Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.81
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Literatus Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat International Journal of Social Science FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies Law Development Journal Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Media Bina Ilmiah MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Nasution, Abdul Hayy
Universitas Pamulang
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENERAPAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PERSPEKTIF ADMINISTRATIVE PENAL LAW (Studi Kasus PT. Indosat dan PT. Indosat Mega Media (IM2) Abdul Hayy Nasution
Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 1 (2017): SURYA KENCANA SATU
Publisher : Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (558.893 KB) | DOI: 10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v7i1.589

Abstract

ABSTRACTPenelitian ini menjelaskan asas Logische Specialiteit dan Lex Specialis Systematis Derogat Lex Generali dalam penerapan hukum, akan tetapi pada faktanya dalam kasus PT. Indosat dan PT. Indosat Mega Media (IM2) mestinya diterapkan Undang-Undang Telekomunikasi nomor 36 Tahun 1999 yang berdimensi administrasi hukum pidana bukan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Dalam penelitian ini, metode yang ini digunakan dalan adala likuid penelitian Studi kasus dengan mengkaji, menelaah, memperbandingkan dan atau analisis agar dapat diperoleh gambaran yang jelas tentang proses memperoleh keadilan bagi setiap orang ataupun Korporasi yang didakwa dengan pasal 2 juncto pasal 20 Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa penerapan hukum dalam kasus ini tidak sesuai dengan asas lex Specialis derogat lex Generali dan terkesan dalam penerapan hukum dipaksakan untuk tindak pidana korupsi oleh Kejari. Kata Kunci : Undang-Undang Tindakan Pidana Korupsi, Undang-Undang Telekomunikasi,  Azas Lex Specialis Derogat Lex Generali.
Zona Integritas dan Pengendalian Gratifikasi dalam Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah pada Kantor Pertanahan di Indonesia Siti Chadijah; Dwi Kusumo Wardhani; Abdul Hayy Nasution
Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Rechtsregel: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.431 KB) | DOI: 10.32493/rjih.v4i1.12663

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to describe and analyze the problems of public services in the land office and to analyze the efforts made to control gratification in the Land Office. The research method used is Socio Legal, the effect of legal rules on certain social problems, in this case analyzing the legal rules of public services and the eradication of corruption associated with the implementation of public services at land offices in Indonesia with a case-based approach.The results in this study, on the one hand, found a form of problematic public services at the land office, namely the massive gratification carried out by officials / ASN. However, on the other hand, efforts have been made to control gratuities, including the Head of BPN regulation Number 15 of 2013 concerning Gratuity Control, which still has weaknesses in its application, so that further efforts are needed to create an Integrity Zone in land offices in Indonesia.
Analisis Unsur-Unsur Pidana Pemalsuan Pasal 263 Ayat (1) KUHP JO Pasal 55 Ayat (1) Ke-1 KUHP dalam Surat Keterangan Bebas Covid-19 Abdul Hayy Nasution
LITERATUS Vol 4 No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmiah Internasional Sosial dan Budaya
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v4i2.846

Abstract

The extraordinary circumstances of the Covid 19 disaster in 2019 the Indonesian government won swiftly by issuing a number of regulations for handling Covid 19 in the country. This study aims to analyze criminal acts in the Forgery of Covid 19-free rancidity letters, but to prove it as a criminal act, objective elements and subjective elements must be fulfilled as a mistake as well as the criminal act has fulfilled the nature of being against the law as the charges so that it can be subject to punishment because it has been proven to be legally against the law and against the material law. The research method used is qualitative with documentation data collection techniques that refer to certain regulations in drawing conclusions. Hasal this research is a criminal act as an act threatened by the law because it is contrary to the law it is done by someone who is able to be responsible, there are two groups of elements to criminal acts such as objective elements and subjective elements, something from outside the perpetrator in the form of actions that are prohibited / required, consequences, and certain circumstances are temporary objective elements attached to the perpetrator in the form of errors and abilities responsible is a subjective element.
KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA, KEKERASAN KEMANUSIAAN Sri Siti Munalar; Abdul Hayy Nasution
Abdi Laksana : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Vol 3, No 3 (2022): Edisi Oktober
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pamulang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32493/al-jpkm.v3i3.24858

