cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Rustamaji
Contact Email
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone
+6285865999842
Journal Mail Official
verstek@mail.uns.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret Gedung 3, Departemen Hukum Acara Alamat: Ir. Sutami No. 36A,Kentingan, Surakarta
Location
Kota surakarta,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
Verstek
Published by Universitas Sebelas Maret
ISSN : -     EISSN : 23550406     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v9i3.55027
Core Subject : Humanities, Social,
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Jurnal Verstek is a peer-reviewed journal published by Procedural Law Department, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret three times a year in April, August, and December. This Journal aims primarily to facilitate undergraduate students paper over current developments on procedural law issues in Indonesia as well as to publish innovative legal researches concerning Indonesian procedural laws and legal system. It provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to public support a greater global exchange of knowledge. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics in the fields of Procedural Law, included but not limited to legal construction of procedural law, critical construction of procedural law in practice, trends and changes in procedural law, and the technical challenges faced in proedural law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 802 Documents
 69   70   71   72   73 
UPAYA PEMBUKTIAN DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK MELALUI SARANA ELEKTRONIK MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (Studi Putusan Nomor: 530/Pid.Sus/2018/PN.Jkt.Sel) Elsa Novianti Ruli Hutami
Verstek Vol 10, No 1: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i1.64035

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui upaya yang dilakukan oleh Penuntut Umum untuk membuktikan dakwaannya dalam tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UU ITE) dalam perspektif Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif serta terapan dan apabila dilihat dari tujuannya termasuk penelitian hukum normatif atau doktrinal. Jenis data yang dipergunakan meliputi data primer dan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data yang dipergunakan yaitu melalui penelitian kepustakaan baik berupa buku-buku, peraturan Perundang-Undangan, dokumen-dokumen, dan sebagainya. Analisis data menggunakan metode silogisme melalui pola pikir deduktif. Berdasarkan dari hasil penelitian dan pembahasan yang dilakukan diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa Penuntut Umum dalam pembuktiannya telah menggunakan alat bukti yang sesuai dengan Pasal 184 KUHAP tentang alat bukti yang sah berupa keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli, surat, petunjuk dan keterangan terdakwa tetapi tidak menghadirkan alat bukti elektronik sesuai dengan Pasal 5 ayat (1) dan (2) dan Pasal 44 UU ITE tentang alat bukti elektronik. Dalam kasus ini, Penuntut Umum menghadirkan printout screenshot laman facebook yang digunakan sebagai tempat untuk melakukan pencemaran nama baik melalui sarana elektronik sebagai barang bukti bukan sebagai alat bukti. Namun karena Indonesia menganut sistem pembuktian secara negatif (negatief wettelijk), maka alat bukti keterangan saksi, keterangan ahli dan keterangan terdakwa dianggap hakim sudah cukup untuk menjatuhkan putusan. Kata kunci : Pembuktian, Penuntut Umum, Pencemaran Nama Baik, Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik ABSTRACT: This research aims to know the efforts of Public Prosecutor in deciding accusation of the criminal acts defamation in terms of Law No.19 of 2016 change over Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transaction in perspective of Criminal Procedure Code in conjuction (KUHAP). Writing this law is the writing of normative law that is prescriptive and applied. The types and sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The legal materials collection technique used is library research. The anaysis technique used is the syllogism method that uses deductive thinking patterns. Based on the results of research and discussion obtained conclusion that the Public Prosecutor in his demonstration had been using evidence in criminal law cases appropriate with Article 184 Criminal Procedure Code in conjuction (KUHAP) about a legal instrumet of evidence in criminal law consisting of witness testimony, an expert, letter, guidance and a statement defendant however ought not bring in electronic evidence in accordance with Article 5 section (1) with (2) and Article 44 Law No.19 of 2016 change over Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transaction about electronic evidence. In this case, the Public Prosecutor bring in a print out of facebook page`s screenshot which is used to undertake defamation as real evidence not a legal evidence. Nevertheless in Indonesia adopt negatief wettelijk legitimate bewujs theorie which basically that the judge in dropped criminal to someone with at least 2 (two) legal evidence accordingly in this case witness testimony, an expert and a statement defendant are enough to judge dropped criminal.Keywords : Burden of Proof, Public Prosecutor, Defamation, Bill Of Act pn Electronic Information and Transaction
PEMENUHAN HAK-HAK ANAK YANG BERHADAPAN DENGAN HUKUM PADA KASUS RESIDIVIS KLITIH Dominica Shinta; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72650

