cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Amelia
Contact Email
melameliaaa99@gmail.com
Phone
+6282214018102
Journal Mail Official
ijssrofficial@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Greenland Sendang Regency Blok. E6 Jl. Pangeran Cakrabuana Sendang, Sumber, Cirebon
Location
Kab. cirebon,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
International Journal of Social Service and Research
Published by Ridwan Institute
ISSN : 2807839X     EISSN : 28078691     DOI : 10.46799
Core Subject : Economy, Science, Education, Social,
Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
International Journal of Social Service and Research is a double-blind, peer-reviewed academic journal with open access to social and scientific fields. The journal is published monthly by Ridwan Institute. International Journal of Social Service and Research provides a means for sustained discussion of relevant issues that fall within the focus and scopes of the journal, which can be examined empirically. The journal publishes research articles covering all aspects of Social Sciences, Contemporary Political Science, Educational Sciences, Religious Sciences, Economics, Engineering Sciences, Health Sciences and Design Arts Sciences.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,047 Documents
 101   102   103   104   105 
Law and Society in the Digital Era Regarding the Case of Scholarship Recipients from Education Fund Management Institutions from A Sociological Perspective Hidayati Hidayati
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1400

Abstract

Law and society are interconnected in the digital world. The viral case of a scholarship recipient from the Education Fund Management Institute whose nationalism declined due to insults to the state through social media, sparked a public movement responding to various opinions. This article aims to educate the public on the wise use of social media from a sociological perspective. The sociological research method uses a qualitative approach, employing a sociological perspective of law. The research results, according to social theory in global history, are manifested in the form of neoliberalism, with the intention of viewing society as individuals who behave as economic beings. This addresses the function of law in society to prevent conflicts of interest. If occur, the law becomes a tool used to resolve the consequences of individual violations that insult the state. According to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia, the Education Fund Management Institute Scholarship Agreement between the government and the people meets the requirements for the validity of the agreement as stipulated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code. This means that the agreement is legally binding for the parties bound by it. Violation of the Education Fund Management Institute Scholarship Agreement by failing to return to Indonesia to serve the national interest after completing studies can result in a civil lawsuit. A civil lawsuit based on breach of contract involves failure to fulfill obligations inherent in a valid agreement, namely the existence of a measurable agreement of rights and obligations (performance).
Reconstruction of the Regulation on the Cancellation of Arbitration Awards by Courts in the Indonesian Legal System Based on the Principle of Finality of Arbitration and Limitation of Judicial Intervention Cepi Hendrayani; Effendy Lod Simanjutak
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1401

Abstract

Arbitration is a dispute resolution forum that upholds the principle of finality, whereby an arbitral award is final and binding on the parties. The finality of arbitral awards is a fundamental principle underlying the success of non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms. However, in Indonesian practice, the mechanism for annulling arbitral awards through the courts is often used as an instrument of judicial intervention that weakens the finality of arbitration. This research aims to analyze the regulatory disharmony concerning the annulment of arbitral awards under Law Number 30 of 1999 and Indonesian judicial practice, and to compare it with several other legal systems. This research uses a comparative legal method with statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case study approaches by comparing the Indonesian arbitration system with those of Singapore under the International Arbitration Act, England under the Arbitration Act 1996, and the UNCITRAL Model Law. The research findings indicate that unclear boundaries of court authority, the absence of technical guidelines for judges, and a culture of judicial supremacy are the main causes of the ineffectiveness of arbitration finality in Indonesia. This research concludes that regulatory reconstruction is needed to align national standards with international practices by affirming the limits of judicial intervention, establishing Supreme Court regulations, enhancing judicial specialization, and harmonizing national arbitration law with the UNCITRAL Model Law in order to strengthen legal certainty and attract investment in Indonesia.
The Juridical Construction of The Obligation of Land Deed Officials to Conduct Field Inspections: Theoretical Foundations, Normative Gaps, and Professional Responsibility in Indonesian Land Law Yanah Susanti; Zudan Arief Fakrulloh
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1402

