Mulawarman Law Review
Mulawarman Law Review (MULREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University. MULREV published twice a year in June and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, State and Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Adat Law and Local Custom, Natural Resources and Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. ISSN: 2527-3485 | e-ISSN: 2527-3477
Articles
143 Documents
<![CDATA[Legal Consequences of The Absense of Informed Consent in Therapeutic Transactions ]]>
<![CDATA[Sacharissa, Vicia]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i1.296
<![CDATA[A person's right to their own body is one of the human rights protected under the right to self-determination,1 and this protection also applies to patients seeking treatments. The process of giving information by the doctor, which is then followed with the consent to medical action by patient, is known as informed consent. In Indonesia, the protection of such right is contained in various laws and regulations. This is a descriptive legal research, with normative-judicial or library research method and qualitative data analysis. The discussion covers topics regarding therapeutic transaction as a form of agreement, the presence of informed consent in therapeutic transactions, and the consequence of the absence of informed consent from the perspective of civil law. It is also supplemented with case decision study on Case Decision No. 3203 K/Pdt/2017 which proves that the lack of informed consent is a legitimate ground for a lawsuit.]]>
<![CDATA[Marine Litter Management Policy: State Responsibilities And The Role Of Local Wisdom ]]>
<![CDATA[Sirait, Yohanes Hermanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Ai Permanasari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i1.307
<![CDATA[Indonesia as the biggest maritime state has not only advantages but also obstacles in managing sea. Called potential because of its large resources but it also brings into a fact of the lack in exploitation of the sea. Such transportation and exploitation have caused a lot debris in the sea which is harmful. This article aims to examine state responsibility in prevent and tackle marine debris. It also aims to enhance local wisdom as solution. This article is normative juridical, using statute and conceptual approach. It is made deductive from specific issue into general issue based on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. After collecting all material, this article then analyzes it qualitatively. The result show that state responsibility has been implemented only in level of regulation. Although some regulation has underlined local wisdom as important matter, in fact, Indonesia still in process of inventory related local wisdom and still far from enhancing the local wisdom as solution to prevent and tackle marine debris. These practices are different to some states which apply their local wisdom as one of solution. Therefore, Indonesia must collaborate legal policy and local wisdom to achieve higher result in preventing and tackling marine littering. A legal policy that born from the way of life in community may accepted better.]]>
<![CDATA[Penegakan Hukum Illegal Fishing dalam Perspektif UNCLOS 1982 ]]>
<![CDATA[Jamilah, Asiyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Disemadi, Hari Sutra]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i1.311
<![CDATA[Indonesia merupakan negara kepulauan terbesar kedua didunia yang mempunyai kekayaan sumber daya perairan yang cukup tinggi serta sumber daya hayati yang beranekaragam. Indonesia juga berada pada posisi yang sangat strategis di antara negara-negara didunia, letaknya yang strategis inilah yang menimbulkan kemungkinan terjadinya berbagai macam kejahatan yang terjadi di laut. Salah satunya adalah tindak pidana illegal fishing. Penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan Undang-Undang (statute approach) serta pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS 1982) sebagai ketentuan hukum internasional mengatur secara umum tentang penegakan hukum di laut teritorial maupun zona ekonomi ekslusif (ZEE) suatu negara yang diimplementasikan dalam hukum nasional melalui perundang-undangan. Adapun Undang-Undang yang mengatur secara spesifik mengenai illegal fishing yakni Undang-Undang No. 31 Tahun 2004 yang diubah menjadi Undang-Undang No. 45 Tahun 2009 tentang Perikanan dan Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1983 tentang Zona Ekonomi Eksklusif Indonesia (ZEEI).]]>
<![CDATA[Implementasi Green Growth Economic pada Industri Kelapa Sawit melalui Sertifikasi ISPO ]]>
<![CDATA[Christiawan, Rio]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i1.323
<![CDATA[Industri kelapa sawit merupakan industri strategis nasional karena selain sebagai penyumbang devisa terbesar juga memiliki dampak besar terhadap perekonomian di Indonesia. Tidak dapat dikesampingkan fakta bahwa industri kelapa sawit juga menimbulkan sejumlah dampak negatif bagi lingkungan. Perdebatan dari kalangan konservasitisme dan developmentalis terkait kelanjutan pengelolaan sumber daya alam tidak akan menyelesaikan akar masalah sebenarnya. Pemerintah perlu mengatur kelanjutan pengembangan industri strategis kelapa sawit. Persaoalan dalam penulisan ini adalah pemerintah dalam sepuluh tahun terakhir berkali-kali membatalkan aturan tentang sertifikasi industri kelapa sawit yang lestari (sertifikasi ISPO) akibatnya pendekatan green growth economic belum dapat terwujud pada industri kelapa sawit. Metode Penulisan dalam penelitian ini yuridis normatif dengan fokus melakukan kajian yuridis terhadap implementasi konsep hukum lingkungan green growth economic terhadap kebijakan sertifikasi pada industri kelapa sawit. Hasil kajian penelitian ini menunjukkan aturan yang tidak jelas dan mengikat terkait sertifikasi ISPO (hanya bersifat voluntary). Selain itu sertifikasi ISPO hanya memberi kewajiban tanpa memberi insentif apapun bagi industri kelapa sawit. Hal ini berbeda jika dibandingkan dengan sertifikasi internasional yakni RSPO, selain memberi kewajiban tetapi juga mampu memberikan insentif berupa harga yang premium menyebabkan sertifikasi ISPO tidak dapat diterapkan secara efektif guna menunjang green growth economic.]]>
