Tadulako Master Law Journal
TADULAKO MASTER LAW JOURNAL is published by Tadulako University Palu-Central Sulawesi Indonesia. TADULAKO MASTER LAW JOURNAL is an open-access peer-reviewed journal that mediates the dissemination of academicians, researchers, and practitioners in the law. TADULAKO MASTER LAW JOURNAL accept submission from all over the world. TADULAKO MASTER LAW JOURNAL aims to provide a forum for national and international academicians, researchers, and practitioners on law science to publish the original articles. All accepted articles will be published and will be freely available to all readers with worldwide visibility and coverage. The scope of TADULAKO MASTER LAW JOURNAL is the issues of the specific topics such as Criminal Law, Civil Law, Constitutional Law, International Law, Administrative Law, Islamic Law, Medical Law, Environmental Law, and another section related contemporary issues in law All articles submitted to this journal can be written in Bahasa Indonesia and English Language.
Articles
86 Documents
<![CDATA[PENERBITAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK PENGGANTI KARENA HILANG OLEH AHLI WARIS YANG DISEBABKAN OLEH BENCANA ALAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Fatmala, Faiqa]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 4, No 2 (2020): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Land registration is essentially aimed at ensuring the right of the landowner. The publication of a certificate is a safeguard to the landowner of his rights to the land. Ownership of the land is hereditary, but if the certificate of ownership is lost, what evidence is used by the heirs in the process of issuing the replacement certificate, and what remedies it can do. In this paper using the type of legal research that is normative by finding the truth of coherence. Proof of ownership by the heirs is a certificate of inheritance endorsed by the sub-district or village head, in the process of issuing the replacement certificate lost due to natural disaster done first checking the physical data and juridical data and then held the announcement. If after 30 (thirty) days after the announcement of the issuance of a replacement certificate and no party has stated the objection then the Land Office will issue a replacement certificate that has been lost due to natural disaster]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HAK-HAK TERSANGKA KORUPSI PADA TAHAP PENYIDIKAN DAN PENUNTUTAN OLEH KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI ]]>
<![CDATA[Wiryawan, Palupi]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 4, No 3 (2020): OCTOBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The Criminal Procedure Code has provided a dimension of protection for human rights in its balance with the public interest, especially in the protection of the rights of suspects or defendants in investigation and prosecution process. However, it cannot be denied that the law enforcers neglected the rights of suspects, defendants and witnesses. The purpose of creating this thesis was for learning and analyzing the protection of the rights of corruption suspects and defendants in investigations and prosecutions by the Corruption Eradication Commission also what efforts can be made by the corruption suspects and defendants.The research method that was used in this thesis was juridical normative. The research’s specification was perspective analysis. The method of compiling data was by secondary files from library studies.Based on the result of the research, it was found that to carry out its duties, the Investigator and Public Prosecutor in the Corruption Eradication Commission not only applied the Corruption Eradication Commission Act but also must apply the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) especially in the provisions of Article 50 Paragraph (1) and Paragraph (2), that was the suspect has the right to immediately get an examination by the investigator so that it can be submitted to the public prosecutor and immediately tried by the court to shorten the process of resolving his criminal case. Corruption suspects that were investigated and prosecuted by the Corruption Eradication Commission could make legal efforts through pretrial justice, justice collaborators, claimed for rehabilitation and compensation also there was a time limit in the judicial process so that the principle of fast and light costs judicial especially legal certainty can be achieved.