cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Fachrudin Sembiring
Contact Email
fachrudin.sembiring@atmajaya.ac.id
Phone
+628129551194
Journal Mail Official
paradigma.hukum@atmajaya.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung C Lantai 3 Jl. Jend. Sudirman No.51, RT.5/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan
Published by Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya
ISSN : 25287486     EISSN : 26549298     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v5i02
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan diterbitkan sesuai standar akreditasi dan dimaksudkan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan publikasi karya ilmiah bidang hukum yang pada akhir ini sulit ditemukan. Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan memuat hasil kegiatan penelitian, pemikiran konseptual, dan resensi buku bidang hukum. Media komunikasi ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta. Terbit perdana April 2016 dengan siklus terbit dua kali setahun. Naskah artikel yang diterima berupa laporan penelitian, pemikiran konseptual, dan resensi buku bidang hukum sepanjang relevan dengan misi redaksi dan belum pernah dipublikasikan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 140 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
THE ROLE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES Maria Angela Maharanim Himan
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2025
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v10i2.7265

Abstract

International law is the law that governs all activities on an international scale. International law aims to create order and justice in the international community. It also regulates cooperative relations between countries worldwide. The purpose of regulating international relations is to prevent tension and major conflicts between countries. However, what if a country fails to maintain its international relations and even cause disputes between countries, which can lead to various problems? This research uses a normative legal research method, namely by reviewing and collecting information from literature sources such as books and laws.
REGULATORY MODEL FOR THE UTILIZATION OF LAND BANK MECHANISMS IN INDONESIA TO PREVENT AND AVOID LAND MAFIA PRACTICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BASED ON LAND GOVERNANCE Putri Purbasari R.M.; Delarosa, Stella
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2025
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v10i2.7266

Abstract

The issue of the "Land Mafia" in Indonesia reflects legal uncertainty and structural inequality in land ownership. The establishment of the Land Bank Agency through Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation, instead of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation and Government Regulation Number 64 of 2021, is a government effort to address this issue. However, the existence of this agency has sparked public concerns about the potential for abuse of authority and the return of discriminatory legalistic practices, similar to the principle ofdomain declaration, as revealed in the case of farmers in Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi.1The main problem faced is the absence of a holistic, transparent, and accountable regulatory model that can guarantee that the Land Bank truly functions for the greatest prosperity of the people, not for the interests of certain groups. This study aims to analyze, compare, and formulate a more effective manual regulation of the Land Bank. The research method used is normative juridical with a comparative approach to the Land Bank models in the Netherlands and France. The comparison shows fundamental differences: Indonesia applies a centralized model, while the Netherlands uses a decentralized model integrated with spatial planning, and France operates a semi-private hybrid model (SAFER) that has preferential rights and is supervised by a multi-stakeholder committee.1These findings highlight the advantages of the Dutch model, namely its adaptation to local contexts and efficiency in land consolidation, and the French model, which offers operational efficiency and robust oversight mechanisms. Based on these findings, this report proposes a "Hybrid-Decentralized Land Bank Regulatory Model." This model combines Dutch-style decentralization principles with a French-style multi-stakeholder oversight structure, grounded in fundamental theories of good governance. The success of Land Banks in Indonesia ultimately depends on institutional reforms that ensure transparency, accountability, and public participation, going beyond the mere formulation of formal regulations.
From I DO to I DON’T: Recognition of Foreign Divorce in the Philippines Melitante, Christian George
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7003

