cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum
Contact Email
anggraeniwijayanto@yahoo.com
Phone
+62248446280
Journal Mail Official
untagsmglawreview@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Pawiyatan Luhur, Bendan Dhuwur, Kota Semarang, Central Java
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
UNTAG Law Review
Published by Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang
ISSN : 25795279     EISSN : 25494910     DOI : https://dx.doi.org/10.56444/ulrev
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
UNTAG LAW REVIEW, is a peer-review journal published by FACULTY OF LAW UNTAG SEMARANG, UNTAG LAW REVIEW is published twice a year in May and November. This journal provides direct open access to its content with the principle that making research freely available to the public supports greater global knowledge exchange within the scope of the legal field. This journal aims to provide a place for academics, researchers, and practitioners to publish original research articles or review articles. The scope of articles published in this journal relates to various topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, State Administration Law, Health Law, State Administrative Law as well as the broad field of legal studies
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 7 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW" : 7 Documents clear
Tinjauan Yuridis Investasi Bodong Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Dakota, Athaya Diah
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4583

Abstract

AbstrakInvestasi bodong merupakan fenomena yang semakin merajalela, menimbulkan kerugian finansial bagi masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan tinjauan yuridis terhadap investasi bodong dalam konteks perlindungan konsumen dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Pendekatan normatif ini digunakan untuk menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan investasi, perlindungan konsumen, dan tanggung jawab pihak-pihak terlibat. Penelitian ini mencakup kajian terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur investasi dan perlindungan konsumen, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen dan peraturan terkait investasi. Metode analisis normatif digunakan untuk mengevaluasi konsistensi dan efektivitas ketentuan hukum yang ada dalam melindungi konsumen dari risiko investasi bodong. Penelitian ini mengadopsi pendekatan metode yuridis normatif sebagai kerangka kerja untuk melakukan analisis mendalam terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan investasi bodong dan perlindungan konsumen.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PULAU BATU ANTARA MALAYSIA DENGAN SINGAPURA DALAM PERPSEKTIF HUKUM INTERNASIONAL Hilmi, Syaiful Ihsan
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4558

Abstract

Penelitian ini secara mendalam menganalisis penyelesaian sengketa Pulau Batu antara Malaysia dan Singapura dalam konteks hukum internasional. Sengketa ini, yang mencakup aspek sejarah, geografi, dan peraturan hukum internasional, menjadi fokus penelitian ini. Metode penyelesaian yang digunakan, seperti negosiasi, arbitrase, dan pendekatan hukum, dieksplorasi untuk menilai keberhasilan dan tantangan masing-masing. Keputusan Mahkamah Internasional yang diambil sebagai bagian integral dari penyelesaian juga dianalisis untuk memahami dampaknya terhadap klaim dan kedaulatan Pulau Batu. Melibatkan telaah mendalam terhadap kerangka hukum internasional, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pemahaman menyeluruh terkait penyelesaian sengketa Pulau Batu. Dengan mengevaluasi sejauh mana metode penyelesaian yang diterapkan mencerminkan prinsip-prinsip hukum internasional, penelitian ini menyajikan analisis yang kritis terhadap dinamika sengketa wilayah dan bagaimana hal tersebut mempengaruhi hubungan bilateral antara Malaysia dan Singapura. Selain itu, penelitian ini merinci implikasi keputusan Mahkamah Internasional terhadap klaim dan kepemilikan Pulau Batu oleh kedua negara. Dengan merinci dampak secara hukum dan geopolitik, penelitian ini memberikan pandangan mendalam terhadap perubahan dinamika regional pasca-putusan Mahkamah Internasional. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan yang berharga bagi para pemangku kepentingan, praktisi hukum internasional, dan peneliti yang tertarik dalam studi sengketa wilayah serta penyelesaian konflik internasional.Kata Kunci: Pulau Batu Puteh, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Dampak Putusan.
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Terhadap Perlindungan Hak Cipta Dalam Aplikasi Streaming Musik Eka, Thalla Tsamara
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4560

Abstract

Masalah hak cipta di Indonesia telah dilakukan sejak di undangkannya Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Republik Indonesia (UUHC).  Penggunaan lagu dalam aplikasi streaming musik dapat menimbulkan masalah ketika lagu tersebut dimasukkan tanpa izin pencipta lagu. Oleh karena itu, penulis ingin mengetahui bagaimana efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa alternatif  terhadap perlindungan hak cipta dalam aplikasi streaming musik. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang menggunakan bahan hukum yang diperoleh melalui bahan-bahan kepustakaan. Bahan hukum primer dalam penelitian ini adalah Undang-Undang Hak Cipta (UUHC). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pencipta atas Musik dapat dilakukan tindakan represif (penyelesaian) secara efektif dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Nonlitigasi.
ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN PUBLIC SERVICES POPULATION ADMINISTRATION FOR SAMIN BELIEFS IN PATI Afda’u, Faisal; Wahyuni, Husnia Hilmi; Gravionika, Elsa
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4982

