cover
Contact Name
Murdani Abdullah
Contact Email
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Phone
+6285891498517
Journal Mail Official
ina.jghe@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Divisi Gastroenterologi, Departemen Ilmu Penyakit Dalam, FKUI/RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo, Jl. Diponegoro No. 71 Jakarta 10430 Indonesia
Location
Kota adm. jakarta pusat,
Dki jakarta
INDONESIA
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy
ISSN : 14114801     EISSN : 23028181     DOI : -
Core Subject : Health,
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Endoscopy is an academic journal which has been published since 2000 and owned by 3 Societies: The Indonesian Society of Gastroenterology; Indonesian Association for the Study of the Liver; The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy. The aim of our journal is to advance knowledge in Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy fields. We welcome authors for original articles, review articles, and case reports in the fields of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy.
Articles 771 Documents
Frequency Scale for the Symptoms of GERD Score for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Koja Hospital Suzanna Ndraha
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/112201075-78

Abstract

Background: The frequency scale for the symptoms of GERD (FSSG) was a specific questionnaire to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which has been validated against the endoscopic findings in Japan. The high score FSSG is one of the factors related to failure of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) mono therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine FSSG score in patients with GERD at Koja hospital, in order to predict the need for combination therapy of PPI with pro- kinetic drug or PPI only. Method: Dyspeptic patients which had have heartburn and/or regurgitation were collected in the period of March until July 2010. The FSSG score was obtain containing 12 questions which consisted of seven questions for reflux symptoms and five questions for dysmotility/dyspeptic symptoms. Results: There were 129 patients, 51 (39.5%) males and 78 (60.5%) females, mostly in the age group of 40 years (55.8%), body mass index of most patients (66.6%) were normal, only 12.4% were overweight. FSSG score revealed the mean of total score of 17.6 ± 6.9. From 129 dyspepsia patients who complained heartburn and or regurgitation, obtained 121 (94%) met criteria for GERD with cutoff eight. The mean of reflux score was 7.4 ± 4.6 while the mean of dyspeptic/dysmotility score was 10.1 ± 4. Thus from 129 patients studied, the symptoms of dyspeptic/dysmotility more dominant than symptoms of reflux Conclusion: GERD patients in Koja hospital have a high mean FSSG score, whereas dysmotility symptoms was proved to be more dominant than acid reflux Keywords: GERD, FSSG, dyspeptic/dysmotility score, reflux score
A Case of Covid-19 Patient Presenting with Gastrointestinal-Specific Symptoms in Indonesia Daniel Martin Simadibrata; Cleopas Martin Rumende; Rahmad Mulyadi; Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (264.939 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/2122020153-157

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease officially declared as a pandemic on 11 March 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO). Indonesia’s COVID-19 case fatality rate remain consistently high, approximately twice the global case fatality rate available. Patients typically present with fever, dry cough and dyspnea. However, there were reports of atypical COVID-19 symptoms such as myalgia, fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. These atypical presentations were suggested to indicate a more severe COVID-19. Here, we present a case of COVID-19 patient presenting with gastrointestinal-specific symptoms in Indonesia.
A Randomized Trial Comparing The Effect of Soy Protein Diet Supplement Versus Hospital Standard Supplement on Clinical and Laboratory Parameters in Malnutrition Patients Ari Fahrial Syam; Marcellus Simadibrata; Chudahman Manan; Daldiyono Hardjodisastro; Riadi Wirawan; Helsi Helsi
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/43200370-74

