cover
Contact Name
Novita Maulida Ikmal
Contact Email
novitamaulidaikma@uwp.ac.id
Phone
+6281334355142
Journal Mail Official
novitamaulidaikmal@uwp.ac.id
Editorial Address
Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Wijaya Putra Jl. Raya Benowo No.1- 3 Surabaya 60197, Telp. 031-7404404, Fax. 031-7404405
Location
Kota surabaya,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Governance: Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Core Subject : Social,
Jurnal ini ditujukan sebagai media akademik yang menyajikan tulisan-tulisan ilmiah hasil penelitian dan kajian teoritik di bidang Administrasi Negara, Kebijakan Publik, Pelayanan Publik, dan Manajemen Sektor Publik.
Articles 7 Documents
Search results for , issue "Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik" : 7 Documents clear
Membangun Kembali Social Capital Dalam Rangka Reformasi Administrasi di Indonesia SRI Juni Woro Astuti
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.318 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.24

Abstract

Social capital is the public goods created by the community and owned by the community as well, not by individuals or government, nor by groups who have abundant resources. Social capital is formed by itself in a relatively long period of time, as well as the formation of value systems or culture in general. Therefore, when social capital has been formed, it will be hard to break away (unlike financial capital). By applying high ethical standards in public service, the social capital which is slowly fading will bounce back by itself. But it's certainly not easy. It takes commitment and integrity of government administrators to actually apply these ethical standards with a consistent and adequate legal system to provide a deterrent effect for those who break them. Economic emphasis on public sector change puts a high value on what is regarded as something that can not be avoided, namely the good of private models in managing the organization, described as a "more productive", which are different approaches to public services commonly referred to as bureaucratic.
Politik Pendidikan: Studi Kasus Formulasi Kebijakan Alokasi 20 Persen APBN Untuk Pendidikan Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik; Andhyka Muttaqin
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (365.485 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.25

Abstract

This research stems from the emergence of an issue about 20 percent of the budget for education, followed by the Constitutional Court Decision No. 026/PUU-III/2005 dated March 22, 2006 which states for the education budget has not yet reached 20 percent as specified in the 1945 Constitution, the budget will always be against the Constitution in 1945. Researchers trying to come up how the trip actually 20 per cent allocation policy formulation national budget for education and political dynamics that exist therein. As the basis is the fourth amendment to the 1945 Constitution article 31 paragraph (4) which states "The state prioritizes the education budget of at least twenty percent of budget revenues and expenditures of state and local spending and revenue budget to meet the needs of national education" is derived to be a Law No. 20 Year 2003 on National Education System of article 49 paragraph (1) that "education fund in addition to salaries for teachers and education costs a minimum of 20 percent is allocated for official from the State Budget (APBN) in the education sector and at least 20 percent of Local Government Revenues and Expenditures (budget) ". The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze the travel policy formulation 20 percent budget allocation for education and to know the political dynamics that occur during the formulation process.
Tantangan Kepemimpinan Administrator Publik : Antara Politik dan Administrasi (Manajerial) Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik; Wima Y. Prasetyo
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (218.943 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.26

Abstract

In each phase of development, political and administrative relations are always filled one room paradigmatic debate of public administration. One of the question, whether the public administration is more a political act or whether he should be an activity to practice the values and managerial considerations in the act. For some thinkers, the debate is no longer relevant and is considered finished with the map that at the level of executive leadership, public administration is the entity with political action. While on the lower level (bureaucracy), a professional managerial approach became the face of public administration leadership. This paper basically not appreciate the satisfaction of the mapping. For the writer, with a variety of environmental changes and trends of other administrative, managerial competence is essential for top level administrators and as important as managerial approach as practiced in midlle and lower levels of public administrators. On the other hand, although not intend to completely reject the political approach, this paper reveals that the style, action and leadership performance of public administrators who rely solely on political capacity will not be able to resolve detail the complexity of a problem with the right. Therefore, reform of government bureaucracy is necessary though, but he was not to be the best answer for the problems of public administration, but rather reform the government itself and more specifically the orientation of reform of public sector leadership
Pembaharuan Dalam Manajemen Pelayanan Publik Daerah: Tantangan dan Peluang Dalam Desentralisasi Pemerintahan di Indonesia Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik; Nuansa Rahmadi
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (170.515 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.27

