cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Dr. Patricia Rinwigati Waagstein
Contact Email
ilrev@ui.ac.id
Phone
-
Journal Mail Official
ilrev@ui.ac.id
Editorial Address
DRC Office Building F 3rd Floor, Faculty of Law University of Indonesia, Depok - 16424
Location
Kota depok,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Indonesia Law Review (ILREV)
Published by Universitas Indonesia
ISSN : 20888430     EISSN : 23562129     DOI : 10.15742/ilrev
Core Subject : Social,
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice
Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) is an open access, double-blind peer-reviewed law journal. It was first published by the Djokosoetono Research Center (DRC) in 2011 to address the lack of scholarly literatures on Indonesian law accessible in English for an international audience. ILREV focuses on recent developments of legal scholarship, covering legal reform and development, contemporary societal issues, as well as institutional change in Indonesia. Realizing the global challenges and ever-increasing legal interaction among developing countries, ILREV also welcomes articles on legal development in the ASEAN region and the larger Global South. By that token, it aims to provide a platform for academic dialogue and exchanges of ideas between scholars and professionals, especially from the Global South. As such, ILREV encourages comparative, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and other approaches to law which can enrich the development of legal scholarship not only in Indonesia but also the Global South as a whole.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 6 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 14, No. 4" : 6 Documents clear
The Principle of Sustainable Development in International Investment Law: A Study from Vietnamese Perspective Tran Thang, Long; Pham, Anh Le Tram
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

