cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Deni Fauzi Ramdani
Contact Email
jiastialanbdg@gmail.com
Phone
+6285315527157
Journal Mail Official
jiastialanbdg@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Hayam Wuruk No34-38 Kota Bandung
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi LAN Bandung
ISSN : -     EISSN : -     DOI : 10.31113/jia.v16i2
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Social Sciences
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi (JIA) is a scientific journal particularly focuses on the main problems in the development of the sciences of public administration and business administration areas as follows Development Administration, Economic Development, Public Policy, Development Planning, Public Sector Finance, Service Management, Public Organization, Human Resource Development, Decentralization and Regional Autonomy, Leadership, Public Sector Innovation, E-Government, Management and Business Policy, E-Commerce, Marketing Management, Budget Management, State Company Management.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Administrasi Publik
Articles 894 Documents
 86   87   88   89   90 
Comparative Studies Between Indonesia and Philippines Conditional Cash Transfer Policy: an Integrative Literature Review Astrid Fernanda; Wimmy Haliim
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v23i1.1522

Abstract

Conditional cash transfer (CCT) interventions are prominent poverty-reduction instruments in Southeast Asia, yet systematic knowledge of the mismatch between design and reality remains insufficient. This integrative literature review analyzes 90 peer-reviewed articles comparing the Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) in Indonesia and the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps) in the Philippines. Based on a design-meets-reality model, the review studies consistency between design assumptions, implementation capacity, and contextual conditions. Findings indicate a systematic design-reality gap due to three theoretical shortcomings: transfer adequacy assumptions, complementarity assumptions, and a lack of behavioral change assumptions, which poorly address the beneficiary agency's multi-sectoral integration demands. The two programs operate under different institutional structures, which creates heterogeneity in implementation. Results show that CCT's effectiveness is mostly mediated contingently rather than deterministically by indices of implementation fidelity, supply factors, and situational conditions such as geographic marginality, disaster shocks, and conflict zones. Policy solutions to PKH involve realigning transfer adequacy, integrating complementary services, and reforming coordination, whereas 4Ps priorities involve lessening fragmentation, integrating health and nutrition, and enhancing transparency for recipients.
Institutional Synergy in Village-Based Tourism Diversification: Governance Challenges in West Manggarai, Indonesia DARMANTO Darmanto
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v23i1.1541

Abstract

Tourism development in West Manggarai Regency remains highly dependent on Komodo National Park as the region’s flagship destination, creating economic vulnerability and limiting the development of alternative tourism areas. This study examines the contribution of institutional synergy in advancing the diversification of village-based tourism in West Manggarai, Indonesia. The research employs a qualitative case study approach focusing on Komodo National Park, Labuan Bajo, and Liang Dara Village. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with 19 informants, focus group discussions, field observations, and analysis of national and local policy documents. The findings indicate that tourism diversification remains limited due to fragmented institutional authority, weak cross-actor coordination, uneven tourism human resource capacity, limited accessibility, and insufficient integration of promotion strategies for non-Komodo destinations. Despite these challenges, Liang Dara Village demonstrates potential for developing nature-based, cultural, and handicraft tourism as part of integrated tourism packages. The study concludes that tourism diversification requires stronger institutional synergy among local government, the Labuan Bajo Flores Authority Agency (BPOLBF), village governments, tourism awareness groups, communities, and tourism businesses through institutionalized coordination, capacity strengthening, and integrated promotion strategies. This study contributes to tourism governance literature by highlighting the importance of institutional synergy in supporting tourism diversification in conservation-based destinations. Practically, the study recommends the establishment of formal coordination platforms among local government, BPOLBF, village governments, Pokdarwis, communities, and tourism businesses, alongside village capacity-building programs and integrated regional promotion strategies for non-Komodo destinations.
Institutional Dynamics in Sustainable Food Crop Land Protection (LP2B) Implementation in Bandung Regency, Indonesia Muhammad Andi Septiadi; Siti Alia; Rudi Kresna
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v23i1.1549

