cover
Contact Name
Mochammad Fahlevi
Contact Email
admin@privietlab.org
Phone
+6281211598747
Journal Mail Official
admin@privietlab.org
Editorial Address
Menara Prima Lantai 29 Jl. DR. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung, RT.5/RW.2, Kuningan, Kuningan Tim., Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12950
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Priviet Social Sciences Journal
Published by PRIVIETLAB
ISSN : 2798866X     EISSN : 27986314     DOI : 10.55942/pssj
PSSJ: Priviet Social Sciences Journal is an open access, monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by PRIVIETLAB. It provides an avenue to academicians, researchers, managers and others to publish their research work that contributes to the knowledge and theory of Social Sciences. PSSJ is published twelve a year. Publisher of Open Access Journals & Books designed to make it easy for worldwide researchers to discover leading-edge scientific research. Working closely with the global scientific community has been at the heart of our book and journal publishing activity. With a portfolio including journals, books, conference proceedings, we focus on Social Sciences and many more. PRIVIETLAB also publishes on behalf of other scientific organizations and represents their needs and those of their members. With worldwide impact, we support researchers, librarians and societies in their endeavours. PRIVIETLAB is an international center for supporting distinguished researchers, teachers, scholars and students who are researching various areas of Business, Science, and Technology. PRIVIETLAB wishes to provide good chances for academic and industry professionals to discuss recent progress in various areas of Business, Science, and Technology. PRIVIETLAB organizes many international conferences, symposia and workshops every year, and provides sponsor or technical support to researchers who wish to organize their own conferences and workshops.
Articles 1,187 Documents
The role of land deed officials or Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) in preventing agricultural land ownership exceeding the maximum area limit Faizal Achmad; Chandra Maharani; Agus Agus; Elvita Rossyana; Tamara Mutiara
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2049

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of land deed officials or Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) in preventing agricultural land ownership from exceeding the maximum limit under national agrarian regulations, which still faces obstacles regarding ownership inequality and weak control over land rights transactions. The main problem lies in the ineffective legal instruments and the lack of supervision over the transfer of land rights, which can potentially lead to excessive land ownership by a few individuals. Using an empirical juridical approach, this study combines a normative analysis of laws and regulations with in-depth interviews with PPATs/Notaries in the Kubu Raya Regency. This study collected primary data from informants and secondary data from legal literature and regulatory documents. The results show that PPATs play a strategic role in ensuring compliance with the principle of legality and land ownership limits. However, their effectiveness is still limited by regulatory constraints, the lack of an integrated national land ownership database, and poor coordination among government agencies. The study concludes that strengthening the legal framework, increasing supervision, and integrating land data are crucial steps to support fair land governance and accelerate agrarian reforms. These points also serve as the main recommendations for future studies.
Communication network patterns among hexahelix actors in creative economy development in Bogor Regency Muhammad Fazrah; Robby Firliandoko; Maria Fitriah
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2070

Abstract

The creative economy sector has mutated into a strategic pillar for boosting macro and micro economic growth at the regional level. This study aims to analyze in depth the communication network patterns among actors in the hexahelix model collaboration through the Creative Economy Committee or Komite Kabupaten Bogor Ekonomi Kreatif (Kabekraf) in Bogor Regency, with an exclusive focus on mapping the flow of message exchange in the field. Utilizing a descriptive qualitative method, the unit of analysis focuses on the communication relationship patterns established between Kabekraf management representatives and other hexahelix actors, including government, academia, business actors, and communities. Data collection techniques were realized through in-depth interviews and a comprehensive documentation study. Data analysis in this study applies the Miles and Huberman interactive model, which includes data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. Research results indicate that the communication network structure positions Kabekraf as a central hub (node) that bridges cross-sectoral relational dynamics. Communication network patterns in the field materialize in three main operational forms: an adaptive vertical flow based on digital platforms, a horizontal flow among parallel elements showing a well-established level of organic independence, and a cross-functional diagonal flow capable of dismantling conventional bureaucratic barriers while stimulating strategic program innovations Keywords: communication network patterns, creative economy, hexahelix collaboration, organizational communication, stakeholder communication
A Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) of ChatGPT’s responses to English grammar learning queries Aleesa Salaeh; Anis Maming; Hameedah Haeweasani; Janice Manangki Sebastian; Aaron Dj Panggilawan Pontongadil; Tsania Malfiya; Vadia Fika Munida; Dewi Puspitasari
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2088

