Mulawarman Law Review
Mulawarman Law Review (MULREV) is a peer-reviewed journal published by Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University. MULREV published twice a year in June and December. This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers, and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deals with a broad range of topics in the fields of Criminal Law, Civil Law, International Law, State and Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Economic Law, Adat Law and Local Custom, Natural Resources and Environmental Law and another section related contemporary issues in law. ISSN: 2527-3485 | e-ISSN: 2527-3477
Articles
138 Documents
<![CDATA[Problematika Peraturan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Organisasi Masyarakat ]]>
<![CDATA[Ismail, Rezki Robiatul Aisyiah]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 1: Mulawarman Law Review - June 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1282.585 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i1.52
<![CDATA[Indonesia is a democratic constitutional state set forth in article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia, as a legal state for running a state and protection of human rights under the law. One of them is in Article 28 E Paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia which states that everyone has the right to freedom of association, assembly, and expression. The regulation concerning the Organization of the Community is in fact set out in Law No. 17 of 2013 on Community Organizations. Community organization is an organization founded and formed by the community voluntarily based on the similarity of aspirations, wills, needs, interests, activities and objectives to participate in development in order to achieve the objectives of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia based on Pancasila. Community organizations may be in the form of two, incorporated and non-legal entities. The Government issued a Regulation in Lieu of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 2 Year 2017 on the amendment to Law No. 17 of 2013 on Social Organization and then with the Regulation of Lieu of the Law the government made a policy that the Government in this case gave authority to the Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Asasi Manusia dissolved social organization which contradict with principle of Pancasila one of them is Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia discussion Government Regulation of society organization still has weakness substantially. Government regulation in lieu of laws of community organizations in order to reinforce the principle of contrarius actus is not appropriate because it has actually attached to government officials without the need to be affirmed in the legislation.]]>
<![CDATA[Normative Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Theofany, Gabriel]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 3 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (502.59 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.53
<![CDATA[It is undeniable that the flow of globalization plays a major role in every aspect of state life, including the field of law and the legal product itself. Indonesia as a WTO member is obliged to ratify various types of international agreements to be made into domestic law products in the form of the Law. One of the important issues that must be protected is Intellectual Property Rights which is compiled based on the TRIPs standard. In its development, the concepts and characteristics of IPR have caused losses to developing countries such as Indonesia which have many assets in the form of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions held by local communities. The IPR legal regime cannot accommodate the protection of traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions as a whole. The direction of legal regulation that protects traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions today is to form a new legal product that is specifically outside the IPR regime. The Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions has long been composed by Indonesia since 2008 and included in the 2009-2014 National Legislation Program. But even until now there has been no approval made by the government. The normatification of this bill is very important to be done so that it can be given that traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions can be used as an aid for advancing the nation's economy. By using normative legal research methods and qualitative approaches, this study concludes that the IPR legal regime in Indonesia has not been able to provide maximum protection to traditional knowledge and traditional cultural expressions. Therefore, it is very important to discuss and ratify the Bill on Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions to become products law to guarantee protection and provide economic benefits to the State and society.]]>
<![CDATA[Burden of Proof Reversal in Criminal Acts of Money Laundering ]]>
<![CDATA[Fauzi Zainal, Muhammad Khusnul]]>;
<![CDATA[Syukri Akub]]>;
<![CDATA[Andi Muhammad Sofyan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (427.194 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.60
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the burden of proof reversal system in handling cases of money laundering. This type of research is normative juridical legal research. The results of this study indicate that in the reversal system of the burden of proof of criminal acts of money laundering, each party has a burden of proof, the public prosecutor is burdened to prove that these assets are the property of the defendant and has a relationship with the original criminal act charged, while the defendant burdened to prove the origin of the assets claimed and if the defendant is unable to prove the origin of the assets, the assets can be strongly suspected to originate from criminal offenses. There are still obstacles in law enforcement both from the substance of the law (norms), legal structure (law enforcement agencies) and the culture of law (the culture of community law).]]>
