cover
Contact Name
Muhammad Ishar Helmi
Contact Email
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Phone
+6281291179663
Journal Mail Official
jlruinjkt@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Ir. H. Juanda No. 95 Ciputat Tangsel
Location
Kota tangerang selatan,
Banten
INDONESIA
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH
ISSN : 27157172     EISSN : 27157164     DOI : 10.15408
Journal of Legal Research is a peer-reviewed journal on legal research published quarterly (February, May, August, November) since 2019 by Departemen Legal Studies Faculty of Sharia and Law Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta in cooperation with Center for the Study of Constitution and National Legislation (POSKO-LEGNAS). Journal of Legal Research aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. It aims primarily to facilitate scholarly and professional discussions over current developments on legal issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Published exclusively in English, the Review seeks to expand the boundaries of Indonesian legal discourses to access English-speaking contributors and readers all over the world. The Review, hence, welcomes contributions from international legal scholars and professionals as well as from representatives of courts, executive authorities, and agencies of development cooperation. The Review basically contains any topics concerning Indonesian laws and legal system. Novelty and recency of issues, however, is a priority in publishing. The range of contents covered by the Review spans from established legal scholarships and fields of law such as privacy laws and public laws which include constitutional and administrative law as well as criminal law, international laws concerning Indonesia, to various approaches to legal studies such as comparative law, law and economics, sociology of law and legal anthropology, and many others. Specialized legal studies concerning various aspects of life such as commercial and business laws, technology law, natural resources law and the like are also welcomed.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 306 Documents
Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Dalam Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 118/PK/Pdt/2018) Farangga Harki Ardiansyah; Alfitra Alfitra; Tresia Elda
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i2.14638

Abstract

This study aims to determine the legal position of legal reconsideration efforts as extraordinary legal remedies. Legal reconsideration efforts are the last legal remedies that can be filed in the judicial system in Indonesia and of course their extraordinary nature requires special supervision in matters of regulation. This research is a normative legal research using a statute approach or a statutory approach to understand the concept of legal reconsideration efforts in civil cases as regulated in statutory regulations as an effort to bring closer to the problems studied based on the rules, norms and rules according to the object under study. The results of the research show that legal review is an extraordinary remedy which in the process requires clear restrictions, especially in civil cases, which still requires firm and clear regulations regarding the procedure and how many times it can be filed.Keywords: Reconsideration, Civil, Legal Efforts, PK, Second Reconsideration
Peran Kepala Desa Dalam Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Menurut Undang-Undang Desa dan Fiqh Siyasah; Studi Kasus Desa Mekarjati Kecamatan Haurgeulis Kabupaten Indramayu Susanto Susanto; Abdur Rahim
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i1.19706

Abstract

The performance of a village head as head of village government must be able to carry out its main duties, namely leading and coordinating the village administration in implementing village development. The role of the village head is one aspect that stands out and affects the success of village development. The village head is assisted by village officials, as an element of village government administration. The formulation of the problem in this research is "What is the Role of the Village Head in the Implementation of Development in Mekarjati Village, Haurgeulis Subdistrict, Indramayu Regency" and "How the Siyasah Fiqh Review and the Village Law on the Role of the Village Head in Implementing Development in Mekarjati Village". The purpose of this research is "To know the role of the village head in the implementation of village development, and" to know the Siyasah Fiqh Overview of the role of the village head in the implementation of village development." This type of research is classified as field research (field research), which is descriptive analysis, namely research that tells and describes data originating from primary data through interviews, observations and reports in the form of documents and secondary data by conducting library research. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the role of the Mekarjati Village Head, in the implementation of village development in general, there are still some that are not optimal. It can be seen that there are still some developments that have not been carried out optimally, such as the development of education and environmental security systems (Siskamling).Keywords: Role, Village Head, Implementation, Development, Village Law, Fiqh Siyasah
Mekanisme Ganti Rugi oleh Pt. Kereta Commuter Indonesia Kepada Para Penumpang Kereta Commuter Line JABODETABEK Pengguna Aplikasi LinkAja Rohmad Krismanto; Asep Syarifuddin Hidayat; Faris Satria Alam
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i4.16715

