cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rahmat Dwi Putranto
Contact Email
rdp@iblam.ac.id
Phone
+6282186310996
Journal Mail Official
Wahyu@iblam.ac.id
Editorial Address
IBLAM Kampus A Jl. Kramat Raya No. 25, Senen Jakarta Pusat Tel / fax : (021) 21392851
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
IBLAM Law Review
Published by Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum IBLAM
ISSN : 22754146     EISSN : 27753174     DOI : 10.52249
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Welcome to the official website of IBLAM Law Review. With the spirit of further proliferation of knowledge on the legal system in Indonesia to the wider communities, this website provides journal articles for free download. Our academic journal is a source of reference both from law academics and legal practitioner . IBLAM Law Review is a double-blind review academic journal for Legal Studies published by Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (LPPM) IBLAM School Of Law. IBLAM Law Review contains several researches and reviews on selected disciplines within several branches of Legal Studies (Sociology of Law, History of Law, Comparative Law, etc.). In addition, IBLAM Law Review also covers multiple studies on law in a broader sense. This journal is periodically published (in January, May, and September), and the approved and ready-to-publish manuscripts will also be regularly published in the website (with early view) and the hardcopy version will be circulated at the end of every period.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 332 Documents
 30   31   32   33   34 
Mitigation of Over-Indebtedness Risk in Online Lending: A Comparative Analysis of Regulatory Frameworks in China, Malaysia, and Thailand Abdullah, Salman; Widyanti , Yenny Eta; Djumikasih, Djumikasih
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.667

Abstract

The rise of defaults and over-indebtedness in online lending reflects failures in credit risk management, mainly due to weak lending limitations and an imbalance between platforms and borrowers. This raises legal protection concerns for debtors, as aggressive lending practices are not based on repayment ability. Therefore, imposing restrictions on online lending is crucial to mitigate risks of default and over-indebtedness, through measures like setting maximum loan limits, conducting proportional creditworthiness assessments, and reinforcing prudence in fintech regulations. This research adopts a normative juridical approach with statutory, conceptual, and comparative methods, focusing on China, Malaysia, and Thailand. The study aims to identify an ideal framework for online lending limits to combat defaults and over-indebtedness. Findings show Indonesia lacks sufficient regulation, especially in real-time integration of cross-platform credit data, enabling debt-cycling. Indonesia’s regulatory approach is reactive, while Malaysia’s is proactive. Law enforcement against illegal lending is weak, and debt relief mechanisms are underdeveloped, unlike China and Thailand, which have implemented lending limits and consumer protections. This research recommends a new legal framework integrating national credit reporting with
Sengketa Merek di Era Digital: Tinjauan Yuridis dari Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Tahun 2025 Mulya , Musa Alam
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v6i1.668

Abstract

Era digital telah mengubah lanskap perdagangan global, mempermudah akses informasi namun juga meningkatkan risiko pelanggaran Kekayaan Intelektual, khususnya penyerobotan merek (brand squatting). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang merek terkenal internasional dalam menghadapi pendaftaran merek lokal yang memiliki persamaan pada pokoknya, dengan studi kasus sengketa antara Wahl Clipper Corporation melawan pendaftar merek lokal di Indonesia berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta tahun 2025. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan studi kasus (case approach) dan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statutory approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengadilan dalam pertimbangannya (ratio decidendi) menekankan pada aspek "itikad tidak baik" pendaftar lokal yang mencoba mendompleng reputasi (free riding) merek global di platform digital. Putusan ini memberikan penegasan bahwa sistem First-to- File di Indonesia tidak bersifat absolut jika terbukti adanya pelanggaran asas keadilan dan kejujuran dalam bermerek. Kesimpulannya, perlindungan merek di era digital memerlukan sinkronisasi antara pengawasan administratif oleh Direktorat Jenderal Kekayaan Intelektual (DJKI) dan ketegasan hakim dalam menafsirkan bukti-bukti digital untuk menjamin kepastian hukum bagi investor asing di Indonesia.

Page 34 of 34 | Total Record : 332

 30   31   32   33   34 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): The Intersection of Law and Technology: Legal Implications of Generative AI and Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): IBLAM LAW REVIEW More Issue