cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Prodi Penelitian & Evaluasi Pendidikan, Pascasarjana UNNES
Contact Email
jere@mail.unnes.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
jere@mail.unnes.ac.id
Editorial Address
Postgraduate, Universitas Negeri Semarang Kelud Utara III, Semarang 50237 Indonesia
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation
Published by Universitas Negeri Semarang
ISSN : 22526420     EISSN : 25031732     DOI : https://doi.org/10.15294/jere
Core Subject : Education,
Education
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation is a fully refereed international journal publishing original academic articles that promote educational processes and outcomes that are both well-informed and evidence-based. The journal is deliberately multi-disciplinary and broad in its scope, and addresses rigorous research and evaluation at all levels, and in all sectors and ages of education. The journal publishes papers which report results of: original research and evaluation studies; secondary analyses of existing (international) data sets; meta-analyses and reviews synthesizing evidence and guidelines for practice. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation also invites articles about the use and evaluation of evidence in practice, theoretical, conceptual, methodological and substantive issues in research and evaluation, as well as position papers related to issues about evidence-based education.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 285 Documents
 25   26   27   28   29 
Mr. Private University Barriers to World-Class Education: The Case of Indonesia Widiputera, Ferdi; Agung, Iskandar
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v12i2.70270

Abstract

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the barriers that prevent private universities from achieving world-class status. Six private universities with national A, B, and C accreditations were examined using qualitative methods including interviews, focus groups, and university documents, as well as the Times Higher Education (THE) assessment criteria in 2021. The research highlights a stark contrast between private universities in developed countries, which have more flexibility in achieving World-Class University (WCU) status, and those in Indonesia, which face significant challenges. Obstacles include the youth of the institutions, limited student enrollment, faculty lacking doctoral degrees, inadequate adoption of international teaching methods, insufficient research output, and weak research linkages. There's also a lack of language skills among faculty, a shortage of international staff, and limited collaboration with recognized institutions. The paper recommends that private universities improve the quality of education with government support through incentives, funding for domestic and international doctoral training, modern research facilities, and other relevant initiatives.
Bibliometric Analysis: Research Trends in the Development of the TPACK Instrument in the 2019–2023 Period Muhlis, Muhlis; Kartono, Kartono; Kuswardono, Singgih
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v12i2.71691

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perkembangan penelitian pengembangan instrumen penilaian TPACK dalam 5 tahun terakhir, dari tahun 2019 hingga 2023, dengan kajian bibliometrik. Kajian analisis bibliometrik dalam penelitian ini mengumpulkan 120 dokumen artikel dari database Scopus pada topik TPACK, yang kemudian dianalisis menjadi 59 dokumen artikel. Proses analisis data menggunakan software Mendeley dan Vosviewer. Hasil analisis dokumen menunjukkan bahwa 1) Tingkat sitasi tertinggi terdapat pada artikel yang ditulis oleh Habibi, dkk dengan jumlah sitasi 84 kali dengan rasio 28,00 per tahun; 2) Sumber jurnal “Journal of Physics: Conference Series” tempat terbit terbanyak untuk artikel dengan total 10 dokumen artikel; 3) Ada dua jenis artikel yang diterbitkan,yaitu artikel jurnal dan artikel prosiding; 4) Jenis instrumen yang dikembangkan meliputi 86% berupa instrumen nontes dan 14% berupa instrumen tes; dan 5) Tren publikasi dengan melihat Network Visualization, Overlay Visualization, Density Visualization hingga perkembangan publikasi artikel per tahun dimana tahun 2020 merupakan tahun yang banyak menerbitkan dokumen artikel. Temuan dari analisis bibliometrik dapat membantu peneliti dalam meninjau kemajuan beberapa instrumen pengembangan studi TPACK sebelumnya untuk dijadikan referensi dan menciptakan kebaruan dalam studi selanjutnya. Kepadatan Visualisasi terhadap perkembangan publikasi artikel per tahun dimana tahun 2020 merupakan tahun yang banyak menerbitkan dokumen artikel.Temuan dari analisis bibliometrik dapat membantu peneliti dalam meninjau kemajuan beberapa instrumen pengembangan studi TPACK sebelumnya untuk dijadikan referensi dan menciptakan kebaruan dalam studi selanjutnya. Kepadatan Visualisasi terhadap perkembangan publikasi artikel per tahun dimana tahun 2020 merupakan tahun yang banyak menerbitkan dokumen artikel. Temuan dari analisis bibliometrik dapat membantu peneliti dalam meninjau kemajuan beberapa instrumen pengembangan studi TPACK sebelumnya untuk dijadikan referensi dan menciptakan kebaruan dalam studi selanjutnya.
Development of An Evaluation Instrument Model for The Counseling Guidance Service Program for Student Discipline Adam, Muhammad Imanul; Anirusilowati, Anirusilowati; Awalya, Awalya
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v12i2.76281