Abstract

Like other countries around the world, both developed and developing countries, Indonesia's local government performance is measured primarily through the provision of basic services. Despite efforts to improve the service represents a concrete manifestation of good governance to promote human development, local governments have struggled to overcome many challenges and limitations. In this paper, good governance focuses on motivation and progress that emerged by some districts in Indonesia in improving their management system for the creation of effective service. Local governments can benefit from the assistance in fostering reform, provide advocacy, facilitating groups of stakeholders in implementing the reform agenda, monitor performance, and initiate and replicate the results. A study showed that coaching should be a partnership between consultant and local governments to develop capacity and provide skills to local government. The creation of a market for consulting and advocacy services include networking and advocacy among professional bodies and practitioners, public oversight bodies and “watchdog” organizations and groups of non-governmental organizations (NGO’s). In addition, the need to develop the market for the instruments in accordance with capacity building, particularly government-assisted instruments.
teori administrasi dan metodologi administrasi publik Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik; Mas Roro Lilik Ekowanti
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.916 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.28

Abstract

In the context of an ontology of administrative science that is under stood by four key administrative, organizational, administrative principles, administrator. The essence of the philosophy of administration is a trust and responsibility. The value of trust and responsibility in the future be important for the development of administrative science in addition to the effective-ness, efficiency, rationality and fairness. While the context of epistemology, the study of public administration because the number was not less important to follow three methodologies: (1). Lack of testing the theory; (2). The lack of cumulative research, because of low initial study and the low effort to build theory through the early work; (3). Publication of research is rarely done. Methodological limitations associated with restriction and development of administrative theory in epistemology. The choice of strategy of both qualitative and quantitative research relevant to the development of contemporary public administration theory. A variety of public problems and issues of public administration provide a space for the use of methods in public administration, the choice of using the combination method in the future become a rational choice in order to obtain validity and reliability in finding generalizations as well asthe depth of analysis in order to obtain the conclusion of representation. With the methodology of public administration that are easier to be under stood by scientists administration is expected to produce development of administrative science theory of the state administration which is conducive for developing countries especially Indonesia.
APLIKASI KONSEP MANAGING FOR RESULTS Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik; AGUS WAHONO
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (134.106 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.29

Abstract

State government in the United States have enthusiastically embraced the idea of managing for result. This appears to represent the victory for New Public Management policy ideas transferred from New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and Australia. The managing for result doctrine that emerged from these countries called for an increased focus on results but also increased managerial authority to achieve results. In turn, it was claimed, government would enjoy dramatic performance improvement and result-based accountability. This article assess the implementation of public management reform and argues that the managing for results doctrine has benen only partially adopted. State governments selected some of the New Public Management ideas but largely ignored others. In short, state government emphasized strategic planning and performance measurement but were less successful in implementing reforms that would enhance managerial authority, undermining the logic that promised high performance improvements.
MEMBANGUN BIROKRASI UNTUK GOOD GOVERNANCE (Relasi Pejabat Politis dan Pejabat Birokratis pada Pemerintahan Lokal Untuk Mewujudkan Good Governance Jurnal Governance Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik; Nanang Haryono
Governance, JKMP (Governance, Jurnal Kebijakan & Manajemen Publik) Vol 1 No 2 (2010): GOVERNANCE : Jurnal Kebijakan dan Manajemen Publik
Publisher : FISIP UWP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (149.042 KB) | DOI: 10.38156/gjkmp.v1i2.30

Abstract

Direct regional head elections (pilkadal) indeed has been promoting the democratic process in Indonesia. However, legislators and regional head of the process results in the execution of his duty pilkadal often there are obstacles in carrying out their duties. This is because the vision that was brought by members of parliament and elected local leaders are often influenced by the spirit of the political party that carried him. The logic used by legislators and local leaders are not elected public servant, but rather the logic of the logic of political servants. The problem posed then is the relationship between elected officials (politicians) and appointed officials (official bureaucracy) to be not in harmony and result in implementing the stunted development.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 7