cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Safrida Lubis
Contact Email
safridalubis900@gmail.com
Phone
+6282163856906
Journal Mail Official
register@unimed.ac.id
Editorial Address
Jurusan Bahasa dan Sastra Inggris Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni Universitas Negeri Medan Jl. Willem Iskandar Pasar V Medan Estate Medan 20221
Location
Kota medan,
Sumatera utara
INDONESIA
Register : Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning of FBS UNIMED
Published by Universitas Negeri Medan
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26559854     DOI : 10.24114
Core Subject : Humanities, Education,
Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media
REGISTER Journal is a quarterly publication presenting articles on English Language Teaching. The contents include analysis, studies, application of theories, research reports, materials development and reviews.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Pendidikan
Articles 493 Documents
 6   7   8   9   10 
DEVELOPING READING MATERIALS FOR THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM OF SMK GAJAH MADA MEDAN Fariza Yusrizal and Nora Ronita Dewi
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 6, No 1 (2017): (JAN-MARCH)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v6i1.5376

Abstract

This research was aimed to develop the appropriate reading materials for the eleventh grade students of Information Technology Program of SMK Gajah Mada Medan. Due to the result in the form of a product, this study was categorized as Research and Development (R & D) study which adapted from Borg and Gall (1989) theory with some modifications. The subject of this study was the eleventh grade students of Information Technology Program of SMK Gajah Mada Medan. In conducting this research, the procedures were gathering the data and information, conducting the need analysis, designing the first draft of materials, validating by the experts, revising the materials, and producing the final product. The instruments of collecting data were the combination of two strategies; interview and questionnaires. The interview result was analyzed as qualitative data and the questionnaires analyzed as quantitative data. These data were needs of students covering target needs and learning needs. This study developed reading materials which only focused on procedure text taught in the even semester. These materials were based on Curriculum 2013.
English Teachers’ Strategy in Teaching Writing Descriptive Text to Students of All-Grades at Junior High School Reza Luthfi; Berlin Sibarani
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 10, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (308.718 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v10i2.29951

Abstract

This research was aimed at describing the extent to which strategy does the teachers use in teaching descriptive writing to students at Junior High School and finds out the reasons underlying the teachers using certain theory. The strategy which the teachers use was analyzed by following the theory of Johns’ Scaffolding Strategy (2010). Scaffolding Strategy divided into Explicit Implementation consist of three types namely (1) modeling; (2) joint negotiation and (3) independent construction. And the other one is Implicit Implementation which consists of four types namely (1) dimly felt of sense; (2) begin composing; (3) course composing and (4) external feedback. The data was analyzed following Miles and Huberman theory of qualitative research (1994). The research findings showed that, the English teachers are using all three types of explicit implementation and only one type of implicit implementations, namely external feedback. And the reasons underlying teachers using these implementations are (1) the teachers want to vivid students’ knowledge about the generic structure, language features and social functions of descriptive text, (2) teachers want the students to understand more and get familiar with descriptive text in real life, (3) teachers wants to know students’ ability in applying their knowledge of descriptive text on their own-making descriptive text and (4) enlighten students on how to criticize their friends’ work.Keywords: Descriptive, scaffolding, explicit implementation, implicit implementation
THE EFFECT OF USING MONITORING, QUESTIONING, AND REPREDICTING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION Dormauli Samosir and Berlin Sibarani
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 3, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v3i3.1375

Abstract

This study was aimed at finding out the effect of using Monitoring, Questioning, and Repredicting strategy on students reading comprehension. This study used the experimental design. The population of this study was the eighth grade students of SMP Trisakti 2 Medan. There were sixty students as the sample of the research. This study was conducted with two randomized groups namely experimental and control group. The experimental group was taught by using Monitoring, Questioning and Repredicting Strategy while control group was taught without using Monitoring, Questioning, and Repredicting Strategy. The instrument of collecting the data was multiple choice test which consists of 20 items. To obtain the reliability of the test, the researcher used Kuder-Richardson (KR-20) formula. The calculation shows that reliability was 0.70 (high). The data were analyzed by using t-test. The calculation shows that t-observed (5.12) is higher than t-table (2.00) at the level of significance (α) 0.05 with the degree of freedom (df) 58. Therefore, the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted. It means that teaching reading comprehension by using Monitoring, Questioning, and Repredicting strategy significantly affect reading comprehension.
THE READABILITY ON GET ALONG WITH ENGLISH TEXTBOOK FOR VOATIONAL SCHOOL OF ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS AT YAPIM SIMPANG KAWAT Djuwi Adiba and Anni Holila Pulungan,
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 6, No 4 (2017): (OCT-DEC)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v6i4.7553