Abstract

The existence of land as a fundamental object of law demands absolute data accuracy in every transfer of rights. This study examines the juridical problems surrounding the obligation of field inspection, or site inspection, by Land Deed Officials (Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah/PPAT), which to date remains without explicit regulation under Indonesia’s positive law. The central issue lies in the tension between formal juridical data and physical field conditions, a discrepancy that frequently gives rise to destructive land disputes. Employing normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, and case analysis approaches, this study identifies a normative gap in Government Regulation No. 37 of 1998 and Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016. The analysis demonstrates that the field inspection obligation constitutes a legal construction derived from the prudential principle and a systematic interpretation of the PPAT’s oath of office, which requires the exercise of due diligence (seksama). Failure to conduct physical verification risks degrading the authenticity of the deed from a public instrument (openbaar document) to a privately executed deed. This study concludes that the transformation of a vague norm into an explicit legal obligation through regulatory reconstruction is urgently required in order to guarantee legal certainty (Rechtssicherheit), substantive justice (Gerechtigkeit), and utility (Zweckmäßigkeit). The principal recommendation is the formalization of standard operating procedures for field inspections, integrated with the electronic land registration system.
The Effectiveness of Investigations and Prosecutions of Corruption Crimes by the Corruption Eradication Commission, the Police, and the Prosecutor's Office: A Study of the Power of Power in Criminal Law Enforcement Rusdi Rusdi; Evita Isretno Israhadi
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1403

Abstract

This research analyzes the effectiveness of investigations and prosecutions of corruption crimes conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), the Indonesian National Police, and the Indonesian Attorney General’s Office, focusing on the dynamics of authority disputes within the national law enforcement system. The multiplicity of law enforcement agencies authorized to investigate corruption has created institutional complexity, disharmony of authority, and potential inter-institutional competition that affect the effectiveness of the case-handling process. This research uses a comparative legal system approach by comparing Indonesia’s multi-agency model with jurisdictions that adopt a single-agency model with exclusive authority in eradicating corruption. The research results show that the effectiveness of investigations and prosecutions conducted by the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is relatively high due to strong regulatory support, independence, and institutional focus on corruption. In contrast, the Police and the Prosecutor’s Office face structural constraints, extensive caseloads, and limited coordination, which affect the quality of case handling. Authority disputes among institutions often give rise to overlapping processes, delays in case handling, and legal uncertainty in determining the most competent institution. Comparisons with other national legal systems show that countries implementing a single-agency model, such as the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) in Singapore and the Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) in Hong Kong, are more effective in handling corruption due to clear authority, minimal jurisdictional conflict, and a rapid investigation process. This research concludes that the effectiveness of investigation and prosecution mechanisms in Indonesia needs to be strengthened through the reconstruction of authority design, the strengthening of systemic coordination, and the establishment of clearer jurisdictional boundaries among law enforcement institutions.
A Juridical Analysis of Data Classification under Regulation of The Minister of Communication and Digital (MoCD) Number 5 of 2025 Concerning Public Electronic System Operators for Public Sector AI Governance Indri Maria; Megawati Barthos
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1404

Abstract

The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the public sector offers significant improvements in bureaucratic effectiveness but simultaneously raises serious concerns regarding data privacy, security, and algorithmic bias. In response, the Ministry of Communication and Digital (MoCD) issued Regulation No. 5 of 2025 concerning Public Electronic System Operators to address these challenges. This research aims to analyze the juridical status of data classification under this regulation as a foundational element for establishing safe and ethical AI governance in the Indonesian public sector. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches, with qualitative and prescriptive analysis of secondary legal materials, including primary and secondary legal sources. The findings reveal that MoCD Regulation No. 5 of 2025 provides legal safeguards through data classification into three categories: open data, restricted data, and confidential or closed data. These categories serve as essential parameters for AI algorithms when processing public information. The juridical analysis confirms that data classification is not merely an administrative measure but constitutes a conditio sine qua non—an absolute necessity—for mitigating the risks of data leaks and algorithmic bias in government-level AI systems. The study concludes that harmonizing this regulation with Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, commonly referred to as the Personal Data Protection Law, is essential to creating a comprehensive legal framework that ensures AI implementation in the public sector adheres to the principles of data security, privacy protection, and digital sovereignty. This research recommends the development of detailed technical guidelines to operationalize data classification in AI systems and the alignment of consent mechanisms with the Personal Data Protection Law to address the asymmetrical power relationship between the state and citizens regarding the use of public data for AI training.
Comparative Analysis of Legal Certainty in Fiduciary Guarantees for Defaulting Visit of Justice and Economic Analysis of Law Wennie Melannie; Suparno Suparno
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1405

