Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum
Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum website provides journal articles for free download. Our journal is a journal that is a reference source for academics and practitioners in the field of law. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum is a law journal articles of students for Law Science published by Warmadewa University Press. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum has the content of research results and reviews in the field of selected studies covering various branches of Law in a broad sense. This journal is published 3 times within a year April, August, and December, submitted and ready to publish scripts will be published online gradually and the printed version will be released at the end of the publishing period. The language used in this journal is Indonesian.
Articles
395 Documents
<![CDATA[Upaya Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur atas Debitur Wanprestasi dalam Perjanjian Kredit pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Mirah Dwi Lestari]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Putu Budiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Gusti Ketut Sri]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (174.174 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4740.176-181
<![CDATA[Default can occur either due to intentional factors or factors beyond human capabilities, such as what happened to the Amerta Sedana Wisata cooperative, a debtor does not fulfill his agreement by being in arrears for debt payments of up to 10 months. This study aims to reveal legal protection efforts against creditors for defaulting debtors in credit agreements during the Covid-19 pandemic. The research method carried out in this writing is using empirical legal research with a statutory approach (The Statute Approach). The results obtained in this study are forms of legal protection that can be carried out in resolving defaults committed by debtors, namely by using preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. Legal protection for creditors has been regulated based on the Civil Code Articles 1131 and 1132. In the credit agreement the Amerta Sedana Wisata Savings and Loans Cooperative more often uses non-litigation channels to resolve existing default or non-performing credit problems. Based on the discussion that has been described, the conclusion in this study is that preventive action is an action or effort taken before the occurrence of a dispute and violation of norms. Preventive legal protection is applied by following regulations. Researchers hope that in borrowing money or credit, they should understand correctly how the risks will arise in the future if there is a dispute that arises due to default.]]>
<![CDATA[Peran Polisi Kehutanan dalam Perlindungan Satwa Liar (Studi Kasus di Balai Konservasi Sumber Daya Alam Bali) ]]>
<![CDATA[Komang Gede Pramantara]]>;
<![CDATA[I Made Minggu Widyantara]]>;
<![CDATA[I Wayan Arthanaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (171.954 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4741.182-187
<![CDATA[Irresponsible actions that can cause damage to nature reserves and conservation areas where there is rampant hunting of protected wildlife that can damage the ecosystem. Forestry Police at the Natural Resources Conservation Center as law enforcers who have the duty and authority to protect and implement forest, plant and animal security. The purpose of this research is to address the causes of wildlife violations in Bali's natural resource conservation areas, as well as to find out how the role of the forest police from the Bali Natural Resources Conservation Center is in protecting wildlife in Bali's natural resource conservation areas. The research uses empirical research methods using a sociological juridical approach. The form of data used is Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary data. To find out the results in this study, data analysis using qualitative methods. The results of this study indicate that the Forestry Police who are at the Bali BKSDA carry out patrols and monitoring in nature, protect the community, install warning boards, make captive areas, coordinate with related agencies and carry out socialization.]]>
<![CDATA[Perjanjian Kredit Bank dalam Hal Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan Tidak Diikuti dengan Akta Pemberian Hak Tanggungan ]]>
<![CDATA[Ni Made Seri Wahyuni Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Putu Budiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (166.998 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4742.188-192
<![CDATA[Deed of Imposition of Mortgage which is processed before a Notary/PPAT and attended by both parties, namely the debtor and creditor. If one of them is unable to attend, the party who is unable to attend will be issued an SKMHT which has a period of one month for land that has been registered and three months for land that is not registered in accordance with the provisions of Article 15 paragraphs (3) and (4) of the UUHT, apart from The validity period of the SKMHT is also affected by the existence of other processes such as: inheritance, roya and rights conventions. This study aims to disclose the Bank's credit agreement in the event that the power of attorney to impose mortgage rights is not followed by the fact of granting mortgage rights. This study uses research methods in the form of normative research with a normative juridical approach, namely analyzing the norms or rules that apply. Primary data and secondary data are used in this study. Data were analyzed using qualitative methods. The results of the study show that the position of the bank as a creditor if the SKMHT is not made APHT is a concurrent creditor which means the bank does not have special rights as contained in the Civil Code, if the debtor is in default while the creditor is a concurrent creditor, the handling of civil cases is generally.]]>
<![CDATA[Pengelolaan Sampah dalam Upaya Pengendalian Pencemaran Lingkungan oleh Desa Adat Padangtegal, Kecamatan Ubud, Kabupaten Gianyar ]]>
<![CDATA[I Kadek Purwadi Putra]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Luh Putu Suryani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (171.081 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4743.193-198
<![CDATA[Indonesia is a country that is ranked 4 (four) in the world, so it cannot be denied that the problem of waste is a complex problem faced by the Government, waste is one of the biggest problems that are often encountered by people in other parts of the world, waste itself is a leftover from activities and activities. human consumption, which has been wasted and has no economic value anymore. Garbage is a problem faced in almost all parts of the world. Seeing the many waste problems that occurred, the Padangtegal Traditional Village built a Compost House as a form of the Village's concern for the waste problem. This study aims to examine environmental pollution by the traditional village of Padangtegal, Ubud District. The method used is empirical legal research. This research uses a statutory approach and is carried out by examining and studying laws or other regulations such as awig-awig and pararem in accordance with the issues in question, in which the norms are hierarchically arranged in the arrangement of legal norms. Sources of data in this study are primary data and secondary data. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of waste management in the Padangtegal Traditional Village has been running well according to applicable regulations and in its implementation the Padangtegal Traditional Village manages waste management independently through management.]]>
