cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Siti Rohmah
Contact Email
sitirohmah@ub.ac.id
Phone
+6285979555105
Journal Mail Official
pjls@peradabanpublishing.com
Editorial Address
Vila Bukit Tidar Blok E2 No 163-164 Karang Besuki Sukun, Kota Malang Postal Code 65149
Location
Kota malang,
Jawa timur
INDONESIA
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society
Published by Pustaka Peradaban
ISSN : 28301757     EISSN : 28301757     DOI : 10.59001
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society (PJLS) is an open access and peer reviewed journal provides space for studies in the field of law and its various aspects in society. PJLS is committed to being an important resource in the study of academics and practitioners as well as researchers in the world regarding the field of law. PJLS encourages discussion of all branches of law, with a view to promoting an understanding of law, both in theory and practice, from a juridical perspective, its history and its relation to other social sciences. This may include but is not limited to areas such as: civil law, criminal law, constitutional and administrative law, Islamic law, customary law, international law, governance of legal pluralism, and other sections related to contemporary issues in legal scholarship. and its relationship to social development.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 44 Documents
 1   2   3   4   5 
Rethinking Same-Sex Marriage in the Global South: A Postcolonial Critique of Human Rights Universalism Tohari, Ilham; Zulkarnain, Muhammad Sulthon
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59001/pjls.v4i1.354

Abstract

This article explores the influence of global political will on the legalization of same-sex marriage in Third World countries, using a postcolonial and decolonial theoretical framework. By engaging with the critical perspectives of Talal Asad and Frantz Fanon, it examines how international human rights norms—particularly those framed by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)—are often promoted as universal values rooted in Western liberal-secular traditions. The article argues that such norms, when imposed without sensitivity to local histories, cultures, and legal traditions, risk reproducing colonial patterns of epistemic domination. Asad critiques secularism as a hegemonic discourse that erases religious and communal legal frameworks, while Fanon identifies the persistence of colonial power through normative violence embedded in global law. The article calls for a dialogical and pluralistic approach to the globalization of human rights—one that respects normative sovereignty, acknowledges epistemic diversity, and avoids reducing justice to legal conformity with Western models.
Analisis Yuridis Wakaf Tanah Negara dalam Perspektif Hukum Agraria dan Hukum Wakaf Herlindah, Herlindah; Medaline, Onny; Maulana, Iqbal; Daud, Azzam Hasan
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59001/pjls.v4i1.474

Abstract

Waqf, as an instrument for the distribution of wealth in Islam, necessitates full ownership by the waqif over the dedicated asset, as stipulated in Article 1, Paragraph 1 of Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf. This establishes that a valid element of waqf is the asset being legally owned by the waqif. However, Article 11 of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning Regulation Number 2 of 2017 concerning Procedures for Waqf Land Registration stipulates that Waqf Land on State Land that has not been previously encumbered with any Land Right shall be registered as Waqf Land under the nazhir's name. Yet, within the National Agrarian Law system, the state only possesses public control over land and does not hold private ownership of State Land. Although the state is not explicitly mentioned as a waqif, the state's action, (as if) acting as a waqif, conceptually raises legal issues. This research analyzes the norm conflict regarding waqf of State Land from the perspectives of Agrarian Law and Waqf Law in Indonesia. It employs a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis concludes that waqf of State Land without a prior concrete legal relationship with a legal subject as the waqif contradicts the principle of State Control Rights and the fundamental waqf principle of al-tamlik qabla al-tabarru’ (ownership before donation/waqf). This can lead to the non-fulfillment of waqf validity requirements. Therefore, it is necessary to pursue a mechanism for granting land ownership rights to qualified socio-religious legal entities to act as the waqif, followed by the waqf process. Wakaf, sebagai instrumen distribusi harta dalam Islam, mensyaratkan adanya kepemilikan penuh dari pihak wakif atas objek yang diwakafkan sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1 angka 1 Undang-Undang Nomor 41 Tahun 2004 tentang Wakaf. Bahwa salah satu unsur sahnya wakaf adalah harta benda yang dimiliki secara sah oleh Wakif. Namun, dalam Pasal 11 Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 2 Tahun 2017 Tentang Tata Cara Pendaftaran Tanah Wakaf mengatur bahwa Tanah Wakaf atas Tanah Negara yang belum pernah dilekati dengan sesuatu Hak atas Tanah didaftarkan menjadi Tanah Wakaf atas nama Nazhir. Padahal dalam sistem Hukum Agraria Nasional, negara hanya berwenang menguasai tanah secara publik dan tidak memiliki secara keperdataan atas Tanah Negara. Meskipun tidak disebutkan secara eksplisit negara sebagai wakif, tindakan negara (seolah) sebagai wakif, secara konseptual menimbulkan persoalan. Penelitian ini menganalisis konflik norma tentang wakaf tanah yang berstatus tanah negara dalam perspektif Hukum Agraria dan Hukum Wakaf di Indonesia, menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil analisis menyimpulkan bahwa wakaf atas Tanah Negara tanpa lebih dulu adanya hubungan hukum kongkrit dengan subjek hukum sebagai wakif  bertentangan dengan prinsip Hak Menguasai Negara dan Prinsip dasar wakaf, al-tamlik qabla al-tabarru’ (pemilikan sebelum hibah/wakaf). Hal ini dapat menimbulkan konsekuensi tidak terpenuhinya syarat sahnya wakaf. Oleh karena itu, perlu ditempuh mekanisme pemberian hak milik atas tanah kepada badan hukum sosial keagamaan yang memenuhi syarat untuk menjadi wakif yang kemudian dilanjutkan dengan proses wakaf.
Integrating Sufi Education into Judicial Ethics: Strengthening Integrity among Religious Court Judges in Indonesia Galib, Andi Muhammad; Kholish, Moh. Anas; Matlail Fajar, Abbas Sofwan
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59001/pjls.v4i1.489

