cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Erni Agustin
Contact Email
media_iuris@fh.unair.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
media_iuris@fh.unair.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Media Iuris
Published by Universitas Airlangga
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26215225     DOI : -
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Media Iuris E-ISSN (2621-5225) is an open-access-peer-reviewed legal journal affiliated with the Faculty of Law of Airlangga University, which was published for the first time in 2018 in the online version. The purpose of this journal is as a forum for legal scholars, lawyers and practitioners to contribute their ideas to be widely disseminated for the development of legal science in Indonesia. This journal is published three times a year in February, June and October. Scope of articles ranging from legal issues in the fields of business law, constitutional law, administrative law, criminal law, international law, comparative law, and other legal fields.
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 229 Documents
 16   17   18   19   20 
Ratio Legis Investigation by the Prosecutor: A Review of Distribution of Power in Investigation of Corruption Crime Abidin, R.B. Muhammad Zainal
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i1.45772

Abstract

AbstractThis study discusses the distribution of investigative powers in the context of law enforcement on corruption crime. The urgency in this research that is to be achieved is to know the concept of distribution of investigative power in the field of corruption crime and to know the law with a closer distance to the ratio legis the Prosecutor is given the authority to investigate corruption crimes. The preparation of this research uses legal research by analyzing legislation as well as treatises on discussing the draft act which arrange institutions are authorized to investigate corruption crime. The results of this study indicate that in a lex specialis manner, those authorized to investigate corruption crime are investigators at the Prosecutor and the Corruption Crime Eradication Commission, in addition to investigators at the Police institution who are also authorized to investigate corruption crime in a lex generalis manner. The three institutions are equally authorized to investigate corruption crime based on the concept of cooperating with each other. The ratio legis forming the act when discussing the draft act number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office gives the Prosecutor authority to investigate corruption crime, namely that people have high hopes for the prosecutor's office as one of the important pillars in upholding the supremacy of law and being pro-actively involved in eradicating rampant corruption crime in all areas of life, bearing in mind that corruptors in Indonesia at that time were experts in breaking into banks, taking state money abroad for the sole reason of seeking treatment abroad, destroying evidence, manipulating data, and being able to trick prosecutors into going abroad freely. The people's high hopes for the Prosecutor are based on Rousseau's social contract theory in the making of the act.Keywords: Distribution of Power; Investigation; Corruption Crime.
The Urgency to Use the Rabat Plan of Action in the Hate Speech Offense Mahdi, Octavia Rahma; Rinwigati, Patricia
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.49903

Abstract

The broad spectrum of hate speech makes it difficult for law enforcement officials to identify which speech can be punished. This difficulty creates uncertainty in law enforcement and potentially triggers injustice. Therefore, this article emphasizes the importance of assessing the multidimensional aspects accommodated in the Rabat Plan Action instrument to determine hate speech. The Rabat Plan of Action instrument is one of the international human rights instruments drafted to handle acts of hate speech without regard to the right to freedom of expression. The Rabat Plan of Action has six elements: context, position and status of the speaker, intention, content and form of speech, range, and possibility and potential for harm. In this article, Rabat Plan of Action was applied to the case of Bambang Tri Mulyono, who believed that President Joko Widodo's diploma was fake and his speech had been uploaded on a YouTube video. The simulation results confirm that the Rabat Plan of Action can effectively provide directions for extracting legal facts and related events so that law enforcement officials can find clues in determining the occurrence of hate speech. Based on these results, the Rabat Plan of Action should be adopted at the national level to complement the legal instruments for handling acts of hate speech.
The Evolution of Scientific Evidence Theory in Criminal Law: A Transformative Insight Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.51095

Abstract

Criminal law evolution accentuates the contrast between traditional eyewitness testimonies and precise modern forensics. While testimonies offer depth, scientific methodologies provide unparalleled accuracy in investigations. This study examines the challenges and merits of both in light of technological advancements. The objective is to understand the evolving paradigm of scientific evidence in criminal justice, emphasizing its integration and balance with traditional evidentiary methods for upholding judicial integrity and revealing material truth. The result of this study is historical evolution in the theory of scientific evidence which has transitioned from relying on testimonies to verifiable scientific data, including advancements in DNA and cyber technology. This scientific approach, characterized by its objectivity, replicability, and measurability, offers a robust foundation for discerning truth and justice, surpassing the limitations of mere factual accounts. Modern criminal law's integration of this evidence signifies a deep-rooted commitment to justice, ensuring verdicts are swift, fair, and grounded in undeniable truth.
Upaya Hukum Tata Usaha Negara Terhadap Polemik Penganugerahan Gelar Kehormatan Akademis Efendi, Virga Dwi; Yossyafaat, Herkin
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.51276

