cover
Contact Name
Wening Sri Wulandari
Contact Email
jurnal.phh@gmail.com
Phone
+628129427717
Journal Mail Official
jurnal.phh@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Gunung Batu 5, Bogor 16610, Indonesia. Tlp. : +62-251-8633378 Fax. : +62-251-8633413
Location
Kota bogor,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
ISSN : 02164329     EISSN : 24428957     DOI : 10.20886/jphh
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan adalah jurnal ilmiah nasional yang mempublikasikan tulisan yang telah dicermati oleh Dewan Redaksi dan Mitra Bestari di bidang hasil hutan. Tulisan dalam Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan mencerminkan inovasi dan hasil penelitian dasar dan terapan yang berkualitas di bidang hasil hutan. Topik tulisan penelitian hasil hutan meliputi: 1. Anatomi bahan berlignoselulosa 2. Sifat fisik dan mekanik bahan berlignoselulosa 3. Teknologi serat bahan berlignoselulosa 4. Papan komposit bahan berlignoselulosa 5. Biodeteriorasi dan pengawetan bahan berlignoselulosa 6. Teknologi pengeringan hasil hutan 7. Penggergajian dan pemesinan kayu 8. Pengolahan hasil hutan kayu dan bukan kayu 9. Pengolahan kimia dan energi hasil hutan 10. Ilmu kayu dan teknologi hasil hutan Keteknikan hutan 12. Pemanenan hasil hutan kayu dan bukan kayu
Articles 1,297 Documents
KETAHANAN KAYU MAHONI (Swietenia macrophylla King) TERHADAP PENGGEREK KAYU DI LAUT Mohammad Muslich; Sri Rulliaty
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 27, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.2009.27.1.88-95

Abstract

Tiga pohon mahoni berumur 12, 21, dan 30 tahun diambil secara acak dan butan tanaman. Dari ketiga log kayu tersebut dibuat contoh ttji berukuran 2,5 cm x 5 cm x 30 cm. Contoh ttji diawetkan dengan larutan CCB konsentrasi 3% melalui proses selpenuh dengan tekanan 10 atmospher selama 2 jam. Contoh yang diawetkan dan yang tidak diawetkan ditlji terhadap penggerek kayu di laut selama 3 dan 6 bulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa contoh ttji yang tidak diawetkan mendapat serangan penggerek di laut. Sebaliknya, yang diawetkan dengan CCB sangat taban, terutama contoh ttji yang diambil dari pohon yang berumur 12 tahun. Penggerek yang menyerang adalah Martesia striata Linne. Dari Jamili Pboladidae, Teredo bartchi Clapp., Dicyathifer manni Wright., dan Bankia cieba Clench./Turner. Dari Jamili Teredinidae. Pada contoh ttji juga ditemukan crustacea yaitu Sphaeroma sp. Dari Jamili Sphaeromatidae.
SIFAT PENGERINGAN ALAMI DAN DEHUMIDIFIKASI BEBERAPA JENIS KAYU INDONESIA Syarif Hidayat; Suparman Karnasudirdja
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 4, No 3 (1987): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1987.4.3.41-44

Abstract

This paper presents results of laboratory study  on the rate of moisture  content  decrease of 19 timber species.  The test specimen from each species were subjected  to air drying under sheltered condition  (under roof) and drying in a dehumidifying chamber.  At the end of each test.  the defect of each specimen  was recorded, and the most appropriate form of relation between duration  of drying and moisture  content  decrease was sought.From data analysis it was shown that a power form of relationship (Y = aXb) was reasonable, with coefficient  of correlation values varying between  0.80-0.90.The result also shows  that the longest air drying time (from 60% to 20%  moisture  content)  was recorded by kayu besi (53 days) and the shortest  by dama-dama  and palapi  (18 days).As  has been anticipated,  drying  in the dehumidifier   has reduced  considerably  the time  required for  drying from 60% to 20% moisture content. For example for the three species mentioned  above  the figures  were 20 days for  kayu  besi and 5 days for  dama-dama  and palapi.The result shows further  that severe defect was observed in kolaka,  bugis, suling and belu itam.  The remaining species have either moderate or slight defect.
PULP SULFAT DARI BATANG KELAPA (Sulphate pulp from coconut trunk) Rena M Siagian; M Rosid
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 1 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1993.11.1.37 – 41