Abstract

In Indonesia, fiduciary guarantees serve as a critical mechanism for securing credit agreements by providing creditors with the right to execute collateral if debtors default. However, the issuance of Constitutional Court Decisions No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 and No. 2/PUU-XIX/2021 has significantly altered the execution mechanism, shifting it from parate execution—direct execution without court involvement—to a mechanism that requires either mutual agreement between the creditor and debtor or a court order. This change has created legal uncertainty, particularly regarding the balance between creditor protection and debtor rights. This research aims to analyze the legal certainty of fiduciary collateral execution against defaulting debtors by integrating the perspectives of justice and the Economic Analysis of Law. The method used in this research is a normative legal approach, which examines and analyzes applicable legal provisions as well as theories related to justice and legal economics. In this context, the theory of justice is used to understand the principles of fairness that should be applied in resolving disputes over fiduciary collateral, while the Economic Analysis of Law is employed to evaluate the economic impact of legal practices related to the execution of fiduciary collateral on both creditors and debtors. The findings of this research are expected to provide insights into how the law can achieve a balance between legal certainty, justice for the parties involved, and economic efficiency in the application of fiduciary collateral execution against defaulting debtors.
Benefit-Sharing from The Utilization of Genetic Resources As an Inclusive, Equitable, and Sustainable Form of Protection For Communal Intellectual Property Ibrahim Ibrahim; Rineke Sara
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1406

Abstract

Genetic resources hold strategic value for science and industry, and their utilization is often linked to the traditional knowledge of indigenous communities. Indonesian law recognizes Communal Intellectual Property Rights through Law No. 11 of 2013, which ratifies the Nagoya Protocol and emphasizes fair benefit-sharing from the utilization of genetic resources, as well as Government Regulation No. 56 of 2022 on Communal Intellectual Property. However, in practice, the economic utilization of biodiversity has not yet been fully accompanied by fair profit-sharing mechanisms for local communities. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions regarding communal intellectual property rights over genetic resources within the Indonesian legal system and to examine profit-sharing mechanisms for the utilization of genetic resources in order to achieve inclusive, equitable, and sustainable protection for indigenous peoples and local communities. The research method employed is a normative legal approach, using both statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that mechanisms for sharing benefits derived from the utilization of genetic resources are key instruments for ensuring justice for local communities and supporting the sustainable management of biodiversity. However, regulations regarding this matter remain scattered across various laws and have not comprehensively addressed benefit-sharing mechanisms. Therefore, it is necessary to adopt the principles contained in the Nagoya Protocol, which emphasizes fair and equitable benefit-sharing in agreements with indigenous communities as the rightful holders of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge
The Problematics of Unclaimed Royalty Funds in The Governance of National Collective Management Organizations in Indonesia Maria Magdalena Astrina Bratajaya; Azis Budianto
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1407