Abstract

This study investigates how ChatGPT constructs knowledge, authority, and pedagogical discourse when responding to English grammar learning queries. While generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly adopted in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) and English Education contexts, existing literature heavily favors technical efficacy and immediate pedagogical utility over critical examination of AI-generated content. To address this research gap, this study applies Norman Fairclough’s Three-Dimensional Framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) to scrutinize ten purposively sampled ChatGPT-4o responses to common English grammar learning queries (e.g., tense distinctions, passive voice mechanics, and article usage). Textual analysis reveals a pervasive reliance on high-affinity epistemic modality and imperative syntactical structures, positioning the AI as an absolute, objective authority rather than an assistive digital tool. Discursive practice analysis indicates that ChatGPT synthesizes standard prescriptive grammar textbooks while masking institutional authorship and algorithmic biases through naturalized, conversational interactions. At the level of social practice, this discourse reinforces traditional, Monolingual Anglo-centric linguistic norms and perpetuates deficit-based framing of EFL learners, undermining contemporary critical pedagogy that values linguistic diversity and translanguaging. The findings underscore the necessity for "Critical AI Literacy" among pre-service teachers and language learners to deconstruct the neutralized power dynamics and hidden ideologies embedded within algorithmic educational discourse.
Beyond participation in community-based waste management: A study of co-production in Tanjungpinang, Indonesia Mohd. Haiqal Haziq; Imam Yudhi Prastya; Dian Prima Safitri
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2112

Abstract

Waste management is a major challenge in delivering sustainable public services, particularly in archipelagic regions with limited infrastructure. The waste bank program was developed as an initiative to reduce waste generation while promoting community participation in waste management. However, existing studies on waste banks have primarily focused on policy implementation, community empowerment, and economic benefits, whereas research adopting a coproduction perspective remains relatively limited. This study aims to analyze the implementation of co-production in waste management through the waste bank program in Tanjungpinang City and identify the factors that facilitate and hinder its implementation. A qualitative approach with a case study design was used. Data were collected through observations, in-depth interviews, and document analysis involving the Tanjungpinang City Environmental Agency, Waste Bank managers, community members, and private sector representatives. The data were analyzed using NVivo 12 Plus through data reduction, display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that the implementation of co-production involves multiple stakeholders; however, community participation has not yet been optimal across all stages of service delivery. The established collaboration has generated environmental, social, and economic benefits, including waste reduction, increased public awareness, and the creation of economic values. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of co-production remains constrained by limited community participation, inadequate facilities and infrastructure, weak coordination among stakeholders, and uneven dissemination of waste management education. This study highlights that the waste bank program represents a form of co-produced public service that fosters collaboration between the government and the community to achieve more effective and sustainable waste management.
Contextual bureaucratic reform towards golden Indonesia 2045: Enhancing adaptive capacity in the VUCA era Bonataon Maruli Timothy Vincent Simandjorang
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2119

Abstract

Indonesia’s Bureaucratic reform or Reformasi Birokrasi (RB) must move beyond administrative compliance and index-based achievement toward a contextual model capable of responding to Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, and Ambiguity (VUCA). This study examines the adaptive capacity of government institutions and formulates policy directions to support the Grand Design of National Bureaucratic Reform 2025–2045 and Vision of Golden Indonesia 2045. The policy paper applies the Adaptive Capacity Wheel developed by Gupta et al. (2008), covering six dimensions and 22 criteria, within a sequential exploratory mixed-method design. Data were collected in April 2026 through interviews, observations, document analysis, expert judgement, and stakeholder assessment involving experts and stakeholders across the Ministry of National Development Planning or Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional (Bappenas), the Province of West Nusa Tenggara or Nusa Tenggara Barat (NTB), and the Regency of Bima. The results show different levels of institutional readiness in the three countries. Bappenas achieved an adaptive capacity score of 1.17, indicating a positive institutional effect supported by strong leadership, diverse perspectives, and fair governance. The NTB scored 0.79, classified as slightly positive, with strengths in learning capacity and accountability but limitations in operational flexibility, cross-sector coordination, and resource allocation. Bima scored 0.29, which is also slightly positive, reflecting basic institutional foundations but weaknesses in leadership, resources, and policy experimentation. The findings demonstrate that improvements in the RB Index do not automatically translate into strong adaptive capacity. Therefore, RB should adopt differentiated strategies, institutionalize organizational learning, strengthen cross-agency delivery mechanisms, integrate evidence and digital governance, and link reform performance to measurable public and development outcomes.
Oliver Quick’s upward social mobility and the struggle for cultural recognition in Emerald Fennell’s Saltburn (2023): A sociological study Indragiy Firzatulloh
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2131

