cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
-
Contact Email
genesissembiring@gmail.com
Phone
+6285359562521
Journal Mail Official
genesissembiring@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jl Ir Juanda No 56b, Medan, Indonesia
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST)
Published by PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29646804     DOI : https://doi.org/10.55927/fjst.v1i2
Core Subject : Humanities, Science, Education, Social, Engineering,
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Social Sciences
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology (FJST) is an open-access scientific journal that publishing full-length research papers and review articles covering subjects that fall under the wide spectrum of science and technology. FJST journal is dedicated towards dissemination of knowledge related to the advancement in science and technology. The prestigious interdisciplinary editorial board reflects the diversity of subjects covered in this journal. Under the realm of science and technology, the coverage includes environmental science, pure and applied mathematics, agricultural research and engineering, biology, biotechnology, bioinformatics, management science, business and economics, Healthcare sciences (including clinical medicine, preventive medicine & public health), physics, biophysics, computer science, chemistry and bioengineering, to name a few. Formosa Journal of Science and Technology is published by Formosa Publisher. The journal now brings out monthly publications. It supports the open access policy for making scientific research accessible to one and all.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 582 Documents
 55   56   57   58   59 
Comparison of Students' Chemistry Learning Outcomes through Verification of Concept Maps and Mind Maps in Discovery Model Learning Auliah, Army; Islawati, Islawati
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v4i1.13711

Abstract

Chemistry learning requires an understanding of complex abstract concepts. The Discovery Learning model has been applied to improve student understanding, but the verification stage in this model is often an obstacle in connecting the concepts found. This study compares the verification of concept maps and mind maps in improving student learning outcomes. The research method used is comparative descriptive, with two experimental groups each using concept maps and mind maps. The research instruments include learning outcome tests, assessment rubrics, and observations. The results showed that concept maps support systematic understanding more, while mind maps are more effective in developing flexibility of thinking. The verification process plays a role in correcting student misconceptions. These findings provide insight for educators to adjust learning methods to improve understanding of chemical concepts.
Analysis of Learning Outcome Indicator Completion through Verification of Concept Maps and Mind Maps in the Discovery Learning Model Yunus, Muhammad; Islawati, Islawati; Auliah, Army
Formosa Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January 2025
Publisher : PT FORMOSA CENDEKIA GLOBAL

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55927/fjst.v4i1.13712

Abstract

A less systematic conceptual understanding can hinder the completion of student learning outcomes. This study aims to compare the verification of concept maps and mind maps in improving student understanding in the Discovery Learning model. The method used is descriptive comparative, with two experimental groups each using concept maps and mind maps. The research process includes pretest, intervention with verification, posttest, and student reflection. Data collection was carried out through learning outcome tests, assessment rubrics, and observations. The results of the study showed that concept maps support more systematic understanding, while mind maps are more effective in developing flexibility of thinking. The verification process plays a role in correcting students' conceptual errors. These findings provide insight for educators to adjust learning methods to improve learning outcomes.

Page 59 of 59 | Total Record : 582

 55   56   57   58   59 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): January 2025 Vol. 3 No. 12 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 3 No. 11 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): October 2024 Vol. 3 No. 9 (2024): September 2024 Vol. 3 No. 8 (2024): August 2024 Vol. 3 No. 7 (2024): July 2024 Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 3 No. 5 (2024): May 2024 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): April 2024 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): March 2024 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): February 2024 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): January 2024 Vol. 2 No. 12 (2023): December 2023 Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 2 No. 10 (2023): October 2023 Vol. 2 No. 9 (2023): September 2023 Vol. 2 No. 8 (2023): Agustus 2023 Vol. 2 No. 7 (2023): July, 2023 Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 2 No. 5 (2023): May, 2023 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): April 2023 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): March 2023 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): February 2023 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): January, 2023 Vol. 1 No. 8 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 1 No. 7 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 1 No. 6 (2022): October 2022 Vol. 1 No. 5 (2022): September 2022 Vol. 1 No. 4 (2022): August 2022 Vol. 1 No. 3 (2022): July 2022 Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): May 2022 More Issue