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PENANGGULANGAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOBA DI WILAYAH HUKUM DIREKTORAT RESERSE NARKOBA POLDA SULAWESI TENGAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Khristina, Kiky]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 4, No 3 (2020): OCTOBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penanggulangan tindak pidana narkotika oleh Direktorat Reserse Narkaba Polda Sulawesi Tengah. Jenis penelitian dalam penulisan ini adalah deskriptif ( descriptive research ), dengan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Metode penelitian dengan mendasarkan pada konsep hukum. Bentuk penelitian yang digunakan adalah diagnostik-evaluatif Analisis datanya menggunakan analisis kualitatif yang selanjutnya dianalisis secara logis sistematis. Berdasarkan deskripsi hasil penelitian dan pembahasan sehubungan dengan masalah yang dikaji, dapat disimpulkan sebagai berikut : Upaya penanggulangaan kejahatan penyalahgunaan narkotika, orientasinya tidak terlepas dari proses penyelesaian suatu perkara pidana melalui prosedur hukum, yaitu prosedur hukum melalui peradilan pidana. Penanggulangan terhadap kejahatan penyalahgunaan narkotika merupakan upaya agar setiap orang mematuhi dan menghormati ketentuan hukum yang berlaku, upaya ini tentunya tidak terlepas dari tindakan prventif, represif dan pre-emtif yaitu dengan melakukan pencegahan sebulum terjadinya kejahatan dan tindakan represif yaitu dengan melakukan pencegahan sebelum terjadinya kejahatan tindak pidana narkotika.Faktor internal pertama mengenai sarana dan fasilitas yaitu kurangnya transportasi, kurangnya alat tes urine dan alat deteksi. Faktor internal yang kedua adalah kurangnya personil kepolisian atau SDM kepolisian bilamana melakukan penyidikan penyidik yang memiliki kompetensi sesusai standar penyidik profesional sangatlah kurang. Faktor internal yang ketiga adalah kurangnya dana operasional, dimana dana operasional diperlukan pada teknik Undercover Buy. Polisi yang menyamar harus membeli narkotika dan memerlukan dana yang besar bila ingin mendapatkan barang bukti yang banyak ]]>
<![CDATA[ALTERNATE SOLUTION OF INTER-SCHOOL GANG FIGHT (SOSIOLOGICAL LAW REVIEW) ]]>
<![CDATA[Silviana, Arina]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This research aim at knowing and analyzing the way how to solve the inter school in Makassar and knowing and analyzing the factors resulting the inter-school gang fight in Makassar. This research of empirical law which used primary data and secondary data. The primary data directly got from the respondents, those are the students and the counselor teachers. The secondary data got from the books and literatures, policies, seminar result and any supported data. the result of the research shows that factors cause the inter school gang fight are some unimportant and trivial things such as so-closed school place, competition, missunderstanding, revenge, and economical problem. Alternate solution of inter school gang fight are teaching the students more religion, do family-improvement, teaching the students about the character education, teaching the students about behavior of respecting each other, do visit each-others, practice the law, make a peace agreement inter school gang fight]]>
<![CDATA[REVERSAL BURDEN OF EVIDANCE ON A CRIMINAL CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Hasnawati, Hasnawati]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 2, No 2 (2018): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The research aim are to know the implementation of strict evidence in corruption committed in Indonesia and the constraint or obstacle faced by the corruption agency. The method of this research was normative juridical, because the research about reversal burden of proof of corruption in crime in Indonesia, which data obtained from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Research result reveal that implementation of proof in corruption cases is often felt to be ineffective and very burdensome to the Investigator apparatus therefor  two theories of proof, namely the free theory embraced by the dependent and negative theory according to the law adopted by the public prosecutor or ordinary commonly called the theory reversal burden of limited proof and in balance , the dependent has the right to proved that he has not commited a criminal act of corruption and that the prosecutor still has the duty to verify the indictment. The obstacles faced by law enforcement in implementing the burdening system of proof on the handling of corruption crime, namely the Contraints for the public Prosecutor and the obstacle for the judge divided into 2(two) types, namely : Juridical and Non Juridical Contrains]]>