Abstract

This paper deals with the study of the influence of active alkali concentration to the properties of coconut trunk (cocos nucifera L.) sulphate pulping trials were conducted in laboratory digester with the cooking liquor circulation, using three levels of active alkali, i,e 14, 16 and 18% cooking sulfidity was 25%, wood to liquor ratio was 1:4, and maximum temperature was 165°c maintained for 120 minutes.Pulp yields from coconut trunks are ranged from 39.9 to 40.9% with permanganate number of 8.17 to 11.15. the increasing amount of active alkali has no significant influence to the yield, and overall physical properties of the pulp but tear factor. The higher active alkali concentration, the lower permanganate number and the higher alkali consumption. It is hope that the sulphate pulping of coconut trunk with active alkali of 16% would give adequate yield and processing properties.
PENINGKATAN PRODUKSI LAK MELALUI PERBAIKAN SISTEM PEMUNGUTAN Ishak Sumantri; Arifin Suzanto; Haryono Haryono
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 6 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1989.6.6.392-397

Abstract

An investigation on lac cultivation was carried out in Probolinggo Forest District in September 1988. The purpose is to find possible ways of increasing the production. Host trees and methods for lac cultivation were observed. The results reveal that: Kesambi trees are good as the host for lac cultivation because they have sap density of 0.16 and sap reaction of 0.59 which which condition is favorable for lac survivals.Higher lac production can be obtained by using host trees that have many branches and twigs. Therefore, host trees need to be pruned in order to provide many new branches and twigs.Lacquor secretion yield can be harvested 5 months after lac cultivation. The lacquor production, thew is sorted intolacquor for cultivation and industrial materials. The cultivated lac can produce lacquor to the amount of three to five fold, depending on the quality of lac cu1tivated and the existance of diseases. 
PENGARUH SIFAT FISIK DAN ANATOMI TERHADAP SIFAT PENGERINGAN ENAM JENIS KAYU Efrida Basri; Sri Rulliaty
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 26, No 3 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.2008.26.3.253-262

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengetahui pengaruh sifat fisik dan anatorni terhadap sifat pengeringan enam jenis kayu, yaitu tisuk (Hibisms 111acropf?yllus), gading (Koilodepas sp), mahang (Macarangaf?ypoleuca), telisai (Planchoniagrandis), sibau (Bl11meodendronkurzi1), clankenari (Santiria laevigata). Sifat fisik meliputi berat jenis dan penyusutan; sedangkan sifat anatomi kayu adalah lebar jari-jari. Sedangkan sifat pengeringan yang diuji meliputi cacat pecah ujung dan permukaan serta pecah di bagian dalam kayu, menggunakan metode pengeringan suhu tinggi (100°C). Berdasarkan kelas kerusakan/cacat yang terjadi dari hasil pengeringan suhu tinggi, kemudian ditetapkan sifat pengeringan untuk masing-masing jenis kayu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan regresi geometrik antara BJ dengan penyusutan tangensial (R' = 0,78), dan regresi linier antara lebar jari-jari dengan sifat pengeringan kayu (R' = 0,60). Kayu tisuk dan sibau termasuk kayu yang sangat mudah dikeringkan karena memiliki berat jenis rendah sampai sedang, dan diameter pembuluh yang cukup besar. Kayu mahang, gading dan telisai sangat sulit dikeringkan. Faktor penyebab, di antaranya adalah berat jenis kayu yang terlalu tinggi (gading dan telisai) dan terlalu rendah (mahang), serta struktur anatomi yang tidak mendukung yaitu dinding serat yang tebal (kayu gading), diameter pembuluh kecil (mahang dan gading), dan berisi tilosis (gading dan telisai).
PENGAWETAN SEBELAS JENIS KAYU DENGAN METODE RENDAMAN PANAS-DINGIN Barly Barly; Pipin Permadi
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 4, No 4 (1987): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1987.4.4.8-14

Abstract

A study on the treatability of eleven wood species was carried out using hot and cold soaking  treatment  methods  with Koppers Formula  7 as preservative. Specimens measuring 50 cm x 5 cm x 5 cm were soaked  in five  and ten percent preservative  solution for  a duration  of one, two, and three hours and then allowed to cool while the timber is still soaked in the liquid.  The penetration  and retention  were recorded. From this study  the following   conclusions  could  be drawn:The treatment schedule and concentration  of solution  have a highly significant  effect  on the preservative  penetration  and retention. Much higher retention  was shown  when longer hot soaking  and higher concentration  were employed.
GAS BIO DARI HASIL FERMENTASI ECENG GONDOK DUA FASE DAN KAYU LAMTORO SEBAGAI DAHAN BAKAR UNTUK MEMASAK Tjutju Nurhayati
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 1 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1994.12.1.1-4

