cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Abdurrahman Alfaqiih
Contact Email
jipro.fhuii@gmail.com
Phone
+62274898444
Journal Mail Official
jipro.fhuii@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl. Kaliurang Km 14,5 Sleman DIY
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property
Published by Universitas Islam Indonesia
ISSN : -     EISSN : 26542889     DOI : https://doi.org/10.20885/jipro
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Bahwa Journal of Intellectual Property yang disingkat JIPRO dihadirkan dan dikembangkan dalam rangka menjawab kebutuhan terhadap upaya disimenasi dan promosi segala hal berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual dalam rangka meningkatkan kesadaran dan pemanfaatan atas ekspresi ide, kreativitas atau kekayaan intelektual guna meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat secara luas berdasarkan pendekatan lintas disipin ilmu dan multidisiplin. Fokus JIPRO dilakukan pada semua bidang keilmuan yang bersifat interdisipliner dan multidisipliner yang berkaitan dengan ekspresi ide dalam hal kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang dapat memberikan nilai pengetahuan dan pemanfaatan dari kreatiitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual itu sendiri guna meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat akan pentingnya suatu penghargaan atas kreativitas, inovasi atau kekayaan intelektual yang mampu mendorong peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 71 Documents
 4   5   6   7   8 
URGENSI PENDAFTARAN KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL KOMUNAL SEBAGAI UPAYA PREVENTIF TERHADAP KLAIM PIHAK ASING ATAS BUDAYA LOKAL Hendar, Jejen; sri imaniyati, neni; Weishaguna; Faizal Adha, Ahmad; Trimelawati, Reni; Anugrah, Dikha
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.1, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol8.iss1.art3

Abstract

Indonesia merupakan negara dengan kekayaan budaya yang sangat melimpah, baik dalam bentuk ekspresi budaya tradisional, pengetahuan tradisional, maupun sumber daya genetik. Namun, belum optimalnya pendaftaran Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal (KIK) telah membuka celah bagi pihak asing untuk mengklaim budaya lokal sebagai milik mereka. Fenomena ini menimbulkan kerugian secara identitas nasional, ekonomi, maupun kedaulatan budaya. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji urgensi pendaftaran KIK sebagai upaya preventif terhadap klaim budaya oleh pihak asing. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Indonesia telah memiliki kerangka hukum terkait KIK, implementasinya masih lemah, terutama dalam aspek pendataan, sosialisasi, dan fasilitasi pendaftaran oleh negara. Pendaftaran KIK tidak hanya memberikan perlindungan hukum secara formil, tetapi juga berperan strategis dalam menjaga kedaulatan budaya nasional di tengah dinamika globalisasi dan perdagangan bebas. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan sinergi antara pemerintah pusat, daerah, serta masyarakat adat untuk mempercepat proses pendaftaran dan perlindungan hukum atas kekayaan budaya komunal. Artikel ini merekomendasikan penguatan regulasi teknis, pembentukan sistem inventarisasi nasional, dan peningkatan kesadaran hukum masyarakat adat sebagai strategi konkret dalam mencegah klaim budaya oleh pihak asing.
RETHINKING AUTHORS’ CONSENT AND PERFORMERS’ USE IN THE INDONESIAN COPYRIGHT ACT Andrini, Laurensia
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.1, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol8.iss1.art5

Abstract

Disputes between Indonesian songwriters and performers have intensified as composers become more assertive about their copyright. A dispute between a songwriter and a performer highlights the legal ambiguity between Article 9(2) of the 2014 Copyright Act that requires prior permission for any commercial use of a work, while Article 23(5) of the same Act allows performers to use work publicly once royalties are paid through a Collective Management Organization (CMO). This doctrinal study focuses on two discussions: i) the scope of an author’s right to prohibit performances of their songs; and ii) the relationship between Article 9(2) and 23(5) of the 2014 Copyright Act. This research employs a normative juridical method, relying on statutory interpretation, legal doctrine, and case-based analysis. It also includes a comparative approach by examining practices of CMOs in other jurisdictions to contextualise the Indonesian framework. This research finds that i) the right to prohibit performance is rooted in moral rights and may be invoked only to prevent harm to the author’s honour or reputation; and ii) Article 23(5) operates as a special rule that overrides Article 9(2) only to the extent of performances, provided royalties are channelled through a CMO.
PEMANFAATAN MUSIK BUATAN AI MELALUI DEEPFAKE: STUDI HUKUM KOMPARATIF INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Latifatunnisa, Raihani; Ramli, Ahmad M.; Mayana, Ranti Fauza
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.2, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss2.art5