<![CDATA[COVID-19 as Force Majeure in Insurance Agreement ]]>
<![CDATA[Padmo, Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Joesoef, Iwan Erar]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i2.329
<![CDATA[Force majeure is an unexpected or unknown event which occur out of control that obstructs a party to fullfill the obligations in the agreement. This clause exempts the parties from the obligation to compensate either overall or partially for conducting default on contract. This research is normative legal research conducted by examining secondary, primary, and tertiary legal materials. As for research, conducted using conceptual approach and statute approach. The results show that COVID-19 is a relative force majeure. This condition affects the debtor’s economic ability to pay premiums to insurance companies every month. But according to article 1244 ICC the debtor must prove that the condition cannot be blamed on them. After it is proven article 1245 ICC can be applied which exempts the debtor from the obligation of compensation. In the face of COVID-19 as a force majeure insurance companies can implement an agreement restructuring policy in accordance with Financial Services Authority Regulations Number 14 of 2020. By implementing this policy insurance company can avoid the cancellation of the agreement due to force majeure.]]>
<![CDATA[Towards a Reformed Carriage of Goods by Sea Law: Indonesia and Global Practice ]]>
<![CDATA[Lubis, Tetty]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i1.330
<![CDATA[The UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) has adopted four international conventions to standardize laws governing the carriage of goods by sea. Hybrid versions of the four conventions have been largely applied by most maritime countries in the world, which leave a few countries to uphold their own versions, including Indonesia. Ten major trading partner countries with Indonesia have long established the implementation of provisions under the UNCITRAL conventions, while Indonesia still stays with 1898 codes, inherited from Dutch colonization. This paper examines the key provisions and shortcomings of UNCITRAL conventions and their global adoption. The discussion continues to individually evaluate and compare the legal practices of governing carriage goods by sea in Indonesia and its ten major country partners. The comparison analysis results in similar implementation of a hybrid version of the four UNCITRAL conventions adopted by the ten trading partners; which strongly encourages Indonesia to replace the 1898 commercial codes with current international practices that convey the best interests of Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Menelaah Koperasi Era Omnibus Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Suryokumoro, Herman]]>;
<![CDATA[Hikmatul Ula]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i2.340
<![CDATA[Gagasan modernisasi koperasi bukan hal baru, gagasan ini muncul seiring dengan tuntutan globalisasi ekonomi yang menuntut peran koperasi untuk dapat bersaing dalam pertarungan pasar bebas. Namun nampaknya, hingga saat ini pemerintah belum menemukan formula yang jitu untuk mendongkrak koperasi di Indonesia agar mampu bersaing. Modernisasi koperasi dapat dilakukan dengan mengacu para aspek-aspek dalam koperasi yaitu dalam hal kelembagaan, usaha, dan permodalan koperasi. Modernisasi usaha mutlak harus dibarengi dengan digitalisasi. Modernisasi koperasi tidak akan berhasil hanya dengan mempermudah izin pendirian dan izin usaha koperasi semata, dalam pada itu sinergitas antar element yang tekait dengan koperasi termasuk didalamnya quadruple helix (pemerintah, masyarakat, perguruan tinggi dan dunia usaha) harus turut menumbuhkan usaha usaha koperasi. Tantangan modernisasi koperasi ada pada pola hubungan koperasi dan pemerintah. Dalam era globalisasi bersaingan bebas fase hubungan koperasi dan pemerintah sudah tidak bisa lagi berada pada fase officialisasi tetapi sudah harus pada fase otonom. Kebijakan-kebijakan modernisasi era omnibus law harus didasarkan pada semangat menumbuhkan kesadaran berkoperasi dengan kualitas sember daya manusia yang mumpuni, semangat sinergitas usaha koperasi dengan entitas bisnis lainnya dan semangat otonomi koperasi dengan meminimalisasi unsur-unsur politik - kekuasaan dalam pengembangan koperasi.]]>
<![CDATA[Reorganisasi Perusahaan Debitor Yang Terancam Pailit Sebagai Suatu Alternatif ]]>
<![CDATA[Asril]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i2.341