Abstract

Riogas of 2-phase water hyacinth fermentation  and lamtoro wood of 4 years old were used as fuel for  cooking by the family.  The value of nutrition requirement was  10,353 calories  made of rice, meat,  fermented  soyabean,  etc. consumed by 5 persons in the family.The  study revealed that bio gas consumptian  was 1.281 1.  with the caloriffic  value of  4,569 Kcal/m3  and methane  content of 46.78%. This bio gas energy  was  5.85 Mcal for  181 minutes of cooking period.  This bio  gas consumption can be fulfilled  by using  33.14 kg fresh Water hyacinth per day in 300 1 volume reactor and 4.3% dry Water.Lamtoro  consumption  Was  4, 243 g for  159  minutes of cooking period with the  caloriffic  vatue of  4,299 Kca/kg and moisture  content of 14.50%. This lamtoro enetgy  was   18.24 Meal per day per family.  The total weight of wood cutting was   164. 80 kg with the moisture content ranged from  44. 74 to 63.33  %.  This  amount  will  be  enough for  cooking for  3 4 days  when converted  to 14.50 % maisture  content.
ANALISIS PENDAPATAN PETANI TUMPANGSARI DI KESATUAN PEMANGKUAN HUTAN BOJONEGORO Akub J Abdurachman
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 7 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1990.6.7.431-442

Abstract

Taungya farming system  has given peasants an opportunity to produce some food  without  getting  involved in forest planting  activities. It is not only  cheap, but also very  attractive to peoples around the  forest. This report was a result of data processing of  peasant's income  in  taungya   farming  system in Bojonegoro Forest District, East Java,   early in 1986.The total peasant's income consists of taungya farming income, other forest  activities  income,  and  income  of  non forest   activities.  Generaly,  the share of each  type  of income    to the average total  peasant's income per year is concecutively 36.8 % (Rp 57,381) of  taungya  farming income;  26.9 % (Rp 41,976) of  other  forest  activities  income  and  36.3.   % (Rp 56,473)  of  non  forest  activities  income.The proportion of  taungya  income to  total  income  of  lnmas peasants (55.8%) is higher  than  Non-Inmas  peasants (21.8%); whereas  peasants working on a low site  quality    have proportion of taungya income to total income, 12.3%, which is lower than those  working  on a  site  with  higher  quality (50.1%).In fact, peasant's income that resultfrom forest activities, especially taungya   farming  still  could  not  cope  withtheir  poverty.   Average   total  income   of  peasants is  Rp  50,814 per capita  in  a year or only 77 % of  the minimum living standard  cost  only.   Nevertheless,  the  average   total  income   of  peasants  had good  distribution,   as far as it is concerned  this would  not  cause an alarming  trouble   to  the  social   community. 
Pengaruh komposisi perekat tanin urea formaldehida terhadap keteguhan rekat kayu lapis meranti Adi Santoso; Paribotro Sutigno
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 3 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1995.13.3.87-93

Abstract

Based on previous  research  tannin formaldehyde  resin from  Acacia   decurens     bark can  be used for  exterior plywood adhesive.  To reduce  the cost,   the effect of urea addition  to produce tannin   urea formaldeliyde   resin has been  studied.   The other treatment  employed is percentage of paraformaldehyde as hardener.The  results  show  that   the  properties  of  tannin  urea formaldehyde   resin  conform  with Indonesian standard for  phenol formaldehyde  resin.   The effect  of weight ratio based on mol ratio on  the plywood  bonding strenght is significant,  while the effect ofpercentage  of hardener   is not significant.    the  weight ratio tannin.urea =  1:2 with three percentages of hardener meet German standardfor exterior plywood (type AW-100).   The  weight ratio tannin urea =  1=2,5  with 2,5%   and 5% hardener  meet the standard, while the weight ratio tannin:urea  =  1:3  do not meet the standard. The plywood bonding strenght  tends    to  decrease if using more urea.  Based on economic consideration,  it is recommended 10   use weight  ratio tannin.urea  =   1:2,5  based on  mol  ratio with percentage of hardener 2,5%   of liquid resin.
PENGARUH BAHAN PENGAWET TERHADAP KETEGUHAN REKAT DAN KEAWETAN KAYU LAPIS TUSAM (Pinus merkusii) l M Sulastiningsih; Jasni Jasni
Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 4 (1997): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hasil Hutan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20886/jphh.1997.15.4.235-246

Abstract

Jenis kayu yang digunakan di lndustri kayu lapis di Indonesia pada umumnya mempunyai kelas awet rendah. Oleh karena itu untuk meningkatkan keawetan kayu lapis tersebut perlu dilakukan usaha pengawetan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh bahan pengawet permetrin terhadap keteguhan rekat dan keawetan kayu lapis tusam yang direkat dengan fenol formaldehida. Kandungan bahan aktif permetrin dalam larutun bahan pengawet yang digunakan adalah 36,8 % dan konsentrasi bahan pengawet yang ditambahkannke dalam perekat fenol formardehida adalah 0.0. 0.25, 0.50, 0. 75, 1.0, 1.25, 1.50, 1. 75 dan 2.0% dari berat perekat.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penambahan bahan pengawet permetrin dalam perekat fenol formaldehida pada pembuatan kayu lapis tusam tidak berpengaruh terhadap keteguhan rekat kayu lapis tusam baik yang diuji menurut standar Indonesia maupun standar Jepang. Sebaliknya penambahan bahan pengawet permetrin tersebut berpengaruh pada keawetan kayu                                                                                                                                                                                        235 lapis tusam terhadap serangan rayap tanah dan rayap kayu kering. Kematian rayap.tanah dan rayap kayu kering meningkat dengan meningkatnya konsentrasi permetrin. Kehilangan berat dan derajat serangan menurun dengan meningkatnya konsentrasi permetrin. Penambahan bahan pengawet permetrin sebanyak 2 % dari berat perekat fenol formadehida dapat menahan serangan rayap tanah maupun rayap kayu kering. Keteguhan rekat kayu lapis tusam yang dibuat dengan berbagai konsentrasi permetrin semuanya memenuhi standar Indonesia dan standar Jepang.