<![CDATA[Corporate Prosecution in Criminal Acts of Corruption: Opportunity and Challenge ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Sofyan, Andi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (455.599 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.67
<![CDATA[The corporation as an entity or legal subject whose existence contributes greatly in promoting economic growth and national development. However in reality, it is often for corporations to commit various criminal acts (corporate crime) that have a detrimental impact on the state and people. This research is normative legal research. Legal research which places the law as a normative system. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results showed that the enactment of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 Year 2016 was to clarify the guidelines for the Public Prosecutor in prosecuting corporate defendants in corruption criminal acts. The application of sanctions against corporations as perpetrators of corruption is carried out as an effort to recover the losses of the State and the restoration of the state’s economy is an appropriate step considering the essence of criminal punishment in eradicating criminal acts of corruption aimed at recovering state losses or the state’s economy.]]>
<![CDATA[Penggunaan Instrumen Kontrak dalam Pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Wahyu, Muhammad]]>;
<![CDATA[A. Moein, Harustiati]]>;
<![CDATA[Bola, Mustafa]]>;
<![CDATA[Arisaputra, Muhammad Ilham]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (489.957 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.68
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penggunaan instrumen kontrak dalam pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar dimungkinkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan, yakni Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2007 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 dan Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil. Kontrak yang dimaksudkan dalam konteks ini adalah kontrak publik oleh karena salah satu pihaknya adalah Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Tanggung jawab para pihak dalam kontrak untuk pembangunan Centre Point of Indonesia (CPI) di Kota Makassar lahir dari adanya hak dan kewajiban masing-masing pihak yang diatur dalam Perjanjian. Selain itu, tanggung jawab yang dimaksud juga tibul dari peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait dengan kegiatan reklamasi tersebut. Untuk itu, maka para pihak memikul beban tanggung jawab, baik secara personal maupun secara institusional sehingga para pihak dapat dinakan sanksi administratif, sanksi perdata, maupun sanksi pidana.]]>
<![CDATA[Rente as Proof of Land Ownership ]]>
<![CDATA[Alimuddin, Nur Hidayani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (426.695 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.69
<![CDATA[Rente or proof of payment of land taxes is no longer able used as proof of landownership, however there still people who think rente as proof of land ownership. This research is juridical empirical that analyze the position and perception of society that think rente as proof of ownership of the land in Pangkajene Islands Regency. The result of the study are rente position after the enactment of the Basic Agrarian Law is no longer able to be used as proof of land ownership. On the other hand the National Land Board still receive rente as written evidence to register a land, and there are still people who think rente as proof of land ownership.]]>
<![CDATA[Prinsip Kepatutan Pembiayaan dengan Jaminan Fidusia ]]>
<![CDATA[Widhaswara, Fadlia]]>;
<![CDATA[Said, Nurfaidah]]>;
<![CDATA[Paserangi, Hasbir]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 4 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (965.319 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v4i2.70
<![CDATA[Asas kepatutan dalam sebuah perjanjian memengang peran penting dan menjadi salah satu syarat sahnya perjanjian. Dalam pelaksanaannya, mewajibkan para pihak mengindahkan kepatutan dan kepantasan sehingga menciptakan rasa keadilan dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris (empirical research). Penelitian ini akan dilakukan di Kantor Notaris/PPAT di Kota Makassar dan Pembiayaan Konsumen di Kota Makassar. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah Notaris/PPAT di Kota Makassar, Pembiayaan Konsumen, dan para pihak dalam Perjanjian. Penentuan sampel dilakukan dengan teknis purposive sampling. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemberian kuasa dari konsumen sebagai debitor kepada perusahaan pembiayaan sebagai kreditor merupakan inisiatif dari satu pihak saja yakni kreditor. Hal ini jelas tidak memenuhi asas kepatutan dalam Pasal 1339 KUHPerdata, karena dalam pelaksanaannya konsumen sama sekali tidak mengerti bahkan tidak mengetahui apa yang menjadi isi dari Akta Jaminan Fidusiayang telah mengikat dirinya sebagai pemberi fidusia. Untuk memenuhi asas kepatutan, sebaiknya pengunaan Surat Kuasa untuk Kuasa yang digunakan untuk pemberian jaminan fidusia haruslah ditiadakan.]]>
<![CDATA[Konstruksi Hukum Diversi Pada Tahap Pelaksanaan Peradilan Anak ]]>
<![CDATA[Sumiati]]>;
<![CDATA[Muhamad Muhdar]]>;
<![CDATA[Ivan Zairani Lisi]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 3 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (457.272 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.85