Abstract

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has enabled the creation of music through deepfake methods that realistically mimic the voice, style, and characteristics of artists without their involvement or consent. While this innovation brings new possibilities to the music industry, it also raises significant legal issues, particularly regarding the recognition of AI as an author, the legal protection of AI-generated musical works, and the potential infringement of the original creator’s economic and moral rights. This study aims to examine the legal status and protection of musical works produced by AI using deepfake techniques under Indonesian Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright, and to compare it with the legal system of the United States. This research employs a normative juridical method, combining a descriptive-analytical and comparative law approach, with a focus on secondary data derived from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The findings show that neither Indonesia nor the United States currently recognizes AI as a creator. Copyright protection is only granted if there is a significant human contribution to the creation process. However, Indonesia lacks specific regulations addressing AI, deepfake technology, or objective standards to assess originality and the threshold of similarity, which creates legal uncertainty in enforcing copyright law for AI-generated music.
ANALISA HUKUM ATAS PENGATURAN ASET HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA Santoso, Tasa Gina
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art3

Abstract

The realization for creative economy actors by providing opportunities for their work in the form of Intellectual Property Rights (HKI) assets which can be used as fiduciary collateral with the ratification of Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning Implementing Regulations of Law Number 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy, creates opportunities to develop the economy in Indonesia with the government's recognition of IPR as collateral that can be guaranteed. It is hoped that this research can be a positive contribution for both the government and banks to implementing IPR as a collateral object. This research uses normative juridical analysis with the problem formulation: First: How do the regulations in Bank Indonesia Regulations with Government Regulation Number 24 of 2022 concerning Implementing Regulations of Law Number 24 of 2019 concerning the Creative Economy provide an opportunity for IPR assets to be used as objects of fiduciary collateral? Second: What is the certainty and position of IPR assets as objects of fiduciary guarantees in Indonesia? The results of this research found that regulations in Indonesia have agreed to stipulate that IPR assets can be used as fiduciary collateral, but in practice until today it is difficult to use IPR assets as fiduciary collateral, as can be seen from Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 9/6/PBI/2007 which does not specifically regulate IPR assets that can be used as collateral objects in banks. The certainty of IPR assets as collateral makes it difficult for banks to provide credit because they are constrained by the limited period of IPR protection. It is hoped that the results of this research will be a consideration for providing guarantees for creative economy actors who have IPR assets that can be pledged as collateral so that they can provide legal certainty for the community.
PASSWORD PROTECTION TPM LINDUNGI HAK CIPTA KONTEN ONLINE COURSE DARI PENGAMBILALIHAN ILEGAL Pradika, Agun
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art1

Abstract

The use of the Password Protection Online Course as a Technological Protection Measure (TPM) then gives rise to various dynamics of pros and cons regarding the impacts. So in this case it is necessary to conduct a study regarding the dynamics of using Password Protection Online Courses as a Technological Protection Measure (TPM) and Efforts to Protect Copyright of Online Course Content against Illegal Takeover of Access Rights Through Password Protection. The type of research used is normative research with a normative juridical approach. The results of this research show that Technologies Protection Measures (TPM) is a technology that can be used to protect documents from digital works with copyright. Efforts to realize copyright protection are carried out by creators to protect their creations from piracy or text mining which may be carried out on the online course content they create. The use of password protection utilizes the use of security technology to protect copyright and economic rights as regulated in articles 52 and 53 of the Copyright Law. Thus, it can be concluded that collaborative efforts between security technology or TPM and the legal provisions in the Copyright Law, ITE Law, WIPO and Bern Convention on Corporate Rights are quite good and provide comprehensive protection. Regulating the use of security technology includes protecting the moral and economic rights of a work. This provides benefits for creators in protecting their creative works in digital form and their distribution, the regulations for which have been implemented in the Copyright Law.
PELINDUNGAN HUKUM NAMA PANGGUNG PUBLIC FIGURE ATAS TINDAKAN PASSING OFF MEREK Permana, Yoga
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art2