Abstract

As individuals who are immature both physically and mentally, children are vulnerable human beings. A child has not been able to protect himself because he is not yet considered capable of being held accountable for his actions, considering that he is immature and still growing. The aim of this research is to examine the fulfillment of the rights of children who are in conflict with the law in the case of recidivist klitih in Decision Number 02/Pid.Sus-Anak/2022/PN Yyk. Children as perpetrators of crime must receive special protection and protection in accordance with the law, especially in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The results of the research study show that even though the perpetrators of criminal acts in the decision are minors who commit repeated crimes (recidivist), their rights as children who are in conflict with the law must fulfill their rights. This research is intended to provide arguments and serve as a reminder for law enforcers to fulfill the rights of children who are in conflict with the law. Keywords: Children, Children's Rights, Recidivist.
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 799/PID.B/2021/PN JAMBI) Muhammad Dedy; Bambang Santoso
Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72440

Abstract

This article aims to examine and find out the suitability of the considerations of the judge who handed down an acquittal in a fraud crime case with article 183 in conjunction with article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This article uses normative or doctrinal legal methods that are prescriptive and applied. The approach used in this article is a case approach. The use of legal materials includes primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses library research by collecting legal materials related to the problem to be studied. The law material analysis technique used is the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it shows that in Decision Number 799/Pid.B/2021/PN Jambi, the considerations of judges who handed down acquittals in cases of fraud were in accordance with Article 183 in conjunction with Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is because the Prosecutor's evidence is still very minimal through the evidence of witnesses and letters to find material truth in this case. In addition, based on the results of the examination at trial the Judge was of the opinion that the second and third elements of Article 378 of the Criminal Code in the Public Prosecutor's indictment were not legally fulfilled so that the Judge handed down an acquittal against the Defendant.Keyword: Judge's Consideration; Evidence; Acquittal Verdict; Fraud
KESESUAIAN PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM BANDING DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DENGAN PASAL 241 KUHAP Neiska Aulia Marcela Sari; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72296

Abstract

This research examines the problem whether the considerations of the panel of appellate judges that giving verdict of upheld the previous court’s decision to the defendant in case number : 237/Pid/2022/PT SMG in accordance with article 241 of The Criminal Procedure Code. Based on the result of the research and discussion it was concluded that the considerations of the panel of judges of appeal who examined and decided on the case in case number : 237/Pid/2022/PT SMG were accordance with article 241 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judges stated that they strengthened the Klaten District Court Verdict Number : 41/Pid.B/2022/PN Kln which stated that the defendant Eko Prayitno bin Nyamin had been legally and convincingly proven guilty of commiting an act of fraud joinly.Keywords: Considerations of The Panel of Judges of Appeal, Criminal Acts of Fraud, Judge’s Decision
PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BEBAS AKIBAT PENGABAIAN VISUM ET REPERTUM (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 992KPID2020) Ditria Fridyaswari Twenthina; Itok Dwi Kurniawan
Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72840

Abstract

This article aims to determine the suitability of the Supreme Court's considerations in canceling the acquittal by Judex Factie in the rape case against Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The type of legal research in this article is normative legal research with a case approach. The technique used in collecting legal materials in this research is literature study. This study uses an analytical technique with the nature of deduction using the syllogistic method, which begins with proposing a major premise, followed by proposing a minor premise in the form of legal facts and conclusions will be drawn from these two premises. Based on this research, it was found that the Judex Factie judge at the Oelamasi District Court was proven not to have applied a rule of law or a rule of law was not applied as it should. So that the consideration of the Supreme Court in canceling the acquittal by Judex Factie in the rape case was correct and in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code.Keywords: Supreme Court; Consideration; Visum et Repertum
SANKSI PIDANA ANAK TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN NAPZA DIKAJI DARI LEGAL JUSTICE Alvien Okta Rajasa; Kristiyadi Kristiyadi
Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72654