Abstract

Believers are a group of people who experience discrimination in the administrative system in relation to the religion column in the e-KTP. In general, when viewed from the population administration, the location of adherents of beliefs, adherents of ancestral religions and the implementation of rituals in adat makes it difficult for them during state administration in personal documents such as electronic identity cards (KTP), family cards (KK), marriage certificates. , and birth certificates. Based on the article of the Population Administration Lawwhich explains that religion in the religion column on the family card (KK) and electronic identity card (KTP) for adherents of faith is not filled in fundamentally, this is because the sect has not been recognized as well as other religions. another, so that in the electronic identity card (KTP) there is no record that someone is a believer. Meanwhile, the Population Administration Law is factually or at least potentially detrimental to constitutional rights. This is where discrimination arises against people who do not yet have an awareness of human rights. Cases of discrimination against adherents of certain religions are even carried out by bureaucracy, although the 1945 Constitution has stated to free people to practice their respective religions and beliefs.
Juridical Analysis of Patient Data Protection in National Legal Perspective Frahma, Elen Anedya
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4979

Abstract

The emergence of digital-based health services has garnered increased attention following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. The utilization of these services involves the collection of user data, a sensitive matter that holds the potential for giving rise to legal issues, thereby calling for the need for regulations concerning the protection of personal data. Indonesia has established provisions to safeguard personal data in the health sector through various legal instruments. However, the effective protection of users' data in the digital transformation of the health sector has not materialized. This is evident in instances of personal data breaches involving participants of the Health Social Security Administering Agency. The research is conducted using normative juridical legal research methods. The findings highlight the context of personal data protection in the health sector within the digital era, which is regulated in, for example, article 26 of the ITE Law, Law Number 43 of 2009 regarding Archives, article 57 of the Health Law, Minister of Health Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning Medical Records and Law Number 36 of 1999 on Telecommunications. Nevertheless, the occurrence of data leaks from BPJS Health indicates the failure to ensure personal data protection in the health sector in Indonesia. As a result, regulations and stringent supervision within health institutions, particularly in the digital sector, are crucial. The appointment of Data Protection Officers in health service agencies represents the solution to these issues, and it is imperative to realize digital protection of personal data in the health sector.
JURIDICAL REVIEW OF THE VALUE OF LEGAL CERTAINTY AND THE VALUE OF JUSTICE FOR THE MISUSE OF CLASS I NARCOTICS IN COURT DECISION NUMBER 304/PID.SUS/2020/PT SMG. Setiawati, Sri; Hartati, Sri; Rubiyanto, Rubiyanto
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4989

Abstract

Legal certainty for narcotics abusers in Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics does not yet have legal certainty where in practice abusers are often charged and even terminated by Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics which is without rights and against the law depositor, owner, who controls narcotics class I non-plants. Based on the description above, the author is interested in studying this scientific paper with the title Juridical Review of the Value of Legal Certainty and the Value of Justice for the Abuse of Narcotics Group I in conviction Number 304/PID.SUS/2020/PT SMG. In practice narcotics abusers still use Article 112 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics which is without rights and against the law of the depositor, the owner, who controls narcotics class I not plants even though there is a Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of 2015 to identify the accused as an abuser. In its implementation, there are obstacles that exist in the authority of law enforcers, especially judges. This research also found that restorative justice for narcotics abusers by the courts is still not effective which is contained in the Appendix to the Decree of the Director General of the General Judiciary Agency Number 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020 concerning Enforcement of the Guidelines for the Application of Restorative Justice in the guidelines for the application of restorative justice in the General Court environment as an effort that can be made in deciding cases of class I narcotics abuse.
Personal Data Theft in the Era of Information Technology Progress: Impact and Overcoming Strategies in Indonesia Dewi, Sumartini; Samara, Muchlas Rastra; Sri D, Pratiwi Ayu
UNTAG Law Review Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/ulrev.v8i1.4992

Abstract

This article examines the problem of information security crimes in the conditions of technological progress with the globalization of international life, including relations between countries, taking into account the high level of development of technological and information resources. The importance of ensuring information security as an object of legal protection protected by written international and national law. This research method is normative with a statutory, historical and philosophical approach. efforts to improve international and national legal policies to modernize the national legal system for the prevention and eradication of cybercrime. An effective legal regulatory mechanism for objects to be legally protected is essential to ensure information security. Special attention is focused on solving the problem of detection, disclosure and accurate legal evaluation of crimes and violations committed in cyberspace. Administrative instruments, institutions, international cooperation, community participation, dispute resolution and procedural law, prohibitions on the use of personal data and criminal law asLast Remedyto overcome personal data leaks, protect personal data in the process of processing Personal Data in order to guarantee people's constitutional rights.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 9, No 2 (2025): UNTAG Law Review Vol 9, No 1 (2025): UNTAG LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 2 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW Vol 8, No 1 (2024): UNTAG LAW REVIEW Vol 7, No 2 (2023): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 6, No 2 (2022): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 6, No 1 (2022): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 5, No 2 (2021): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 5, No 1 (2021): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 4, No 2 (2020): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 4, No 1 (2020): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 3, No 2 (2019): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 3, No 1 (2019): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 2, No 2 (2018): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 2, No 1 (2018): UNTAG LAW REVIEW (ULREV) Vol 1, No 2 (2017): UNTAG Law Review (ULREV) Vol 1, No 1 (2017): UNTAG Law Review (ULREV) More Issue