Abstract

The management of music royalties is part of the protection of creators’ economic rights, as stipulated in Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, specifically Articles 87 to 93 concerning royalty management through Collective Management Organizations. To improve the effectiveness of royalty collection and distribution, the government established a one-stop management system through the National Collective Management Organization (LMKN), as regulated in Government Regulation No. 56 of 2021. However, in practice, the issue of unclaimed royalty funds persists due to unregistered creators, limited data on the use of works, and the suboptimal integration of the royalty distribution system. This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing music royalty management and the status of unclaimed royalty funds within the National Collective Management Organization system, as well as to examine issues related to the management and distribution of unclaimed royalty funds in the practical governance of the LMKN. The research method used is normative legal research, employing statutory and analytical approaches. The results of the study indicate that the royalty management system is centrally regulated through the LMKN and distributed periodically through Collective Management Organizations (LMKs) to creators based on data regarding the use of works. However, unclaimed royalty funds remain due to data limitations and the fact that some creators have not yet registered with a Collective Management Organization. These funds are temporarily held by the LMKN until the rights holders file a claim. This situation creates uncertainty regarding the fulfillment of creators’ economic rights, thereby necessitating improved data collection, greater transparency in governance, and stronger integration among stakeholders involved in music royalty management.
The Influence of Financial Education, Financial Attitudes, and Lifestyle on The Financial Behavior of E-Commerce Users in Yogyakarta, with Financial Literacy and Self-Control as Moderating Variables Diah Wulandari; Nur Rahmah Tri Utami
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1408

Abstract

The development of e-commerce has encouraged significant changes in people’s financial behavior, particularly in online consumption activities, which often lead to impulsive spending and unwise financial decision-making. This study aims to analyze the influence of financial education, financial attitude, and lifestyle on the financial behavior of e-commerce users in Yogyakarta and to examine the roles of financial literacy and self-control as moderating variables. This research employed a quantitative approach using a survey method involving 313 e-commerce users in Yogyakarta. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) with IBM SPSS Statistics 25. The results showed that financial education, financial attitude, and lifestyle had positive and significant effects on financial behavior. Financial literacy moderated the influence of financial attitude on financial behavior, while self-control did not moderate the influence of lifestyle on financial behavior. The findings indicate that improving financial education and literacy is essential to encourage wiser financial behavior among e-commerce users. In conclusion, financial education and positive financial attitudes play crucial roles in shaping better financial behavior, whereas lifestyle, when balanced with financial management skills, does not necessarily lead to negative consumption patterns. This study highlights the importance of improving financial education and literacy to promote wiser financial behavior in the use of e-commerce.
Employment Law Reform: A Responsive and Participatory Approach to Create Laws that Achieve Social Justice Mardonius Irawan Profianto; Faisal Santiago
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i6.1409

Abstract

Social justice is a key measure of whether Indonesia, as a welfare state, is capable of realizing true prosperity. The numerous judicial reviews of the Employment Cluster of the Job Creation Law, both the 2020 Job Creation Law and the 2023 Job Creation Law, reflect public doubts about the country's ability to achieve social justice. This paper reviews the Job Creation Law from a social justice perspective and then explains how responsive law achieves social justice. The research method is normative juridical, using both a statutory and conceptual approach. The secondary data sources consist of primary legal materials, various legal regulations and court decisions, and secondary legal materials, namely books and articles related to the research. The results of the study indicate that the Job Creation Law, specifically the Employment Cluster, has shortcomings in terms of social justice. The numerous judicial reviews from the public are due to the lack of public participation and transparency in the law-making process, and are considered to not provide social justice for applicants, most of whom are workers. Responsive law offers advantages that can address the shortcomings of the Job Creation Law, as it better accommodates the needs and aspirations of the community and brings the desired benefits to realize social justice by prioritizing the principles of openness, efficiency and effectiveness, clarity of objectives, and meaningful community participation.

Page 103 of 105 | Total Record : 1047

 101   102   103   104   105 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 10 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 8 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 12 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 11 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 10 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 05 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 4 No. 04 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 4 No. 03 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 4 No. 02 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 4 No. 01 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 4 No. 9 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 8 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 7 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 12 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 11 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 10 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 9 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 8 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 7 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 12 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 11 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 10 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 9 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 8 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 7 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 6 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 5 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): International Journal of Social Service and Research (IJSSR) More Issue