Abstract

The objective of this study aimed to find out the textbook that is readable for vocational school of eleventh grade students at YAPIM. It also used descriptive method to analyze and describe the readability based on SMOG and the New Dale-Chall formula. The data are the sentences in the six texts taken from the textbook published by Erlangga. The findings shows that the readability score based on SMOG formula looks like: text 1 got 134.43 in grade 15, text 2 got 89.98 in grade 12, text 3 got 25.88 in grade 8, text 4 got 85.89 in grade 12, text 5 got 15.75 in grade 7, and text 6 got 53.31 in grade 10. The average of the score was 67.54. Meanwhile, the readability score based on the New Dale-Chall formula looks like: text 1 got 8.0525 in grade 11-12, text 2 got 7.6315 in grade 9-10, text 3 got 5.0865 in grade 5-6, text 4 got 8.9655 in grade 11-12, text 5 got 5.5505 in grade 5-6, text 6 got 6.7285 in grade 7-8. The average of the score was 7. It shows that based on the average of the score from those formulas, the textbook is readable for the eleventh grade students.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BLOOM’S REVISED TAXONOMY IN TEACHER’S QUESTIONS IN TEACHING ENGLISH AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Maya Anggriani; Johannes Jefria Gultom
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 10, No 4 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (299.844 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v10i4.29994

Abstract

The present study entitled “The Implementation of Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy in Teacher’s Questions in Teaching English at Senior High School” focuses on describing the categorization of teacher’s questions according to the theory proposed by Wilen (1991) and Anderson and Krathwol (2000). The main purpose of the study is investigating and analyzing cognitive level of teacher’ questions based on the mentioned theory, and additionally the technique of questioning used. The data were collected through the observation from the three lesson videos selected on Youtube and were transcribed. The researcher only focuses on collecting the teacher’s question utterances from grade of X and XI senior high school in the topic of descriptive and biography text. The results showed that the teacher 1 used 8 techniques out of 9 techniques of questioning, teacher 2 and teacher 3 used 6 techniques of questioning. The three teachers similarly didn’t use T9 technique, and frequently used T8 technique. There are 4 cognitive levels used by teacher 1 and teacher 2 those are remembering (C1), understanding (C2), analyzing (C4), and creating (C6). In the side of teacher 3 only used 2 cognitive levels in questioning the students, those are remembering (C1) and understanding (C2). The three teachers frequently asked questions in the level of remembering (C1) respectively 69% from video 1, video two is 43%, and video 3 is 70%.Keywords: Teacher's Question, Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, Techniques of Questioning.
THE EFFECT OF USING PICTURE WORD INDUCTIVE MODEL ON STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING PROCEDURE TEXT Indah C.R Marbun and Sumarsih
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 4, No 2 (2015): Apr-June
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v4i2.2103

Abstract

This study aims to find out whether students’ achievement trough using Picture Word Inductive Model is higher than trough lecture method in writing procedure text. The research was conducted by experimental research used in two groups. They are experimental use picture word inductive model and control use lecture method. The subject of this were the students of SMP 32 class IX-A and IX-B consisted of 30 students for each class. To collecting the data was taken from writing test. After analyzing the data, it was found that the value of t-obs was 4.16 with degree of freedom (df) = 58 at the level of significance p(0,05) = 2,000. It means that t-obs is higher than t-table. It was found that teaching procedure text by use picture word inductive model is higher than lecture method. Picture word inductive model has a significant effect on students’ achievement in writing procedure text.
TEACHER TALK IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM INTERACTION USING SINCLAIR AND COULTHARD MODEL Friska Octavia and Zainuddin
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 7, No 1 (2018): (JAN-MARCH)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (333.343 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v7i1.9186

Abstract

This study deals with teacher talk in English classroom interaction. The objectives of the study were: (a) to find out the types of moves found in the teacher talk used in English classroom interaction based on Sinclair and Coulthard model, and (b) to describe how the types of moves are realized in the teacher talk used in English classroom interaction based in Sinclair and Coulthard model. The design used in this study was qualitative research. The data of this study was the teacher’s utterances. The data was collected by using audio recording and video recording. The data analysis of this study were based on Sinclair and Coulthard model as the following: (a) to find out the types of moves found in the teacher talk, and (b) to describe how the types of moves are realized in the teacher talk used in English classroom interaction. Based on the analysis of the data, the findings were shown as the following: (a) there were four types of moves found in the teacher talk, namely: opening, follow-up, framing and focusing, (b) the types of moves found in the teacher talk were mostly realized by h. When the teacher got no response or got a wrong answer from the students, then the structure given was (s) h (post-h) (sel), the follow-up moves were mostly realized by (pre-h) h, the framing moves were realized by h q and the focusing moves were realized by h. Based on the analysis of the data, some conclusions can be presented as the following: (a) the types of moves found in the teacher talk were opening, follow-up, framing and focusing, while the answering moves were not found in the teacher talk, which indicates that the classroom is not effective because there is no initiation from the students, (b) the opening moves were mostly realized by h. When the teacher got no response or got a wrong answer from the students, then the structure given was (s) h (post-h) (sel), the follow-up moves were mostly realized by (pre-h) h, the framing moves were realized by h q and the focusing moves were realized by h. Therefore, to create an effective English classroom, teacher should be able to recognize the moves she applies in her talk.
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXT THROUGH FOCUS GROUP DISCUSSION ( FGD ) Wenny Sasmita and Busmin Gurning
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 1, No 2 (2012)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (190.111 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v1i2.405