Abstract

Background: Studies have shown that soy protein diet may improve clinical nutrition status of malnutrition patients. Soybeans itself are unique foods because of their rich nutrient content. The complete nutrient in soybean is important and also offers many health benefits especially in malnutrition patient during hospitalization. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effect of soy protein supplement and hospital standard supplement (animal protein) on anthropometries and laboratory findings in malnutrition patients during hospitalization. Method: Forty-eight patients with malnutrition (confirmed by Body Mass Index 20 kg/m2) aged 14- 70 years old were recruited from Internal Medicine wards in Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. The study design was randomized controlled trial. The subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups were fed supplement diet contained soy protein supplement diet (40 g/d) or hospital standard supplement (40 g/d) for 2 weeks. Body weight was measured in the first day (base line data), 7-dayand 14-day after intervention. Blood and urine was collected at baseline, 7-day and 14-day for measuring transferin, prealbumin and nitrogen balance. The intake of supplement, gastrointestinal symptoms and others adverse event were noted every day. Result: From 48 subjects, there were only 32 patients that completed the study during 2 weeks. In the base line data there were no significant different for intake diet calculation, anthropometrics and laboratory  parameters in study group and control group. A total of patients 32 consist of 20 (62,5 %) female and 12 (37,5%) male with a mean age 31,8 + 12,9 years old. Anthropometrics evaluation after 1 week and 2 weeks intervention in soy protein supplement showed significantly increased every week in 2 weeks. In control group, significantly increased showed only after two weeks intervention. But there was no significantly increased of BMI of two groups. Serum transferin concentration increased from 1,489 ± 0,502 at base line to be 1,600 ± 0,502 at week 1 and to bel, 695 ± 0,402 in study group. But this increasing was no significantly between two groups. No significant differences were found between two groups for prealbumin level after 1 week and 2 weeks intervention. Nitrogen balance improved significantly (p0,05) more with soy protein supplement than hospital standard supplement (animal protein). In this study, there was no side effect in soy protein supplement diet and 1 case with diarrhea and nausea in hospital standard supplement (animal protein) Conclusion: Soy protein supplement diet improved both of nutrition parameter: anthropometrics and laboratory parameter. There were no significantly different in anthrometrics and laboratory parameter berween soy protein supplements tahan hospital standar supplement (animal protein). But nitrogen balance improved significantly in study group than control group. Substitution of soy protein for animal protein has the potential role for the patient with malnutrition Keywords: Soy protein diet, Malnutrition
Conformity between Ileoscopy Appearance with Terminal Ileum Histopathology Appearance in Normal Colonoscopy Chronic Diarrhea Patients Indra Marki; Ari Fahrial Syam; Irsan Hasan
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (122.424 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/152201488-92

Abstract

Background: Chronic diarrhea is one of the most common problem in gastroenterology cases. Ileoscopy is one of the modalities to determine the etiology of chronic diarrhea by normal colonoscopy appearance. Recently, there is still controversy in the need of this examination in normal macroscopic appearance. The aim of this study is to study the conformity of histopathology abnormalities with ileoscopy appearance in chronic diarrhea patients with normal colonoscopy.Methods: This study uses cross sectional study design by collecting 60 medical record data in several hospitals in Jakarta in the period of 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2011. Diagnostic test between ileoscopy and histopathology is performed by histopathology examination as a gold standard.Results: Study results revealed conformity between both examinations for 93.33%. Sensitivity value of ileoscopy examination compared to histopathology as a gold standard was 94%, specificity 90%, positive predictive value 97.9%, and negative predictive value 75%.Conclusion: Ileoscopy examination in chronic diarrhea patients and normal colonoscopy showed similar results with histopathology examination. Keywords: Ileoscopy, histopathology, conformity, chronic diarrhea
The Result Discrepancies between Histological and PCR Method for Detecting Helicobacter pylori in Patients with Dyspepsia due to Inappropriate Preparation before Endoscopy Maruni Wiwin Diarti; Haris Widita; Soewignjo Soemohardjo; Weny Astuti; Troef Sumarno; Yunan Jiwintarum; Zainul Mutaqin; Retno Handayani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/102200946-50

Abstract

Background: False negative result of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) detection in gastric tissue can be due to inappropriate preparation before endoscopy. The objectives of this study is to compare the result of H. pylori detection in gastric biopsy by histological method and ure C polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in patients with dyspepsia who underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy without preparations other than six hours fasting before endoscopy. Method: We obtained 156 paraffin blocks of gastric endoscopic biopsy samples, taken from antrum and corpus of patients with dyspepsia who underwent endoscopic examination at the Endoscopy Unit of Biomedika hospital, Mataram. All biopsy samples were stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin for tissue diagnosis and Giemsa stain for detecting H. pylori Ure C PCR were done on all blocks. Cag PCR were performed on all Ure C PCR positive samples. Results: Of 156 paraffin blocks, only 17 blocks (10.9%) were positive for H. pylori by histological examination. All of the 17 samples showed positive results on PCR method. Of 156 paraffin blocks, positive results were found in 73 patients (45.9%) by ure C PCR method. The PCR method has increased the positivity rates of H. pylori more than four times compared to histological method. This study showed that the rate of cag a was 63.0%. Conclusion: Ure C PCR is superior to histological examination in patients who did not stop consuming acid supressor drug and antibiotic two weeks prior to endoscopy. This phenomenon can be explained by the change of spiral form into coccoid form of H. pylori, which is hardly detected using Giemsa stain.   Keywords: Helicobacter pylori, histology, ureC, Cag a, PCR
Role of Helicobacter pylori in Damaging the Gastroduodenal Mucosa Marcellus Simadibrata
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (194.46 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/19120181-2