Abstract

This study investigates the representation of Oliver Quick's upward social mobility and his struggle for cultural recognition in Saltburn (2023), directed by Emerald Fennell. Two research questions guide the analysis: (1) how is Oliver's upward social mobility represented in the film, and (2) how do cultural capital, habitus, and symbolic violence shape his mobility and negotiation of elite social space? Using Sorokin's (1927) theory of social mobility and Bourdieu's (1984) and Bourdieu's (1986) concepts of cultural capital, habitus, and symbolic violence, this study applies qualitative textual and cinematic analysis to examine dialogue, characterization, and visual elements such as framing, costume, and aspect ratio. The analysis identifies three interconnected phases of Oliver's mobility: Oxford as an institutional gateway that grants access without legitimacy, the Saltburn estate as a site of persistent symbolic exclusion enacted through everyday domestic ritual, and Oliver's strategic self-positioning through fabricated narratives and calculated manipulation, fully disclosed only in the film's closing montage. These findings are not merely isolated incidents but manifestations of the cultural and symbolic logic that governs entry into the elite British social space. The study concludes that Saltburn frames social mobility not as a meritocratic achievement but as a sustained struggle for cultural and symbolic legitimacy, in which recognition—understood through Bourdieu's (1990) concept of misrecognition rather than as simple elite acceptance—is granted only to those whose self-presentation is read as authentic rather than strategic.
Register features in Formula One motorsport commentary: A study of the 2021 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix Alif Rafsanjani; Adam Damanhuri
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.2136

Abstract

This study examines the register features used in the English commentary of the Formula One Abu Dhabi Grand Prix 2021. Despite the growing body of research on sports discourse, Formula One commentary remains underexplored from a register perspective, particularly in relation to the linguistic features that characterize live motorsport broadcasting. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the study analyzes English-language commentary from the official Formula One broadcast using the Register-Functional framework proposed by Biber et al. (2022). The findings indicate that the commentary belongs to the Spoken Broadcast Commentary register and is realized through four register features: technical, descriptive, evaluative, and expressive. Technical features are the most frequent, reflecting the commentators' need to communicate specialized racing terminology, strategies, and regulations accurately during live broadcasts. Descriptive features narrate unfolding race events, while evaluative and expressive features are employed selectively to emphasize decisive moments and convey the significance of key developments. These findings demonstrate how different register features work together to fulfill the communicative demands of live Formula One commentary, extending the application of register analysis to motorsport discourse and contributing to the broader study of language variation in sports broadcasting.

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026 Vol. 6 No. 7 (2026): July 2026 Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026 Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): May 2026 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): April 2026 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): March 2026 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): February 2026 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026 Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025 Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025 Vol. 5 No. 10 (2025): October 2025 Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025 Vol. 5 No. 8 (2025): August 2025 Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): July 2025 Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): May 2025 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): April 2025 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): March 2025 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): February 2025 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January 2025 Vol. 4 No. 12 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 4 No. 11 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 4 No. 10 (2024): October 2024 Vol. 4 No. 9 (2024): September 2024 Vol. 4 No. 8 (2024): August 2024 Vol. 4 No. 7 (2024): July 2024 Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): May 2024 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): April 2024 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): March 2024 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): February 2024 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January 2024 Vol. 3 No. 12 (2023): December 2023 Vol. 3 No. 11 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 3 No. 10 (2023): October 2023 Vol. 3 No. 9 (2023): September 2023 Vol. 3 No. 8 (2023): August 2023 Vol. 3 No. 7 (2023): July 2023 Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): May 2023 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): April 2023 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): March 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): February 2023 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): January 2023 Vol. 2 No. 12 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 2 No. 11 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 2 No. 10 (2022): October 2022 Vol. 2 No. 9 (2022): September 2022 Vol. 2 No. 8 (2022): August 2022 Vol. 2 No. 7 (2022): July 2022 Vol. 2 No. 6 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 2 No. 5 (2022): May 2022 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): April 2022 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): March 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): September 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): February 2022 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): January Vol. 1 No. 6 (2021): December Vol. 1 No. 5 (2021): November Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): October Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): September Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): August Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): July More Issue