Abstract

This research aimed to develop disciplinary instruments and student rules using a questionnaire. To achieve this objective, a Research and Development was employed by using an assessment instrument in the form of a questionnaire (non-test). As the subject of this research, small and large scales with 250 students were used by ten development steps. Validation and reliability were simplified into three stages: preliminary, development, and evaluation. The preliminary stage involved determining instrument specifications, writing the instrument, and determining scoring. The development stage involved counseling guidance, trialing, analysis, and revision. The evaluation stage involved assembling and refining the instrument. Validity analysis and content reliability were performed using Aiken's V formula and Crombach's Alpha. Field tests showed that all items on the student discipline and rules instrument had a value of > 0.3, indicating validity and reliability. Whereas if the reliability test is >0.7, the instrument is valid and reliable, so the instrument is suitable for use. The results were in the valid and reliable category with a Likert scale of 4,3, and 2, indicating good rules and discipline among SMA AZ Semarang City students. However, efforts are needed to improve violations of rules and discipline, even if they are minor.
The Application of Aiken's V Method for Evaluating the Content Validity of Instruments that Measure the Implementation of Formative Assessments Nurjanah, Siti; Istiyono, Edi; Widihastuti, Widihastuti; Iqbal, Muhammad; Kamal, Saefudin
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v12i2.76451

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the content validity of the measuring instrument used for formative assessment implementation by utilizing the Aiken method. The selection of formative assessment was based on the consensus within experts that it offers significant enhancements to the progression of classroom learning. Nevertheless, there is currently no valid instrument available to measure it. The instrument under study encompasses three key dimensions: perceptions, practices, and challenges. The instrument consists of a closed-ended questionnaire with 37 items and an open-ended questionnaire with 2 items. The content validity was evaluated by three raters who are highly experienced in their respective disciplines. After doing a quantitative study of the Aiken's V value, it was determined that all items of the instrument for implementing formative assessment were deemed valid. According to the qualitative analysis, raters provided some modest revisions for certain items. Overall, the instrument used to assess the implementation of formative assessment is deemed valid through content validity analysis relying on Aiken's method. Instructors, researchers, and policy makers can utilize the findings of this study to obtain information regarding the implementation of formative assessment through the utilization of the measuring instrument employed in this study.
Content Validity and Inter-Rater Reliability in Developing Minimum Competency Assessment Test Instruments (AKM) Umami, Zalika; Suharini, Erni; Sholeh, Muh.
Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jere.v12i2.78136

Abstract

This research aims to describe the results of validation by experts regarding the development of AKM test instruments in class XI geography subjects. This research is development research (R&D) with the research model used, namely the 4-D model (design, define, develop, disseminate). The product in this research is the AKM test instrument in class XI Geography. This expert validation involved 4 validators including 1 evaluation expert lecturer, 1 geography education expert lecturer, and 2 geography subject expert teachers. The tests carried out by experts are the AKM test instrument assessment test and the validity and reliability test results of the AKM test instrument. The results of this research are the AKM test instrument with expert assessment results based on language of 87% which is in the very good category, 87% of the construction aspect is in the very good category and 89% of the material aspect is in the very good category. Furthermore, the validity assessment by experts related to the development of the AKM test instrument obtained a v'Aikens index test result of 0.8125 which was included in the very valid criteria. The results of the reliability test showed that Avage Measures was 0.686, which is included in the ICC criteria for good reliability. In this way, the overall development of the AKM test instrument is valid and can also be used by educators as a reference in developing the AKM test instrument to support students' abilities.

Page 29 of 29 | Total Record : 285

 25   26   27   28   29 

Filter by Year

2012 2023


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12 No 2 (2023): Article In Process (August 2023) Vol 12 No 1 (2023) Vol 11 No 2 (2022) Vol 11 No 1 (2022) 2021: Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 10 No 2 (2021) Vol 10 No 1 (2021) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) Vol 9 No 1 (2020) Vol 8 No 2 (2019) Vol 8 No 1 (2019) Vol 7 No 2 (2018) Vol 7 No 1 (2018) Vol 6 No 1 (2017) Vol 5 No 1 (2016) Vol 4 No 2 (2015) Vol 4 No 1 (2015) Vol 3 No 2 (2014) Vol 3 No 1 (2014) Vol 2 No 1 (2013) Vol 1 No 2 (2012) Vol 1 No 1 (2012) More Issue