Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Article Per Year (5 Year)

All

Yuridika

YDK
Website

Published by Universitas Airlangga

ISSN : 0215840X EISSN : 25283103 DOI : https://doi.org/10.20473

Core Subject : Social,

Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

The scope of Yuridika article concerns dogmatic legal studies, this is the procedure of scientific research to find the truth of the logic of the dogmatic legal studies, particulary in developing and emerging countries. These may include but are not limited to various field such as : 1 Criminal Law; 2 Civil Law; 3 Constitutional Law; 4 Administrative Law; 5 International Law; 6 Islamic Law;

Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum

Articles 422 Documents

16 17 18 19 20

PENGATURAN HUKUM ATAS HAK BERDAULAT INDONESIA UNTUK MENGELOLA SUMBER HAYATI DI ZONA EKONOMI EKSKLUSIF INDONESIA SERTA PENEGAKANNYA Eman Eman
Yuridika Vol. 8 No. 1 (1994): Volume 8 no 1 Januari 1994
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Pasal 1 Konvensi Montevideo tahun 1993 telah menentukan bahwa "The state as a person of international law should possess the following qualification: a.a permanent population ; b.a defined territory; c. government; and d.a capacity to enter in to relation with the other states. Article lengkap klik disini

PENGKAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DOGMATIK (NORMATIF) Philipus M. Hadjon
Yuridika Vol. 8 No. 1 (1994): Volume 8 no 1 Januari 1994
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Apakah ilmu hukum adalah ilmu bukanlah lagi zamannya untuk memperdebatkan hal tersebut. Article lengkap klik disini

PENEGAKAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI DALAM KAITANNYA DENGAN KETENTUAN PASAL 20 AYAT 3 DAN 4 UU NO. 4 TH. 1982 TENTANG KETENTUAN KETENTUAN POKOK PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP Philipus M. Hadjon
Yuridika Vol. 11 No. 1 (1996): Volume 11 no 1 Januari 1996
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Penegakan hukum administrasi (handhaving van het bestuurs-recht) merupakan bagian dari "Bestuuren".Article lengkap klik disini

TENTANG WEWENANG Philipus M. Hadjon
Yuridika Vol. 7 No. 5-6 (1997): Volume 7 no 5-6, September - Desember 1997
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Dalam hukum positif, kita temukan istilah wewenang antara lain dalam UU no. 5 tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara (Pasal 1.6; Pasal 53 ayat 2 huruf C)Article lengkap klik disini

KAJIAN AKADEMIK TENTANG PEMOTONGAN GAJI PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL YANG SEDANG MENEMPUH TUGAS BELAJAR DI LINGKUNGAN KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN NASIONAL DALAM SISTEM KEUANGAN NEGARA Indrawati Indrawati; Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah
Yuridika Vol. 25 No. 2 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 2 Mei 2010
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

There are many various efforts have been taken by the Government to improve the quality of education in Indonesia, one of them with empowerment and improving the quality of teachers and lecturers as professional educators must have the academic qualifications, competence, education certificates, and have the ability to achieve national education goals. However, as consequences Government cut the student salaries component included basic salary and allowances, and only receive the benefits of the family. The existing laws concerning the financial management of state budget allocations, especially civil servants salaries that are taking education in the Ministry of National Education in Indonesia that are incompatible with the principles of good governance. While the principle of state financial accountability contained in Article 23 art (1) of UUD 1945 that is "responsible for the greatest prosperity of the people". The dimensions of financial accountability, not judged merely from the final report submitted, but from the beginning of the design process, discussion, andratification, and implementation.

PENATAAN ATURAN HIPOTIK KAPAL SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 17 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG PELAYARAN Aktieva Tri Tjitrawati
Yuridika Vol. 25 No. 3 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 3 September 2010
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Dirumuskannya ketentuan mengenai hipotik kapal dalam UU Pelayaran Tahun 2008 dan keikutsertaan Indonesia dalam International Convention on Maritime Liens and Mortgages 1993 belum mampu mengisi kekosongan hukum yang dibutuhkan oleh para pelaku dalam aktivitas bisnis pelayaran, sementara di sisi lain, lembaga keuangan dan perbankan membutuhkan landasan hukum yang memadai untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan mereka akan pengembalian dana pengadaan kapal. Diperlukan penataan aturan-aturan di bidang hipotik kapal, terutama memisahkan aturan tersebut dari undang-undang pelayaran, untuk meningkatkan kepercayaan lembaga keuangan dan perbankan dalam mendanai sektor ini.

