cover
Contact Name
Fachrudin Sembiring
Contact Email
fachrudin.sembiring@atmajaya.ac.id
Phone
+628129551194
Journal Mail Official
paradigma.hukum@atmajaya.ac.id
Editorial Address
Gedung C Lantai 3 Jl. Jend. Sudirman No.51, RT.5/RW.4, Karet Semanggi, Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12930
Location
Kota adm. jakarta selatan,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan
ISSN : 25287486     EISSN : 26549298     DOI : https://doi.org/10.25170/paradigma.v5i02
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan diterbitkan sesuai standar akreditasi dan dimaksudkan untuk memenuhi kebutuhan publikasi karya ilmiah bidang hukum yang pada akhir ini sulit ditemukan. Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan memuat hasil kegiatan penelitian, pemikiran konseptual, dan resensi buku bidang hukum. Media komunikasi ini diterbitkan oleh Fakultas Hukum Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya, Jakarta. Terbit perdana April 2016 dengan siklus terbit dua kali setahun. Naskah artikel yang diterima berupa laporan penelitian, pemikiran konseptual, dan resensi buku bidang hukum sepanjang relevan dengan misi redaksi dan belum pernah dipublikasikan.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 132 Documents
THE ROLE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT OF INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES Maria Angela Maharanim Himan
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2025
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v10i2.7265

Abstract

International law is the law that governs all activities on an international scale. International law aims to create order and justice in the international community. It also regulates cooperative relations between countries worldwide. The purpose of regulating international relations is to prevent tension and major conflicts between countries. However, what if a country fails to maintain its international relations and even cause disputes between countries, which can lead to various problems? This research uses a normative legal research method, namely by reviewing and collecting information from literature sources such as books and laws.
REGULATORY MODEL FOR THE UTILIZATION OF LAND BANK MECHANISMS IN INDONESIA TO PREVENT AND AVOID LAND MAFIA PRACTICES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY BASED ON LAND GOVERNANCE Putri Purbasari R.M.; Delarosa, Stella
Jurnal Paradigma Hukum Pembangunan Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): JURNAL PARADIGMA HUKUM PEMBANGUNAN - AGUSTUS 2025
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25170/paradigma.v10i2.7266

Abstract

The issue of the "Land Mafia" in Indonesia reflects legal uncertainty and structural inequality in land ownership. The establishment of the Land Bank Agency through Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation, instead of Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation and Government Regulation Number 64 of 2021, is a government effort to address this issue. However, the existence of this agency has sparked public concerns about the potential for abuse of authority and the return of discriminatory legalistic practices, similar to the principle ofdomain declaration, as revealed in the case of farmers in Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi.1The main problem faced is the absence of a holistic, transparent, and accountable regulatory model that can guarantee that the Land Bank truly functions for the greatest prosperity of the people, not for the interests of certain groups. This study aims to analyze, compare, and formulate a more effective manual regulation of the Land Bank. The research method used is normative juridical with a comparative approach to the Land Bank models in the Netherlands and France. The comparison shows fundamental differences: Indonesia applies a centralized model, while the Netherlands uses a decentralized model integrated with spatial planning, and France operates a semi-private hybrid model (SAFER) that has preferential rights and is supervised by a multi-stakeholder committee.1These findings highlight the advantages of the Dutch model, namely its adaptation to local contexts and efficiency in land consolidation, and the French model, which offers operational efficiency and robust oversight mechanisms. Based on these findings, this report proposes a "Hybrid-Decentralized Land Bank Regulatory Model." This model combines Dutch-style decentralization principles with a French-style multi-stakeholder oversight structure, grounded in fundamental theories of good governance. The success of Land Banks in Indonesia ultimately depends on institutional reforms that ensure transparency, accountability, and public participation, going beyond the mere formulation of formal regulations.