cover
Contact Name
Mu'tashim Billah
Contact Email
mutashim1992@gmail.com
Phone
+6281213101465
Journal Mail Official
mutashim1992@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga, Jln. Marsda Adisucipto, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Kode Pos 55281
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum
ISSN : 23027355     EISSN : 28091019     DOI : -
Al-Mazaahib adalah jurnal pemikiran hukum milik Jurusan Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum, Fakultas Syari’ah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta. Al-Mazaahib merupakan jurnal yang berisi atau memuat karya-karya ilmiah yang terkait dengan pemikiran-pemikiran di bidang hukum, baik hukum umum (positif) maupun hukum Islam. Keberadaan Jurnal Al-Mazaahib ini tentu sangat penting dalam menggali, memperkaya, dan mengembangkan pemikiran dan teori-teori hukum. Dengan demikian, Jurnal Al-Mazaahib ini akan memberikan kontribusi positif dalam memperkaya khazanah pemikiran di bidang hukum, baik hukum Islam maupun hukum positif.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 176 Documents
STUDI ATAS PANDANGAN KAUM AGAMAWAN, PRAKTISI KESEHATAN DAN RESPONS MUI TERHADAP MASALAH ABORSI Mustafid, Fuad
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (471.091 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v3i1.1383

Abstract

Abortion is a classic problem that still continue to be discussed among experts and the public. It is perhaps because of the practice of abortion continues to occur from time to time with vary shapes and motifs. In Indonesia, talks and discussions on abortion also gone on long enough. The experts, both clerical and medical experts, involved in a heated debate on the issue of abortion. Nevertheless, the debate nevertheless did not come to fruition. On the other hand, the practices of abortion continues to occur in the wider community. The Council of Indonesian Ulama (MUI) felt obliged to give guidance to the Muslims in viewing and addressing the issue of abortion. In this case, the steps taken by the MUI issued a fatwa is the law. The MUI fatwa states that abortion is against their religion, so it must be prevented. But on the other hand, the institution of fatwa also gives room for the possibility of abortion if it is seen it will be able to bring good to the pregnant mother and her family.
IZIN POLIGAMI DALAM BINGKAI MAQASHID SYARIAH DAN HUKUM PROGRESIF Halim, Abdul
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2020): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (184.655 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v8i2.2216

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh realitas sosial bahwa kendatipun pengaturan mengenai poligami dalam UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan telah mendekati setengah abad, namun sampai saat ini masih terjadi pro dan kontra terhadap ketentuan tersebut. Tulisan ini memaparkan regulasi izin poligami dalam bingkai Maqashid Syariah dan Hukum Progresif. Hasil pembahasan memberikan pemahaman bahwa ketentuan yang mengatur tentang izin poligami didasarkan pada pertimbangan untuk memberikan kemanfaatan dan kebahagiaan kepada 94 Abd. Halim, Izin Poligami dalam Bingkai Maqashid Syariah... (93-111)masyarakat, yaitu untuk melindungi kemaslahatan semua pihak yang terkait dalam suatu perkawinan. Tegasnya, ketentuan ini mengandung nilai-nilai maqashid sayariah dan hukum progresif. Ketentuan ini telah berusaha menggeser pemahaman yang telah berada pada posisi paham status quo---bahwa poligami adalah urusan pribadi (suami) yang tidak bisa dicampuri oleh penguasa dan selanjutnya pelaksanaannya tidak hanya sekedar private affairs, tetapi memilki segi keagamaan, segi sosial, dan segi hukum.
KEADILAN PEMBAGIAN HARTA WARISAN PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM DAN BURGERLIJK WETBOEK Al-Mabruri, M. Nasikhul Umam
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 1 (2017): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (197.277 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i1.1394

Abstract

The question of the distribution of heritage property from parents to their children, or from people who have died to the parties entitled to them is a complicated problem and often cause problems for many family members. Generally, the problems arising from the practice of inheritance share are because each party feels it does not get the inheritance as it should be (unfair). This paper examines the concept of justice in the distribution of inheritance under Islamic law and Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW). This paper has provided valuable information on the understanding and concept of justice existing in Islamic law and also in BW, in which the different concept of justice has given rise to different provisions in terms of inheritance division. In the Islamic heirs law, the concept of justice is based on the principle of equitable justice, while the concept of justice contained in Burgerlijk Wetboek is built on Western philosophies and ideas, especially the justice Aristotle made about the equality of rights between individuals. Therefore, the rights of the heirs are equal to the rights of the daughter's heirs. The difference in fairness in the distribution of inheritance is due to differences in the perspectives of justice and the legal basis of the two heirs. Islam considers that the obligation to provide family support is the responsibility of men so that it is appropriate if men doubled the share of women's heritage. Meanwhile, in the Western thinking that forms the BW heir system does not determine and imposes obligations to provide a family income only to men or women, so BW's heirs provide a share of inheritance equally between men and women.
PELARANGAN AKITIVITAS JAMA’AT AHMADIYAH INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM DAN HAM (Mengkaji Legalitas Sk Gubernur Jawa Timur Nomor 188/94/Kpts/013/2011) Haris, Ach. Faidi; Marwini, Marwini
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (211.512 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v1i2.1362

