cover
Contact Name
Zaenal Arifin
Contact Email
zaenal@usm.ac.id
Phone
+6282242226898
Journal Mail Official
usmlawreview@usm.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jl. Soekarno - Hatta
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW
Published by Universitas Semarang
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26214105     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26623/julr.v2i2.2266
Core Subject : Social,
Journal USM LAW REVIEW (JULR) is an academic journal for Legal Studies published by Master of Law, Semarang University. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. The focus and scope of this journal are legal problems in the fields of Criminal Law; Civil Law; Constitutional Law; International Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Business Law; Medical Law; Environmental Law; Adat Law; Agrarian Law; Legal Philosophy.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 62 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER" : 62 Documents clear
Eksistensi Kontrak Kegiatan Ekonomi Kreatif Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Pengajuan Kredit Bank Ilhami, Maulidya; Abubakar, Lastuti; Handayani, Tri
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.9428

Abstract

This research and article aim to find answers to the difficulties in implementing contracts for creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral, which are indeed regulated, but their implementation has never been carried out in Indonesia itself. The urgency of this research is to support the development of the creative economy industry sector, particularly in terms of funding, and to provide benefits and clarity for the parties involved. Therefore, legal research was conducted using the normative juridical method. This research and article provide new insights regarding contracts in creative economy activities as collateral, which have not been extensively discussed in previous literature. Based on the research conducted, it is known that, in principle, the regulation of contracts for creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral is very likely to be implemented as long as there is a specific mechanism regarding this matter. A mechanism is needed because a contract cannot simply be classified as an object, so the economic value contained in the contract can be guaranteed through fiduciary collateral. Furthermore, there is a need for regulations in the POJK regarding the details of the implementation of contracts by creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral, the approval of the parties involved in the contract related to the collateralization of the contract, and the application of the principle of prudence by banks before accepting creative economy activity contracts as collateral. With the existence of regulations and mechanisms, as well as the approval of the parties involved in using contracts from creative economy entrepreneurs as collateral, it can provide legal certainty in its implementation and protect the parties involved. Penelitian dan artikel ini bertujuan menemukan jawaban atas kesulitan dalam pengimplementasian kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan yang mana pengaturannya memang sudah ada, tetapi pengimplementasiannya belum pernah dilakukan di Indonesia sendiri. Adapun urgensi dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendukung pengembangan sektor industri ekonomi kreatif terutama dari segi pendanaan serta memberikan manfaat, dan kejelasan bagi para pihak yang terkait di dalamnya. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan penelitian hukum dengan metode yuridis normatif. Penelitian dan artikel ini memberikan wawasan baru terkait kontrak dalam kegiatan ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan yang belum banyak dibahas dalam literatur-literatur sebelumnya. Berdasarkan penelitian yang dilakukan, maka diketahui bahwa pada dasarnya peraturan kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan sangat mungkin untuk diimplikasikan selama terdapat mekanisme khusus mengenai hal tersebut. Mekanisme dibutuhkan karena kontrak tidak dapat serta merta digolongkan sebagai benda, sehingga nilai ekonomis yang terdapat dalam kontrak tersebut yang dapat dijaminkan melalui jaminan fidusia. Lebih lanjut, perlu adanya pengaturan pada POJK terkait rincian pelaksanaan kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan, persetujuan dari para pihak dalam kontrak berkaitan dengan penjaminan kontrak tersebut, serta penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian oleh bank sebelum menerima kontrak kegiatan ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan. Dengan adanya pengaturan dan mekanisme, serta persetujuan para pihak dalam menjadikan kontrak pelaku usaha ekonomi kreatif sebagai jaminan, dapat memberikan kepatian hukum dalam pelaksanaannya serta melindungi para pihak yang terlibat.
Implementation of Public Complaints to the Ombudsman Regarding Road Infrastructure Wijayanti, Anisa; Al Meida Putri, Ardhita
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10646

Abstract

This research aims to examine the function, role and authority of the Ombudsman representative of Lampung The province accepts public complaints under the Ombudsman Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 37 of 2008. The thing that underlies this research is the alleged maladministration practices carried out by public service officials of Lampung Province regarding road infrastructure that has not been repaired. This research is a field research with a sociological juridical approach. The results of this study indicate that the Ombudsman of Lampung Province has fulfilled his duties and obligations in accordance with Law No. 37 of 2008 on the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. Where all incoming complaints have been received, processed and submitted to the authorities in tackling this problem.
Pemberantasan Mafia Tanah di Indonesia: Dalam Mewujudkan Keadilan dan Kepastian Hukum Bagi Pemilik Tanah Zamil, Yusuf Saepul; Eprilia, Farina Firda; Firdaus, Hendri; Maharso, Triadi; Rizal, Nursyah
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10239

