cover
Contact Name
Muhadam Labolo
Contact Email
jurnaldharmapraja@ipdn.ac.id
Phone
+6281221798695
Journal Mail Official
jurnaldharmapraja@ipdn.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan IPDN Jatinangor Jl. Ir. Soekarno Km.20, Jatinangor, Jawa Barat, Sumedang, Jawa Barat 45363 Email: jurnaldharmapraja@ipdn.ac.id
Location
Kab. sumedang,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
ISSN : 19798857     EISSN : 27217043     DOI : https:doi.org/10.33701/jppdp
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja is a scientific journal which publishes theoretical and empirical articles on the most recent knowledge, researches, or applied researches in fields of politics and government including decentralization, political parties, elections, conflicts, human rights, and political thoughts. The targeted audiences of Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja are academicians, students, graduate students, practitioners, and other people interested in politics and government issues.
Articles 103 Documents
ESCAPING THE RESOURCE CURSE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA AND NIGERIA IN THE CONTEXT OF NATURAL RESOURCE PRIVATIZATION Rizky Bangun Wibisono; Nazilatus Sholikhah; Anggun Nadya Dinata; M Arvin Kirano; M Haris Ramdani
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Vol 18 No 1 (2025): Volume 18 Nomor 1: Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates the political instability triggered by the privatization of natural resources in Indonesia, particularly through Government Regulation No. 72/2016, using Nigeria as a comparative case. Employing a qualitative, descriptive-comparative approach and case studies in Papua, Sulawesi, and the Niger Delta, the research finds that non-inclusive resource governance, weak state oversight, and the dominance of foreign corporate actors have led to local marginalization, social inequality, and conflict. The Nigerian case illustrates how overreliance on oil, extreme privatization, and poor governance have entrenched the resource curse—manifesting in poverty, political crisis, and armed violence. This study underscores the risks Indonesia faces as it exhibits early signs of similar vulnerabilities, including agrarian disputes, environmental degradation, and diminishing state control over strategic sectors. The paper calls for inclusive governance reforms, greater public participation, and a critical reassessment of privatization policies to prevent escalating instability and ensure sustainable, equitable resource management. Keywords: Privatization, resource curse, inclusive governance.
Dekonstruksi Independensi KPK Pasca-Revisi UU No. 19 Tahun 2019: Analisis Politik Hukum dan Penanganan Korupsi Pejabat Eksekutif NOVI ENJELINA PUTRI; Muhaimin
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Vol 18 No 2 (2025): Volume 18 Nomor 2: Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jppdp.v18i2.5708

Abstract

The revision of the Corruption Eradication Commission Law through Law No. 19 of 2019 has sparked serious debate regarding the weakening of the institution and the erosion of the KPK's independence, particularly in handling corruption cases involving executive officials. This article aims to analyze how the KPK's independence has been reconstructed after the revision and how this is reflected in law enforcement practices. The analysis was conducted on a number of strategic decisions, including the cases of Edhy Prabowo, Juliari Batubara, Syahrul Yasin Limpo, and Lukas Enembe, which show indications of structural and procedural weakening, as well as inconsistencies in the judicial and criminal justice processes. A comparison is made with the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) model in Hong Kong, which has proven highly effective thanks to guaranteed institutional independence, operational transparency, and active community involvement in corruption prevention. The results of the study show that after the revision, the independence of the KPK has experienced a shift in the political direction of law enforcement in combating corruption in Indonesia, structural weaknesses reflected in procedural interventions, changes in investigation patterns, and inconsistencies in verdicts against high-level corruption perpetrators, as well as a spirit of independence that is vulnerable to political intervention. This article recommends reinforcing the legal framework that guarantees the KPK's operational independence and conducting a systemic evaluation of political influence in
REVOLUTIONARY NATIONALISM AND EARLY STATE-BUILDING: DIVERGENT PATH OF NKRUMAH AND SOEKARNO Pietro Fasola; Fadhli Zul Fauzi
Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja Vol 18 No 2 (2025): Volume 18 Nomor 2: Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja
Publisher : Fakultas Politik Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article presents a comparative historical analysis of postcolonial state-building under the leadership of Kwame Nkrumah in Ghana and Sukarno in Indonesia. It argues that revolutionary nationalism functioned as a double-edged force, enabling mass mobilization and political legitimacy while simultaneously generating institutional fragility in newly independent states. Employing a qualitative historical-comparative methodology and a most similar systems design, the study examines how colonial institutional legacies, bureaucratic capacity, strategies of political legitimacy, civil–military relations, social fragmentation, and Cold War geopolitics shaped divergent state-building trajectories in the two cases.The analysis shows that although both leaders pursued anti-imperialist agendas, state-led development, and mass mobilization, they adopted contrasting political strategies in response to distinct domestic and international constraints. Nkrumah relied on political centralization and a single-party system to compensate for weak administrative capacity, whereas Sukarno emphasized ideological integration and symbolic unity through Guided Democracy within a highly pluralistic social context. In both cases, however, these strategies were structurally constrained and ultimately contributed to political instability and regime collapse.The article concludes that postcolonial state-building cannot be explained by leadership charisma alone but must be understood as a product of the interaction between institutional inheritance, societal formation, political authority, and global forces.

Page 11 of 11 | Total Record : 103