Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Overview of Thesis Writing Guidelines for The Faculty of Law, Syiah Kuala University and Its Relation to Johny Ibrahim's Normative Legal Research Methods Bakti Bakti; Muhammad Saleh
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 5, No 3: Desember 2021
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

This paper is intended to understand the description and characteristics of legal research produced by law faculty students and developed by law scientists and researchers at Syiah Kuala University as a sample case. Does the description of the research results of legal researchers, including students and legal scientists, follow the characteristics and legal paradigms that tend to be classical or have they led to the development of contemporary legal theories.

Kewenangan Gubernur Dalam Mutasi Jabatan di Lingkungan Pemerintah Aceh Mudfar Alianur; Faisal A.Rani; Eddy Purnama
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 1, No 1: April 2017 (Print Version)
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pasal 71 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemilihan Gubernur Bupati dan Walikota menjadi Undang-Undang yang mana Gubernur atau Wakil Gubernur, Bupati atau Wakil Bupati, dan Walikota atau Wakil Walikota dilarang melakukan penggantian pejabat 6 (enam) bulan sebelum tanggal penetapan pasangan calon sampai dengan akhir masa jabatan kecuali mendapat persetujuan tertulis dari Menteri. Tujuan penelitian untuk mengetahui pergantian yang dilakukan Gubernur terhadap Pejabat Eselon II Pemerintah Aceh dan mengetahui larangan pergantian pejabat oleh Undang-Undang No 10 Tahun 2016 telah membatasi jabatannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) yakni penelitian yang difokuskan untuk mengkaji penerapan kaidah-kaidah atau norma-norma dalam hukum positif dengan pendekatan yang digunakan adalah Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan, Pendekatan Konseptual dan Pendekatan Kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukan kepala daerah (Gubernur atau Wakil Gubernur, Bupati atau Wakil Bupati, dan Walikota atau Wakil Walikota) dilarang melakukan penggantian pejabat 6 (enam) bulan sebelum tanggal penetapan pasangan calon sampai dengan akhir masa jabatan kecuali mendapat persetujuan tertulis dari Menteri.Article 71 verse (2) of the Act Number 10, 2016 on the change of the Act Number 1, 2015 on the Determination of the Replacement of Government Regulation Number 1, 2014 on the Election of Governor, Head of District and Mayor becomes the Act which is the Governor or vice governor, head of district, or vice of the head of district and major and vice of major is forbidden to replace the high rank official 6 (six) months before the date of its determination of the candidate couples till the end of the power except it has an approval written from the minister, This research aims to know the position changing of echelon II of Aceh Government and to know the ban on the official movement under the Act Number 10, 2016 has limited the power of the Governor that This is juridical normative legal research by focusing on the problems posed in this research, which are on exploring the implementation of the principles or norms in existing laws by applying statutory approach, and it applies conceptual approach by the implementation of conceptual approach. The research shows that the Head of Regions (Governor or vice Governor, Head of District of vice of the Head of District, Major or vice of Major) is forbidden to change high official ranks 6 (six) months before the date of the determination of candidate couple till the end of the power except it has a written approval from the Minister.

PPAT'S Legal Responsibility For The Creation Of Empty Deed Wirantia Wirantia; Darmawan Darmawan; Suhaimi Suhaimi
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 4, No 3: Desember 2020
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Article 53 of the Regulation of the Head of the National Land Agency Number 1 Year 1960, which states that the PPAT deed is made by filling in the complete available deed blanks in accordance with the instructions for filling it. In practice carried out by a small number of PPAT there is a deed that has been prepared in advance, and has had some contents emptied containing agreements or general and standard agreements, which the purpose of which is to facilitate the work of PPAT in terms of administration and in terms of providing services by PPAT to interested parties or faces. The results showed that, Responsibility for authentic deed which is partially subtansinya empty, because PPAT is a public official who is given the authority to make authentic deed and PPAT has rules that must be obeyed by all PPAT in Indonesia regulated in Government Regulation No. 24, 2016 and the IPPAT Code of Ethics, and the position of PPAT deed which is partially subtansinya vacant in the event of degradation of PPAT deed even though the PPAT deed is a perfect evidence tool, but in the ppat certificate can experience degradation of the deed that can not be enforced as an authentic deed, but is considered a deed / handwriting under the hands caused by violation of the provisions of Article 1869 KUHPerdata.