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find solutions to prevent and eradicate land mafia in Indonesia. This is because the practice of land mafia in Indonesia has been going on for a long time, and is very worrying and detrimental to the state and society. The urgency of this study is to ensure legal certainty for legitimate land owners from land grabbing by the land mafia. This study uses a normative legal research method, namely a research method using secondary data or library data as its main data supported by primary data. Efforts that can be made to eradicate the land mafia are by changing land data into digital data including digitally integrated land maps. By changing land data digitally, it produces accurate land data so that there is no loophole for the land mafia to claim land belonging to others. The digital land data includes land maps per plot which are contained in the land book and then issued electronic land certificates or hard copy land certificates based on digital data that has one hundred percent accuracy. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mencari solusi pencegahan dan pemberantasan mafia tanah di Indonesia. Hal ini dilatarbelakangi karena praktik mafia tanah di Indonesia sudah berlangsung sangat lama, sangat mengkhawatirkan dan merugikan negara dan masyarakat. Urgensi dari penelitian ini adalah agar adanya kepastian hukum bagi pemilik tanah yang sah dari perampasan tanah oleh mafia tanah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu metode penelitian dengan menggunakan data sekunder atau data kepustakaan sebagai data utamanya dengan didukung oleh data primer. Upaya yang dapat dilakukan untuk memberantas mafia tanah adalah dengan merubah data pertanahan menjadi data digital termasuk peta tanah yang terintegerasi secara digital. Dengan merubah data pertanahan secara digital, maka menghasilkan data pertanahan yang akurat sehingga tidak ada celah bagi mafia tanah untuk mengklaim tanah milik orang lain. Data pertanahan secara digital tersebut meliputi peta tanah perbidang yang dimuat dalam buku tanah kemudian diterbitkan sertifikat tanah secara elektronik atau sertifikat tanah berbentuk hard copy berdasarkan data digital yang mempunyai keakuratan seratus persen.
Kewajiban Notaris Membacakan Akta Autentik Bagi Penghadap Disabilitas Rungu Analisis Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Sesung, Rusdianto; Putri, Ria Riani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10695

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the obligation of Notaries to read authentic deeds for deaf parties. The limited access of deaf parties to the process of making authentic deeds is due to the absence of translators or facilitators who understand their needs in communicating. This problem is important because of the potential for the failure to fulfill the validity of authentic deeds and the protection of the rights of deaf parties. The normative legal method is used in this study through a legal approach to analyze the obligation of Notaries to read authentic deeds for deaf parties. The updates in this study show that Notaries have an important responsibility in reading authentic deeds to the parties involved as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph (1) letter (l) of the Notary Law. However, until now, the Notary Law (UUJN) has not expressly regulated the obligation of Notaries to provide sign language interpreters for clients with deaf disabilities, which is a form of solution for deaf parties. The results of the study indicate that there is a regulatory gap that does not fully cover Notaries in handling the special needs of people with hearing disabilities, which in turn can cause potential problems related to the validity and authenticity of authentic deeds. This study concludes that changes are needed to the UUJN which explicitly requires Notaries to provide sign language interpreters for people with hearing disabilities. Penelitian ini memberikan tujuan untuk melakukan analisis kewajiban Notaris membacakan akta autentik bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu. Keterbatasan akses penghadap disabilitas rungu terhadap proses pembuatan akta autentik sebagai akibat dari ketiadaan penerjemah atau fasilitator yang memahami kebutuhan mereka dalam berkomunikasi. Masalah ini menjadi penting karena adanya potensi tidak terpenuhinya keabsahan akta autentik dan perlindungan hak dari penghadap disabilitas rungu. Pada penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif untuk melakukan analisis kewajiban Notaris membacakan akta autentik bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu. Pembaharuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa Notaris memiliki tanggung jawab yang penting dalam membacakan akta autentik kepada para pihak yang terlibat sebagaimana Pasal 16 ayat (1) huruf (l) UUJN. Namun hingga saat ini, UU Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) belum secara tegas mengatur kewajiban Notaris dalam menyediakan juru bahasa isyarat bagi klien dengan disabilitas rungu yang merupakan bentuk solusi untuk penghadap disabilitas rungu. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kekosongan regulasi yang belum mencakup sepenuhnya bagi Notaris dalam menangani kebutuhan khusus para penyandang disabilitas rungu, yang pada gilirannya dapat menimbulkan potensi permasalahan terkait validitas dan keaslian akta autentik. Penelitian ini memberikan kesimpulan bahwa diperlukan perubahan pada UUJN yang secara tegas kewajiban Notaris menyediakan juru bahasa isyarat bagi penghadap disabilitas rungu.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Sebagai Kreditur Istimewa Arapenta, Deary Christian; Karsona, Agus Mulya; Sari, Deviana Yunita
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10103