International investment significantly contributes to economic development by fostering hunger eradication, poverty reduction, job creation, and the introduction of new technologies and services. However, it also presents challenges, including resource degradation, environmental decline, waste generation, and human rights violations. This article emphasizes integrating sustainable development principles into international investment law to balance investor and host country interests while safeguarding the environment and human rights for long-term sustainability. In Vietnam, a nation increasingly integrated into the global economy, legal frameworks stipulate sustainable development principles for foreign-invested projects, aligning with international standards to protect the environment and people alongside economic and social progress. Despite these efforts, Vietnam’s regulations exhibit limitations and unpredictability, hindering effective responses to potential international investment disputes. This study examines Vietnam’s approach to these principles and its practical implementation toward achieving sustainable development goals through investment, using case studies and conceptual analysis of international investment agreements. The central research question explores how Vietnam can leverage international investment benefits while ensuring sustainable development. The article analyzes the interplay between sustainable development and investment promotion, identifies key principles in investment agreements, and highlights challenges for host countries like Vietnam in managing expropriation disputes tied to public interest criteria. Findings underscore the need to prioritize sustainable development in attracting investment, proposing legal enhancements to strengthen state remedies against investor violations, and minimizing expropriation lawsuits. By addressing these gaps, Vietnam can better enforce sustainable practices, balancing economic gains with environmental and human rights protections. The research advocates for refined legal provisions to enhance Vietnam’s capacity to resolve disputes and uphold sustainable development commitments, offering actionable recommendations to perfect its legal framework in this domain.
QUASI-VERTICAL INTEGRATION MODEL IN PARTNERSHIP OF SMES (SMALL MEDIUM ENTERPRISES) AND THE ROLE OF COMPETITION COMMISSION IN EU AND INDONESIA Hernayanto, Yayan; Toha, Kurnia; Silalahi, Udin
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Partnerships between large and small companies should not be imagined as David and Goliath, enemies of each other. However, partnerships between large and small business actors are a mutually beneficial synergy. Partnerships with Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are not charity activities that prevent them from growing strongly. Guidance and assistance need to be provided so that they grow with a strong foundation. Both parties must agree to a fair transaction scheme, trade terms, and clauses that sustain this partnership and not cause SMEs to go bankrupt. Quasi-Vertical Integration is a model for conducting transactions in the manufacturing industry. This article is compiled using a doctrinal research method, namely analyzing the implementation of partnership regulations in Indonesia in the context of partnerships with the Automotive Industry (OEM), as well as examining the role of the Competition Supervisory Commission (KPPU) in Indonesia, which has been given the authority to oversee this partnership. More specifically, this article discusses and presents several points: first, how good partnership protection in Indonesia and the EU protects SME businesses; second, how the partnership pattern of SMEs in the automotive sector between Quasi-Vertical integration and quasi-rent is implemented as Vertical Integration; Finally, how the KPPU in Indonesia uses its authority in considering supervising partnerships and its comparison with the EU. As a conclusion in this article, mandatory partnerships in Indonesia are implemented based on the OSS (Online Single Submission) requirements in the registration or licensing of investment. Voluntary Partnerships are agreements between Parties that are equal with the principle of mutual need and mutual benefit. The partnership pattern of SMEs in the automotive sector between Quasi-Vertical integration and quasi rent is implemented as Vertical Integration which is not prohibited by Indonesian competition law. KPPU must encourage voluntary partnerships by Business Actors and SMEs as a more appropriate approach to developing Partnerships
DELAYS IN THE INTERNATIONAL SEABED AUTHORITY MINING CODE: INSIGHT FROM TWAIL AND BBNJ FRAMEWORKS Putri, Ria Wierma; Khanza, Yuga Narazua; Davey, Orima Melati; Sabatira, Febryani
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The International Seabed Authority (ISA) plays a crucial role in governing the vast expanses of the ocean floor that lie beyond national jurisdictions, referred to as "the Area" under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS). Although the ISA has established regulations for deep-sea exploration, it has encountered significant challenges in finalizing a comprehensive mining code for resource exploitation. This ongoing delay underscores the notion that legal development is often catalyzed by broader social changes. To comprehend the factors contributing to this delay, it is essential to consider the historical context of UNCLOS 1982, a framework established during a period when numerous developing nations were asserting their independence. The Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL) critiques highlight how international legal frameworks have frequently favored developed nations, complicating the pursuit of a just and equitable mining code. Furthermore, the recent Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ) Agreement, which advocates for equitable access to marine resources, poses additional challenges for the ISA. Developed nations, equipped with advanced technologies, continue to dominate deep-sea resource exploitation, exacerbating the existing technological divide, as illustrated by Indonesia's collaboration with the U.S. NOAA in 2010 to explore its marine territory. Social change typically emerges not merely from value shifts but through the resolution of conflicts that lead to new agreements. This article will attempt to understand why the ISA mining code has been delayed and what this means for international law considering the TWAIL and BBNJ approaches.
RECONSTRUCTION OF COMPETITION LAW: PREVENTING MONOPOLIZATION THROUGH DATA EXPLOITATION IN E-COMMERCE Fitriana, Diana
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis nilai big data dan implikasinya terhadap monopoli usaha, mengkaji perbandingan hukum persaingan usaha dan mengkaji kelemahan hukum persaingan usaha Indonesia, serta menganalisis rekonstruksi hukum Undang-Undang Larangan Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat di masa mendatang. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normatif (doktrinal) dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui kajian pustaka, analisis isi, dan studi kasus. Data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk menghasilkan informasi yang komprehensif dan menarik simpulan yang relevan. Big data memiliki kapasitas untuk memicu perilaku monopoli karena mencerminkan permintaan pasar konsumen. Namun, regulasi persaingan di Indonesia kurang dalam hal kontrol dan pengungkapan perusahaan besar yang memiliki kapasitas untuk memonopoli pasar. Hal ini disebabkan tidak adanya prinsip ex ante, seperti yang diterapkan dalam DMA, untuk mencegah praktik monopoli dan eksploitasi data pribadi. Di samping itu, asas ekstrateritorialitas perlu diperkuat dengan menerapkan doktrin akibat, seperti yang dilakukan oleh Amerika Serikat, yang memperbolehkan Indonesia mengenakan sanksi terhadap tindakan monopoli yang mengakibatkan kerugian negara, terlepas dari tindakan tersebut terjadi di luar wilayah hukumnya.
THE IMPACT OF FOOD LAW POLICIES ON LOCAL COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT IN INDONESIA’S SUSTAINABLE FOOD GARDEN PROGRAM Widyastuti, Tiyas Vika; Hamzani, Achmad Irwan; Masdurohatun, Anis
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research examines the impact of food law politics on community empowerment and sustainable agriculture in Indonesia, focusing on the Sustainable Food Garden Program (P2L). Utilizing a normative juridical analysis, it explores how legal frameworks can support or obstruct community-led agricultural initiatives. The study highlights the empowering effect of laws aligned with community goals and the challenges arising from legislation favoring industrial agriculture. It proposes legal reforms to address ambiguities and barriers, such as clarifying land tenure rights and simplifying organic certification processes. Recommendations aim to foster a legal environment conducive to sustainable, community-driven agriculture, enhancing food security and environmental sustainability. This paper contributes insights into legal and policy reforms needed to empower communities and promote sustainable agricultural practices in Indonesia.
Rupture in the Legal Hierarchy: Normative Conflicts and the Subversion of Agrarian Principles in Indonesia’s Omnibus Law Situmorang, Waldus; F. R., Mella Ismelina; Rasji, Rasji
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 14, No. 4
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article examines the normative conflict between Law No. 6 of 2023 on the Establishment of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law on Job Creation and the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), specifically within the land law cluster. Using a normative approach and the theory of derogation, the article identifies three core areas of legal inconsistency: (1) the strengthening of Land Management Rights (Hak Pengelolaan), (2) foreign ownership of apartment units, and (3) the granting of land rights in aboveground and underground spaces. These legal inconsistencies not only create normative dualism but also generate legal uncertainty and threaten the principle of the rule of law. The article discusses the legal and policy implications of this dualism and proposes pathways for harmonization, including affirming the UUPA as a lex specialis, revising sectoral laws, or filing for judicial review. The analysis ultimately seeks to reclaim coherence in Indonesia’s land governance framework amidst the rising trend of autocratic legalism in pro-investment legislation.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 6

 1 

Filter by Year

2024 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 15, No. 2 Vol. 15, No. 1 Vol. 14, No. 4 Vol. 14, No. 3 Vol. 14, No. 2 Vol. 14, No. 1 Vol. 13, No. 3 Vol. 13, No. 2 Vol. 13, No. 1 Vol. 12, No. 3 Vol. 12, No. 2 Vol. 12, No. 1 Vol. 11, No. 3 Vol. 11, No. 2 Vol. 11, No. 1 Vol. 10, No. 3 Vol. 10, No. 2 Vol. 10, No. 1 Vol. 9, No. 3 Vol. 9, No. 2 Vol. 9, No. 1 Vol. 8, No. 3 Vol. 8, No. 2 Vol. 8, No. 1 Vol. 7, No. 3 Vol. 7, No. 2 Vol. 7, No. 1 Vol. 6, No. 3 Vol. 6, No. 2 Vol. 6, No. 1 Vol. 5, No. 3 Vol. 5, No. 2 Vol. 5, No. 1 Vol. 4, No. 3 Vol. 4, No. 2 Vol. 4, No. 1 Vol. 3, No. 3 Vol. 3, No. 2 Vol. 3, No. 1 Vol. 2, No. 3 Vol. 2, No. 2 Vol. 2, No. 1 Vol. 1, No. 3 Vol. 1, No. 2 Vol. 1, No. 1 More Issue