cover
Contact Name
Dwi Sulisworo
Contact Email
sulisworo@iistr.org
Phone
+6281328387777
Journal Mail Official
jgi@journal.iistr.org
Editorial Address
Jalan Sugeng Jeroni No.36 Gedongkiwo Mantrijeron Yogyakarta 55142 Indonesia
Location
Kota yogyakarta,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Jurnal Genesis Indonesia
ISSN : 29625750     EISSN : 29621666     DOI : https://doi.org/10.56741/jgi
Jurnal Genesis Indonesia is a journal managed by The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research. True to its name: Genesis, which means "beginning of formation", this journal is aimed at students, as well as young researchers and young professionals. This journal covers various scopes, from education, management, economics, engineering, technology, to health. Authors are encouraged to submit submissions, whether in English or Indonesian Language.
Arjuna Subject : Umum - Umum
Articles 82 Documents
Industry-Academe-Government Partnership: Effects on Business Faculty Competencies in Higher Education Institutions Crisola Lee Lita
Jurnal Genesis Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 03 (2026): Articles in Press - Jurnal Genesis Indonesia
Publisher : The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56741/IISTR.jgi.002389

Abstract

This study examines the influence of industry, academe and government partnerships on the teaching competencies of business faculty in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Camarines Sur, Philippines. Anchored on Experiential Learning Theory and the Triple Helix Model, the research investigates how faculty engagement with industry translates into instructional innovation, industry alignment, and research productivity. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed, integrating quantitative data from 73 faculty respondents and qualitative insights from 12 academic leaders. Descriptive findings reveal that faculty predominantly adopt interactive and learner-centered teaching strategies, reflecting a shift toward experiential pedagogy. Statistical results demonstrates that abstract conceptualization and reflective observation significantly predict instructional innovation, while reflective observation alone predicts industry alignment and research productivity. Notably, concrete experience and active experimentation were not statistically significant predictors, indicating that exposure alone does not ensure competency development. Qualitative findings corroborate that reflection and institutional support are critical in transforming experience into meaningful outcomes. The study concludes that industry partnerships become effective only when integrated with structured reflection and supported by institutional systems, highlighting the need for policy-driven, equitable, and sustainable collaboration frameworks.
Beyond Formal Wellness Programs: Informal Social and Spiritual Resources in Employee Well-Being at a Philippine Higher Education Institution Ma. Francia Dechavez; Maria Joy Casano Iglesia
Jurnal Genesis Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 03 (2026): Articles in Press - Jurnal Genesis Indonesia
Publisher : The Indonesian Institute of Science and Technology Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56741/IISTR.jgi.002443

Abstract

Employee well-being programs are commonly evaluated according to the activities institutions formally provide. Such an approach may overlook resources that employees develop through everyday relationships, personal meaning, and support beyond formal organizational arrangements. This study examined employee well-being in a Philippine higher education institution, focusing particularly on an apparent mismatch between employees’ reported well-being and the institution’s formal wellness provision. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. The quantitative phase involved 215 regular teaching and non-teaching employees who completed a validated survey assessing physical, emotional, social, and spiritual well-being and institutional well-being activities. The qualitative phase involved semi-structured interviews with 10 purposively selected employees, followed by thematic analysis. Quantitative findings showed high overall well-being (M = 3.42), driven particularly by social (M = 3.73) and spiritual well-being (M = 3.67), whereas physical (M = 3.06) and emotional well-being (M = 3.20) were moderate. This pattern contrasted with the institutional provision: formal activities were perceived as predominantly physical, while structured social, emotional, and spiritual initiatives were less developed or less consistent. Qualitative findings helped explain this paradox. Employees described supportive collegial relationships even in the absence of systematic social programs and reported finding spiritual resources outside formal institutional provision. Conversely, participation in physical activities was constrained by workload and scheduling despite their greater institutional visibility. These findings suggest that employee well-being cannot be inferred directly from the number or visibility of formal wellness activities. Informal relational resources and extra-institutional sources of meaning may substantially complement formal provision. Higher education institutions should therefore strengthen formal support without displacing the informal social relationships and personally meaningful resources that already sustain employees.