Abstract

AbstractAccording to the annual report of PT. KCI until December 2018, PT. KCI has 792 KRL units, and continues to grow to date to meet the growing passenger demand from time to time. Users of the Commuter Line Train service, as a whole, as of December 2018, there were 336.7 million passengers. That number increased 7% from the number of passengers in 2017 amounted to 315.8 million passengers. At present, PT. KCI serves 79 stations throughout the Greater Jakarta, Banten and Cikarang areas with a route range of 418.5 km. In the face of an increase in the number of passengers, one of the efforts that can be emphasized in improving the quality of customer service is by implementing e-ticketing technology as a substitute for manual payment systems using paper tickets. Based on this with the large number of KRL enthusiasts, the need for legal arrangements governing consumer protection for KRL users. This is necessary to protect consumer rights in the event of undesirable events, such as Extraordinary Events (PL) on Jabodetabek commuter line train trips.This study aims to determine, describe, and provide an understanding of the forms of consumer protection and compensation mechanisms for passengers using the LinkAja application for the extraordinary events of the Jabodetabek Commuter Line Train trip by PT. Kereta Commuter Indonesia.This study uses qualitative research, with a juridical empirical research method, namely legal research with existing facts and applied by humans living in the community itself that can be constrained or observed and free of values to determine the implementation of applicable legal norms.The results of the analysis showed that the form of passenger protection for users of the LinkAja application for extraordinary events on the Jabodetabek Commuter Line train trip, namely the compensation of the amount of money spent and the compensation could be given if the passenger canceled the Jabodetabek commuter line train trip. Jabodetabek commuter line train trip cancellation mechanism, can be done by Passenger can report to station officer to cancel Jabodetabek commuter line train trip. After that the station accompanied the passengers to cancel the Jabodetabek commuter line train trip to the station ticket clerk. Then the station ticket clerk confirmed to the linkaja that the passenger would cancel the Jabodetabek commuter line train trip due to an extraordinary event on the Jabodetabek commuter line train trip. When it has been confirmed by the linkaja, the passengers only need to wait for the balance to be returned to the passenger linkaja account itself.Abstrak Menurut laporan tahunan PT. KCI hingga Desember 2018, PT. KCI telah memiliki 792 unit KRL, dan terus bertambah hingga saat ini untuk memenuhi permintaan penumpang yang terus bertambah dari waktu ke waktu. Pengguna jasa Kereta Commuter Line, secara keseluruhan, per Desember 2018, terdapat 336,7 juta penumpang. Angka tersebut meningkat 7% dari jumlah penumpang tahun 2017 sebesar 315,8 juta penumpang. Saat ini, PT. KCI melayani 79 stasiun di seluruh wilayah Jabodetabek, Banten, dan Cikarang dengan jangkauan rute mencapai 418,5 km. Dalam menghadapi kenaikan jumlah penumpang, salah satu upaya yang dapat ditekankan dalam peningkatan kualitas pelayanan pelanggan, yaitu dengan penerapan teknologi e-ticketing sebagai pengganti dari sistem pembayaran manual dengan menggunakan tiket kertas. Berdasarkan hal tersebut dengan banyaknya peminat KRL, diperlukannya pengaturan hukum yang mengatur mengenai perlindungan konsumen bagi pengguna KRL. Hal ini diperlukan untuk melindungi hak-hak konsumen apabila terjadi hal-hal yang tidak diinginkan, seperti Peristiwa Luar Biasa (PL) pada perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui, mendeskripsikan, dan memberi pemahaman mengenai bentuk perlindungan konsumen serta mekanisme ganti rugi pada penumpang pengguna aplikasi LinkAja atas  peristiwa luar biasa perjalanan Kereta Commuter Line Jabodetabek oleh PT. Kereta Commuter Indonesia.            Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif, dengan metode penelitian empiris yuridis, yaitu penelitian hukum dengan fakta yang ada dan diterapkan oleh manusia yang hidup dalam masyarakat itu sendiri yang dapat dikonstatasi atau diamati dan bebas nilai untuk mengetahui implementasi norma hukum yang berlaku.            Hasil dari analisis yang dilakukan menunjukkan bahwa bentuk perlindungan konsumen penumpang pengguna aplikasi LinkAja atas peristiwa luar biasa pada perjalanan kereta Commuter Line Jabodetabek, yaitu pemberian kompensasi sejumlah uang yang dikeluarkannya dan kompensasi tersebut dapat diberikan apabila penumpang membatalkan perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek. Mekanisme pembatalan perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek, dapat dilakukan dengan cara Penumpang dapat melapor ke petugas stasiun untuk melakukan pembatalan perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek. Setelah itu stasiun mendampingi penumpang untuk melakukan pembatalan perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek ke petugas loket stasiun. Lalu petugas loket stasiun mengkonfirmasi ke pihak linkaja bahwa penumpang tersebut akan melakukan pembatalan perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek dikarenakan adanya peristiwa luar biasa pada  perjalanan kereta commuter line Jabodetabek. Ketika sudah terkonfirmasi oleh pihak linkaja, penumpang hanya tinggal menunggu saldo dikembalikan ke akun linkaja penumpang itu sendiri.
Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Aplikasi Go-Jek Atas Mitra Kerja Yang Mengalami Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Hafizh Maulana; Djawahir Hejazziey
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i3.17065