Abstract

This study addresses the challenge of maintaining integrity and judicial ethics in Indonesia’s Religious Courts, which are often threatened by social, political, and economic pressures. In response to the modern crisis of spirituality, Sufi education offers a prophetic paradigm that emphasizes purification of the soul, honesty, and justice as divine orientations. This research, based on library study of classical and contemporary Sufi literature alongside legal regulations on judicial ethics, argues that Sufi education provides a spiritual foundation for strengthening judges’ moral integrity and professional ethics. The findings reveal that the internalization of teachings such as tazkiyat al-nafs, muraqabah, and ihsan can enhance ethical awareness, foster judicial independence, and reduce the risk of abuse of authority. Rather than replacing formal codes of ethics, Sufi education complements them with a deeper spiritual framework. The study recommends integrating Sufi educational modules into judicial training and continuous professional development. Its novelty lies in framing Sufi education not merely as private spirituality but as an institutional instrument for building a clean, dignified, and just Religious Court system in Indonesia. Penelitian ini membahas tantangan menjaga integritas dan etika peradilan di Pengadilan Agama Indonesia yang kerap terancam oleh tekanan sosial, politik, dan ekonomi. Di tengah krisis spiritualitas modern, pendidikan tasawuf menawarkan paradigma profetik yang menekankan pensucian jiwa, kejujuran, dan keadilan sebagai orientasi ilahiah. Dengan menggunakan metode studi pustaka terhadap literatur tasawuf klasik dan kontemporer serta regulasi hukum terkait kode etik hakim, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa pendidikan tasawuf dapat menjadi fondasi spiritual untuk memperkuat integritas moral dan etika profesional hakim. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa internalisasi ajaran seperti tazkiyat al-nafs, muraqabah, dan ihsan mampu meningkatkan kesadaran etis, menumbuhkan independensi peradilan, dan meminimalisasi potensi penyalahgunaan kewenangan. Pendidikan tasawuf tidak dimaksudkan menggantikan kode etik formal, melainkan melengkapinya dengan kerangka spiritual yang lebih mendalam. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan integrasi modul pendidikan tasawuf dalam pelatihan calon hakim maupun pengembangan profesional berkelanjutan. Kebaruan penelitian terletak pada argumentasi bahwa pendidikan tasawuf bukan sekadar urusan spiritualitas privat, tetapi juga instrumen institusional untuk membangun peradilan agama yang bersih, bermartabat, dan berkeadilan.
Pembaruan Hukum Keluarga Islam di Indonesia: Analisis Produk Hukum Mahkamah Agung tentang Hak-Hak Istri dan Anak Pasca Perceraian Fauzi, Anwar
Peradaban Journal of Law and Society Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Pustaka Peradaban

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59001/pjls.v4i1.493

Abstract

The implementation of post-divorce rights for wives and children in Indonesia continues to face significant challenges, marked by a persistent gap between legal provisions and practical enforcement, with limited court rulings that fully guarantee these rights. This article aims to analyze the reform of Islamic family law in Indonesia and to compare the substance of post-divorce rights as regulated in statutory legislation with those articulated through the legal instruments of the Supreme Court. Employing a normative-comparative approach, this study finds that the Supreme Court has substantially reformed legal norms concerning post-divorce rights through various instruments—including Supreme Court Regulations (PERMA) and Circular Letters (SEMA)—issued between 2017 and 2022. These reforms, which include stricter obligations for payment prior to the pronouncement of divorce (ikrar talak), provisions for non-custodial parental access, more equitable considerations of economic capacity in determining financial support, and the introduction of enforcement mechanisms such as asset seizures for child support, reflect the Supreme Court’s ijtihad in alignment with the principles of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah as well as contemporary concerns of gender justice and human rights. This study contributes to mapping the dynamics and direction of Islamic family law reform in Indonesia, highlighting the strategic role of the Supreme Court in ensuring protection and legal certainty. Implementasi hak-hak istri dan anak pasca perceraian di Indonesia masih menghadapi tantangan serius, ditandai oleh kesenjangan antara ketentuan hukum dan praktik di lapangan, dengan minimnya putusan pengadilan yang menjamin pemenuhan hak-hak tersebut. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis potret pembaruan hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia dan membandingkan substansi hak-hak istri dan anak pasca perceraian dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dengan produk hukum Mahkamah Agung. Menggunakan pendekatan normatif-komparatif, studi ini menemukan bahwa Mahkamah Agung telah secara signifikan memperbarui kaidah hukum terkait hak-hak pasca perceraian melalui berbagai produk hukumnya (Peraturan Mahkamah Agung/PERMA dan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung/SEMA) sejak 2017 hingga 2022. Pembaruan ini, yang mencakup kewajiban pembayaran yang lebih tegas sebelum ikrar talak, hak akses orang tua non-hak asuh, pertimbangan kemampuan ekonomi yang lebih adil dalam penentuan nafkah, serta mekanisme jaminan pemenuhan hak (seperti sita jaminan untuk nafkah anak), merefleksikan ijtihad Mahkamah Agung yang selaras dengan prinsip maqasid al-syariah serta isu-isu keadilan gender dan hak asasi manusia. Penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam memetakan dinamika dan arah pembaruan hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia, menyoroti peran strategis Mahkamah Agung dalam memberikan perlindungan dan kepastian hukum.

Page 5 of 5 | Total Record : 44

 1   2   3   4   5 

Filter by Year

2022 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025) Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022)