Abstract

The awarding of honorary academic degrees in the form of a chancellor's decision always gives rise to positive and negative assessments from academics and the public. The aim of this research is to analyze the chancellor's decision regarding the awarding of honorary academic degrees regarding the qualifications for the State Administrative Decree (KTUN) which is the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) as well as legal remedies for the polemic that arises as a result of the issuance of this decision. Next we will explain the efforts law regarding disputes that arise as a result of the rector's decision. This research uses a type of juridical-normative legal research with a historical, conceptual and normative approach. The results of this research show that the rector's decision regarding the awarding of academic honorary degrees, both honoris causa doctoral degrees and professorial degrees. Honor is a State Administrative Decision (KTUN) and is included in the absolute authority of the PTUN so that if a dispute arises, the resolution can be reached through the PTUN. The conditions for granting honorary academic degrees are the result of accumulated historical thought and experience in the legal dynamics that govern it. The legal remedies for the emergence of TUN disputes related to the chancellor's decision regarding academic honorary degrees are the same as resolving KTUN disputes in general, namely through administrative efforts or litigation efforts through the PTUN.
Prioritas Lingkungan dalam Model Bisnis Alternatif: Pendekatan Hukum dan Doughnut Economy Modeong, Indriati; Sunarno; Mukti Fajar ND
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.53749

Abstract

The Donut Economy visualization emphasizes how important it is to balance social and ecological boundaries to ensure a safe and equitable space for everyone. This research aims to determine the benefits of the Donut Economy concept in prioritizing environmental health in alternative business models by reforming laws in Indonesia. This normative legal research uses a comparative approach. Comparisons were made between Indonesia and the Netherlands. The results of this research found that the Netherlands has succeeded in applying the Donut Economy concept to reorganize cities after the Covid-2019 pandemic, such as the City of Amsterdam. Although Indonesia has legislation on environmental priorities such as the Government Regulations Replacing the Law (Perpu) No. 2 of 2022 on the Creation of Work Section 22, the existing regulations are still not strong enough to emphasize the priorities of the environment for business operators in Indonesia. From that, it is expected that Indonesia will follow the strategy taken by the Netherlands in implementing the concept of the doughnut economy, which should focus on the creation of a circular economy and participate in initiatives such as sharing platforms, used goods stores, online markets, and repair services.
Prinsip Sistemik Lembaga Perdamaian PKPU Untuk Mencapai Nilai Keadilan Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih; Shubhan, M. Hadi; Poesoko, Herowati; R. Murjiyanto; Zahir, Mohd Zamre Mohd; Sudiyana
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.55386

Abstract

Systemic principles serve as the basic basis for thought and action processes, representing interconnected elements that contribute to the formation of a comprehensive whole. Bankruptcy law is a special and special law, regulated in Articles 222 to 294 of the Bankruptcy Law and PPU, PKPU is a legal peace institution whose operational elements include deciding judges, administrators, supervisory judges, debtors, creditors, and additional elements in the PKPU institution that are guarantors if provided. Systemically, these elements are interrelated both within their own elements and with theoretical elements, namely the Ideal elements (about meaning) and the actual elements. According to Article 287 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU Jo Article 282 of the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU, PKPU has a final and binding decision, but it is limited, and its decision is only related to the minutes of the meeting. The verdict still has legal consequences if violated. The author's motivation is to analyze systemic principles in the legal framework of PKPU peace institutions with the aim of upholding the principle of justice. The analysis methodology used is the legal system theory developed by Kees Schuit, focusing on the Ideal, Operational, and Actual elements. In addition, it incorporates three basic principles outlined by Gustav Radbruch – Certainty, Benefit, and Justice. The results of this study contribute prescriptive value to the field of law, especially in bankruptcy law.
Front Matter Volume 7 No. 1, February 2024 Iuris, Media
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Volume 7 No. 1, February 2024
Back Matter Volume 7 No. 1, February 2024 Iuris, Media
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Back Matter Volume 7 No. 1, February 2024
Climate Litigation in Indonesia: Lessons from the Royal Dutch Shell Case Prihandono, Iman
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/mi.v7i2.57628

Abstract

This article compares the concept of unlawful act in the Indonesian and Dutch Civil Codes, with specific attention to the notorious decision of the Milieudefensie et al v. Royal Dutch Shell Case. Therein, the Dutch Court applied unwritten law under Article 6:612 of the Dutch Civil Code, calling for reduction in carbon emissions through policy changes by the Shell group. The use of unwritten law allowed for a comprehensive assessment of legal bases, including international soft law instruments, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. Inspired by such a decision, this article aims to unveil the readiness of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code in entertaining a similar case. It compares the approach taken in the Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell Case with pertinent decisions by the Indonesian court concerning the implementation of Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Furthermore, it focuses on two prongs of civil liability that are necessary for establishment: 1) unwritten law; and 2) causality. By doing so, this article aims to contribute to the evolving realm of climate litigation, specifically within the framework of civil law.
Front Matter Volume 7 No. 2, June 2024 Front Matter
Media Iuris Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Front Matter Volume 7 No. 2, June 2024

Page 18 of 23 | Total Record : 229

 16   17   18   19   20 

Filter by Year

2018 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 3 (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 1SpecialIssue (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 4 No. 3 (2021): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 3 No. 3 (2020): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 2 No. 2 (2019): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 1 No. 3 (2018): MEDIA IURIS Vol. 1 No. 2 (2018): MEDIA IURIS More Issue