Perlindungan Bagi Hak Konsumen dan Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perjanjian Transaksi Elektronik Desy Ary Setyawati; Dahlan Ali; M. Nur Rasyid
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 1, No 3: Desember 2017
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Transaksi elektronik adalah suatu transaksi perdagangan atau perniagaan baik berupa penyebaran, pembelian, penjualan, pemasaran barang dan jasa dengan menggunakan media elektronik yang terhubung melalui internet. Dengan adanya transaksi elektronik sangat menguntungkan bagi pihak konsumen dalam memilih berbagai jenis barang namun pelanggaran hak-hak konsumen sangat memungkinkan terjadi mengingat transaksi elektronik mempunyai karakteristik yang berbeda dengan transaksi konvensional. Untuk itu diperlukannya perlingan hukum terhapa konsumen dalam jual beli barang yang mengandung unsure penyalahgunaan keadaan yang dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (UUPK). Penyalahgunaan keadaan yang sering dilakukan oleh pihak pelaku usaha adalah melanggar Pasal 4 UUPK tentang hak-hak konsumen. Penyalahgunaan keadaan juga dapat dilakukan oleh pihak pelaku usaha dengan mencantumkan klausula baku tidak sesuai dengan Pasal 18 UUPK tentang larangan pencantuman klausula baku. Akibat dari penyalahgunaan keadaan dari pihak pelaku usaha mengakibatkan pihak konsumen mengalami kerugian dan mengakibatkan terjadinya wanprestasi. Selain UUPK dalam transaksi elektronik mengenai perlindungan terhadap konsumen juga diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (UUITE). UUITE menjelaskan tentang tanggung jawab pelaku usaha terhadap konsumen yang terdapat dalam Pasal 9 UUITE yang menyatakan bahwa,” Pelaku usaha yang menawarkan produk melalui sistem elektronik harus menyediakan informasi yang lengkap dan benar berkaitan dengan syarat kontrak, produsen, dan produk yang ditawarkan”. Pasal ini menjelaskan tanggung jawab pelaku usaha dalam memberikan informasi yang sebenarnya mengenai toko online miliknya dan informasi terkait pencantuman klausula baku untuk menghindari terjadinya wanprestasi antara pihak konsumen dan pelaku usaha. Dalam kondisi seperti ini sepatutnya negara hadir terutama dalam wujud hukum yang mengatur dan memberi perlindungan kepada konsumen, seperti yang dijelaskan dalam Pasal 1 angka 1 UUPK menyebutkan bahwa Perlindungan Konsumen adalah segala upaya yang menjamin adanya kepastian hukum untuk memberi perlindungan kepada konsumen.Electronic transaction is a trading or commercial transaction in the form of distributing, purchasing, selling, marketing of goods and services by using electronic media connected via internet. With the electronic transaction is very beneficial for the consumer in choosing various types of goods but violations of consumer rights is possible because electronic transactions have characteristics different from conventional transactions. Therefore, the need for legal relief on consumers in buying and selling of goods containing elements of misuse of the circumstances associated with the Act Number 8, 1999 concerning Customer Protection (UUPK). Abuse of the state that is often done by the business actor is violating Article 4 UUPK concerning consumer rights. Abuse of the situation can also be done by the business actor by stating the standard clause does not comply with Article 18 UUPK about the ban on the inclusion of the standard clause. As a result of misuse of the circumstances of the business actors resulted in the consumer losses and resulted in a default. In addition to UUPK in electronic transactions concerning consumer protection is also regulated in the Information and Electronic Transaction Act (UUITE). UUITE explains the business actors' responsibility to consumers contained in Article 9 UUITE states that, "Business actors offering products through electronic systems must provide complete and correct information relating to the terms of contracts, producers and offered products". This Article describes the responsibility of business actors in providing actual information about their online store and information related to the inclusion of standard clauses to avoid the occurrence of wanprestasi between the consumer and business actor. Under these circumstances, the state should be present primarily in the form of laws that regulate and provide protection to consumers, as described in Article 1 point 1 UUPK mention that Consumer Protection is any effort that ensures legal certainty to provide protection to consumers.

