cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Andri Winjaya
Contact Email
jurnalhukumunissula@gmail.com
Phone
+6281325035773
Journal Mail Official
jurnalhukumunissula@gmail.com
Editorial Address
Jalan Kaligawe Raya KM.4, Terboyo Kulon, Genuk, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia, 50112
Location
Kota semarang,
Jawa tengah
INDONESIA
JURNAL HUKUM
Published by Universitas Islam Sultan Agung
ISSN : 14122723     EISSN : 27236668     DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/jh
Core Subject : Religion, Humanities, Social,
Religion Humanities Social Sciences
The aims of this journal is to provide a venue for academicians, researchers and practitioners for publishing the original research articles or review articles. The scope of the articles published in this journal deal with a broad range of topics, including: Criminal Law; Civil Law; International Law; Constitutional Law; Administrative Law; Islamic Law; Economic Law; Medical Law; Adat Law; Environmental Law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 226 Documents
 19   20   21   22   23 
The Femicide in Indonesia: Critical Analysis and Innovative Legal Reconstruction Ainal Mardhiah; Rizanizarli Rizanizarli; Iskandar A. Gani; Sri Walny Rahayu; Mohammad Nasr Khater
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.45735

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the legal vacuum surrounding femicide in Indonesia and to urge legal reform to address this most extreme form of gender-based violence. Femicide, the killing of women for gender reasons, is not explicitly recognized in Indonesian positive law and is still processed under general murder provisions, thus ignoring the structural and gender dimensions of the crime. The research method used is a normative juridical method as well as a conceptual and comparative approach. The results of the study show that although femicide cases are increasing and judges are starting to consider gender motives as an aggravating factor, the absence of specific regulations leads to inconsistent legal protection and opens up opportunities for impunity. This article proposes three forms of legal reconstruction: the creation of a specific femicide crime or its recognition as an aggravating factor, the development of gender-based sentencing guidelines, and the development of technical judicial guidelines that ensure contextual interpretation of gender-based violence. These reforms are necessary to achieve substantive justice, legal certainty, and fulfill Indonesia's constitutional and international obligations to eradicate violence against women.
The Urgency of Arbitration Failure: Reconceptualizing the Construction of Industrial Relations Arbitration Yati Nurhayati; Ifrani Ifrani; Nahdhah Nahdhah; M.Yasir Said; Martine Flipse
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.47129

Abstract

Industrial relations arbitration remains limited and has not yet become a primary option for disputing parties. The purpose of this study is to reconceptualize Industrial Relations Arbitration with a focus on procedural and institutional reform. This study begins with more fundamental principles, taking into account the dimensions of worker protection and the urgent need for institutional restructuring of Industrial Relations Arbitration. The research method used is doctrinal legal research with a prescriptive-analytical approach, combining conceptual, legal, and case-based approaches. The findings reveal several problems, such as the limited scope of disputes that can be submitted and the scarcity of qualified arbitrators. The reconceptualization of Industrial Relations Arbitration offers a solution by expanding the absolute competence of arbitration forums to cover all types of labor disputes. This will optimize the forum for resolving disputes between employers and workers as well as conflicts between trade unions. Furthermore, restructuring the institutional framework of Industrial Relations Arbitration is crucial. The establishment of a competent and independent arbitration body will increase the attractiveness and quality of dispute resolution, with the fundamental principle of maintaining harmonious and sustainable industrial relations.
The Marriage Law Reform in The Global Era: Integrating Human Rights into Family Law I Nyoman Sujana; Nur Fareha; Jawade Hafidz; Indriana Masru’iyati Salma Izzah; Mazhab Mursida Zidan
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.48618

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine marriage law reform in the global era, emphasizing the integration of human rights principles into family law. This study focuses on how marriage law can respond to the demands of globalization, gender equality, and the protection of vulnerable groups. This study uses a juridical-normative approach and comparative methods through a review of laws and regulations, court decisions, and ratified international instruments. The analysis focuses on practices in Indonesia and Southeast Asian countries, particularly Malaysia and the Philippines. This study reveals that Indonesia still places religion as the primary basis for marriage legality, Malaysia faces the complexity of dualism between Islamic law and civil law, while the Philippines is relatively progressive in adopting human rights principles despite still being influenced by Catholic doctrine. This study contributes to the family law literature by offering an integrative perspective that emphasizes the importance of marriage law reform that is responsive to local values while aligning with global human rights standards. These findings have strategic implications for the development of family law policy in Southeast Asia in the face of globalization and international standardization.
Structural Inequality of Land Ownership in Indonesia: A Justice-Based Legal Perspective Agung Iriantoro; Junimart Girsang; Suwarno Suwarno
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.47808