Abstract

Narcotics are drugs used for the medical world for patients who have certain diseases. Of course, with the rules of use according to the instructions of the doctor concerned. However, the problem of drug abuse has become a national and international problem. Narcotics abuse can cause physical, mental, psychological, emotional and attitudinal damage in society. Children who are involved in drugs must get protection both psychologically and legally to avoid psychological disorders that may occur in children and preventive measures of stigmatization of children in conflict with the law and it is hoped that children can return to the social environment in society. The purpose of the research is an objective objective, namely to determine the suitability of the judge's assessment of the evidence in decision number 001/pid.sus-anak/2021/pn skt with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. Meanwhile, the subjective goal is to add, broaden the author's horizons and abilities in studying problems in the field of Criminal Procedure Law. The benefits of research consist of theoretical benefits and practical benefits. The theoretical benefits of the research results can be used to explore the theories that have been obtained by the author in writing legal writing. And the practical benefit is that it can provide benefits and additional knowledge for various parties in need, especially in community groups and in general and parties related to the subject matter. Keywords: Sanctions, Child Crime, Narcotics, Legal Justice
KEKUATAN ALAT BUKTI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA GUGATAN PERCERAIAN Yeni Novitasari; Harjono Harjono
Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72572

Abstract

This article examines the strength of evidence of witness testimony de auditu in the case of a divorce lawsuit in Decision Number 110/Pdt.G/2020/PN Skt and Decision Number 82/Pdt.G/2021/PN Bln. The purpose of this article is to find out the strength of evidence of De Auditu's Testimonium Witness in the divorce lawsuit case in that Decision. Based on this research, the panel of judges based on the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court Decision number 308 K/Pdt/1959 that testimony de auditu couldn’t be used as direct evidence but could be used as evidence of presumption (vermoeden), and as a basis for proving something. In addition, the Supreme Court in decision number 239 K/Sip/1973 justified de auditu testimony except as evidence that meets the material requirements if the witness gives testimony under oath, the statement is accepted as independent evidence reaching the minimum limit of proof without other evidence if the de auditu witness consists of several people. Although it is free proof, in this case the testimony of the witness is important so that the strength of evidence is decisive evidence because de auditu witnesses played a major role in the granting of the Plaintiff's claim.  Keywords: Divorce; Evidence; Testimonium de Auditu
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PENJATUHAN PIDANA DI BAWAH MINIMUM KHUSUS PERKARA NARKOTIKA: PUTUSAN NOMOR 215/PID.SUS/2020/PN.JTH Nurul Aulia Fitri; Muhammad Rustamaji
Verstek Vol 9, No 4: 2021
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72309

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the judge's considerations in imposing a sentence below the special minimum for narcotics crime cases by studying the decision of the Jantho District Court Number 215/Pid.Sus/2020/Jth which violates the special minimum criminal provisions in Law No.35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. This research method is a prescriptive normative legal research with a case approach. Based on the research conducted by the author, it was found that in imposing a sentence below the special minimum in the narcotics crime case committed by T. Irfan, the judge made juridical and non-juridical considerations accompanied by the application of combined sentencing theory. This consideration is based on the fulfillment of the elements of the second alternative indictment, the fact that the purpose of possession of narcotics is for self-consumption, the provisions of the SEMA which accommodate the doubts of judges to then be able to commit deviations, and are based on the ability to be responsible, mitigating and aggravating things. The considerations in imposing the sentence are in accordance with legal objectives which are based on legal justice, legal benefits and legal certainty. From the results of this study it can be concluded that the use of articles regarding the possession and control of narcotics is irrelevant because they are always associated with the purpose of use and distribution which are regulated in different provisions so that these provisions seem ambiguous and need to be corrected.Keyword: Judge’s Consideration; Narcotics Crime; Special Minimum Punishment
MENILIK PENERAPAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM MUKA PERSIDANGAN DI INDONESIA Deva Izzatul Jannah; Vincentius Patria Setyawan
Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.73016