Abstract

           The Philippines, uniquely situated as the only nation outside Vatican City where divorce remains illegal for the vast majority of its citizens, holds marriage in high legal and cultural regard. Marriage is enshrined in both the 1987 Constitution and the Family Code as an "inviolable social institution," making its dissolution not only legally complicated but also socially contentious. Despite this strict framework, the wave of globalization and an increasing number of cross-national unions have made the recognition of foreign divorce a critical legal issue.            This paper examines the nuanced landscape of foreign divorce recognition in the Philippines, contextualizing it against a backdrop of historical conservatism, colonial legacy, and current socio-legal challenges faced by Filipinos, particularly women unable to legally dissolve unhappy or harmful marriages. With only annulment or nullity available—and both options being expensive and difficult to obtain—Filipinos seeking legal dissolution often encounter substantial barriers, especially when foreign divorce decrees are involved.            Through an in-depth review of landmark Supreme Court decisions, the evolving legal doctrine is highlighted, showing a gradual though uneven liberalization in the recognition of valid foreign divorces. These cases clarify procedural requirements, the effect of divorce by mutual agreement, the capacity of Filipino spouses to remarry, and the need for clear guidance on documentary proof and applicable foreign laws. Further, the role of the Office of the Solicitor General and the logistical difficulties encountered by parties, including issues with documentation and appeals, are scrutinized.             The paper concludes by advocating for the Supreme Court to promulgate a comprehensive circular that harmonizes procedure and requirements for foreign divorce recognition. Recommendations include clearer rules on initiation, streamlined documentation in light of international conventions, enhanced training for judges, judicial notice of updated foreign divorce laws, and measures to deter procedural delays and prevent injustice to Filipino litigants. Such reforms would not only ease docket congestion but also bring much-needed clarity and fairness to a sensitive and often fraught area of family law.
EU CSDDD POSTPONEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR SOUTHEAST ASIAN WORKERS’ HUMAN SECURITY Wuisan, Celine Reyna; Surya Tjandra
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7485

Abstract

            The EU Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) was first adopted in 2024. By imposing legal obligations on companies operating in the EU market, the CSDD aims to improve working conditions and safeguard human security beyond the EU borders, particularly in high-risk supply chains such as those in Southeast Asia. While the primary responsibility for human rights and security are with the respective Southeast Asian governments, many of these countries face enforcement challenges that limit effective protections for workers. The CSDDD’s extraterritorial scope complements state obligations by legally requiring multinational corporations to undertake due diligence on their global supply chains. However, its recent postponement to 2027-2029 raises concerns about regulatory gaps and enforcement challenges. This paper analyzes the impact of the CSDDD delay on human security in Southeast Asian supply chains, including how it impacts the leverage of local workers, trade unions, and NGOs in holding multinational corporations accountable. This paper uses a comparative and descriptive legal analysis of the CSDDD’s drafts and amendments, case studies from Indonesia and Vietnam, and stakeholder perspectives from NGO reports and trade union statements. The regulatory postponement poses a threat to human security in critical Southeast Asian industries. In conclusion, the delay in the CSDDD’s implementation risks stalling critical progress towards a sustainable and ethical global supply chain. To address this regulatory gap, interim solutions including bilateral cooperation, enforceable contractual protections, and stakeholder engagement mechanisms are needed to protect vulnerable workers and enforce corporate accountability.
SOIL DEGRADATION RISK AND HUMAN SECURITY IMPLICATIONS OF LAND USE IN SAMARINDA'S STEEP SLOPES Kedhaton, Arum Sekar; Damanik, Prince Clinton Immanuel Christian; Muhammad Kimie Aliyev; Talitha Shabrina Fasha; Mardiana Ulan Dari; Alfiansyah; Muhammad Dafi Ramadhan
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7489