Abstract

In the industrial world, a public figure who uses a stage name without giving it legal protection will be prone to causing problems such as being used for personal gain. For example, someone uses the stage name of a public figure to trick consumers so that many of them use the product, even though the product used does not belong to the public figure. The research was conducted using a normative juridical approach using secondary data. Data collection techniques were carried out using literature studies which were analyzed qualitatively. The results obtained from this research are that stage names can be compared to the names of famous people as stated in Article 21 paragraph (2) letter a of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This article provides legal protection for public figures' stage names from passing off actions carried out by irresponsible people. This article not only prohibits the use of the name of a famous person, but if it is similar, if there are elements that stand out between the trademark and the name of a famous person without the consent of the party concerned, the registration of the trademark must be rejected. There are several legal steps that can be taken by a public figure who feels aggrieved by someone's passing off his/her stage name, such as filing an objection, canceling the brand, suing for compensation, and criminal charges.
TRANSPLANTASI PENGATURAN RESALE RIGHTS (DROIT DE SUITE) PRANCIS KE DALAM SISTEM HUKUM HAK CIPTA INDONESIA Syakura, Abdan; Wicaksono, Rifki Alfian; Madani , A. Iqbal; Riswandi , Budi Agus
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art4

Abstract

The concept of droit de suite or the right to receive royalties from the resale of a work (resale royalty rights) for artists is designed so that it can be used as a system to provide a portion of the increase in the value of the work to the artist when his work is resold. In the regulation of the copyright law system in Indonesia, the principle of droit de suite does not yet have a specific arrangement as part of the moral rights contained in Law No. 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright (UUHC), even though the condition for implementing droit de suite is that the state must give permission and legally recognize the droit de suite in the laws and regulations. This study uses a juridical normative method and uses the Statute Approach and the Conceptual Approach which are analyzed descriptively. The results of the study indicate that there is a need for harmony with the resale rights law which will be carried out by transplanting the law into Indonesian law.
HARMONISASI PENGATURAN PERLINDUNGAN KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL OLEH PEMERINTAH DAERAH Fauzani, Muhammad Addi
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol7.iss1.art5

Abstract

This research is driven by the issue of widespread violations of intellectual property rights, which have occurred due to insufficient involvement of the Regional Government in intellectual property protection. Unfortunately, legislation concerning intellectual property remains incomplete, posing challenges for local governments in implementing effective protection measures. The objectives of this research are twofold: first, to analyze the role of the Regional Government in providing intellectual property protection; second, to formulate regional-level intellectual property regulations for greater coherence. This study employs a normative juridical approach with a statutory and conceptual framework. The research findings indicate the following: Firstly, despite having authority over intellectual property protection, the Regional Government faces challenges due to the partial nature of intellectual property laws and regulations—comprising at least six statutes. This complexity impedes the Regional Government's ability to comprehend, formulate, and enforce laws related to intellectual property. Therefore, harmonization is essential. Secondly, the harmonization of intellectual property regulations at the regional level involves the Regional Government conducting: a) an inventory of existing intellectual property laws and regulations; b) analysis, evaluation, and harmonization of their content, which will be incorporated into Regional Regulations on Intellectual Property Protection. These regulations must be grounded in a robust philosophical and sociological framework.
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN ATAS HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL KOMUNAL : STUDI KASUS KULINER TRADISIONAL RENDANG BABI DI INDONESIA Nugrahani, Rr. Aline Gratika; Halim, Suci Lestari
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/jipro.vol8.iss2.art1