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Rumah Sakit Akibat Kelalaian Pelayanan Medis Panji Maulana
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 3, No 3: Desember 2019
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pasal 46 Undang-Undang Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit berbunyi bahwa rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara hukum terhadap semua kerugian yang ditimbulkan atas kelalaian yang dilakukan oleh tenaga kesehatan di rumah sakit. Namun pada kenyataannya, rumah sakit tidak bertanggung jawab terhadap kelalaian yang dilakukan oleh tenaga kesehatan pada rumah sakit tersebut bahkan menjurus kepada kelalaian medis dengan penelantaran pasien yang membutuhkan pertolongan segera, sehingga perbuatan tersebut menyebabkan kematian ibu dan anak. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian yuridis empiris yaitu jenis penelitian yang meneliti dan menelaah efektivitas suatu peraturan perundang-undangan yaitu Undang-Undang Rumah Sakit terutama terhadap pelaksanaan tanggung jawab pidana oleh rumah sakit. Hasil penelitian menujukkan bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana Rumah Sakit Ibu dan Anak (RSIA) Banda Aceh pada kasus kematian ibu Suryani dan bayinya akibat penelantaran yang dilakukan oleh tenaga kesehatan RSIA belum terealisasi sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang - Undang Rumah Sakit.Article 46 of Law Number 44 of 2009 concerning Hospital (Hospital Law) states that the hospital is legally responsible for all losses incurred due to negligence committed by health personnel in the hospital. But in reality, the hospital is not responsible for negligence carried out by health workers at the hospital and even leads to deliberate neglect of patients who need immediate help, so that these actions cause maternal and child deaths. The type of research used in this study is empirical juridical research, which is a type of research that examines and examines the effectiveness of legislation, namely the Law on Hospitals, especially for the implementation of criminal responsibility by hospitals. The results of the study show the form of criminal responsibility of the Banda Aceh Maternal and Child Hospital (RSIA) in the case of the death of the Syriac mother and her baby due to neglect carried out by RSIA health personnel that have not been realized as stipulated in the Hospital Law.

Kepemilikan Tanah Hak Milik Yang Dikuasai Bersama Warga Negara Indonesia (WNI) Dan Warga Negara Asing (WNA) Yang Diperoleh Berdasarkan Warisan di Provinsi Aceh Nurlaila Nurlaila; Ilyas Ismail; Mahdi Syahbandir
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 2, No 2: Agustus 2018
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pasal 21 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 menyatakan bahwa orang asing yang sudah berlakunya Undang-undang ini memperoleh hak milik karena pewarisan tanpa wasiat atau percampuran harta karena perkawinan, demikian pula warga negara indonesia yang mempunyai hak milik dan setelah berlakunya undang-undang ini kehilangan kewarga-negaraannya wajib melepaskan hak itu didalam jangka waktu satu tahun sejak diperolehnya hak tersebut atau hilangnya kewarga-negaraan itu. Jika sesudah jangka waktu tersebut lampau hak milik tidak dilepaskan, maka hak tersebut hapus karena hukum dan tanahnya jatuh pada negara, dengan ketentuan bahwa hak-hak pihak lain yang membebaninya tetap berlangsung. Namun dalam kenyataannya hak-hak milik tersebut ada yang belum dilepas oleh WNA. Article 21 paragraph (3) of Law No. 5 of 1960 about foreigners who already enactment of this Act property rights because inheritance without a will or an engaging treasure because marriage, as well as citizens of Indonesia who have owned and after the enactment this Act lost his citizenship was obliged to relinquish rights within a period of one year from obtaining such rights or loss that citizenship. If after that time period past the property are not removed, then the right remove because of the law and the land falls on the state, provided that the rights of other parties which encumber still persists. However, in fact the property rights there is still not released by the WNA.

The Implementation Of State Responsibility Principle in Indonesia Concerning Plastic Waste of Pacific Ocean Zulkhanadya Zulkhanadya; Sophia Listriani
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 4, No 2: Agustus 2020
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Today, plastic waste is the most widely found in the Pacific Ocean, around 99% of garbage in the Pacific Ocean is plastic waste. Indonesia as the second-largest contributor plastic waste to sea, it needs to implement the state responsibility principle to fulfill the international obligations as referred to article 235 (1) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, stated that states are responsible for the fulfillment of their international obligations concerning the protection and preservation the marine environment. The state responsibility principle is also discussed at the national level, in Indonesia itself, there is a national regulation that discusses the state responsibility principle such as Law No. 32 of 2009 on environmental protection and management. Therefore, this paper will discuss the implementation of state responsibility principle in Indonesia and the challenges faced by Indonesia in implementing the state responsibility principle.