<![CDATA[Effectiveness of implementation of Diversion at Prosecution Level (Case Study at Judiciary State of Banggai) ]]>
<![CDATA[Astutik, Inti]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 3, No 1 (2019): FEBRUARY ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[ABSTRACT The Main Problem of this research is the effectiviness of implementation of diversion at the level of procesution in the case of the child. This is an empricialjuridicial research or direct research conducted in the field supported by laws and books related to how to uncover the laws that live in society. Main data of thois research is primary taken trhough one real picture of practice in the procesution of a child case. The problem background of this research is criminak acts number commited by children. Furthermore, an effort to prevent and to overcome them needs to be contuducted through implementing, criminal justice system of children. The result of this research revealed that handled procesutioncase in state procesutor of Banggai has been found that the implementation of diversion is difficult to achieve in terms of deliberation because it is very had to bring together all parties. Therefore, all child cases handled by state procesutor of Banggaiprocesuted in the Banggai District Court because diversion at the level of procesution has not been effective. Constraints faced in theprocesution of child deals with the law that the parties are reluctan to attend in the process of diversion even though they get picked up. The victim,s family wants the criminal offender to be processed in court as well as inadequate facilities and infrastructures, as is the result of interviews with the public prosecutor.Keywords :Effectivennes of Implementation of Diversion at Prossucition Level]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS PEMBERIAN BANTUAN HUKUM BAGI MASYARKAT MISKIN DALAM MEWUJUDKAN AKSES KEADILAN TERHADAP MASYARAKAT MISKIN ]]>
<![CDATA[Harpa, Akhdiari]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2019): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Permasalahan yang diteliti adalah bagaiamana pelaksanaan penyelenggaraan dan pemberian bantuan hukum Cuma Cuma bagi masyarakat miskin oleh LBH dan Orkemas berdasarkan undang-undang No 16 Tahun 2011 Tentang bantuan hukum, sebagaimana dalam Undang undang bantuan hukum Pasal 1 ayat (3) pemberi bantuan hukum adalah Lembaga Bantuan Hukum atau organisasi kemasyarakatan yang memberi layanan bantuan hukum, ayat (4) Menteri adalah menteri yang menyelenggarakan urusan pemerintahan di bidang hukum dan hak asasi manusia.penulisan ini bermaksud ingin menegetahui Bagaiamana Fungsi dan wewenang Kementrian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia sebagai penyelenggara bantuan hukum dan ingin mengetahui masalah pelaksanaan pemberian bantuan hukum. Metode penelitian menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder yang pengolahan bahan hukum pada dasarnya serangkaian aktivitas untuk mengadakan sistematisasi atau klasifikasi atas bahan hukum tertulis, untuk mempermudah kegiatan analisis terhadap penulisan. Penilitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui fungsi dan wewenang penyelenggara bantuan hukum. Dan hasilnya adalah penyelenggara bantuan hukum mempunyai fungsi menyusun kebijakan bantuan hukum, menetapkan standar bantuan hukum,menyusun anggaran bantuan hukum, sedangkan wewenang yaitu mengawasi penyelenggaraan bantuan hukum dan melakukan verifikasi dan akreditasi lembaga bantuan hukum dan orkemas. Dan penelitian ini pula menunjukkan bahwa syarat utama pelaksanaan pemberian bantuan hukum adalah LBH/Orkemas yang telah dinyatakan lulus verifikasi dan akreditasi dari penyelenggara bantuan hukum yakni kementrian hukum dan hak asasi manusia.     ]]>
<![CDATA[EVALUASI RANCANGAN PERATURAN DAERAH OLEH GUBERNUR SEBAGAI WAKIL PEMERINTAH PUSAT DI DAERAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Nuriani, Esti]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 3, No 2 (2019): JUNE ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Penulisan ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui evaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah oleh gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah pusat di daerah dan untuk mengetahui kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dalam pelaksanaan proses evaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah. Tipe penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer yang diperoleh melalui peraturan perundang-undangan dan bahan hukum sekunder yang bersumber dari berbagai dokumen resmi seperti buku-buku