Abstract

Pada saat ini perlindungan terhadap karya-karya tradisional seperti kuliner tradisional diatur oleh beberapa peraturan, yaitu Undang-undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta, Undang-undang No. 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, Undang-undang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan dan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 56 Tahun 2022 Tentang Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal. Namun, terdapat perbedaan pengelompokan karya tradisional pada sejumlah peraturan tersebut, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan polemik dalam menentukan dasar penyelesaian sengketa. Seperti pada kasus rendang babi. Rendang biasanya dibuat dengan daging sapi, tetapi akhir-akhir ini, beberapa pihak mulai menggunakan daging babi sebagai bahan utama, yang menyebabkan keresahan sosial dan sengketa di masyarakat. Dari sekian banyak peraturan tersebut, mana yang dapat digunakan dalam menyelesaikan masalah di atas. Pendekatan penulisan normatif digunakan dalam karya ini. Hasilnya menunjukan bahwa Rendang merupakan salah satu komponen Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal berupa Indikasi Asal. Meskipun negara bertanggung jawab untuk melindungi kekayaan intelektual komunal, Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan mendorong masyarakat, khususnya masyarakat asal, untuk secara aktif memperjuangkan tujuan atau cita-cita pemajuan kebudayaan. Dengan demikian, Peraturan tentang Kekayaan Intelektual Komunal dan Pemajuan Kebudayaan dapat menjadi landasan hukum dalam menyelesaikan masalah pelanggaran karya tradisional Indonesia, baik dari pihak dalam negeri maupun pihak luar negeri.
MENGGALI POTENSI THE WIPO TREATY ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, GENETIC RESOURCES AND ASSOCIATED TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE UNTUK MEMPERKUAT PELINDUNGAN PENGETAHUAN TRADISIONAL Tiaraputri, Adi; Daulay, Zainul; Diana, Ledy
JIPRO: Journal of Intellectual Property JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/ jipro.vol8.iss2.art2

Abstract

WIPO Treaty 2024 was adopted by WIPO Member States on May 24, 2024, and will enter into force three months after there are 15 ratifications and accessions. The treaty is open for signature by any eligible party for one year after its adoption, i.e. until May 23, 2025. The first WIPO Treaty 2024 recognizes the rights of indigenous peoples and local communities to their genetic resources and knowledge and their right to be included in the implementation of the treaty. Recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples such as their traditional knowledge is part of human rights. Indigenous peoples as holders of intellectual property rights. This paper is a legal research, namely normative legal research. Research that reflects on applicable norms. In addition, the research also uses literature both from books and journals as a source of research data. The normative legal research method uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The articles in the WIPO Treaty 2024 that are closely related to traditional knowledge and indigenous peoples/local communities are Article 3, Article 5, and Article 6. Article 3 deals with disclosure requirements related to patents and traditional knowledge. Article 5 regulates sanctions and maintenance and Article 6 on the availability of information systems of traditional knowledge. The provisions in the WIPO Treaty 2024 do not maximize the protection of traditional knowledge, but this could be the first step towards the recognition of traditional knowledge in international agreements relating to intellectual property rights.

Page 7 of 8 | Total Record : 71

 4   5   6   7   8 

Filter by Year

2018 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.2, 2025 JIPRO, Vol. 8, No.1, 2025 JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.2, 2024 JIPRO, Vol. 7, No.1, 2024 JIPRO, Vol. 6, No.2, 2023 JIPRO, Vol. 6, No.1, 2023 JIPRO, Vol. 5, No.2, 2022 JIPRO, Vol. 5, No.1, 2022 JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2021 JIPRO, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2021 JIPRO , Vol. 3. No. 2, 2020 JIPRO , Vol. 3. No. 1, 2020 JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 2, 2019 JIPRO, Vol. 2. No. 1, 2019 JIPRO, Vol. 1. No.1, 2018 More Issue