Abstract

AbstrakStudi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui kedudukan hukum prihal pertanggungjawaban antara perusahaan Go-Jek    dengan mitra kerjanya. Belum jelasnya pertanggungan asuransi kecelakaan terhadap driver disebabkan belum adanya peraturan yang secara jelas mengatur tentang kendaraan roda dua yanga dijadikan alat transpoirtasi umum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian library research dan field research yang mengkaji berbagai data dokumen terkait penelitian dan menggabungkan dengan data wawancara yang dilakukan secara langsung dengan subjek penelitian. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah normative-empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Metode pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan dan wawancara. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa hubunagan hukum antara driver dengan PT. Go-Jek    Indonesia hanya sebatas hubungan mitra kerja sehingga PT. Go-Jek    Indonesia tidak bertanggung jawab apabila terjadi kecelakaan kerja, hanya saja mitra kerjanya akan ada asuransi yang dikelola berupa Go-Protection dan juga bekerjasana dengan allianz sebagai bentuk perlindungan keselamatan kerja. Kendaraan roda dua yanga dijadikan alat transpoirtasi umum di Indonesia tidak masuk dalam klasifikasi kendaraan bermotor umum dikarenakan tidak diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Kata Kunci : Go-Jek   , Pertangungjawaban Kemitraan.
Analysis of the Comparative Western Democracy, Pancasila Democracy, and the Concept of Shura; Study of the Book Manuscript "Democracy in Islamic Perspective by Ahmad Sukardja and Ahmad Sudirman Abbas" Nurhasan Nurhasan; Siti Ngainnur Rohmah
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i2.20620

Abstract

Democracy that comes from the West is often juxtaposed with the concept of shura in Islam. The concept of shura is often seen as having an intersection with democracy. There are those who agree and there are those who are not in line with democracy. Those who agree with democracy argue that the value of democracy is universal and can coexist with Islam. The opinion that rejects an Islamic state (caliphate) and justifies democracy states that the legacy of the Islamic political system is based on the experience of the Caliphate with no standard standards. The author is interested and compelled to examine how Western Democracy, Pancasila Democracy, and the concept of Shura in an Islamic perspective? How do we compare the principles of western democracy, Pancasila Democracy and the concept of Shura in the book "Democracy in an Islamic perspective by Ahmad Sukardja and Ahmad Sudirman Abbas?" This study uses a qualitative research method, with a manuscript study approach. The results of this study state that Western Democracy and Pancasila Democracy in essence do not contradict the Shura principles, as long as the principles in them are in accordance with the essence of Islamic teachings. Western democracy is bound by equality of blood, race, language, and customs, whereas in Islam it does not see this bond as a barrier. Al-Qur'an and Al-Sunnah are more general in nature and cover all aspects of human life throughout the world. Meanwhile, Pancasila Democracy is only suitable for a country.Keyword: Western Democracy, Pancasila Democracy, Shura Concept, Islamic Perspective 
Penahanan Ijazah Pekerja Oleh Perusahaan Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 205/Pdt.G/2019/PN.SDA) Daryanto Wibowo; Abdullah Sulaiman
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i2.17069