Abstract

Management of Autoimmune Hepatitis Supriono Supriono
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/121201150-56

Abstract

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a necroinflammatory liver disease of unknown etiology. Although the pathogenetic mechanism of AIH is still unknown, an underlying genetic predisposition and the association of the disease with certain human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) have been suggested. The molecular mimicry has been proposed as a pathogenetic mechanism for AIH. The diagnosis of AIH is based on a constellation of clinical, serological, and histopathological findings. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) proposed diagnosis criteria in 1993, which were revised in 1999. In 2008, the IAIHG decided to devise a simplified scoring system for wider applicability in routine clinical practice. Based on clinical and serological parameters, AIH cases have been categorized into three subtypes: type-1 AIH, type-2 AIH and type-3 AIH. The therapeutic guidelines of AIH include immunosuppressive agent with corticosteroid and usually in combination with azathioprine. Starting dose of prednisone monotherapy is 60 mg daily, which should be tapered slowly over a 1 week period to a maintenance dose of 20 mg daily. The other regimen is used in combination with azathioprine, prednisone dose is started at 30 mg and tapered 10 to 5 mg every week until a maintenance dose of 10 mg is achieved. Azathioprine is given at the dose of 50 mg daily. In the very few patients that do not tolerate or have significant side effects to gold standard therapy, alternative immunosuppressive drugs should be given. Other powerful immunosuppressive drugs and molecular interventions are being developed based on recent insights into pathogenic pathways, emerging pharmacologic agents, and new technologies. Keywords: autoimmune hepatitis, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management
Usefulness of semi-solid medical foods administered after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy Yusaku Kajihara
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (606.242 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/2222021130-133

Abstract

Background: Even if preoperative enteral nutrition is administered without any issues, some patients suffer from gastrointestinal symptoms (e.g., vomiting and diarrhea) after initiating gastrostomy feeding. Because of the amino acid composition and limited amount of lipids, elemental diets may reduce the risk of gastrointestinal symptoms. However, elemental diets are expensive. Semi-solid medical foods are inexpensive and more closely mimic normal physiology than elemental diets. The aim of the present study was to investigate the usefulness of semi-solid medical foods when administered after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG).Method: This retrospective study analyzed 91 patients who had PEG performed by the author who was the attending physician. All patients received preoperative enteral nutrition with liquid nutrients, and there were no instances of gastrointestinal symptoms before PEG tube placement. The types of nutrients administered after PEG were divided into three categories: semi-solid medical foods (n = 20), polymeric formulas (n = 26), and elemental diets (n = 45). The incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms was compared among the three groups.Results: No gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in the semi-solid medical foods group; the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms in the semi-solid medical foods group was significantly lower than that of the polymeric formulas group [0% vs. 26.9% (7/26), p 0.05] and was similar to that of the elemental diets group [0% vs. 2.2% (1/45), p = 1].Conclusion: If preoperative enteral nutrition is administered without any issues, semi-solid medical foods are useful as nutrients administered after PEG tube placement.
Leptospirosis and Pancreatitis Complication Diany N Taher; Murdani Abdullah; Marcellus Simadibrata; Herdiman T Pohan
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24871/61200527-30