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini membahas konsekuensi hukum dalam proses peradilan bilamana penerapan diversi tidak dilakukan pada tingkat penyidikan, dan proses yang meniadakan penerapan diversi mempengaruhi perlindungan kepentingan hukum bagi pelaku tindak pidana. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah social legal research dengan membangun variable sebagai dasar pengukuran isu hukum yang dibangun. Dalam pendekatan ini, variabel mengenai perdebatan dalam kerangka teori, perdebatan pada tingkat relasi antar norma dan perdebatan pada tingkat kepentingan korban dalam proses penerapan diversi. Konsekuensi hukum dalam proses peradilan anak bilamana penerapan diversi tidak dilakukan pada tingkat penyidikan bahwa tidak ada konsekuensi hukum bagi penyidik yang tidak melakukan upaya diversi pada saat proses pemeriksaan perkara yang dilakukan karena secara normatif tidak ada ketentuan yang dilanggar selama proses penyidikan. Peniadaan penerapan diversi bagi pelaku tindak pidana khususnya untuk anak tentunya tidak memberikan rasa keadilan bagi anak, dikarenakan hak-hak anak yang dijamin oleh undang-undang tidak terpenuhi.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Protection of Go-Jek Driver That Experiences Damages Due To The Fictive Order In Go-Food Menu In Go-Jek Aplication ]]>
<![CDATA[Hermawan, Aditya]]>;
<![CDATA[Susanti, Erna]]>;
<![CDATA[Hidayatullah, Syukri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 3 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (441.482 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.117
<![CDATA[This research is proposed to answer two questions: Firstly, to find out the cause of fictitious orders experienced by Go-Jek drivers in the Go-food menu in Go-Jek app. Secondly, to know the legal protection of Go-Jek drivers who suffered losses due to a fictitious plane in the Go-food menu on the Go-Jek app. And the research is directed to educate the public the importance of Civil law which governs agreement in the life of society. This study uses socio-legal approach with a number of resource persons. The choice of approach to socio-legal does not mean disregarding doctrinal side support on the grounds that one of the aims of this study sees a set of positive norms in relation to Legal protection of Go-Jek drivers, including legal theory support with a view to verifying the implementation of law in practice (protection and responsible). This study concludes that, Transactions using Go-Jek access has so far caused legal consequences among others who is responsible for the losses experienced by drivers, whether the Go-Jek party is responsible for the losses experienced drivers, including what kind of legal protection obtained by the driver when suffering application losses by irresponsible consumers. The factors of the emergence of fictitious orders are the existence of competitions between the Go-Jek driver, Go-Jek verification system is still weak, and the existence of bad faith in someone. Partnership agreement between PT. Go-Jek and Go-Jek’s driver is a standard clause that created and provided without involving the Go-Jek drivers in which there is a clause of transfer of responsibility because of PT. Go-Jek as the Go-Jek application service manager will not be responsible if there is a loss caused by the use of Go-Jek application. The legal relations and responsibilities of the parties should be clearly stipulated in the partnership agreement between PT. Go-Jek Indonesia, and Partners are created based on mutual agreement and agreement between both parties. To minimize the losses experienced by Go-Jek drivers in service delivery for every use of consumer spending service must have a Go-Pay account, which expenditures can not be executed if the balance in the Go-Pay account is insufficient to make an expense transaction.]]>
<![CDATA[The Contradiction of Between Judge’s Decision and Legal Provisions Regarding The Position of Heirs in Proof of Land Rights ]]>
<![CDATA[Adont, Sulistiani]]>;
<![CDATA[Syarifuddin, La]]>;
<![CDATA[Al Hidayah, Rahmawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 3 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2018 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (489.367 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v3i2.118
<![CDATA[As the economic development of Indonesian society increases, so will the need for legal certainty in the field of land for the right holder of a plot of land. the fundamental issue in verifying the right to the land is any person claiming to have a right, or appointing an event to affirm his right or to deny any right of another person, shall prove the existence of that right or prove the event, the heirs' a case study of the Samarinda District Court Judgment Number 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr.This research uses normative research method. The primary legal material of this research is the legislation that is compiled into a conceptual form based on existing legislation. Which then conducted legal analysis of the problems in this study.The result of the research is the position of the heirs in verification of the right to land must have at least two evidences, that can prove that the heirs are valid first through the certificate of inheritance. To strengthen the verification of the heirs to the land rights, the heirs must prove by means of evidence as set forth in Article 24 paragraph (1) of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Registration. The second result of the research is the letter of appointment by the Government/Local Government is a valid evidence based on existing legislation, and it becomes the base of the right which is the basis of the land ownership, the analysis of the judge's decision namely the judge decision of Samarinda District Court No. 138 / Pdt.G / 2014 / PN.Smr is incorrect and does not provide legal certainty, it is caused by no reference what is contained in Article 24 paragraph (1) and Article 32 paragraph (2) Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 on Land Registration.]]>