Abstract

Pada umumnya orang berpendapat bahwa Kekerasan Dalam rumah Tangga (KDRT) adalah urusan intern keluarga dan rumah tangga. Sekian banyak KDRT, istri notabene pendidik awal dari generasi manusia adalah korban. Padahal istri garda depan yang mewujudkan model manusia yang bagaimana di masa mendatang. Kondisi sehat lahir bathin atau sebaliknya sakit istri menentukan bentuk masyarakat manusia. Pengabdian kali ini Kelurahan Rawa Mekar Jaya, Kecamatan Serpong, Kota Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Jawa Barat, menjadi salah satu tempat pelaksanaan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarkat (PKM) Universitas Pamulang mengusulkan tema KDRT sebagai kekerasan kemanusiaan.. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam kegiatan pengabdian yaitu pendampingan yang dilakukan dengan brainstorming untuk membuka mindset tentang pemahaman terhadap kekerasan dalam rumah tangga bagi warga masyarakat. Penyadaran secara komprehensif agar dapat meningkatkan peran serta masyarakat dalam mengurangi angka kekerasan dalam rumah tangga walau sulit untuk menghapuskannya. Perlindungan hukum dan edukasi korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil kegiatan pengabdian antara lain aspek tingginya tingkat pemahaman dalam penanggulangan kekerasan dalam rumah tangga, komunikasi yang komunikatif disadari wajib ada dalam sebuah rumah tangga, sehingga tidak tercipta sumbatan pemikiran yang memicu konflik. Manajemen sosial, terkelolanya manajemen yang berkelanjutan, berupa peran partisipasi aktif anggota keluarga khususnya, masyarakat umumnya.Kata kunci: Kekerasan, RumahTangga, Kemanusiaan
Kewenangan Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No.8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana pada Pasal 1 Ayat (1) Jo. Pasal 6 Ayat (1) dan Undang-Undang No.19 Tahun 2019 tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi pada Pasal 1 Ayat (6) dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Abdul Hayy Nasution; I Gusti Ayu Anita Lakshana
FOCUS Vol 3 No 2 (2022): FOCUS: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/fcs.v3i2.830

Abstract

  Law No. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) Article 1 paragraph (10) states that an investigator is a State Police Officer of the Republic of Indonesia or certain Civil Servant Officers who are given special authority by law to conduct investigations. And it is emphasized again in Article 6 paragraph (10) letter b which reads that investigators are certain Civil Servant officials who are given special authority by law. The scope of Civil Servant Investigators (PPNS) in Corruption Crimes, in Law No.19 of 2019, Article 69B paragraph (1), (2) and Article 69C, which reads as follows: "Article 69b paragraph (1); when this Law comes into force, investigators or investigators from the Corruption Eradication Commission have not been registered as employees of the state civil apparatus within a maximum period of 2 (two) years after this Law comes into force, they may be appointed as employees of the state civil apparatus as long as they comply with the provisions of laws and regulations. invitation.
Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Anak dalam Proses Peradilan Dilihat dari Pasal 1 Angka 27 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (Kuhap) Studi Kasus pada Putusan 380/Pid.Sus/2022/Pnckr.”: Studi Kasus pada Putusan 380/Pid.Sus/2022/Pnckr.” Abdul Hayy Nasution
LITERATUS Vol 4 No 3 (2022): Pergeseran Sosial, Budaya, dan Hukum dalam Menghadapi Era Society 5.0
Publisher : Neolectura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37010/lit.v4i3.1051

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of knowing how the position of witnesses in criminal cases and what is the role of witnesses as one of the tools of evidence in criminal proceedings according to the Criminal Procedure Code. By using normative juridical research methods it can be concluded: that the position of a witness in a criminal case is a powerful means of proof to reveal and dismantle crimes. From the investigation stage to proof before the court, even in practice, the position of a witness is very important, often a determining factor and success in disclosing a case, because it can provide 'witness testimony' which is placed as the first of the five valid pieces of evidence as stipulated in the Article 184 KUHAP. Without the presence and role of a witness, it is certain that a case will become an obscure event, because in the legal system in force in Indonesia, what is the reference for law enforcers is a statement or statement that can only be obtained from a witness or expert, as well as the role of the witness' statement as wrong. One means of evidence in the criminal case process will be able to reveal the crime that occurred. Because the testimony of the witness is of its nature as the main means of evidence, it will be difficult for the witness' statement to prove that the crime charged against the defendant is denied by the defendant.
AUTHORITIES OF CIVIL SERVANT INVESTIGATES IN CONDUCTING INVESTIGATIONS ON ACTS OF CORPORATE MALADMINISTRATION IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCORDING TO LAW NO. 36 OF 1999 CONCERNING TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADJUSTED TO THE PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY Abdul Hayy Nasution; Edi Setiadi; Yeti Sumiati
International Journal of Social Science Vol. 2 No. 5: February 2023
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/ijss.v2i5.4952