Abstract

This research analyzes the impact of corporate bankruptcy and the legal protection that must be provided to workers, particularly regarding the normative rights that workers are entitled to receive. In such circumstances, workers' normative rights, such as wages, severance pay, and benefits, are often not fulfilled. Workers are in a weak position as creditors in bankruptcy proceedings, as the regulations prioritize secured creditors. This research employs the normative juridical method. The novelty of this research lies in the comprehensive analysis of legal certainty and justice for workers as preferred creditors in bankruptcy cases, as well as the proposal for legal reforms to harmonize conflicting regulations to strengthen the protection of workers' normative rights. The conclusion drawn from the discussion is that workers, as preferred creditors, must be prioritized in the payment of bankruptcy debts. There is a need for stricter supervision, stronger legal protection for workers in bankruptcy proceedings, and the necessity for reforms in bankruptcy law, especially in the mechanism for the settlement and distribution of bankruptcy assets to each creditor. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak kepailitan perusahaan dan bagaimana perlindungan hukum yang harus diberikan kepada tenaga kerja, terutama hak-hak normatif yang harus diterima pekerja. Dalam kondisi ini, hak-hak normatif pekerja, seperti gaji, pesangon, dan tunjangan, sering kali tidak dipenuhi. Pekerja berada pada posisi yang lemah sebagai kreditur dalam proses kepailitan, karena aturan lebih mengutamakan kreditur yang memiliki jaminan. Yuridis normatif adalah metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis komprehensif mengenai kepastian hukum dan keadilan bagi pekerja sebagai kreditur preferen dalam kasus kepailitan, serta usulan reformasi hukum untuk menyelaraskan peraturan yang bertentangan guna memperkuat perlindungan hak-hak normatif pekerja. Kesimpulan yang dapat diambil dari hasil pembahasan bahwa pekerja sebagai kreditur preferen harus didahulukan dalam pembayaran utang pailit, diperlukan pengawasan yang lebih ketat, perlindungan hukum yang lebih kuat bagi tenaga kerja dalam proses kepailitan, dan diharuskan adanya pembaharuan undang-undang kepailitan khususnya dalam mekanisme pemberesan dan pembagian boedel pailit kepada masing-masing kreditur.
State Financial Position as State Equity Participation in Indonesia Investment Authority Al Farizy, Mohammad Rafi; Nugroho, Fiska Maulidian; Prakoso, Bhim
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10453

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine the position of state finances as state capital participation in the INA. Through Government Regulation in Lieu of Law (PERPPU) No. 2/2022, the Investment Management Institution as known as Indonesia Investment Authority (INA) is a new initiative by the government to manage Central Government investments. Referring to the Santiago Principles, the government uses the separate legal entity model for the establishment of INA. The capital of INA comes from state equity participation, which in Indonesia’s financial system is categorized as separate state assets. This means that, in essence, INA’s capital is considered state finance. However, there is a regulatory construction in Article 158 paragraph (4) which states that INA’s losses are not state losses, thus INA’s equity is no longer considered state finance. This is akin to the concept of a separate legal entity in corporations, which have their own assets separate from the assets of their owners/managers. Previously, Constitutional Court Decisions No. 48/PUU-XI/2013 and No. 62/PUU-XI/2013 had established that separated state assets remain state finance. Therefore, a question arises regarding the status of INA. Using normative legal research methods, the research findings indicate that INA’s equity originating from state equity participation has transformed into INA’s private finance. However, this transformation is not in line with the national financial system constructed based on the welfare state principle. Consequently, this could potentially create loopholes for the embezzlement of state funds.
Fungsi Hasil Laboratorium Forensik Sebagai Bukti dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika Farid, Achmad Miftah; Indahsari, Novi Nur
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10729