Page 80 of 130 | Total Record : 1297


Filter by Year

1984 2022


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 40, No 3 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 40, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 40, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 39, No 3 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 39, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 39, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 38, No 3 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 38, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 38, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 37, No 3 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 37, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 37, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 36, No 3 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 36, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 36, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 35, No 4 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 35, No 3 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 35, No 2 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 35, No 1 (2017): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 34, No 4 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 34, No 3 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 34, No 2 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 34, No 1 (2016): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 33, No 4 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 33, No 3 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 33, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 33, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 32, No 4 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 32, No 3 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 32, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 32, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 31, No 4 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 31, No 3 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 31, No 2 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 31, No 1 (2013): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 30, No 4 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 30, No 3 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 30, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 30, No 1 (2012): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 29, No 4 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 29, No 3 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 29, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 29, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 28, No 4 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 28, No 3 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 28, No 2 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 28, No 1 (2010): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 27, No 4 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 27, No 3 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 27, No 2 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 27, No 1 (2009): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 26, No 4 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 26, No 3 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 26, No 2 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 26, No 1 (2008): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 25, No 4 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 25, No 3 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 25, No 2 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 25, No 1 (2007): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 24, No 5 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 24, No 4 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 24, No 3 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 24, No 2 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 24, No 1 (2006): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 23, No 5 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 23, No 4 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 23, No 3 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 23, No 2 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 23, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 22, No 4 (2004): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 22, No 3 (2004): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 22, No 2 (2004): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 22, No 1 (2004): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 21, No 3 (2003): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 21, No 2 (2003): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 21, No 1 (2003): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 20, No 5 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 20, No 4 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 20, No 3 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 20, No 2 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 20, No 1 (2002): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 19, No 4 (2001): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 19, No 3 (2001): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 19, No 2 (2001): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 19, No 1 (2001): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 18, No 3 (2000): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 18, No 2 (2000): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 18, No 1 (2000): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 17, No 4 (2000): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 17, No 3 (2000): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 17, No 2 (1999): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 17, No 1 (1999): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 16, No 5 (1999): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 16, No 4 (1999): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 16, No 3 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 16, No 2 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 16, No 1 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 8 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 7 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 6 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 5 (1998): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 4 (1997): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 3 (1997): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 2 (1997): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 15, No 1 (1997): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 10 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 9 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 8 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 7 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 6 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 5 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 4 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 3 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 2 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 14, No 1 (1996): Buletin Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 8 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 7 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 6 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 5 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 4 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 3 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 2 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 13, No 1 (1995): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 6 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 5 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 4 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 3 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 2 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 12, No 1 (1994): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 8 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 7 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 6 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 5 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 4 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 3 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 2 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 11, No 1 (1993): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 10, No 6 (1992): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 10, No 5 (1992): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 10, No 4 (1992): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 10, No 3 (1992): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 10, No 2 (1992): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 10, No 1 (1992): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 7 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 6 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 5 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 4 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 3 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 2 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 9, No 1 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 8, No 6 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 8, No 5 (1991): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 8, No 4 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 8, No 3 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 8, No 2 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 8, No 1 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 7, No 4 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 7, No 3 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 7, No 2 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 7, No 1 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 8 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 7 (1990): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 6 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 5 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 4 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 3 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 2 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 6, No 1 (1989): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 7 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 6 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 5 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 4 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 3 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 2 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 5, No 1 (1988): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 4, No 4 (1987): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 4, No 3 (1987): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 4, No 2 (1987): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 4, No 1 (1987): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 3, No 4 (1986): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 3, No 3 (1986): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 3, No 2 (1986): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 3, No 1 (1986): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 2, No 4 (1985): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 2, No 3 (1985): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 2, No 2 (1985): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 2, No 1 (1985): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 1, No 4 (1984): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 1, No 3 (1984): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 1, No 2 (1984): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan Vol 1, No 1 (1984): Jurnal Penelitian Hasil Hutan More Issue