Abstract

Incidents of violence against followers of Ahmadiyah in Indonesia are still happening. The case of destruction, burning mosques, is an example of violence against the Ahmadiyah congregation as a form of denial of the existence of this group and its teachings. In response, the government issued a decree three ministers, namely the agreement (SKB) between the Ministry of Religious Affairs, Ministry of Interior and the Attorney General who in essence to limit the activities of Ahmadiyah congregation in Indonesia. However, the SKB is sometimes still vague, yet firmly, proven related conflicts as well Ahmadis continues unabated. Therefore, as a preventive measure so that the conflict does not recur, some regional heads decided to publish a Decree (SK) on the prohibition of activities of Ahmadiyah congregation Indonesia, one of which is a East Java Governor Decree No. 188/94/KPTS/013/2011 that contains a ban on Ahmadiyah activities in East Java, Indonesia. After the issuance of the decree, the pros and cons in the back sticking out, some people accused the decree is unconstitutional, legally flawed both formal and material, as well as violation of Human Rights (HAM). This Decree can’t be formally referred to as the Administrative Decision, because there are still elements that have not been met, namely individual elements. On the other hand, the decree has jurisdiction flawed, because the material on the issue of religion under the authority of the central government. In other words, the decree is not legally and irrevocably flawed because it still contains elements of authority.
PEMBARUAN PEMIKIRAN HUKUM ISLAM: Studi tentang Teori Hudud Muhammad Syahrur Mustafid, Fuad
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (380.723 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i2.1423

Abstract

In the last few decades, the awareness of the importance of reforming Islamic legal thought has been increasing. This is triggered by the fact that the existing Islamic law is considered less able to respond to various problems that arise and develop in the modern world. As a result, Islamic law is seen or deemed to be incompatible with the times. This is of course contrary to the doctrine or belief that Islam is a plenary religion that will always be in harmony with the times. This anxiety also afflicted Muhammad Syahrur, prompting him to examine carefully and deeply the teachings of Islam, especially those contained in God's revelation. From his careful and profound study of God's revelation, Syahrur succeeded in formulating a theory of legal excavation which became known as hudud theory. This theory is expected to be a means to reform in the field of Islamic law. This paper will try to study the theory hudud (nazhariyyah al-hudud) offered by Syahrur.Kata Kunci:  Muhammad Syahrur, teori hudud, pembaruan pemikiran hukum Islam
GENEALOGI GERAKAN PENEGAKAN SYARI’AT ISLAM DI INDONESIA Sodiqin, Ali
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (430.632 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v3i1.1378

Abstract

Enforcement of Islamic law in Indonesia has historically and empirically problem. Debating in this case is not a new discourse of Islamic law, but of a "burden of history" which until this moment has not been completed. Political law of Dutch colonial that twist the facts enactment of Islamic law, caused  marginalization of the Shari'ah in the Indonesian legal system. As a result, there are fragmentation among the Muslims in the form and establishes the basic state at the beginning of independence. Two groups of Muslims appeared, namely the secular nationalist and Islamic nationalist group. During reformation period, appear artifisialistic and reductionist understanding, when Islamic law narrowed at the level of legal provisions that formal and rigid. The emergence of regional regulations of Shari'ah,  was more the efforts of syariah formalization rather than enforcing the doctrine of universal substance. It can be seen from the regulated materials that only at the outside or the skin only, not on the key issues that touch the lives of many people. Besides, it appears a group that understands the shari'ah as a solution and a way of life that is totalistic, without considering aspects of historicity and contextuality. As a result is widespread understanding of Islamism is more emphasis than substance formalization. Transformation understand fundamentalism in the Middle East are sourced from Wahhabi’s teachings that has a big influence in developing the ideology called salafiyah ideological.
PEREMPUAN SEBAGAI PEMBATAL SALAT: STUDI ATAS PANDANGAN NASR AD-DIN A-ALBANI DAN FATIMA MERNISSI Irfan, Muhammad Miftah
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 8 No. 1 (2020): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.523 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v8i1.2211

