adalah pelaksanaan kedaulatan rakyat di desa dalam rangka memilih kepala desa yang bersifat langsung, umum, bebas, rahasia, jujur, dan adil]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Penerapan Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Pada Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Perjudian ]]>
<![CDATA[Halimah Humayrah Tuanaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Nursolihi Insani]]>;
<![CDATA[Ari Widianti]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (185.533 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12664
<![CDATA[Gambling is a crime whose form of action is mostly wrapped in the form of games, so it is easy to lure children to fall into a criminal consequence. Gambling is basically a victimless crime, so to reach a diversion agreement, it does not require the consent of the victim or the parents of the guardian/victim. If implemented consistently, this will provide a great opportunity for children who are perpetrators of gambling crimes to produce diversion agreements and prevent children from coming into contact with the criminal justice process. This is in line with restorative justice which is the legal goal of the juvenile criminal justice system. The problem in this study is to further examine the application of the principle of restorative justice by elements of the criminal justice system in dealing with children who are perpetrators of gambling crimes. The type of legal research conducted is normative juridical. The problem approach used in this research is an analytical approach. The data used in this study is secondary data. The legal analysis carried out is expected to be able to provide juridical arguments against several decisions related to the problems that are the object of this research. Of the three cases of child gambling examined in this study, it shows that there is a uniformity of approach taken by elements of the criminal justice system in dealing with child gambling offenders. Both investigators, public prosecutors, and judges are still ignorant of the diversion rights that have been regulated in the SPPA Law. As a result, children must come into contact with criminal justice processes that should be avoided in the best interests of children. After the Constitutional Court Decision stating that Articles 96, 99, 100, and 101 of the law no. 11 of 2012 concerning the juvenile criminal justice system are contrary to the constitution, it is necessary to create a control mechanism that is able to maintain the performance of elements in the juvenile criminal justice system in accordance with the objectives of the juvenile criminal justice system which prioritizes restorative justice.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertanggungjawaban Pemegang Saham Perseroan Perorangan dalam Hal Perseroan Perorangan Mengalami Kerugian Berdasarkan UU No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Zulhidayat]]>;
<![CDATA[Milatul Aslamiyah]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (147.954 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12669
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine the accountability of shareholders in an individual company in the perspective of Job Creation Law ( as known as Undang-undang Cipta Kerja) and related Government Regulations. This research is a normative juridical study which is based on library-literal research in order to obtain secondary data. Data obtained from legal principles, regulations, and books were analyzed using qualitative methods. This qualitative research produces descriptive-analytical data. The results showed that shareholders in an individual company are only responsible for the shares they own , as long as there are no exempt matters as mentioned in Article 153 J paragraph 2. Based on the results of the research, the authors suggest two things, which are, first for individual company shareholders should run the company in good faith so that the individual company can be utilized properly in accordance with the philosophy of its formation. , secondly, the executive and legislative bodies should be able to make clearer rules regarding the establishment, amendment and discontinuation of individual companies and also supervision due to there is no notary role in the establishment, amendment and dissolution of individual companie.]]>
<![CDATA[Penyelesaian Sengketa Wansprestasi Melalui Mekanisme Arbitrase ]]>
<![CDATA[Ade Maulana]]>;
<![CDATA[Devi Siti Hamzah Marpuang]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (118.907 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12660
<![CDATA[Wansprestasi is the implementation of obligations that are not fulfilled or broken promises or even do something that according to the agreement cannot be done. Default gives legal consequences to the party who did it and brings consequences to the emergence of the right of the injured party to sue the party who did the default to provide compensation, so that by law it is hoped that neither party will be harmed because of the negligence made by the debtor either because they do not carry out what has been promised or default. Arbitration is a way of resolving a civil dispute outside the general court based on an arbitration agreement made in writing by the disputing parties. Basically, this is in accordance with the provisions stated in Article 7 of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (Law 30/1999) which reads in full as, The parties can agree on a dispute that occurs or that will occur between them to be resolved by arbitration. the agreement to resolve a dispute through arbitration is contained in a document signed by the parties, the arbitration agreement is an agreement in the form of an arbitration clause stated in a written agreement made by the parties before the dispute arises, or a separate arbitration agreement made by the parties after it arises. disputes mentioned (Article 1 point 3 of Law 30/1999).]]>
<![CDATA[Penguatan Kapasitas Daerah dalam Kebijakan Penanganan Covid 19 di Tinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 ]]>
<![CDATA[Dian Eka Prastiwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Wahib Wahib]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (126.453 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12665
<![CDATA[Tujuan dari adanya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah didalam pemberian kewenangan terkait dengan adanya kebijakan didalam penanganan Covid 19. Didalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normative dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari adanya penelitian ini memperlihatkan bahwasannya kasus Covid 19 ini dapat dikategorikan kedalam pandemic yang memerlukan penanganan extra sehingga biersifat extra ordinary yang dapat menimbulkan bahaya kesehatan bagi seluruh wilayah di Indonesia atau dapat juga bersifat lintas negara. Dengan demikian, itu semua sudah masuk kedalam unsur kedaruratan kesehatan bagi masyarakat sehingga ketentuan yang dapat diberlakukan adalah UU Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 mengenai Kekarantinaan Kesehatan.]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Kode Etik Polri Terhadap Anggota Porli yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana ]]>