Parol Evidence Rule Doctrin as the Limitation for the Parties in Submitting Evidence Before the Court Praditha Suraja Wahana
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): Volume 33 No 3 September 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Contracts that made by the parties as the basis of engagement are the perfect and strongest proof or facts when there is a contract dispute between the parties which made it. To be reliable then the contents of the contract must be guaranteed the truth. The doctrine parol evidence rule plays a big role to make that happen. This doctrine works primarily in the evidentiary stage of the trial by preventing the submission of evidences which is classified as an extrinsic evidence to be submitted to the courts, since such evidences is highly questionable and therefore potentially fraudulent. However, the application of a rigid and absolute parol evidence rule may also lead to unfavorable situations for contracting parties, so under certain conditions such doctrine by the judge may be overruled. The doctrine if implemented in Indonesia will be support in enforcement and application the articles in BW (Indonesian Civil Code), especially Articles 1342 and Article 1350 BW. Moreover, the application of this doctrine can also improve judicial efficiency in terms of time, cost and personnel. The parties will be benefited from the application of this doctrine, for instance it will protect the truth of the contents of the contract so as to prevent doubts about the contracts they have made and encourage the parties to promote the prudentially principle.

UNSUR KERUGIAN DALAM UNJUSTIFIED ENRICHMENT UNTUK MEWUJUDKAN KEADILAN KOREKTIF (CORRECTIVE JUSTICE) Faizal Kurniawan; Peter Mahmud Marzuki; Erni Agustin; Rizky Amalia
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Recent development to claim damages on the basis of either wanprestatie or onrechtmatige daad would not provide saticfactory grounds to the question of justice. There will be a situation in which that no one shall be unjustly enriched at the expense of another which all outside the scope of contract and tort. This has led to the existence of an independent legal doctrine known as unjust enrichment. It is among the most debated private law subjects today in asking for justice. Corrective justice brings to the remedial relation between the plaintiff and the defendant; it is solely concerned with the norm of justice that provides reasons to restitution. Corrective justice properly evaluates the structure of injustness to the both sides, the plaintiff and the defendant. It gives effect to restitutionary proprietary interests rather than compensatiton. This article elaborates the law of unjust enrichment as ground for restitution in conjunction with the corrective justice. Furthermore, this article focuses on the theoritical foundation of corrective justice to meet the unjustified enrichment criteria.

Implementation of the best Interests of the Child Principles in Intercountry Adoption in Indonesia Leonora Bakarbessy; Dian Purnama Anugerah
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Adoption of Indonesian children by foreigner is a form of intercountry adoption. In Indonesia such adoption is not prohibited but conditions are more difficult because it is a last effort or ultimum remedium for the best interests of the child. Therefore petition for intercountry adoption throught the court, its decision in the form of a court decision, because the proof as the same as the evidence in civil suit.This is defferent from the petition of national adoption.This paper discusses the implementation of the best interest of child’s principle in Indonesia and how to conduct intercountry adoption in Indonesia in order to avoid any attempts of illegal adoption. This paper concludes that the Indonesian Government has issued a number of laws and regulations govern the intercountry adoption. These laws require implying the principle of the best interest of children in order to protect the interest of children who is adopted by foreigner. In order to undertake the adoption, the court should decide that it is eligible after the Ministry of Social of the Republic of Indonesia approves adoption application.

BINDING EFFECT OF ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO THIRD PARTIES: PRIVITY OF CONTRACT DOCTRINE Vs. PIERCING THE CORPORATE VEIL Y Sogar Simamora; Sujayadi Sujayadi; Yuniarti Yuniarti
Yuridika Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

The arbitration agreement is the legal basis for the arbitration forum to examine and adjudicate the dispute which arose from a private relationship where the parties agree to settle the dispute in arbitration forum. As an agreement, the arbitration agreement still applies the principles of contract, including the principle of privity of contract. In the doctrine of privity of contract, an agreement is only binding and have legal effect only to the parties, the agreement in principle, cannot provide profit or loss to a third party. In the arbitration agreement, only the parties are bound by the arbitration agreement that can become parties to the case investigation. However, in the development of arbitration practice also shows that a third party, not a signatory to the arbitration agreement can be held accountable through an examination of the arbitration case. Such a situation is possible if the third party is resident as a holding company or shareholder of a limited liability company, in which the limited liability company is bound by an arbitration agreement, and the holding company or shareholder proven to perform actions through a subsidiary or a limited liability resulting harm the other party.