Abstract

           Soil erosion represents a critical environmental issue that threatens both ecological stability and human security in rapidly developing urban areas of Indonesia. This study aims to assess the soil erosion potential in Air Hitam Subdistrict, Samarinda Ulu, East Kalimantan, through field observation and environmental analysis. The study area is characterized by steep slopes, open-pit mining activities, limited vegetation cover, and high rainfall intensity, which collectively accelerate surface erosion processes and increase landslide potential. The soil type was identified with clay-dominated texture and low permeability, leading to significant surface runoff. Observations revealed clear signs of slope instability, sediment displacement, and exposed subsoil layers, confirming high erosion susceptibility. The degradation of vegetation and soil structure not only increases the likelihood of slope failure but also poses direct risks to surrounding communities, infrastructures, and water systems. To mitigate these impacts, integrated land conservation strategies are recommended, including slope stabilization, drainage improvement, and revegetation using local pioneer species such as Vetiver grass and leguminous cover crops.
DEFORESTATION AND COMPENSATION FOR THE SURROUNDING COMMUNITY FROM A LEGAL PERSPECTIVE fristikawati, yanti; adipradana, nugroho; hutabarat, samuel
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7723

Abstract

           Forests are the lungs of the world, benefiting both the environment and the communities surrounding them. Forest destruction, including through deforestation, will have detrimental impacts on society. Some of the detrimental impacts that can occur with deforestation are: landslides and floods have damaged both medicinal and community-owned crops. This means local communities cannot utilize the forest. The problem that will be discussed in this article is how to regulate forest protection, and if deforestation occurs, can the community receive compensation? The method used in this research is normative juridical, which studies more about the existing regulations in Indonesia regarding environmental protection, especially forests. From the research results it can be seen that the existing regulations are sufficient to protect forests, however, compensation for the community has not yet been regulated.             Things that can be done regarding the losses experienced by communities due to deforestation include restoring the environment and helping communities to meet their needs. Environmental restoration and assistance to the community can be carried out by companies that manage forests, or the government, especially if the forest is a customary forest or state forest.
Digital Justice and Human Security: Evaluating E-Court Reforms in Italy and Indonesia Marchetti, Marco Marchetti
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7746

Abstract

              The digital transformation of judicial systems represents a critical intersection between technological innovation and access to justice in the 21st century. This comparative study examines the implementation and impact of E-Court reforms in Italy and Indonesia—two civil law jurisdictions with divergent institutional capacities and development trajectories. Utilizing an integrated theoretical framework combining Human Security principles with Digital Governance theory, this research analyzes how judicial digitalization affects procedural transparency, case processing efficiency, and equitable access to justice.               Drawing on qualitative document analysis of legislative frameworks, judicial performance data, and policy documents from 2015-2023, the study reveals significant contextual variations in reform outcomes comparing Italy’s Processo Civile Telematico (PCT) and Indonesia’s E-Court system.             The research identifies institutional capacity, technological infrastructure, regulatory coherence, and explicit attention to digital equity as critical determinants of successful judicial digitalization. The study highlights the importance of human security-centered design approaches, addressing ethical dimensions of artificial intelligence deployment, ensuring algorithmic transparency, and maintaining hybrid access models to prevent digital exclusion. Findings suggest that technological sophistication alone cannot guarantee successful reform; rather, success depends on contextual adaptation, comprehensive capacity building, and sustained commitment to equity principles. The comparative analysis offers valuable insights for policymakers and judicial administrators in developing and developed democracies pursuing digital justice initiatives while safeguarding human security and fundamental rights.
GENDERED AI GOVERNANCE: INDONESIA'S HUMAN SECURITY FRAMEWORK Yuga, Muhammad; Herdiansyah Hamzah
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7750

