cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
kornelius benuf
Contact Email
korneliusbenuf@gmail.com
Phone
+6282325620669
Journal Mail Official
korneliusbenuf@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Simongan No. 123 Semarang
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Law, Development and Justice Review
Published by Universitas Diponegoro
ISSN : 26551942     EISSN : 26551942     DOI : DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.v3i1.7349
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
aw, Development & Justice Review (e ISSN:2655-1942) diterbitkan Badan Konsultasi Hukum (BKH UNDIP), Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro. Law, Development & Justice Review merupakan jurnal ilmiah sebagai wadah bagi dosen, konsultan hukum, dan Advokat dalam mengekspresikan hasil Pengabdian masyarakat (public service publications), hasil penelitian (research), hasil pembahasan kasus (case review), dan hasil pemeriksanaan dokumen (book review). Law, Development & Justice Review sebagai media dalam memenuhi salah satu kegiatan tri darma perguruan tinggi di Fakultas Hukum UNDIP. Selain itu, LDJR juga digunakan sebagai wahana mengembangkan dan atau kebaharuan ilmu hukum dalam menjawab dan menyelesaikan problem solving di bidang hukum mengekspresikan dalam bentuk tulisan ilmiah populer. BKH merupakan salah satu kegiatan yang memberikan pelayanan konsultasi di bidang hukum bagi masyarakat, mahasiswa dan akademisi Universitas Diponegoro Semarang. Maka dari itu, pertanggungjawaban pun disampaikan kepada Dekan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro. Law, Development & Justice Review baru terindeks melalui Google Scholar saja dan belum masuk sebagai jurnal bereputasi. Tiada gading yang tak retak, mohon masukan, restu dan dukungan atas keberadaan Law, Development & Justice Review supaya tetap konsistensi agar dapat disejajarkan dengan jurnal ilmiah bereputasi di lingkungan UNDIP.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 144 Documents
 11   12   13   14   15 
Tantangan Perlindungan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional: Ketiadaan Payung Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Hukum Adat Hasibuan, Khairuna Malik; Khairunnisa, Khairunnisa; Sitepu, Faradila Yulistari
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.254-273

Abstract

Ekspresi budaya tradisional mencakup berbagai bentuk kreasi budaya baik berupa benda ataupun tak benda, yang diwariskan secara turun-temurun oleh masyarakat adat dan dimiliki secara komunal. Namun sistem hukum yang berlaku saat ini, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta belum sepenuhnya memberikan perlindungan yang memadai terhadap bentuk Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional (EBT). Hal ini disebabkan UU Hak Cipta menerapkan perlindungan hak individual yang diketahui siapa penciptanya, sementara EBT merupakan warisan budaya yang dimiliki secara komunal, sehingga diperlukan suatu perlindungan yang bersifat sui generis terhadap pengetahuan tradisional dan EBT. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus. Sumber data utama berasal dari UU Hak Cipta serta regulasi lain yang terkait dengan perlindungan EBT. Permasalahan yang muncul adalah problematika perlindungan EBT sehingga urgensi atas Rancangan Undang-Undang Masyarakat Adat dan Rancangan Undang-Undang Pengetahuan Tradisional dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional perlu segera disahkan
Dehumanisasi dan Krisis Kesadaran Hukum di Era Industri Modern: Kajian Sosiologis atas Hilangnya Moralitas dalam Relasi Produksi Ridwan, Agusriansyah; Febianty, Iranda Nadya; Edisam, Kuswandi Dwi Eri; Amellia, Demitha Selvira; Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.294-310

Abstract

The development of modern industrialization has created new tensions in the social structure, which have weakened human values and the moral legitimacy of law. This study aims to analyze the relationship between dehumanization in production relations and the crisis of legal consciousness, as well as to identify the sociological roots of the loss of morality in legal practice in the modern industrial era. This research is useful in enriching the study of legal sociology and providing a conceptual basis for strengthening the humanistic approach in legal policy and education. This study employs a qualitative method with a literature study approach, analyzing both classical and contemporary theories, as well as secondary data from books and national and international journals related to industrialization, dehumanization, and the transformation of legal consciousness. The findings reveal that the transition from mechanical to organic solidarity has shifted the orientation of law toward a more instrumental and formalistic character. Consequently, law has lost its moral essence and its function as a social balancer, being replaced by the logic of productivity and efficiency that generates anomie and weakens the fulfillment of humanistic values within production relations. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of rehumanizing the law through ethics-based legal education, strengthening community participation in the formation and implementation of law, and promoting legal policies that balance economic interests with social justice and human dignity. The recommendation is that it is very important to implement the concept of legal rehumanization based on social solidarity as a transformative solution to the crisis of moral legitimacy in law in the modern industrial era.
Implikasi Perancangan Kontrak Terhadap Pencegahan Wanprestasi: Analisis Kritis Putusan Perkara Nomor 171/PDT.G/2020/PN.JKT.SEL Ariani, Lillah; Jamaica, Jingga Ajeng Muda; Awalia, Sahihah Anik; Mujib, Rayi Kharisma
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.311-329

Abstract

Weaknesses in contract drafting often cause legal uncertainty and lead to breach of contract disputes. This study focuses on South Jakarta District Court Decision No. 171/Pdt.G/2020/PN.Jkt.Sel. to analyze how inadequate drafting contributes to contractual violations and how it can be prevented. The research aims to identify the legal principles neglected in the case and to propose preventive measures for improving contract drafting quality. Using a normative juridical method with statutory and case approaches, the study examines the imbalance of legal positions, ambiguity of clauses, and disregard of fundamental principles such as good faith and contractual justice. The findings show that poor drafting and unequal bargaining positions weaken the binding force of agreements, resulting in breach of contract. The study concludes that applying prudential drafting principles and proportional supervision is essential to ensure fairness, legal certainty, and the prevention of similar contractual disputes.
Analisis Kewajiban Notaris Dalam Memberikan Jasa Hukum Kepada Orang Yang Tidak Mampu Sirojul Hakim, Muhammad Difa; Santoso, Budi
Law, Development and Justice Review Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/ldjr.8.2025.274-293

Abstract

Implementing good notary services can increase public trust in the notary institution itself. Reputation and trust are very important in the business world. However, not all people in Indonesia have the same economic capabilities, there are also less well-off people. Legal services in the notary sector are needed by all levels of society. Article 37 Paragraph (1) of the Law on the Position of Notaries states that Notaries must provide protection and guarantee legal certainty to the public regardless of the economic capacity of their clients. This research aims to determine the factors behind notaries providing free legal services to people who cannot afford it in accordance with Article 37 paragraph (1) UUJN, as well as to determine the legal consequences for notaries who do not carry out these obligations. The method used is a normative legal research method with a legal concept analysis approach and a legislative approach. The research results show that there are several factors behind notaries providing free legal services to people who cannot afford them, namely human factors, the notary's confidence, and the client's candor. These three factors encourage notaries to provide free legal services. In addition, if a notary does not provide free legal services to people who cannot afford it, the notary may be subject to sanctions. Acceptable sanctions include verbal warnings, written warnings, temporary dismissal, honorable dismissal, or dishonorable dismissal.

Page 15 of 15 | Total Record : 144

 11   12   13   14   15 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 8, No 3 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 8, No 2 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 7, No 3 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 7, No 2 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 7, No 1 (2024): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 6, No 1 (2023): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 5, No 2 (2022): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Law, Development & Justice Review (In Press) Vol 4, No 1 (2021): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Law, Development & Justice Review Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Law, Development & Justice Review More Issue