Abstract

This study aims to explain the legal provisions for the detention of workers' certificates in the work agreement and legal protection for workers who suffer losses due to having their certificates detained by the company. The company requires workers to submit an original certificate to the company so that workers can be bound by the regulations set by the company. These bound workers cannot and do not have the freedom to leave the company for a certain period of time on the work contract proposed by the company and must be fulfilled. The detention of a certificate in a work agreement is not regulated by the prevailing laws and regulations and tends to harm workers and violate workers' human rights. This research is normative juridical by examining library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the detention of workers' certificates was not regulated in the labor-related legislation, meaning that there was a legal vacuum. Due to the legal vacuum that occurs, employers carry out the act of detaining the certificate based on habits and agreements and freedom of contract in the agreement as the source of law.Keywords: Diploma Detention, Work Agreement, Labor Law, Losses, Illegal Acts
Upaya Restorative Justice Pada Tingkat Kejaksaan Sebagai Salah Satu Tindakan Upaya Hukum Pidana Anak Anton Wahyudi
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i3.20998

Abstract

Anak adalah bagian yang tidak terpisahkan dari keberlangsungan hidup manusia dan keberlangsungan sebuah bangsa dan negara. Salah satu solusi yang dapat ditempuh dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana anak adalah pendekatan restorative juctice, yang dilaksanakan dengan cara pengalihkan (diversi). Restorative justice merupakan proses penyelesaian yang dilakukan di luar sistem peradilan pidana (Criminal Justice System) dengan melibatkan korban, pelaku, keluarga korban dan pelaku, masyarakat serta pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan dengan suatu tindak pidana yang terjadi untuk mencapai kesepakatan dan penyelesaian. Restorative justice dianggap cara berfikir/paradigma baru dalam memandang sebuah tindak kejahatan yang dilakukan oleh seorang. Substansi yang paling mendasar dalam Undang-undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak adalah pengaturan secara tegas mengenai keadilan restoratif dan diversi yang dimaksudkan untuk menghindari dan menjauhkan anak dari proses peradilan sehingga dapat menghindari stigmatisasi terhadap anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum dan diharapkan anak dapat kembali ke dalam lingkungan sosial secara wajar.
Panwaslih Sebagai Penyelesai Pelanggaran Administrasi Pemilihan Umum di Aceh Sutri Helfianti
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 3, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v3i2.20509

Abstract

Dalam rangka untuk memastikan pemilihan umum berjalan sesuai dengan azas pemilu dan peraturan perundangan maka dibentuklah suatu komisi pemilihan umum yang bersifat nasional, tetap dan mandiri. Dalam sistem pemilu di Indonesia dikenal lembaga penyelenggara pemilu yang merupakan satu kesatuan fungsi, yaitu Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU), Badan Pengawas pemilihan Umum (Bawaslu) dan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (DKPP). 
Hukum Kepabeanan dalam Kegiatan Pelaku Usaha Jasa Titip Online Rafli Wiratama; Fahmi Muhammad Ahmadi; M. Nuzul Wibawa
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 4 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i4.16648