<![CDATA[Law No.37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Article 2 paragraph (1) has determined that a debtor who has two or more Creditors and does not pay in full at least one debt that has matured and is collectible, is declared bankrupt by verdict Court, either at the request of one or more creditors. With this provision, it can be understood that bankruptcy is a reasonable choice. However, several opinions of bankruptcy law have not provided sufficient protection to debtors with good intentions. This article intends to find out more about the implementation of the reorganization of debtor companies whether it can be used as an alternative so that the debtor company does not go bankrupt. The method used is normative legal research. Data sources consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, it is known that the regulations regarding company reorganization have not been clearly and firmly regulated in Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations, Reorganization is part of the restructuring, bankruptcy can be avoided through a business reorganization in the form of mergers, consolidations. , business acquisitions, and other forms. This bankruptcy law also does not provide sufficient protection to debtors with good intentions, because there has been a tendency to interpret bankruptcy as liquidation. However, it must be understood that bankruptcy should also be a means of reorganizing the company. The legal consequence of company reorganization on the settlement of the company's debt and accounts receivable is that there is an opportunity for creditors and debtors to settle their debts without going through a bankruptcy process which can result in the debtor being declared bankrupt.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Status of MoU Determining The Limits of The Territory Area Between Indonesia and Malaysia ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Ambarina Rita Kadarsih]]>;
<![CDATA[Putra Kurnia, Mahendra]]>;
<![CDATA[Hidayatullah, Syukri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i2.343
<![CDATA[The border region is the front territory of the country jurisdiction and posses an important role in the matter of enforcement of national law sovereignty. Sebatik Island owned by two countries, Indonesia and Malaysia. Demarcation of territorial boundaries in Sebatik Island refers to Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of Malaysia and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia regarding Surveys and Demarcation of the Border Line of 1973 which is followed up with the results of a joint Surveys and Demarcation on the island of Borneo poured in the form of an advanced Memorandum of Understanding containing each boundary point which has been agreed upon.From 1973 to 2017 there are 9 (nine) points of Outstanding Boundary Problem (OBP) on Sebatik Island that have not been agreed by both countries. The boundary disputes have led to unclear legal status of Sebatik Island's land border territory within the framework of international treaty law and also led to the uncertainty of the status of the MoU as the legal basis for the determination of state borders between Indonesia and Malaysia on Sebatik Island.This law research questioning two issue. First, what factors make the border region not yet regulated by international agreements on borders. Second, how the legal status of the 1973 Memorandum of Understanding in stipulate the point of demarcation between Indonesia and Malaysia in the perspective of international treaty law. Based on the research, the factor that caused the border area not yet been regulated by a definitive border agreement is the disparity of reference between Indonesia and Malaysia to determining the land boundary in Sebatik Island. Indonesia uses the provisions of 4o 10 'LU degree while Malaysia uses existing pillar references. This dispute involve the overlap of the Sebatik Island border area from both countries. Thus, the legal status of the 1973 Memorandum of Understanding has not been binding as law either in national law or as an agreement in international law.]]>
<![CDATA[Demokrasi Deliberatif dalam Konsep Amandemen Konstitusi Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Bayu Aryanto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i2.366
<![CDATA[Amendemen konstitusi merupakan suatu keniscayaan untuk dilaksanakan. Wacana amendemen kelima menjadi suatu perhatian khusus untuk dicermati dengan baik. Beragam isu penting menjadi topik yang akan menjadi objek amendemen. Proses amendemen sebelumnya mendapatkan kritik terkait kepentinggan politik yang mempengaruhi hasil amendemen. Hal itu menjadi dasar pelaksanaan amendemen selanjutnya harus melalui prosedur yang baik dan sesuai dengan prinsip negara hukum. Demokrasi deliberatif menjadi konsep yang penting dalam proses amendemen konstitusi. Hal itu dikarenakan demokrasi deliberatif dianggap dapat mengakomodir segala kepentingan elemen masyarakat. Prinsip demokrasi deliberatif memberikan ruang terhadap titik temu antara pengambil keputusan dan masyarakat. Konsep yang lebih terbuka juga menjadi hal penting dalam pelaksanaan teori demokrasi deliberatif. Dengan begitu, konsep amendemen konstitusi dapat dilakukan dengan baik dan sesuai dengan arah tujuan masyarakat bukan golongan tertentu. Demokrasi deliberatif menyatukan berbagai kepentingan yang timbul dalam masyarakat Indonesia yang heterogen. Hal tersebut akan menghasilkan konstitusi dari musyawarah yang baik bukan dipaksakan. Konsep yang mengelaborasi sistem keterwakilan dengan proses yang memberikan ruang publik untuk terlibat dan berpartisipasi ini akan menjadi sebuah ikhtiar dalam mewujudkan konstitusi yang diharapkan semua warga negara.]]>
