cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Afandi Sitamala
Contact Email
asitamala@untirta.ac.id
Phone
+6285601938531
Journal Mail Official
adil@untirta.ac.id
Editorial Address
Faculty of Law, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa Jl. Tirtayasa, Sindangsari, Kec. Pabuaran, Serang, Provinsi Banten Telp. (0254) 280330 Ext. 218, Fax.: (0254) 281254 Website: https://jurnal.untirta.ac.id/index.php/nhk E-mail : yustisia.tirtayasa@untirta.ac.id
Location
Kab. serang,
Banten
INDONESIA
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir
Published by Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa
ISSN : 28072863     EISSN : 28071565     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta
Core Subject : Humanities, Education, Social,
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir also known as Yustisia Tirtayasa is national peer review journal on legal studies. The journal aims to publish new work of the highest calibre across the full range of legal scholarship, which includes but not limited to works in the law and history, legal philosophy, sociology of law, Socio-legal studies, International Law, Environmental Law, Criminal Law, Private Law, Islamic Law, Agrarian Law, Administrative Law, Criminal Procedural Law, Commercial Law, Constitutional Law, Human Rights Law, Civil Procedural Law and Adat Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 136 Documents
 10   11   12   13   14 
Notary Protocols in Indonesia: Position, Urgency, and the Rule of Law Khairunnisa, Azzahra Kamiliya
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Rule of Law: Legal Certainty, Policy, and Governance
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v5i2.31206

Abstract

This research addresses the critical yet under-regulated area of notary protocol submission and management within the Indonesian legal system. Despite the Notary Position Law (UUJN), a significant legal vacuum persists regarding implementation procedures, leading to practical obstacles such as lost or incomplete protocols and refusal of acceptance. This deficiency undermines legal certainty, hinders administrative efficiency, and risks harm to involved parties. This study offers a novel in-depth analysis of these shortcomings and proposes concrete, comprehensive regulatory solutions to streamline submission and management processes. The research contributes by providing specific recommendations aimed at enhancing legal certainty, preventing administrative issues, and ultimately strengthening the notary's role in upholding the validity and security of legal transactions. The urgent need for clearer regulations is underscored by the current practical impediments and their potential for broader legal disruption.
Insolvency and Legal Gaps in Unlegalized Murabahah Contracts Mahardika, Kamila Dwi; Hutomo, Putra; Anwar, Khoirul
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Rule of Law: Legal Certainty, Policy, and Governance
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v5i2.30774

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the legal consequences of murabahah agreements made underhand without legalization or waarmerking when the debtor fails to pay and to examine and analyze the legal certainty of murabahah agreements made underhand without legalization or waarmerking between the debtor and creditor. Murabahah agreements are often made underhand without legalization or waarmerking by a Notary to reduce contract costs and can be detrimental to creditors if the debtor defaults so that they must meet the terms of the agreement and sharia principles to obtain legal force in Court. The method used in the study is normative legal research. The research approaches used are the Legislation Approach, Case Approach, Analytical Approach, Conceptual Approach and the technique of collecting legal materials is carried out by identifying and inventorying positive legal rules, book literature, journals and other sources of legal materials. The technique of analyzing legal materials is carried out with systematic interpretation, analogy construction and legal construction methods. From the research results, it was found that the murabahah agreement made underhand without legalization or waarmerking by a Notary has legal consequences in the form of binding the parties which gives rise to rights and obligations for the parties. The murabahah agreement made underhand without legalization or waarmerking by a Notary has legal certainty if it meets the terms of the agreement and meets the principles of sharia but does not have perfect legal proof. The murabahah agreement should be made with an authentic deed to obtain legal certainty and legal consequences in the form of perfect legal proof if in the future the debtor commits a default in the form of failure to pay.
The Legal Conundrum of Electoral Dispute Settlement Regarding the Candidacy Threshold Fathurokhman, Ferry; Rayhan, Ahmad; Karsa, Pipih Ludia; Gunawan, Muhammad Safaat
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Rule of Law: Legal Certainty, Policy, and Governance
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v5i2.32751

Abstract

This study addresses the persistent challenges in Indonesian electoral dispute resolution and candidacy threshold regulations, a recurring issue in both general and regional elections, notably in 2024. The urgency lies in the need for robust legal frameworks to ensure fair and democratic processes. Employing a normative juridical method with legal, historical, comparative, and conceptual approaches, this research offers novel insights into optimizing dispute settlement mechanisms. It proposes empowering Bawaslu, KPU, and DKPP for proactive and reactive oversight, alongside advocating for candidacy threshold adjustments aligned with prevailing laws and Constitutional Court rulings on presidential thresholds. This research contributes by offering concrete policy recommendations for a more stable and just electoral system.
Kampung Tua Batam Policy Model: Between the Right of Indigenous Peoples and Presidental Decree Raziansyah, Reza Philafi; Amboro, F. Yudhi Priyo; Sudirman, Lu
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Rule of Law: Legal Certainty, Policy, and Governance
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v5i2.31220