Tinjauan Yuridis Pembatasan Upaya Hukum Kasasi Dalam Kasus Gugatan Terhadap Keputusan Pejabat Daerah Muhibuddin Muhibuddin; Mahdi Syahbandir; M. Nur Rasyid
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 1, No 2: Agustus 2017
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pasal 45A Ayat (2) huruf c Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004 tentang Mahkamah Agung membatasi pengajuan upaya hukum kasasi terhadap perkara tata usaha negara yang objek gugatannya berupa keputusan pejabat daerah. Pembatasan ini menimbulkan ketidakadilan bagi pencari keadilan (yustisiable) yang ingin mendapatkan keadilan jika pada tingkat pertama dan banding tidak diterima gugatannya. Di samping itu, pembatasan tersebut telah merubah sistem peradilan di Indonesia yang terdiri dari tingkat pertama, banding dan kasasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan pembatasan upaya hukum dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2004, tinjauan keadilan kepada warga negara dan asas-asas pembentukan perundang-undangan yang baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang ingin mengidentifikasi dari aspek hukumnya. Data yang digunakan terdiri bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembatasan pengajuan upaya hukum untuk mengurangi penumpukan perkara di Mahkamah Agung. Akibat pembatasan tersebut sangat merugikan warga negara yang ingin memperjuangkan haknya dan tidak mencerminkan asas-asas pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan yang baik.Article 45 (2) point C of the Act Number 5, 2004 on the Supreme Court Especially Limiting judicial review on the decision of the object of civil administrative state’s case which its lawsuit is the decision of officials in district, municipality or provincial officials. The limitation is not fair towards every justice seekers who are willing to obtain justices in the first court and the court of appeal have not tried the cases fairly. Apart from that the limitation has changed the justice system in Indonesia consisting of the first instance court, the court of appeal, and review court of the Supreme Court. This research aims to know the reasons of such limitation in the Act Number 5, 2004, justice review for citizens and principles of well law making. This is juridical normative research, which is trying to identify legal substances. The sources of data are secondary that are primary, secondary and tertiary legal sources. The research shows that the limitation of judicial review is to reduce the number of cases at the Supreme Court. The result of the nullification causes loss for citizens who are trying to fight for their rights and it does not reflect the principle of well law making process.

Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Pencabutan Larangan Keterlibatan Mantan Narapidana Sebagai Pejabat Publik Mukhlis Mukhlis; Eddy Purnama; Zahratul Idami
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 3, No 2: Agustus 2019
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Pencabutan Pasal 67 ayat (2) huruf g pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 51/Puu-Xiv/2016 menyangkut pembatasan hak mantan narapidana untuk mencalonkan diri dalam pemilihan kepala daerah tentu akan berpengaruh pada undang-undang lain. Baik undang-undang yang sudah ada maupun yang akan dibentuk karena berkaitan dengan sifat final dan mengikat pada putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Tahun 2017 muncul undang-undang baru yang memuat kembali pembatasan hak mantan narapidana yaitu Undang-undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017. Sehingga menarik diteliti kedudukan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam sistem hukum nasional? dan apakah kekuatan putusan Mahkamah Konstistusi bisa mempengaruhi perundang-undangan lain secara keseluruhan?. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji kedudukan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam sistem hukum nasional dan pengaruh kekuatan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi terhadap perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif. Penelitian yang mencakup asas-asas hukum, sistematika hukum dan taraf sinkronisasi hukum. Sumber data yang digunakan diperoleh dari penelitian perpustakaan serta informasi dari para ahli akan dianalisis dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan aturan yang memiliki peranan setingkat dengan perundang-undangan untuk dilaksanakan. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi jelas mampu mempengaruhi semua undang-undang, sehingga undang-undang yang memuat prihal yang sama dipastikan tidak memiliki kepastian hukum. Disarankan adanya suatu aturan hukum yang mempertegas teknis implementasi putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan tersedianya suatu wadah pengujian kembali terhadap putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi.The revocation of Article 67 paragraph (2) letter g in Law No. 11 of 2006 by the Constitutional Court No. 51 / Puu-Xiv / 2016 concerning restrictions on the rights of former prisoners (ex-convicts) to involve themselves to be the candidate for local election will certainly affect other laws, both the existing laws and laws that will be formed, because they are related to the final and binding characteristic on the decisions of Constitutional Court. In 2017, new law emerged which restated about the restrictions on the rights of former prisoners, namely Law No. 7 of 2017. Thus, it is interesting to investigate the position of the Constitutional Court decision in the national legal system? And whether the power of the Constitutional Court’s decision could influence other legislations as a whole or not? This study aims to examine the position of the Constitutional Court decision in the national legal system and the influence of the power of Constitutional Court decision towards the legislation. This study is conducted by using legal research methods of normative juridical. This research covers legal principles, legal systematic and level of legal synchronization. The source of data used in this research is obtained through library research and information from the experts will be analyzed by legislative approach and case approach. The results of this research indicate that the constitutional court decision is a rule that has the same level as the role of legislation to be implemented. The decision of the Constitutional Court is clearly capable of influencing all laws, so that the law that contains the same subject is certain to have no legal certainty. It is suggested that there should be a legal regulation that reinforces the technical implementation of the Constitutional Court Decision in legislation and the availability of a place for re-testing towards the decisions of Constitutional Court.