Abstract

This research aims to examine the position of forensic laboratory analysis results within the legal system based on Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, and the function of forensic laboratory results as evidence in narcotics criminal cases at the Sukoharjo Police Resort. The forensic laboratory plays an important role in proving narcotics cases, including in the Sukoharjo Police Resort area, by ensuring the identification of the type and concentration of narcotics as valid evidence in court. Unlike previous studies, the focus of this research is on the validity of forensic evidence in supporting justice in narcotics cases, particularly in the Sukoharjo area. The research method used is normative juridical with an analytical approach to relevant legislation, as well as using primary data from Law Number 35 of 2009, the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Police Medical Regulations. Research findings indicate that forensic laboratories play a central role in proving drug-related crimes by providing valid scientific analysis, which also influences judges' considerations in the criminal justice system. Law Number 35 of 2009 has provided a clear legal basis, but the validity of forensic laboratory results can be questioned if there is damage or contamination of the evidence. This study highlights the importance of more optimal forensic evidence management at Sukoharjo Police Station and recommends the enhancement of quality control procedures to minimize these obstacles in order to ensure justice and legal certainty. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kedudukan hasil analisis laboratorium forensik dalam sistem hukum berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika, serta fungsi hasil laboratorium forensik sebagai alat bukti dalam kasus tindak pidana Narkotika di Kepolisian Resor Sukoharjo. Laboratorium forensik memiliki peranan penting dalam pembuktian perkara Narkotika, termasuk di wilayah Polres Sukoharjo, dengan memastikan identifikasi jenis dan kadar Narkotika sebagai alat bukti yang sah di pengadilan. Berbeda dari penelitian sebelumnya, fokus kajian ini adalah validitas bukti forensik dalam mendukung keadilan kasus Narkotika, terutama di kawasan Sukoharjo. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan, serta menggunakan data primer dari Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009, KUHAP, dan Peraturan Kedokteran Kepolisian. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa laboratorium forensik memiliki peran sentral dalam pembuktian tindak pidana Narkotika melalui penyediaan analisis ilmiah yang valid, yang turut memengaruhi pertimbangan hakim dalam sistem peradilan pidana. Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 telah memberikan landasan hukum yang jelas, namun validitas hasil laboratorium forensik dapat diragukan jika terjadi kerusakan atau kontaminasi pada barang bukti. Kajian ini menyoroti pentingnya pengelolaan bukti forensik yang lebih optimal di Polres Sukoharjo, serta merekomendasikan peningkatan prosedur pengendalian kualitas untuk meminimalkan hambatan tersebut demi menjamin keadilan dan kepastian hukum.
Efektivitas Sanksi Administrasi Dalam Mencegah Pencemaran Sungai Stella, Stella; Prianto, Yuwono
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10460

Abstract

The purpose of the research is to analyze the effectiveness of compliance with the Environmental Law and the impact of administrative sanctions on companies violating river pollution regulations. The urgency of this research lies in the need to analyze the effectiveness of administrative sanctions in curbing environmental violations by textile companies, which cause river pollution in Indonesia, to provide a deterrent effect and raise awareness of the importance of maintaining environmental quality. The number of environmental violations by textile companies that cause river water pollution is the reason behind the preparation of this research. This is very important because scientific studies serve as an analysis and information for the general public and input for the government so that it can become a concentrated issue and achieve a quick and precise resolution. The type of this research is normative juridical. The novelty in the research that the author presents is the author's intention to understand the effects of the use of administrative sanctions. The results of this study indicate that the effectiveness of administrative sanctions is considered to provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators/parties who pollute the river water. However, there is a need to further enhance the administrative sanctions given to achieve a more significant impact. Additionally, it is also noted that there is a need to improve the quality of supervision and the integrity of law enforcement officers to create better and more optimal environmental law enforcement. Tujuan penelitian untuk menganalisi efektifitas kepatuhan Undang-Undang Lingkungan Hidup dan dampak sanksi administrasi terhadap perusahaan pelanggar pencemaran sungai. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada perlunya analisis efektivitas sanksi administratif dalam menekan pelanggaran lingkungan oleh perusahaan tekstil, yang menyebabkan pencemaran sungai di Indonesia, untuk memberikan efek jera dan meningkatkan kesadaran akan pentingnya menjaga kualitas lingkungan. Jumlah kasus pelanggaran lingkungan oleh perusahaan tekstil yang menyebabkan tercemarnya air sungai menjadi alasan yang melatarbelakangi disusunnya penelitian ini, hal ini menjadi begitu penting sebab kajian ilmiah sebagai sebuah analisa dan informasi terhadap masyarakat umum dan masukan bagi pemerintah agar dapat menjadi sebuah isu yang terkonsentrasi sehingga dapat memperoleh penyelesaian yang cepat dan tepat. Jenis penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Kebaruan dalam penelitian yang penulis angkat adalah penulis hendak mengetahui mengenai efek dari penggunaan sanksi administratif tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian ini bahwa efektivitas sanksi adnministratif dirasa cukup memberikan efek jera terhadap pelaku/pihak yang melakukan pencemaran air di sungai akan tetapi perlu ditingkatkan kembali mengenai sanksi andministratif yang diberikan agar lebih memberikan dampak yang signifikan, serta dalam hal ini turut juga menjadi suatu catatan di mana perlunya peningkatan kualitas pengawasan dan integritas aparat penegak hukum agar dapat tercipta penegakan hukum lingkungan yang lebih baik dan optimal.
Judges' Efforts to Uphold the Principles of Legal Justice and Human Rights in Imposing Sanctions in Drug Cases Septian, Nurul Naeni; Pangastuti, Inagatha Setyarahma
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10765