teks, kamus-kamus hukum, jurnal-jurnal hukum dan komentar-komentar atas putusan lembaga pengadilan. Analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa evaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah kabupaten/kota telah dilakukan oleh Gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah pusat. Tetapi pengaturan evaluasi berdasarkan ketentuan dalam peraturan menteri dalam negeri yang mengatur dan menunjuk perangkat daerah provinsi untuk melakukan evaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah tidak tepat. Oleh karena dengan kedudukan gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah pusat melakukan evaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah tidak memiliki perangkat. Adapun kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dalam proses evaluasi rancangan peraturan daerah oleh gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah pusat di daerah adalah terkait dengan waktu evaluasi yang singkat, tidak tersedianya perangkat gubernur sebagai wakil pemerintah pusat,  dan anggaran evaluasi. ]]>
<![CDATA[EFEKTIFITAS KINERJA UNIT PEMBERANTASAN PUNGLI (UPP) PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGAH DALAM PENCEGAHAN PRAKTEK PUNGUTAN LIAR ]]>
<![CDATA[Rustang, Rustang]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 3, No 3 (2019): OCTOBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan menemukan beberapa permasalahaan yaitu, efektivitas kinerja UPP Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah dan kendala yang dihadapi oleh Satuan Tugas Sapu Bersih Pungutan Liar dalam pencegahan praktek pungutan liar di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Penelitian  ini adalah penelitian hukum empiris, penelitian ini terdiri beberapa pendekatan  wawancara dan pendekatan kepustakaan baik buku-buku, peraturan perundang-undangan, makalah-makalah, hasil penelitian terdahulu, dokumen-dokumen, dan sebagainya. Analisis data menggunakan analisis kualitatif. Dan hasil penelitian ini menunjukan kinerja UPP Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah belum efektif karena belum optimalnya 4 faktor yang mempengaruhi efektifitas kinerja yaitu faktor hukum atau perundang-undangan, faktor penegak hukum, faktor Sarana dan fasilitas dan faktor kebudayaan dan dapat dilihat dari minimnya jumah kegiatan operasi tangkap tangan serta kegiatan pencegahan berupa sosilisasi dan kendala-kendala yang dihadapi oleh tim satgas saber pungli UPP Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah dikarenakan beberapa faktor yaitu : faktor penghambat pada fungsi pencegahan, faktor penghambat pada fungsi penindakan dan faktor penghambat pada mekanisme kerja.  ]]>
<![CDATA[PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA KEPABEANAN TERHADAP PAKAIAN BEKAS (BALLPRESS)/CAKAR DI WILAYAH PALU SULAWESI TENGAH ]]>
<![CDATA[Hanker, Force]]>
<![CDATA[ Tadulako Master Law Journal Vol 4, No 1 (2020): FEBRUARY ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tadulako ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[AbstractThe problem studied were the law enforcementof the customs of used secondhand clothesat the office Supervision and Customs Service of Madya Pabean C Type Pantoloan and the obstaclesin criminal law enforcement for the circulation of secondhand clothes that affected the society of Palu. This research was empirical legal research that used primary dan secondary data is then presented in the form of inductive thinking patterns, namely the specific things to general things. The results of the research find that the office Supervision and Customs Service Of Madya Pabean C Type Pantoloan had carried out several law enforcement on the crime of secondhand clothes covering preventive and repressive law enforcement. Preventive law enforcement such as carrying out observation of importers data, distributing brochures about the dangers of secondhand clothes, collaborating with related parties that are the health Office and industry and trade service, and patrolling parts in the working area. Depressive law enforcement such as arresting the perpetrators of customs offens, confiscation of evidence in the form of secondhand clothes and destruction of secondhand clothes. Obstacles faced by customs in making legal efforts to the crime of secondhand clothes namely the limitation of ships in conducting patrols, lack of human resource that are not in accordance with the extensive of working area, weak legislation, law enforcement officers, society are interested in used clothing and proof because they have to present key witnesses.Keywords : law enforcement, customs, secondhand clothes]]>