Legalitas Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh Wahyu Ramadhani; Said Iskandar; Radhali Radhali
Syiah Kuala Law Journal Vol 2, No 3: Desember 2018
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Maraknya penangkapan akhir-akhir ini yang dilakukan oleh KPK yang dikenal dengan istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan atau OTT memunculkan polemik apakah sah atau tidak sah. Pihak-pihak yang menganggap bahwa OTT adalah ilegal mendasarkan pada argumentasi bahwa tidak adanya istilah Operasi Tangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP, yang ada hanyalah Tertangkap Tangan.Perbedaan tersebut kemudian disimpulkan bahwa OTT adalah illegal.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah Tertangkap Tangan dalam KUHAP dan OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif (yuridis normatif) dengan melakukan studi bahan kepustakaan guna mengumpulkan data sekunder. Penelitian hukum normatif dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka (kepustakaan) yang merupakan data sekunder. Dari analisis yang dapat dipahami maka OTT Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi terhadap Gubernur Aceh dalam kaitannya dengan istilah tertangkap tangan dalam KUHAP bahwa Pasal 111 ayat (1) KUHAP dan Pasal 1 butir 19 KUHAP diatas dasar hukum bagi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam melakukan Operasi Tangkap Tangan (OTT) yang dianggap illegal serta memandang bahwa Operasi Tangkap Tangan berbeda dengan Tertangkap Tangan yang terdapat pada pasal-pasal tersebut. Kemudian OTT dalam kaitannya dengan teknik penyidikan khusus yang dikenal dengan istilah Controlled Delivery sering digunakan oleh penyidik BNN, menilai bahwa praktik KPK dalam OTT telah menggunakan dua tindakan tersebut (interdiction and entrapment) yang berarti penyidik KPK telah mengadopsi tanpa kewenangan yang telah dimiliki penyidik BNN, sehingga KPK telah melakukan tiga jenis tindakan yang melanggar UU (interdiction, entrapment dan dalam proses penyelidikan). Rampant catching lately done by KPK is known by the term Operation Catch hand or OTT gave rise to polemic whether legitimate or illegitimate. Parties who consider that OTT is illegal basing on arguing that the absence of a Capture Operation term of hands in the code of criminal procedure, only Caught hand. The difference is then inferred that OTT is illegal. This research aims to clarify OTT corruption eradication Commission Against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure and OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known with the term Controlled Delivery. Research methods the research methods used are normative legal (juridical normative) and conduct studies of materials libraries in order to collect data on the secondary. Normative legal research done by researching library materials (library) which is a secondary data. From the analysis that can be understood then the OTT corruption eradication Commission against the Governor of Aceh in relation to the term caught on hand in the code of criminal procedure that Article 111 paragraph (1) of the code of criminal procedure and the code of criminal procedure article 1 19 rounds above the legal basis for the The corruption eradication Commission in conducting Operation Catch hands (OTT) that are considered illegal and looked at that Capture different Hand Operation with Hand Caught on the articles. Then OTT in relation to special investigation techniques that are known by the term Controlled Delivery is often used by BNN, the investigators argued that the practice of KPK in the OTT has been using these two acts (interdiction and entrapment) which means investigators KPK has been adopted without the authority that has been owned by the investigator so that the KPK, BNN has conducted three types of actions that violate the ACT (entrapment, interdiction and investigation in the process).

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name
Rizanizarli

Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id

Phone
+62651-7410147

Journal Mail Official
sklj@unsyiah.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jln. Putroe Phang Street No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111

Location
Kab. aceh besar,

Aceh

INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Home Page

OAI Link

Editorial Team

Contact

Reviewer

Google Scholar

Contact Name Rizanizarli

Contact Email rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id

Phone +62651-7410147

Journal Mail Official sklj@unsyiah.ac.id

Editorial Address Jln. Putroe Phang Street No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111

Location Kab. aceh besar, Aceh INDONESIA

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Contact Name
Rizanizarli

Contact Email
rizanizarli@unsyiah.ac.id

Phone
+62651-7410147

Journal Mail Official
sklj@unsyiah.ac.id

Editorial Address
Jln. Putroe Phang Street No.1. Darussalam, Provinsi Aceh, 23111

Location
Kab. aceh besar,

Aceh

INDONESIA