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether court decisions in drug abuse cases are based on Indonesia's principles of justice and human rights. This study is important to conduct because there are quite significant differences in the sanctions received by perpetrators of drug crimes, giving rise to the perception that judges are inconsistent in providing fair decisions for perpetrators of drug crimes. In their decisions, judges often ignore the principles of human rights to provide a deterrent effect to perpetrators of drug crimes. Hence, the assumption arises that judges in many cases discriminate against defendants of drug crimes. This study uses a normative legal approach and case studies to examine the case submitted in decision number 1041/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Sby. Based on these findings, the judge attempts to uphold a fair decision by imposing a sentence commensurate with the error and considering the economic ability of the perpetrator to pay the fine, with the option of additional imprisonment for six months if unable to pay. This decision approach aims to uphold the principles of human rights. Keywords: Drug Abuse; Human Rights; Principle of Justice
Peran Lembaga Penegak Hukum Dalam Proses Perampasan Aset Arianto, Andhie Fajar
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10516

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to the strategic role of law enforcement agencies in the asset confiscation process in Indonesia, by highlighting the challenges faced, such as overlapping regulations, lack of coordination between agencies, and technical obstacles in tracing and confiscating assets across countries. Overlapping regulations make the asset confiscation process longer. This provides an opportunity for corruptors to hide or transfer their assets. The role of law enforcement agencies in Indonesia, including the police, prosecutors, and courts, greatly determines the success of the asset confiscation process and the recovery of state losses. This research method uses a normative legal approach. The results of this study Law enforcement officers must be involved in tight collaboration at the national, bilateral, and multilateral levels. To carry out the asset recovery process, a central team and task force with special expertise are needed, which serve as the main driving force behind the investigation and prosecution of asset recovery efforts. The use of information technology can help in tracking assets from corruption hidden abroad or in the form of crypto assets. Improving Indonesia's asset confiscation system requires a comprehensive approach that includes harmonization of regulations with the ratification of the Asset Confiscation Bill, strengthening coordination between law enforcement agencies, and utilizing information technology. Thus, efforts to repair state losses caused by criminal acts of corruption can be carried out better. Tujuan dari penelitian ini peran strategis lembaga penegak hukum dalam proses perampasan aset di Indonesia, dengan menyoroti tantangan yang dihadapi, seperti tumpang tindih regulasi, minimnya koordinasi antar lembaga, serta kendala teknis dalam penelusuran dan penyitaan aset lintas negara. Tumpang tindih regulasi menyebabkan proses perampasan aset menjadi lebih panjang. Hal ini memberikan kesempatan bagi pelaku korupsi untuk menyembunyikan atau mengalihkan asetnya. Peran lembaga penegak hukum di Indonesia, termasuk kepolisian, kejaksaan, dan pengadilan, sangat menentukan keberhasilan proses perampasan aset dan pemulihan kerugian negara. metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini Aparat penegak hukum harus terlibat dalam kolaborasi yang ketat di tingkat nasional, bilateral, dan multilateral. Untuk melaksanakan proses pemulihan aset, diperlukan tim dan gugus tugas pusat dengan keahlian khusus, yang berfungsi sebagai kekuatan pendorong utama di balik investigasi dan penuntutan upaya pemulihan aset. Penggunaan teknologi informasi dapat membantu dalam melacak aset hasil korupsi yang disembunyikan di luar negeri atau dalam bentuk aset kripto. Perbaikan sistem perampasan aset Indonesia memerlukan pendekatan yang komprehensif yang mencakup harmonisasi regulasi dengan pengesaha RUU Perampasan Aset, penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga penegak hukum, dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi. Dengan demikian, upaya untuk memperbaiki kerugian negara yang disebabkan oleh tindak pidana korupsi dapat dilakukan dengan lebih baik.