<![CDATA[Basyarudin Basyarudin]]>;
<![CDATA[Budi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (149.582 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12661
<![CDATA[Kode Etik bagi profesi kepolisian telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, yang ditindaklanjuti dengan Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2006 sebagaimana telah dirubah dengan Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2011 Tentang Kode Etik Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, sehingga Kode Etik Profesi Polri berlaku bagi setiap anggota Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. Untuk menegakkan Kode Etika Profesi Polri maka disetiap tingkatan Polri (Polsek, Polres, Polwil, Polda dan Mabes), harus mampu memberikan sanksi kepada Anggota Polri yang melakukan pelanggaran melalui Sidang Kode Etik Profesi (KEP) maupun Sidang Disiplin. Penegakan etika kepada Anggota Polri diharapkan harus dilaksanakan oleh setiap Kepala Satuan Organisasi Polri selaku Atasan Yang Berhak Menghukum (Ankum) di seluruh tingkatan sehingga pelanggaran sekecil apapun harus ditindak-lanjuti dengan tindakan berupa korektif atau sanksi. Apabila hal ini selalu terpelihara, maka pelanggaran-pelanggaran hukum yang dilakukan oleh Anggota Polri dapat diminimalisir. Terkait dengan uraian singkat tersebut di atas, maka permasalahan yang akan dibahas dalam penelitian ini ialah; Pertama, bagaimana Penegakan Kode Etik Polri Terhadap Anggota yang melakukan Tindak Pidana Penulisan Artikel ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis sosiologis yaitu penelitian dan pembahasan yang didasarkan pada ketentuan Peraturan Perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan Wawancara. Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini ialah bahwa penerapan terhadap pelanggaran kode etik profesi Kepolisisan Negara Republik Indonesia dapat dilakukan secara prosedural berdasarkan ketentuan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 14 tahun 2011 tentang Kode Etik Profesi Polri.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana dalam Pembuktian Dilihat dari Perkspektif Psikologi Forensik ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasan Alzagladi]]>;
<![CDATA[Agastia Irdrananda]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (131.624 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12666
<![CDATA[One branch of forensic science that used in diagnosing perpetrators, personality, and psychological problems is forensic psychology. In forensic psychology, there is a psychological theory approach that aims to analyze the motives for criminal behavior. Some of the psychological theories in question are social learning theories and mental disorders. With a matter of manner or personality, the performance of perpetrators of criminal acts or prisoners will certainly not be the same because they are working with different aspects in the deal with certain conditions. The performance of prisoners divided into three stages, namely the behavior of the prisoner before being sentenced, the behavior of the prisoner when sentenced, and the behavior of the prisoner after being punished.]]>
<![CDATA[Karakteristik Hak Milik Atas Satuan Rumah Susun Bagi Warga Negara Asing yang Berkedudukan di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Mentari Putri Lijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Putu Patsana Anggarawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Dewi Rumaisa]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (166.813 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12662
<![CDATA[This research is entitled The Characteristics of Ownership Rights of Foreign Citizen Apartment Units domiciled in Indonesia and is based on normative research through the Legislative Approach and Conceptual Approach. In this study, we will discuss the problems between the Laws and Regulations, namely Law No. 5 of 1960 and Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Work Copyright and other implementing regulations that have no confirmation regarding the subject of Land Rights in the form of Building Use Rights. We already know that foreign citizens are not subjects who can have land rights in the form of building use rights, foreign citizens can only have Apartment Units on State Land or Management Rights with Building Use Rights or Use Rights. Based on these problems, two problem formulations are taken regarding (a) the ratio legis on ownership of Flat Units for Foreign Citizens domiciled in Indonesia; (b) Types of land rights that can be granted to foreign citizens for ownership of apartment units in Indonesia. It is hoped that the preparation of this thesis can produce legal problem solutions for foreign citizens who wish to establish Flats in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Analisis Dampak dan Resiko Hukum Terhadap Praktik Pinjaman Online di Masa Pandemi ]]>
<![CDATA[Iin Indriani]]>;
<![CDATA[Nurhayati Nurhayati]]>;
<![CDATA[Sri Utaminingsih]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (190.004 KB)
|
DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12667
<![CDATA[Technology provides many benefits for life. Its development is needed by the people of the world, it does not need the people of Indonesia. Since the beginning of 2020, the Covid-19 virus has spread to almost all countries in the world, so it requires various quick treatments by utilizing technology as an effort to deal with the pandemic situation. The Covid-19 pandemic has resulted in many Indonesian people being laid off, being laid off without a clear time limit and other economic problems. One of the uses of technology carried out by the Indonesian people during this pandemic is by using Information Technology-Based Borrowing-Lending Services. Online loans are money lending facilities by financial service providers that operate online. These credit providers are known as fintech, online loans whose funds can be immediately disbursed and without collateral are an alternative solution for people who need funds without having to apply face-to-face. The approach method used in this paper is empirical normative based on the Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 77/PJOK.01/2016 Year 2016 concerning Information Technology-Based Lending Services ("PJOK 77/2016"). In addition to being a temporary solution, online credit has impacts and risks that are often unknown and not realized by the public. The purpose of the study was to analyze the impact of the existence of online credit during the covid 19 pandemic and to analyze the legal risks of online credit that are rife in the community.]]>
