cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Unang arifin
Contact Email
bcssel@unisba.ac.id
Phone
+6281224131431
Journal Mail Official
bcssel@unisba.ac.id
Editorial Address
UPT Publikasi Ilmiah, Universitas Islam Bandung. Jl. Tamansari No. 20, Bandung 40116, Indonesia, Tlp +62 22 420 3368, +62 22 426 3895 ext. 6891
Location
Kota bandung,
Jawa barat
INDONESIA
Bandung Conference Series : Sharia Economic Law
Published by Universitas Islam Bandung
ISSN : -     EISSN : 28282264     DOI : https://doi.org/10.29313/bcssel.v2i2
Core Subject : Religion, Economy,
Religion Economics, Econometrics & Finance
Bandung Conference Series Sharia Economic Law (BCSSEL) menerbitkan artikel penelitian akademik tentang kajian teoritis dan terapan serta berfokus pada ekonomi syariah dengan ruang lingkup yaitu Perbankan Syariah, Keuangan Syariah, Akuntansi, Muamalah. Prosiding ini diterbitkan oleh UPT Publikasi Ilmiah Unisba. Artikel yang dikirimkan ke prosiding ini akan diproses secara online dan menggunakan double blind review minimal oleh dua orang mitra bebestari yang ahli dalam bidangnya.
Arjuna Subject : Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (semua kategori) - Bisnis, Menejemen, dan Akutansi (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "149-156" : 1 Documents clear
Keabsahan Akad Endorsement Intagram: Kajian Ijarah dan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata Nazwa Divalya Raya Gunadi; Panji Adam Agus Putra; Ira Siti Rohmah Maulida
Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law 149-156
Publisher : UNISBA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29313/bcssel.v6i2.25061

Abstract

Abstract. The rapid growth of social media, particularly Instagram, has produced a new digital-marketing phenomenon in the form of endorsement services offered by influencers, most of which are arranged informally without written agreements, raising legal issues concerning contract validity, object clarity, and certainty of compensation. This study analyzes the endorsement practice of the Instagram account @selebgram_X from the perspective of fiqh muamalah, particularly the ijarah contract, and from the perspective of Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), then compares the conformity between both perspectives. A qualitative descriptive-analytical case-study method was used, with data obtained through in-depth interviews with the account owner, content observation, and documentation of the rate card and Terms and Conditions. The findings show the practice is partially compliant with both legal systems: the pillars of ijarah are substantively fulfilled, yet conditions such as content display duration, halal verification of skincare products, and formal valuation of bartered ujrah remain unmet. The subjective requirements of Article 1320 are met, while the objective requirements need improvement. Both systems are complementary, converging on clarity, voluntariness, and fairness, and harmonization can be pursued through more comprehensive written agreements and consistent disclosure of paid content. Abstrak. Perkembangan media sosial, khususnya Instagram, melahirkan fenomena baru dalam pemasaran digital berupa praktik jasa endorsement oleh influencer yang umumnya dilakukan secara informal tanpa perjanjian tertulis, sehingga menimbulkan persoalan hukum terkait keabsahan akad, kejelasan objek, dan kepastian kompensasi. Penelitian ini menganalisis praktik endorsement pada akun Instagram @selebgram_X dari perspektif fikih muamalah, khususnya akad ijarah, serta dari perspektif Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata, kemudian mengomparasikan kesesuaian kedua perspektif tersebut. Penelitian menggunakan metode kualitatif deskriptif-analisis dengan pendekatan studi kasus. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam dengan pemilik akun, observasi konten, serta dokumentasi rate card dan Terms and Conditions (TNC). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan praktik endorsement @selebgram_X bersifat partially compliant terhadap kedua sistem hukum. Rukun ijarah terpenuhi secara substantif, namun sejumlah syarat seperti durasi tayang konten, verifikasi kehalalan produk skincare, dan penyetaraan nilai ujrah barter belum terpenuhi optimal sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan gharar. Dari perspektif KUHPerdata, syarat subjektif terpenuhi, sedangkan syarat objektif, terutama kejelasan objek perjanjian, memerlukan penyempurnaan. Kedua sistem hukum terbukti bersifat komplementer, sama-sama menghendaki kejelasan, kesukarelaan, dan keadilan, sehingga harmonisasi dapat ditempuh melalui penyusunan perjanjian tertulis yang lebih komprehensif dan penerapan disclosure konten berbayar secara konsisten.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 1

 1 

Filter by Year

0000


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Bandung Conference Series: Sharia Economic Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): Sharia Economic Law 345-354 337-344 329-336 319-328 313-318 305-312 297-304 287-296 277-286 269-276 261-268 253-260 245-252 237-244 229-236 219-228 209-218 199-208 191-198 183-190 175-182 167-174 157-166 149-156 141-148 131-140 123-130 115-122 107-114 99-106 89-98 81-88 73-80 65-72 57-64 49-56 41-48 More Issue