Abstract

This research was conducted to find out how the laws and regulations regulate PPNS Authority in conducting investigations of corporate maladministration in the telecommunications sector, then regarding the Implementation of PPNS Authority in conducting investigations or corporate maladministration actions in the field of telecommunications, and find out how the PPNS authority mechanism to conduct maladministration investigations telecommunications sector corporations on the principle of legal certainty. This study uses a normative juridical approach, namely by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and laws and regulations and using the preparation of analytical descriptive research specifications, and the data used are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The results of this study are that PPNS is obliged to notify the investigation to Polri investigators. in the form of tactical assistance, technical assistance, coercive assistance and investigative consulting assistance. The case files must be submitted to the Prosecutor, in accordance with Article 110 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the submission is carried out through Polri investigators in accordance with Article 107 paragraph (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code
AUTHORITY OF MILITARY POLICE INVESTIGATORS REGARDING CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION ACCORDING TO LAW NUMBER 31 OF 1997 CONCERNING MILITARY JUSTICE Abdul Hayy Nasution
International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4 No. 2: August 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/ijss.v4i2.8436

Abstract

The background to this research is the investigation carried out by investigators within the scope of Military Justice with its implementation, and the role of the Military Police (POM) which coordinates with the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) as the front guard in eradicating Corruption Crimes. The problem in this research is the authority of Military Police Investigators (POM) regarding Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law, as well as how the Military Police Investigators' (POM) Authority is implemented for Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law. This research uses sociological jurisprudence. The sociological juridical approach is a research method carried out to obtain primary data and find the truth using inductive thinking methods and corresponding truth criteria and the facts used to carry out the induction process and correspondent truth testing are up-to-date facts. The way this sociological juridical method works in this research is from the results of collecting and discovering data and information through literature study of the basic assumptions and presumptions used in answering the problems in this research. The purpose of this research is to find out the authority of Military Police Investigators regarding Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law, as well as how the authority of Military Police Investigators is implemented regarding Corruption Crimes according to the Military Justice Law
AUTHORITY OF CIVIL SERVANT INVESTIGATORS (PPNS) ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 424 PARAGRAPH (1) LAW NUMBER 17 OF 2023 CONCERNING HEALTH AGAINST ADDICTIVE SUBSTANCE ABUSE LINKED TO ARTICLE 82 OF LAW NUMBER 35 OF 2009 CONCERNING NARCOTICS Abdul Hayy Nasution
International Journal of Social Science Vol. 4 No. 4: December 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/ijss.v4i4.9622

Abstract

Looking at current developments, this has an impact on narcotics abuse in all levels of society in Indonesia. The targets of narcotics distribution are not limited to people who experience broken homes, are frustrated, or people who live the nightlife, but have spread to other circles, especially students and students, and not a few even among executives. To be able to prevent and overcome these crimes, the role of Narcotics Investigators in the territory of the Republic of Indonesia is required. This research uses a type of normative legal research with a qualitative approach. Legal Regulation of the Authority of Investigators in Handling Narcotics Crimes in the Territory of the Republic of Indonesia is regulated in Article 7 to Article 9 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), Article 13 to Article 14 of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the Position of the Republic Indonesia, Article 424 of Law Number 17 of 2023 concerning Health, and Articles 73 to 88 of Law Number 35 of 2023 concerning Health 2009 Concerning Narcotics. The planned output for this research will be published in the form of an accredited journal
PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP KEGIATAN ADMINISTRASI NEGARA YANG TIDAK SESUAI DENGAN ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK Abdul Hayy Nasution; Nyak Amini
Media Bina Ilmiah Vol. 20 No. 1: Agustus 2025
Publisher : LPSDI Bina Patria

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 Tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, yang dimana bertujuan untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum dengan mendasarkan segala tindakan pemerintahan (bestuurs handelingen) harus memiliki dasar hukum yang jelas (keabsahan/legalitas) dan disediakan upaya hukum bagi warga masyarakat yang menderita kerugian akibat tindakan pemerintahan. Khusus mengenai sengketa administrasi yang timbul dari tindakan faktual pemerintah (feitelijke handelingen), UU AP mentransformasikan pengaturannya kedalam Pasal 85 Tentang peralihan penyelesaian sengketa “onrechmatige overheidsdaad” dari Pengadilan Umum ke PTUN, Pasal 22 dan Pasal 29 Tentang keputusan/tindakan diskresi serta Pasal 87 hurup a. PTUN berwenang untuk mengadili sengketa administrasi yang timbul dari tindakan faktual pemerintah (feitelijke handelingen), yang dimana terbatas pada pengujian keabsahan (legalitas), dan tidak sampai pada tuntutan terhadap ganti kerugian. Dalam hal ini PTUN mempunyai kewenangan untuk mengadili sengketa sengketa administrasi, yang timbul dari tindakan nyata pemerintah yang tidak sesuai dengan AUPB dalam mengeluarkan Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara.
Co-Authors Abdul Halim Abdul Halim Ali Sati Ali Sati Rangkuti Dwi Kusumo Wardhani Edi Setiadi I Gusti Ayu Anita Lakshana Muhammad Ridwan Munalar, Sri Siti Nyak Amini Nyak Amini Oksidelfa Yanto Siti Chadijah Sri Siti Munalar Yeti Sumiati