Abstract

Islam hadir dengan membawa semangat kesetaraan antara lakilaki dan perempuan, baik dalam hal ibadah maupun lainnya. Namun demikian, terdapat sejumlah nash Al-Qur’an dan juga hadis nabi yang mengesankan adanya subordinasi terhadap perempuan. Salahnya adalah hadis yang menyatakan bahwa lewatnya perempuan di depan orang yang salat bisa menjadi penyebab batalnya salat. Dalam hal ini, perempuan, anjing dan keledai seolah diposisikan secara setara dan sama-sama bisa menjadi penyebab batalnya salat. Berkaitan dengan hadis ini, Muhammad Nas}r ad-Di>n al-Albi>ni memegangi makna literal hadis nabi tersebut. Dengan demikian, menurutnya, perempuan yang lewat di depan seseorang yang sedang menjalankan salat bisa menjadikan salatnya batal. Sementara itu, Fatima Mernissi berpendapat sebaliknya, bahwa lewatnya perempuan di depan orang yang sedang salat tidak bisa secara otomatis membatalkan salat. Dia berarguen bahwa ada kecenderungan patriarki yang tersimpan dalam hadis tersebut. Nasr ad-Din al-Albani berpegang pada hadis yang diriwayatkan oleh Abu Hurairah dan Abu Zarr, sementara Fatimah Mernissi berpegang pada hadis Aisyah dan Ummu Salamah. Hadis-hadis tersebut ‘tampak’ saling bertentangan namun sebenarnya bisa dikompromikan dengan menggunakan metode al-jam’u wa at-tawfiq. Dengan menggunakan metode tersebut dapatlah dikatakan bahwa melintasnya perempuan di depan orang yang sedang menjalankan salat tidaklah membatalkan salat, namun memutus kehusyu’an salat. Hal ini sejalan dengan kata yaqt}a’u dalam hadis tersebut, yang makna aslinya adalah memutus. Dengan demikian, hadis tersebut harus dipahami bahwa melintasnya perempuan bisa menjadi pemutus kehusyukan salat, bukan sebagai pembatal salat.
TEORI HERMENEUTIKA HUKUM KHALED M. ABOU EL-FADL Membongkar Fiqh Otoriter Membangun Fiqh Otoritatif Zayyadi, Ahmad
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2012): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (600.003 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v1i1.1341

Abstract

The hermeneutic approach in law is the new discourse. It has its unique, because of Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl‟s idea. It tries to deconstruct the law authoritarianism phenomena which bring to the new fiqh that is more authoritative and applicable in the contemporary fiqh discourse (Islamic Jurisprudence). Law hermeneutic he formed is tend to a text interpretation authority through negotiating the text, the author and the reader. The set of very basic methods are the basic assumptions such as assumption based on the values, methods, reason, and belief. The four assumptions according to Khaled M. Abou El-Fadl can‟t be leave in developing law theory and interpretation. The article aims to create the new meaning more objective, authoritative which is not included in the interpretation authoritarianism conducts, especially in the creating law texts more authoritative and humany.
KADAR MINUMAN BERALKOHOL PERDA NOMOR 7 TAHUN 1953 KOTA YOGYAKARTA PERSPEKTIF MAQĀSID ASY-SYARĪ’AH Idawan, Irman Doni
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (250.221 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v1i2.1357

Abstract

In terms of permits and collection of sales tax on licenses to sell liquor, Yogyakarta city government has issued Regional Regulation (Perda) No. 7 of 1953 and confirmed by the Regional Regulation No. 7 of 2006 on changes to the criminal provisions in local regulations area of the city of Yogyakarta. However, these two rules are not discussed in detail the levels of restrictions in the use of alcohol liquor is allowed to be sold. This paper uses philosophical worldview that explains the theory of Maqa>sid as-Syari>’ah in understanding the limitations alcoholic liquor contained in the Regional Regulation No. 7 of 1953. The regulation is not clear on setting the levels of alcohol restrictions. In fact, the provision of alcohol it is a very crucial due to excess use of alcohol is a risk to the maintenance of religion, life, intellect, lineage and property. New legislation, number 7 in 2006 only stipulates sanctions for violations contained in the Regional Regulation No.. 7 in 1953 and have not been able to address problems that exist.
KEDUDUKAN JANDA DALAM HUKUM WARIS ADAT, PERDATA, DAN ISLAM: KAJIAN INTEGRATIF Halim, Abd
Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2017): Al-Mazaahib
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (181.311 KB) | DOI: 10.14421/al-mazaahib.v5i2.1417

Abstract

The inheritance law prevailing in indonesia is pluralistic since it consists of customary inheritance law (Adat), civil inheritance law (KUH Perdata), and Islamic inheritance law. This is inseparable from the politic of law performed by Dutch-Indische Government about population classsification in article 131 and 163 Indische Staatsregeling (S.1855-2). The influence of this policy is visible even now because there are some differences in their principles and norms. The difference in principle such as application of “legitieme portie” principle that is exist in civil inheritance law is unheard in Adat law, while the Islamic law has ijbrari principle. Another differences lay in the inheritance elements. In Adat, element of kinship between someone and his/her heir is very important. Civil inheritance law, in other hand, has two ways to determine how the heritage can be passed down, first is arranged in constitution, and second is mentioned in testament letter. Islamic law also has two ways to determine the inheritance right that consist of kinship elements (nasabiyah) and inheritance relations that built by marriage, etc (sababiyah). The consequence of this differences affecting widow’s position as a heir because of its acknowledgement in civil and Islamic law, while Adat doesn’t recognize it. This paper is trying to find a way to integrate this matter with law harmonisation theory and other relevant theories.

Page 6 of 18 | Total Record : 176