Abstract

            The concept of human security, first articulated by Mahbub-ul-Haq in the United Nations Development Programme's Human Development Report in 1994, emphasizes freedom from fear and freedom from want as cardinal principles, positioning individuals as the primary referent in security discourse. As artificial intelligence systems rapidly proliferate across Indonesia, these foundational human security concerns have manifested in distinctly gendered dimensions that demand urgent regulatory attention. This article examines the critical intersection between gender, human security, and AI governance in Indonesia's evolving regulatory landscape. Through systematic analysis of algorithmic discrimination cases affecting Indonesian women, particularly in the gig economy and online gender-based violence contexts, this research establishes the imperative for integrating gendered human security frameworks into national AI regulation. The study employs doctrinal legal research methodology combined with intersectional feminist analysis to propose a three-pillar regulatory model encompassing gender-responsive Smart Mix Approach, mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence, and gender-sensitive Regulatory Sandbox mechanisms. Findings reveal significant gender bias in AI systems, with online gender-based violence cases surging by 80.8 percent in 2024. The article argues that constitutional obligations under Indonesia's 1945 Constitution necessitate explicit gender mainstreaming in AI governance to protect women's fundamental rights from algorithmic discrimination.
DISCRIMINATION AGAINST DOMESTIC WORKERS: STRUCTURALINEQUALITY AND THE URGENT NEED FOR PRIVATE LEGAL PROTECTIONTHROUGH INDONESIA’S DOMESTIC WORKER PROTECTION BILL raharningtyas, putri purbasari; Sergio, Dellvin
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7754

Abstract

            2004 marked the first year for the Domestic Workers Protection Bill (RUU PPRT) to be passed as a law. 21 years later, Indonesia’s legislators still fail to see its urgency. Domestic Workers in Indonesia have a substantial role in sustaining a household, where the majority of them goes undocumented. Without a clear and formal agreement, Domestic Workers may face multitudes of discrimination and exploitation. With predominant Domestic Workers being women and/or underage, the vulnerability of this group becomes prominent, especially in highlighting the extremity of the dire need for legal protection. This paper sought to answer two questions, how does structural discrimination shape working conditions of domestic workers in Indonesia, and how can the Domestic Workers Protection Bill (RUU PPRT) address these systemic inequalities? Through a normative-juridical approach, this paper finds various structural victimization that may impede on the rights of these workers, ranging from economic structural victimization to social structural victimization. This paper also highlights current laws and regulations and how it failed to extensively protect Domestic Worker’s rights, this was also furthered by the ambiguity stance of Domestic Workers in Indonesia’s current legal frameworks. In conclusion, Indonesia still needs to address and acknowledge Domestic Workers as formal employees and ensure social and legal protection of their rights.
LEGAL SETTLEMENT OF TAX AVOIDANCE PRACTICES BY FOREIGN WORKERS WORKING IN INDONESIA -, Yoanes Daru Weda
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v11i1.7758

Abstract

             The increasing presence of foreign workers in Indonesia as a result of globalization has created challenges in the imposition of Income Tax, particularly related to tax avoidance practices. Although the taxation of foreign workers has been normatively regulated under Indonesian tax laws, in practice there remain legal loopholes and weak supervision that allow tax avoidance to occur. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing Income Tax on foreign workers, identify common forms of tax avoidance, and examine the available legal mechanisms for their resolution. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and comparative law approaches. The findings indicate that tax avoidance by foreign workers commonly occurs through dual payroll schemes, manipulation of reported income, and non-compliance in reporting foreign assets. Furthermore, enforcement through administrative and criminal sanctions has not yet been fully effective. A comparison with Malaysia shows that preventive administrative measures are more effective in reducing tax avoidance by foreign workers.

Page 14 of 14 | Total Record : 140

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2016 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN – FEBRUARI 2026 Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2025 Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - FEBRUARI 2025 Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2024 Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - FEBRUARI 2024 Vol. 8 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2023 Vol. 8 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - FEBRUARI 2023 Vol 7 No 1 (2022): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - FEBRUARI 2022 Vol 6 No 02 (2021): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 6 No 1 (2021): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum dan Pembangunan Vol 5 No 02 (2020): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 5 No 01 (2020): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 4 No 02 (2019): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 4 No. 01 (2019): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 4 No 01 (2019): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 3 No 03 (2018): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 3 No 02 (2018): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 3 No 01 (2018): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 2 No 03 (2017): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 2 No 02 (2017): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 2 No 01 (2017): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 1 No 03 (2016): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 1 No 02 (2016): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol 1 No 01 (2016): Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan More Issue