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a wide-spread zoonosis in the world, especially in the tropical countries. Ninety percent of cases are characterized by abrupt fever and have good prognosis, but in 10% of cases, exacerbation will occur and the mortality rate is about 10%. Leptospirosis may strike the entire organ, including gastrointestinal tract. Pancreatitis in leptospira is characterized by increased serum amylase levels, with mean values of five times normal. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment will engender good prognosis. Treatment of acute pancreatitis caused by leptospira is similar with other acute pancreatitis treatment caused by other agents. The pathophysiology of leptospira infection includes endotoxin, hemolysis and lipase. Keywords: Leptospirosis, pancreatitis, diagnosis
Hepatic Stellate Cells and Liver Disease Rino Alvani Gani
The Indonesian Journal of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Digestive Endoscopy Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015
Publisher : The Indonesian Society for Digestive Endoscopy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (379.342 KB) | DOI: 10.24871/162201565-66

Abstract

-

Page 8 of 78 | Total Record : 771


Filter by Year

2000 2025


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 26, No 2 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 2, AGUSTUS, 2025 Vol 26, No 1 (2025): VOLUME 26, NUMBER 1, April, 2025 Vol 25, No 3 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 3, December, 2024 Vol 25, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 2, August, 2024 Vol 25, No 1 (2024): VOLUME 25, NUMBER 1, April, 2024 Vol 24, No 3 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 3, December, 2023 Vol 24, No 2 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 2, August, 2023 Vol 24, No 1 (2023): VOLUME 24, NUMBER 1, April, 2023 Vol 23, No 3 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 3, December 2022 Vol 23, No 2 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 2, August 2022 Vol 23, No 1 (2022): VOLUME 23, NUMBER 1, April 2022 Vol 22, No 3 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 3, December 2021 Vol 22, No 2 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 2, August 2021 Vol 22, No 1 (2021): VOLUME 22, NUMBER 1, April 2021 Vol 21, No 3 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 3, December 2020 Vol 21, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 2, August 2020 Vol 21, No 1 (2020): VOLUME 21, NUMBER 1, April 2020 Vol 20, No 3 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 3, December 2019 Vol 20, No 2 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 2, August 2019 Vol 20, No 1 (2019): VOLUME 20, NUMBER 1, April 2019 Vol 19, No 3 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 3, December 2018 Vol 19, No 2 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 2, August 2018 Vol 19, No 1 (2018): VOLUME 19, NUMBER 1, April 2018 Vol 18, No 3 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 3, DECEMBER 2017 Vol 18, No 2 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 2, AUGUST 2017 Vol 18, No 1 (2017): VOLUME 18, NUMBER 1, April 2017 Vol 17, No 3 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 3, December 2016 Vol 17, No 2 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 2, August 2016 Vol 17, No 1 (2016): VOLUME 17, NUMBER 1, April 2016 Vol 16, No 3 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 3, December 2015 Vol 16, No 2 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2, August 2015 Vol 16, No 1 (2015): VOLUME 16, NUMBER 1, April 2015 Vol 15, No 3 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 3, December 2014 Vol 15, No 2 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 2, August 2014 Vol 15, No 1 (2014): VOLUME 15, NUMBER 1, April 2014 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 3, December 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 2, August 2013 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 1, April 2013 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 3, Desember 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 2, August 2012 VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, April 2012 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 3, December 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 2, August 2011 VOLUME 12, NUMBER 1, April 2011 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 3, December 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 2, August 2010 VOLUME 11, NUMBER 1, April 2010 VOLUME 10, NUMBER 3, December 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 2, August 2009 VOLUME 10, ISSUE 1, April 2009 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 3, December 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 2, August 2008 VOLUME 9, ISSUE 1, April 2008 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 3, December 2007 VOLUME 8 ISSUE 2 August 2007 VOLUME 8, ISSUE 1, April 2007 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 3, December 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 2, August 2006 VOLUME 7, ISSUE 1, April 2006 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 3, December 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 2, August 2005 VOLUME 6, ISSUE 1, April 2005 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3, December 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 2, August 2004 VOLUME 5, ISSUE 1, April 2004 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 3, December 2003 VOLUME 4, ISSUE 2, August 2003 VOLUME 4, NUMBER 1, April 2003 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 3, December 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 2, August 2002 VOLUME 3, NUMBER 1, April 2002 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 3, December 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 2, August 2001 VOLUME 2, NUMBER 1, April 2001 VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1, December 2000 More Issue