<![CDATA[Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Tenaga Medis yang Memaksa Memberlakukannya Vaksin Covid-19 bagi Masyarakat yang Memiliki Riwayat Penyakit ]]>
<![CDATA[Dendy Martono Prabowo]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[Ida Ayu Putu Widiati]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (210.825 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4746.204-209
<![CDATA[he outbreak of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease that entered Indonesia which can be overcome by giving vaccines to the Indonesian people who meet the criteria according to the applicable law. However, the government requires the vaccination to be applied to all Indonesian citizens, even those with a history of disease, the government should guarantee the rights of everyone with the consent and without the slightest coercion in the voluntary vaccination process. This study aims to reveal criminal sanctions against medical personnel who force the implementation of the COVID-19 vaccine for people who have a history of illness. This study uses a normative juridical method by using a statutory problem approach. The sources of legal materials used are primary legal sources and secondary legal sources. The collected legal materials were analyzed systematically with descriptive presentation. Based on the results of the existing analysis, this study reveals that medical personnel who provide vaccines to people who have a history of illness can be said to have committed serious negligence which resulted in the recipient of the Health Service being seriously injured, the punishment for the maximum 3 (three) years in prison, even if it causes death, will be sentenced to 5 years. (five) years in accordance with the provisions of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 36 of 2014 concerning Health Worker.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Ketentuan Me-Review Produk dimedia Sosial ]]>
<![CDATA[I Wayan Pertama Yasa]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Komang Arini Styawati Styawati]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (170.968 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4747.210-214
<![CDATA[The era of the digital economy in Indonesia has made buying and selling transactions easier and faster to do. By using social media, consumers can channel their opinions, criticisms and suggestions on the goods/services they consume to business actors in various forms. One of them is in the form of a review (review) of goods/services products that are poured through photos and videos. However, this activity reaped pros and cons in the community, because it is considered that this activity actually tarnishes the good name. This study aims to examine the form of legal protection against the provisions for reviewing products on social media. The sources of legal materials used in this paper are the first sources of primary legal materials that have binding power, the second sources of secondary legal materials which are legal materials derived from the results of literature studies by reading books, legal journals, and articles in accordance with the issue at hand. Data were analyzed by qualitative method. This study uses a normative type of research by using a deductive reasoning approach. Legal protection for the provisions for reviewing products on social media is stated in Law Number 12 of 2005 Article 23 paragraph (2) concerning Human Rights, Article 44 paragraph (3) of the UUPK, and criminal sanctions for perpetrators are stipulated in the UUPK which can be sentenced to punishment. imprisonment and fines.]]>
<![CDATA[Kedudukan Hukum Pemegang Hak Preferen dan Retensi terhadap Perusahaan PT Bukit Inn Resort yang Dinyatakan Pailit ]]>
<![CDATA[I Putu Angga Septayana]]>;
<![CDATA[I Nyoman Putu Budiartha]]>;
<![CDATA[Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (222.357 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4751.215-219
<![CDATA[Entrepreneurs have a strategy so that their business is always in a stable condition, namely by borrowing additional funds from third parties. Especially in Bali, entrepreneurs can seek additional funds through financial institutions/LPDs (Village Credit Institutions). However, many companies were declared bankrupt because they did not fulfill their obligations. This study aims to examine the legal position of the holder of preference rights and retention of the company PT. Bukit INN Resort which was declared bankrupt. The method used in this study is the normative legal method with a statutory, conceptual and case approach. This study uses primary and secondary data. Analysis of the data used is a qualitative analysis. The results showed that the settlement of preference rights and retention rights for the curator of the company PT. Bukit INN Resort is carried out in accordance with the provisions of Article 15 paragraph (1) of Law no. 37 of 2004. Legal efforts are carried out by the parties concerned who must explicitly do so in order to obtain a solution or settlement of the legal problems they face, after taking legal action, the parties concerned will obtain a judge's decision that has legal force.]]>
<![CDATA[Konsep Anti Eco-Slapp dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup ]]>
<![CDATA[Nyoman Gede Aditya Jay Medhika]]>;
<![CDATA[Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi]]>;
<![CDATA[Luh Putu Suryani]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Warmadewa Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (171.075 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4752.220-224
<![CDATA[There are several weaknesses in the regulation of the Anti Eco-SLAPP concept in Indonesia, which can hinder the implementation of the Anti Eco-SLAPP concept and cause protection for community participation to still have room for criminalization. This study aims to describe the regulation of the anti-Eco-SLAPP concept in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. This type of research is normative law. This study uses a statute approach by examining the laws and regulations. The data used in this study are primary and secondary data. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative analysis. The data that has been analyzed shows that Anti Eco SLAPP has been regulated in Article 66 of the UUPPLH, which emphasizes that every individual who strives for the right to a good and healthy environment cannot be prosecuted criminally or civilly. In operationalizing Article 66 of the PPLH Law, it is hoped that there are four things that must be considered, namely: the requirements for protection and who is the subject being protected as well as the type of Eco-SLAPP action and the requirements for determining Eco-SLAPP. There are several weaknesses in the regulation of the Anti Eco-SLAPP concept in Indonesia, which can hinder the implementation of the Anti Eco-SLAPP concept and cause protection for community participation to still have room for criminalization. This study aims to describe the regulation of the anti-Eco-SLAPP concept in Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. This type of research is normative law. This study uses a statute approach by examining the laws and regulations. The data used in this study are primary and secondary data. Data analysis was carried out using qualitative analysis. The data that has been analyzed shows that Anti Eco SLAPP has been regulated in Article 66 of the UUPPLH, which emphasizes that every individual who strives for the right to a good and healthy environment cannot be prosecuted criminally or civilly. In operationalizing Article 66 of the PPLH Law, it is hoped that there are four things that must be considered, namely: the requirements for protection and who is the subject being protected as well as the type of Eco-SLAPP action and the requirements for determining Eco-SLAPP.]]>