Page 18 of 43 | Total Record : 422

16 17 18 19 20

Filter by Year

2001 2026

Filter By Issues

All Issue Vol. 41 No. 1 (2026): Volume 41 No 1, January 2026 Vol. 40 No. 3 (2025): Volume 40 No 3 September 2025 Vol. 40 No. 2 (2025): Volume 40 No 2 May 2025 Vol. 40 No. 1 (2025): Volume 40 No 1, January 2025 Vol. 39 No. 3 (2024): Volume 39 No 3 September 2024 Vol. 39 No. 2 (2024): Volume 39 No 2 May 2024 Vol. 39 No. 1 (2024): Volume 39 No 1, January 2024 Vol. 38 No. 3 (2023): Volume 38 No 3 September 2023 Vol. 38 No. 2 (2023): Volume 38 No 2 May 2023 Vol. 38 No. 1 (2023): Volume 38 No 1 January 2023 Vol. 37 No. 3 (2022): Volume 37 No 3 September 2022 Vol. 37 No. 2 (2022): Volume 37 No 2 May 2022 Vol. 37 No. 1 (2022): Volume 37 No 1 January 2022 Vol. 36 No. 3 (2021): Volume 36 No 3 September 2021 Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Volume 36 No 2 May 2021 Vol. 36 No. 1 (2021): Volume 36 No 1 January 2021 Vol. 35 No. 3 (2020): Volume 35 No 3 September 2020 Vol. 35 No. 2 (2020): Volume 35 No 2 May 2020 Vol. 35 No. 1 (2020): Volume 35 No 1 January 2020 Vol. 34 No. 3 (2019): Volume 34 No 3 September 2019 Vol. 34 No. 2 (2019): Volume 34 No 2 May 2019 Vol. 34 No. 1 (2019): Volume 34 No 1 January 2019 Vol. 19 No. 2 (2004): Volume 19 No 2 March-April 2004 Vol. 18 No. 3 (2003): Volume 18 No 3 May 2003 Vol. 16 No. 4 (2001): Volume 16 No 4 Juli-August 2001 Vol. 15 No. 4 (2000): Volume 15 No 4 Juli-Agustus 2000 Vol. 14 No. 2 (1999): Volume 14 No 2 Maret-April 1999 Vol. 33 No. 3 (2018): Volume 33 No 3 September 2018 Vol. 33 No. 2 (2018): Volume 33 No 2 May 2018 Vol. 33 No. 1 (2018): Volume 33 No 1 January 2018 Vol. 7 No. 5-6 (1997): Volume 7 no 5-6, September - Desember 1997 Vol. 6 No. 4-5 (1991): Volume 6 No 4-5 July, Agustus, September Oktober 1991 Vol. 32 No. 3 (2017): Volume 32 No 3 September 2017 Vol. 32 No. 2 (2017): Volume 32 No 2 May 2017 Vol. 32 No. 1 (2017): Volume 32 No 1 January 2017 Vol. 31 No. 3 (2016): Volume 31 No 3 September 2016 Vol. 11 No. 1 (1996): Volume 11 no 1 Januari 1996 Vol. 8 No. 1 (1994): Volume 8 no 1 Januari 1994 Vol. 7 No. 4 (1992): No 4 Tahun VII, Juli-Agustus 1992 Vol. 31 No. 2 (2016): Volume 31 No 2 May 2016 Vol. 31 No. 1 (2016): Volume 31 No 1 Januari 2016 Vol. 30 No. 3 (2015): Volume 30 No 3 September 2015 Vol. 30 No. 2 (2015): Volume 30 No 2 Mei 2015 Vol. 30 No. 1 (2015): Volume 30 No 1 Januari 2015 Vol. 29 No. 2 (2014): Volume 29 No 2 Mei 2014 Vol. 28 No. 2 (2013): Volume 28 No 2 Mei 2013 Vol. 29 No. 3 (2014): Volume 29 No 3 September 2014 Vol. 29 No. 1 (2014): Volume 29 No 1 Januari 2014 Vol. 28 No. 3 (2013): Volume 28 No 3 September 2013 Vol. 28 No. 1 (2013): Volume 28 No 1 Januari 2013 Vol. 27 No. 3 (2012): Volume 27 No 3 September 2012 Vol. 27 No. 2 (2012): Volume 27 No 2 Mei 2012 Vol. 27 No. 1 (2012): Volume 27 No. 1 Januari 2012 Vol. 26 No. 3 (2011): Volume 26 Nomor 3 September 2011 Vol. 26 No. 2 (2011): Volume 26 Nomor 2 Mei 2011 Vol. 26 No. 1 (2011): Volume 26 Nomor 1 Januari 2011 Vol. 25 No. 3 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 3 September 2010 Vol. 25 No. 2 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 2 Mei 2010 Vol. 25 No. 1 (2010): Volume 25 Nomor 1 Januari 2010 Vol. 16 No. 6 (2001): Volume 16 No. 6, November - Desember 2001 More Issue

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Faizal Kurniawan

Contact Email
yuridika@fh.unair.ac.id

Phone
+62315023151

Journal Mail Official
yuridika@fh.unair.ac.id

Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia

Location
Kota surabaya,

Jawa timur

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Faizal Kurniawan

Contact Email yuridika@fh.unair.ac.id

Phone +62315023151

Journal Mail Official yuridika@fh.unair.ac.id

Editorial Address Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia

Location Kota surabaya, Jawa timur INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Faizal Kurniawan

Contact Email
yuridika@fh.unair.ac.id

Phone
+62315023151

Journal Mail Official
yuridika@fh.unair.ac.id

Editorial Address
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga Jl. Dharmawangsa Dalam Selatan, Surabaya 60286 Indonesia

Location
Kota surabaya,

Jawa timur

INDONESIA