Abstract

This article analyzes the application of restorative justice before the trial based on the study of decision number 63/Pid. B/2021/PN Skm. The purpose of this article is to find out the basic considerations of judges in deciding cases with the application of retorative justice as an alternative solution to crime based on the study of decision number 63/Pid. B/2021/PN Skm. This article is a normative legal research with a prescriptive nature and uses primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials is to use a literature study with a case approach. The analysis technique used is the syllogism method using a deductive mindset. The results of the study show that restorative justice has been implemented during the trial examination. The Suka Makmue district court judge’s decision has an element of legal certainty by implementing and adhering to legal values and a sense of justice that lives in society. The judge's decision also reflects a sense of justice and expediency, it is said that because all parties involved, both the accused, the victim, and the community can feel a sense of peace as in the same as condition before which is like the principle emphasized by restorative justice, by prioritizing the recovery of victims, the accused and the public.Keywords : Basic Considerations of the Judges; Restorative Justice; The crime of presecution
KAJIAN KENDALA EKSEKUSI PIDANA BERDASARKAN SEMA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2011 DENGAN PASAL 270 KUHAP Rafi'ah Nafida Zalna; Ismawati Septiningsih
Verstek Vol 10, No 4: 2022
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i4.72656

Abstract

This article aims to determine the constraints and legitimacy of prosecutors in carrying out criminal executions based on the provisions of the Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 1 of 2011 in terms of the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code and legal certainty. This type of legal research is normative research with primary and secondary legal materials using a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials uses library research and the technique of analyzing legal materials is deductive in nature using the syllogism method. As for the results of this study, it was found that based on Article 79 of the Supreme Court Law and Article 7, 8 paragraph of Law Number 11 of 2011 Supreme Court Circular Letter Number 1 of 2011 is not a statutory regulation, but a policy regulation that only has the power internal binding. As a result, SEMA No. 1 of 2011 by the Prosecutor in the criminal procedural law environment is a form of customary law (customary law) which also has legal certainty because the execution must be carried out against a judge's decision that has permanent legal force (in kracht van gewisjde) and has executive power. So that the execution of a crime using the excerpt of the decision certainly has legal certainty for the convict in assisting the convict to immediately obtain the convict's rights while serving his sentence as an inmate in a penitentiary.Keywords: Criminal Execution; Prosecutor's Constraints, Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA), Excerpt of the Decision

Page 71 of 81 | Total Record : 802

 69   70   71   72   73 

Filter by Year

2013 2024


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 12, No 4: OKTOBER - DESEMBER 2024 Vol 12, No 3: JULI - SEPTEMBER 2024 Vol 11, No 4 (2023) Vol 11, No 3: 2023 Vol 11, No 2: 2023 Vol 11, No 1: JANUARI - APRIL 2023 Vol 11, No 1: 2023 Vol 10, No 4: 2022 Vol 10, No 3: 2022 Vol 10, No 2: 2022 Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI - APRIL Vol 10, No 1: 2022 Vol 9, No 4: 2021 Vol 9, No 3: 2021 Vol 9, No 3 (2021) Vol 9, No 2 (2021) Vol 9, No 2: 2021 Vol 9, No 1: 2021 Vol 9, No 2: MEI - AGUTUS Vol 8, No 3 (2020): DESEMBER JURNAL VERSTEK VOL. 8 NO. 3 ( SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER 2020 ) Vol 8, No 2 (2020): AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1 (2020): APRIL Vol 8, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 8, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 8, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 7, No 3 (2019): DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2 (2019): AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 2 (2019) Vol 7, No 1 (2019): APRIL Vol 7, No 1 (2019): Foreword Vol 7, No 3: SEPTEMBER - DESEMBER Vol 7, No 2: MEI - AGUSTUS Vol 7, No 1: JANUARI-APRIL Vol 6, No 3 (2018) Vol 6, No 3 (2018): DESEMBER Vol 6, No 2 (2018): AGUSTUS Vol 6, No 2 (2018) Vol 6, No 1 (2018) Vol 5, No 3 (2017) Vol 5, No 2 (2017) Vol 5, No 1 (2017) Vol 4, No 3 (2016) Vol 4, No 2 (2016) Vol 4, No 1 (2016) Vol 3, No 2 (2015) Vol 3, No 1 (2015) Vol 2, No 3 (2014) Vol 2, No 2 (2014) Vol 2, No 1 (2014) Vol 1, No 3 (2013) Vol 1, No 2 (2013) Vol 1, No 1 (2013) More Issue