Abstract

This study deals with the improvement of students’ writing achievement through focus group discussion method. The objective of this study is to find out whether students’ writing achievement will be improved through focus group discussion method. This study was conducted by using classroom action research. The subject of this research was class VIII-4 SMPN. 2 Tanjung Pura. The number of the students was 36 students which consist of 18 male students and 18 female students. The research was conducted in two cycles. Each cycle consisted three meetings. The instrument for collecting the data were quantitative data (writing test ) and qualitative data ( observation sheet, interview and field note). Based on the analysis, students’ achievement kept improving in every test.   Key Words : Writing, Recount, Focus Group Discussion.
TEACHERS STRATEGY IN TEACHING NARRATIVE TEXT AT SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Ade Elvina Harianja and Muhammad Natsir
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 5, No 1 (2016): (JAN-MARCH)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v5i1.5295

Abstract

This study is a qualitative descriptive. This research was conducted by direct observation of English teachers. This research was conducted by direct observation of the teacher in the classroom and by interviewing. Researchers studied four English teachers and gave the same four questions to each teacher. Indicators of success include three English teachers use cooperative strategy. The results of this study showed that three out of four English teachers who are in SMA Negeri 1 OnanRunggu using cooperative strategies in the teaching of narrative text. That means that 75% of 100% choose to use a cooperative strategy. Thus, it is suggested that the english teachers apply strategy cooperative when teaching narrative text.
EVALUATING ENGLISH SUMMATIVE TEST FOR NINTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPS LETJEN S PARMAN MEDAN BASED ON ITEM ANALYSIS Lastri Prima Sari Sibuea; Anni Holila Pulungan; Syamsul Bahri
REGISTER: Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS-Unimed Vol 8, No 3 (2019): English Teaching
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (599.271 KB) | DOI: 10.24114/reg.v8i3.20899

Abstract

This research was aimed to explain the indices in evaluating English Summative test based on item analysis. In addition, this research was also aimed to find out the quality of the English Summative test for Ninth Grade Students of SMPS Letjen S Parman Medan based on item analysis, which covers item facility, item discrimination, and distractors efficiency. This research was descriptive-quantitative research. The data were taken from the English Summative Test, answer key, and the students’ answer sheets. The data were collected by documentary technique. There were three indices in evaluating English test based on item analysis, they were: item facility, item discrimination, and distractor efficiency. There was 0% very difficult item, 76% moderate item, and 24% very easy item. Item with negative discrimination were 2.22%, zero discrimination were 6.67%, low discrimination were 20%, moderate discrimination were 60%, and high discrimination were 11.11%. Items with functioned distractors were 42% and items with non-functioned distractors were 58%. The quality of English summative test for ninth grade students of SMPS S Parman was moderate. There were 11.11% good items, 57.78% moderate items, and 31.11% bad items.Keywords: Test, Item Analysis, Item Facility, Item Discrimination, Distractors Efficiency.

Page 8 of 50 | Total Record : 493

 6   7   8   9   10 

Filter by Year

2012 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 14 No. 3 (2025) Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025) Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 13 No. 4 (2024) Vol 13, No 3 (2024) Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 2 (2024) Vol 13, No 1 (2024) Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 12 No. 4 (2023) Vol 12, No 4 (2023) Vol 12, No 3 (2023) Vol 12, No 2 (2023) Vol 12, No 1 (2023) Vol 11, No 4 (2022) Vol 11, No 3 (2022) Vol 11, No 2 (2022) Vol 11, No 1 (2022) Vol 10, No 4 (2021) Vol 10, No 3 (2021) Vol 10, No 2 (2021) Vol 10, No 1 (2021) Vol 9, No 4 (2020) Vol 9, No 3 (2020) Vol 9, No 2 (2020) Vol 9, No 1 (2020) Vol 8, No 4 (2019) Vol 8, No 3 (2019): English Teaching Vol 8, No 2 (2019) Vol 8, No 1 (2019): jAN-MARCH Vol 7, No 4 (2018): (OCT-DEC) Vol 7, No 3 (2018): (JUL-SEP) Vol 7, No 2 (2018): (APR-JUN) Vol 7, No 1 (2018): (JAN-MARCH) Vol 6, No 4 (2017): (OCT-DEC) Vol 6, No 3 (2017): (JUL-SEP) Vol 6, No 2 (2017): (APR-JUNE) Vol 6, No 1 (2017): (JAN-MARCH) Vol 5, No 4 (2016): (OCT-DEC) Vol 5, No 3 (2016): (JUL-SEP) Vol 5, No 2 (2016): (APR-JUN) Vol 5, No 1 (2016): (JAN-MARCH) Vol 4, No 4 (2015): OCT-DEC Vol 4, No 3 (2015): JUL-SEP Vol 4, No 2 (2015): Apr-June Vol 4, No 1 (2015): Jan-March Vol 3, No 4 (2014) Vol 3, No 3 (2014) Vol 3, No 2 (2014) Vol 3, No 1 (2014) Vol 2, No 4 (2013) Vol 2, No 3 (2013) Vol 2, No 2 (2013) Vol 2, No 1 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2012) Vol 1, No 1 (2012) More Issue