Abstract

Structural inequality in land ownership remains a pressing issue in Indonesia, where control over vast land areas is concentrated among corporations and elites, while many communities continue to face limited access to agrarian resources. This condition contributes to poverty, social vulnerability, and recurring agrarian conflicts across regions. This research aims to analyze the phenomenon of structural inequality in land ownership through a justice-based perspective, examining its root causes and assessing the effectiveness of existing agrarian policies. Using a normative juridical method with statute and conceptual approaches, the study reviews legal frameworks, policy documents, and academic literature to provide a comprehensive evaluation. The findings indicate that overlapping regulations, weak recognition of customary rights, pro-investment legal reforms, and limited public participation have hindered equitable land governance. Agrarian Reform policies have also fallen short, particularly in achieving meaningful redistribution, strengthening community rights, and providing adequate conflict resolution mechanisms. The study concludes that reducing structural inequality requires strengthening justice-oriented legal norms, improving coherence among agrarian regulations, enhancing recognition of local and customary rights, and ensuring more inclusive participation in policy implementation.
Reconstruction of the Guilt Concept in the 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code from a Neurolaw Perspective Kartono Kartono; Sophan Y. Warnasouda; Sri Humana Lagustiani; Soeryaniati Koesoemo; Sri Hastuti; J. Aminullah Alwahdy; Ulang Mangun Sosiawan; Bhanu Prakash Nunna
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.48576

Abstract

This study examines the reconstruction of the guilt concept in the 2023 Indonesian Criminal Code through a neurolaw perspective. Employing doctrinal legal research with an interdisciplinary approach, it analyzes Law Number 1/2023, neurolaw publications from international journals, and recent Supreme Court decisions (2023–2025) through thematic and conceptual analysis. The findings reveal three principal issues. First, Articles 17, 35, 38, and 39 contain progressive provisions but lack neuroscientific specificity, creating interpretive gaps: undefined “ability” (Article 17), unspecified “impairment” threshold (Article 35), and exclusive reliance on traditional psychiatric categories (Articles 38 and 39). Second, analysis of court decisions reveals significant interpretive disparity in cases involving mentally disordered defendants. Neuroscientific evidence demonstrates that prefrontal cortex impairments compromise moral decision-making and impulse control, supporting a spectrum-based understanding of guilt. Third, integrating neurolaw would provide objective criteria for assessing cognitive and volitional capacity across the graded framework of Articles 38 and 39. This study is the first to systematically integrate international neurolaw literature with doctrinal analysis of the 2023 Criminal Code, offering interpretative guidance for key articles and an implementation roadmap for Indonesian criminal justice aligned with the ultimum remedium principle.
Regulatory Coherence and Accountability in Indonesia’s National Health Insurance: A Doctrinal and Stakeholder Analysis Nurul Istiqomah; Izza Mafruhah; Norlida Hanim Mohd Saleh; Dewi Ismoyowati; Alif Ksatria Firdausi AI
Jurnal Hukum Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Unissula

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jh.v42i1.40737

Abstract

This article examines the regulatory coherence and accountability of Indonesia’s National Health Insurance (JKN) within the framework of constitutional and administrative law. It addresses two principal legal questions: whether the JKN regulatory structure demonstrates hierarchical consistency within Indonesia’s system of laws, and whether its governance design particularly in relation to the referral system and the arrears regime complies with principles of legal certainty, proportionality, and accountability. Using a doctrinal legal approach supported by stakeholder mapping through the MACTOR framework, the study evaluates both normative structure and institutional interaction. The findings indicate that the JKN framework is formally consistent with constitutional mandates and statutory delegation under the SJSN Law and the BPJS Law. However, horizontal regulatory harmonization remains incomplete, particularly regarding the interaction between hospital classification regulations and BPJS referral policies. Moreover, the arrears enforcement mechanism, while legally grounded in mandatory participation, lacks sufficiently clear criteria to distinguish inability to pay from non-compliance. The study concludes that targeted amendments to implementing regulations and the establishment of formal administrative dispute-resolution mechanisms are necessary to strengthen proportional enforcement, regulatory coherence, and institutional accountability within the JKN system.

Page 23 of 23 | Total Record : 226

 19   20   21   22   23 

Filter by Year

2005 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol 42, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Vol 41, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Vol 41, No 3 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Vol 41, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Vol 41, No 1 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Vol 40, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Hukum Vol 39, No 2 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Vol 39, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Vol 38, No 2 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Vol 38, No 1 (2022): Jurnal Hukum Vol 37, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Vol 37, No 1 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Vol 36, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Vol 35, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Vol 35, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Vol 31, No 2 (2015): Jurnal Hukum Vol 31, No 1 (2015): Jurnal Hukum Vol 30, No 2 (2014): Jurnal Hukum Vol 29, No 1 (2014): Jurnal Hukum Vol 28, No 2 (2012): Jurnal Hukum Volume XXVIII No. 2 Tahun 2012 Vol 26, No 2 (2011): Jurnal Hukum Volume XXVI, Nomor 2, Edisi Agustus 2011 Vol 25, No 1 (2011): Jurnal Hukum Volume XXV, Nomor 1, Edisi April 2011 Vol 15, No 1 (2005): Jurnal Hukum More Issue