Abstract

Currently, there is a regulatory conflict regarding Kampung Tua (Traditional Villages) in Batam, where there is an overlap between Presidential Decree No. 41/1973, which grants Management Rights of all land in Batam Island to the Batam Authority, and Batam City Regional Regulation No. 2/2004 on Spatial Planning that includes the definition of traditional villages. To resolve this conflict, it is recommended that the Batam City Government and BP Batam implement Romli Atmasasmita's Integrative Law Theory and propose alternatives by designating Kampung Tua as a cultural heritage area with tourism potential development, not solely focusing on industrial areas, thus requiring an effective Kampung Tua Policy Model to reduce prolonged conflicts. Methodology: This research employs a qualitative descriptive method with primary data collection through observations in9 districts and 18 sub-districts in Kampung Tua Batam. Data analysis was conducted descriptively-qualitatively using Batam City Regional Regulation No. 2/2004 as secondary data, supported by Good Governance theory and other relevant legal materials. Conclusion: The research findings indicate that there is complexity and regulatory overlap concerning Kampung Tua in Batam between Presidential Decree No. 41/1973 and indigenous community protection regulations, leading to legal uncertainty and prolonged conflicts. To address this, a comprehensive approach is needed through the implementation of Integrative Law Theory, establishment of cultural heritage status, and implementation of Administrative Policy Theory, considering aspects of law, law enforcement, infrastructure, community, and culture to achieve a balance between legal certainty, community welfare, and cultural preservation.
Legal Protection of Student Victims of Sexual Violence in Educational Settings: A Victimological and Child Protection Perspective Cahyaningrum, Nike; Kurnianingsih, Marisa
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 6, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v6i1.39383

Abstract

Sexual violence against students in Indonesia is an escalating concern that highlights urgent gaps in effective legal protection. This study examines the implementation of legal protection for student victims in Jatisrono District and identifies key obstacles that hinder its effectiveness. Using an empirical legal method, data were collected through in depth interviews with law enforcement, educational authorities, child protection agencies, and civil society organizations. The findings show that despite the existence of comprehensive legal frameworks, particularly Law No. 12 of 2022 on Sexual Violence Crimes and Law No. 35 of 2014 on Child Protection, protection remains suboptimal. Structural and cultural barriers, including limited institutional capacity, low legal awareness, and weak inter agency coordination, significantly impede implementation. The novelty of this study lies in its victimological and child protection perspective within a semi rural educational context. It contributes by offering context sensitive policy recommendations to strengthen local legal protection mechanisms for student victims.
Judicial Consideration of State Financial Loss Calculations by The Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia and Regional Inspectorates Matris Ijham; Fenty U. Puluhulawa; Suwitno Y. Imran
Yustisia Tirtayasa : Jurnal Tugas Akhir Vol 6, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51825/yta.v6i1.39461

Abstract

This study examines judicial considerations in the use of state financial loss calculations prepared by the Audit Board of Indonesia (BPK) and Regional Inspectorates in corruption cases. The research focuses on the legal standing, evidentiary value, and institutional characteristics of calculations produced by both bodies, particularly regarding whether they possess equivalent authority and are derived from comparable evidentiary standards in assisting judges to construct legal reasoning. Employing normative legal research through statutory and conceptual approaches, this study analyzes the position of state financial loss assessments within Indonesia’s criminal justice system. The findings demonstrate that both BPK and Regional Inspectorates possess legally recognized authority to calculate state financial losses within the scope of their respective institutional mandates. However, the determination of evidentiary weight remains subject to judicial assessment in accordance with the principles of proof in criminal proceedings. Consequently, judges retain discretionary authority in evaluating whether such calculations sufficiently establish elements of corruption offenses. In practice, judicial consideration is not limited to financial loss assessments alone, but also incorporates witness testimony, expert opinions, documentary evidence, and the substantive criminal law framework under Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code. This study contributes to the discourse on evidentiary harmonization and institutional authority in Indonesia’s anti-corruption adjudication system.

Page 14 of 14 | Total Record : 136

 10   11   12   13   14 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 6, No 1 (2026): IN PRESS Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Jan - March 2025 Vol 5, No 2 (2025): Rule of Law: Legal Certainty, Policy, and Governance Vol 4, No 4 (2024): Oct - Dec 2024 Vol 4, No 3 (2024): July - Sept 2024 Vol 4, No 2 (2024): April-June 2024 Vol. 4 No. 1 January-March 2024 Vol. 3 No. 3 September-December 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2 May-August 2023 Vol. 3 No. 1 January-April 2023 Vol. 2 No. 3 Desember 2022 Vol 2 No.2 Agustus 2022 Vol.2 No.1 April 2022 Vol. 1 No. 2 Desember 2021 Vol. 1 No. 1 Agustus 2021 More Issue