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe role of Customs and Excise Type C Soekarno-Hatta in carrying out supervision of onlne deposit service business operators who do not pay import duty and tax in the framework of import as well as the modus operandi carried out by online deposit service business actors to avoid payment of import duty and deeds of perpetrators online courier services business perspective criminal law because, the number of online entourage business operators who use passenger luggage facilities contained in Article 7 and Article 12 of the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 203 / PMK.04 / 2017 concerning the provisions on the export and import of goods carried by passengers and the crew of the means of conveyance, namely exemption of imported imported goods up to a maximum value of Free On Boad USD 500.00 (Five Hundred United States Dollars) per person for each arrival is exempted from import duty. However, this exemption from import duty is utilized by business people who entrust online services to carry out trading activities, because basically this regulation is for personal goods of passengers or personal use and not for goods. This research uses qualitative research by combining an empirical approach is legal research on law in fact and applied by humans who live in the community itself and to determine the implementation of legal norms that have been applied. The results of this study aimed that the role of Customs and Excise Soekarno-Hatta in carrying out complaints against business operators entrusting services online, using the category of passenger luggage control by conducting preliminary supervision by looking at, baggage x-ray analysis and looking at passenger profiles using the Passanger Name Record system For Government (PNR-GOV), then the modus operandi of online business services is to use deminimis threshold by recognizing that service goods are left as personal goods and not giving actual customs notification. Acts carried out by online deposit service business operators who do not pay taxes by physically smuggling by placing their merchandise in improper places have violated the rules of Article 102 letter (e) of Law Number 17 Year 2006 concerning Customs of the act of entrusted business services online by not notifying the type and / or quantity of imported goods in customs notification wrongly violating Article 102 letter (h) of Law Number 17 Year 2006 concerning Customs. The threat of criminal imprisonment is 1 (one) year and a maximum of 10 (ten) years and a fine of at least Rp.50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah) and a maximum of Rp.5,000,000,000.00 (five billion rupiah).Keywords: Business Executives Services Online, Customs Type C Soekarno Hatta, Exemption from Import Duties.ABSTRAKPeran Bea dan Cukai Tipe C Soekarno-Hatta dalam melakukan pengawasan terhadap pelaku usaha jasa titip onlne yang tidak melakukan pembayaran pajak bea masuk dan pajak dalam rangka impor serta modus operandi yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha jasa titip online untuk melakukan penghindaran pembayaran bea masuk serta perbuatan pelaku usaha jasa titip online perspektif hukum pidana karena, banyaknya pelaku usaha jasa titip online yang menggunakan fasilitas barang bawaan penumpang yang terdapat dalam Pasal 7 dan Pasal 12 Peraturan Menteri Keuangan  Nomor 203/PMK.04/2017 tentang ketentuan ekspor dan impor barang yang dibawa oleh penumpang dan awak sarana pengangkut yaitu pembebasan barang impor bawaan sampai dengan nilai paling banyak Free On Boad USD 500.00 (Lima Ratus United States Dollar) perorang untuk setiap kedatangan diberikan pembebasan bea masuk. Namun pembebasan bea masuk ini dimanfaatkan oleh pelaku usaha jasa titip online untuk melakukan kegiatan perdagangan, karena pada dasarnya peraturan ini untuk barang pribadi penumpang atau personal use dan bukan untuk barang daganangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan menggabungkan pendekatan empiris adalah penelitian hukum tentang hukum pada kenyataanya dan diterapkan oleh manusia yang hidup dalam masyarakat itu sendiri dan untuk mengetahui implementasi norma hukum yang telah berlaku.Hasil penelitian ini menujukan bahwa peran Bea dan Cukai Soekarno-Hatta dalam melakukan pengawsaan terhadap pelaku usaha jasa titip online, menggunakan katagori pengawasan barang bawaan penumpang dengan melakukan pengawasan pendahuluan dengan melihat, analisis x-ray bagasi dan melihat profil penumpang dengan menggunakan sistem Passanger Name Record For Government (PNR-GOV), kemudian modus operandi yang di lakukan pelaku usaha jasa titip online adalah menggunakan deminimis threshold dengan mengakui bahwa barang jasa titip sebagai barang pribadinya dan tidak memberikan pemberitahuan pabean dengan sebenarnya. Perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku usaha jasa titip online yang tidak membayar pajak dengan melakukan penyeludupan secara fisik dengan meletakan barang daganganya di tempat yang tidak sewajarnya telah melanggar peraturan Pasal 102 huruf (e) Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2006 tentang Kepabeanan perbuatan pelaku usaha jasa titip online dengan tidak memberitahukan jenis dan/atau jumlah barang impor dalam  pemberitahuan  pabean  secara salah melanggar Pasal 102 huruf (h) Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2006 tentang Kepabeanan. Ancaman pidananya pidana penjara  1 (satu) tahun dan paling lama 10 (sepuluh) tahun dan pidana  denda paling sedikit Rp.50.000.000.00 (lima puluh juta rupiah) dan paling banyak Rp.5.000.000.000.00 (lima milyar rupiah).
Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan (Analisis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 01 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan) Satria Ramadhany; Rosdiana Rosdiana; Syafrudin Makmur
JOURNAL of LEGAL RESEARCH Vol 2, No 3 (2020)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law State Islamic University Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jlr.v2i3.17611

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektivitas dari pelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan setelah diterbitkannya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 01 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian kualitatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan hukum empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data pada dilakukan dengan menggunakan cara wawancara, dokumentasi dan observasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat keberhasilan dari pelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan setelah diterbitkannya Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 01 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan masih kurang maksimal. Keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan hanya sekitar 4% sampai 5% perkara. Peran mediator dalam pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan, sudah maksimal untuk mengupayakan perdamaian yang diamanatkan oleh Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 01 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kata kunci: Efektivitas, Mediasi, Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan 

Page 10 of 31 | Total Record : 306