Abstract

The rapid conversion of paddy fields in Bandung Regency, Indonesia, threatens regional food security and challenges the implementation of the Sustainable Food Crop Land Protection (LP2B) policy. This study examines the institutional dynamics influencing LP2B implementation using the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed through document analysis, in-depth interviews with ten key informants, two focus group discussions (FGDs), and field observations conducted in five purposively selected villages: Sugihmukti, Jelegong, Bojongsari, Sumbersari, and Banjaran Wetan. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman. The findings reveal distinct institutional dynamics across the five villages. Jelegong and Bojongsari experience stronger land conversion pressure driven by urbanization and land market expansion, whereas Sumbersari and Banjaran Wetan face greater challenges related to irrigation limitations. Sugihmukti demonstrates relatively stronger community participation in farmland management but remains vulnerable to market-driven land conversion. LP2B implementation is constrained by weak inter-agency coordination, limited village administrative capacity, inadequate policy dissemination, ineffective incentive mechanisms, and insufficient irrigation infrastructure. Conversely, active farmer groups, village regulations, and local government initiatives provide institutional opportunities to strengthen farmland protection. The study highlights that effective LP2B implementation depends not only on formal regulations but also on the interaction between institutional capacity, local governance, and stakeholder collaboration. These findings contribute to the literature on agricultural land governance by demonstrating how institutional dynamics shape the implementation of farmland protection policies in peri-urban regions
Artificial Intelligence and Digital Transformation in Public Service Delivery in Bangladesh: Prospects and Obstacles Md Nahidul Islam
Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi: Media Pengembangan Ilmu dan Praktek Administrasi Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Lembaga Administrasi Negara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31113/jia.v23i1.1560

Abstract

This article explores the implications for the principles of Digital Era Governance (DEG) and the proposed third wave of digital transformation in Bangladesh as a result of the nation's digital transformation over the past decade and the growing application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in public services. It is a qualitative descriptive study that features a PRISMA systematic literature review of 2010–2026 peer-reviewed and selected contextual studies, thematically coding evidence across five service domains (health, education, land, finance, and e‑governance) for reintegration, needs‑based holism, digitization changes, and algorithmic augmentation/accountability. The review identifies strong but uneven progress on digitization; selective advances in needs-based holism; and only incipient reintegration, with AI deployments remaining a set of fragmented pilots plagued by digital divides, infrastructural gaps, inadequate data protection and cyber security regimes, skills shortages, institutional fragmentation, politicized regulation, and reliance on foreign technologies. The article adds to DEG by highlighting the legal‑political safeguards, intermediary actors, and technology sovereignty as aspects of third‑wave governance in the Global South. In practical terms, it suggests that inclusive public value through AI in Bangladesh can only be realized through co‑sequenced investments in rural connectivity, data and identity infrastructure, capacities of civil‑service and local intermediary organizations, rights‑respecting data‑AI governance frameworks and an independent algorithmic accountability mechanism, and provides a grounded roadmap for policymakers and a transferable framework for other lower‑middle‑income nations.

Page 90 of 90 | Total Record : 894

 86   87   88   89   90 

Filter by Year

2004 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 23 No. 1 (2026): June 2026 Vol. 22 No. 2 (2025): December 2025 Vol. 22 No. 1 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 21 No. 1 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 20 No. 2 (2023): December 2023 Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023): June 2023 Vol 19, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 19, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 18, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 18, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Ilmu Admnistrasi Vol 17, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 17, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 16, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 16, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 15, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 15, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 14, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 14, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 13, No 3 (2016): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 13, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 13, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 12, No 3 (2015): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 12, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 12, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 11, No 3 (2014): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 11, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 11, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 10, No 3 (2013): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 10, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 10, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 9, No 3 (2012): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 9, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 8, No 3 (2011): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 8, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 8, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 7, No 4 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 7, No 3 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 7, No 2 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 7, No 1 (2010): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 6, No 4 (2009): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 6, No 3 (2009): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 6, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 6, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 5, No 4 (2008): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 5, No 3 (2008): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 5, No 2 (2008): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 5, No 1 (2008): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 4, No 4 (2007): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 4, No 3 (2007): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 4, No 2 (2007): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 4, No 1 (2007): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 3, No 4 (2006): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 3, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 3, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 3, No 1 (2006): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 2, No 4 (2005): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 2, No 3 (2005): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 2, No 2 (2005): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 2, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 2, No 4 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 1, No 3 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Vol 1, No 2 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi STIA LAN Bandung Vol 1, No 1 (2004): Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi STIA LAN Bandung More Issue