cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Pringati Singarimbun
Contact Email
pringatisingarimbun@adm.unand.ac.id
Phone
+6289617699764
Journal Mail Official
031262646@ecampus.ut.ac.id
Editorial Address
Cluster Gajah Mada Kapling 2 Gunung Pangilun Padang Sumatera Barat, Indonesia
Location
Kota padang,
Sumatera barat
INDONESIA
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary
Published by CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing
ISSN : -     EISSN : 29881293     DOI : -
Core Subject : Economy, Education, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other
The Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary (ELJBN) is a scholarly publication dedicated to exploring the intersection of ethics, law, business, and notarial practices. Our journal aims to provide a platform for researchers, academics, legal professionals, and practitioners to contribute to the advancement of knowledge and discourse in these fields. ELJBN publishes original research articles, critical reviews, case studies, and thought-provoking commentaries that delve into the ethical and legal dimensions of business activities and notarial practices. ELJBN covers a wide range of topics related to business law, corporate governance, commercial transactions, contracts, intellectual property, dispute resolution, regulatory frameworks, and the evolving landscape of notarial practices. Our journal encourages interdisciplinary perspectives, drawing insights from law, business, economics, ethics, and related disciplines to foster a comprehensive understanding of the complex issues at hand. We seek to promote the highest standards of research integrity, analytical rigor, and ethical inquiry within the realm of business and notary law.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Hukum
Articles 4 Documents
 1 
Search results for , issue "Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)" : 4 Documents clear
Akibat Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Oleh Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan Dalam Kasus Ekspor Minyak Goreng (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 41/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst) Amran, Yuko; Markoni, Markoni; Judge, Zulfikar; Wdarto, Joko; Elawati, Tuti
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/eljbn.283

Abstract

The phenomenon of widespread corruption crimes in Indonesia reflects a serious issue in law enforcement. Ironically, perpetrators of corruption are not only found among the executive or legislative branches but also within the judiciary, which should serve as the last bastion for seekers of justice. The bribery case involving a judge in the cooking oil export scandal serves as concrete evidence of how judicial integrity is at stake. This study aims to analyze the legal consequences of bribery committed by a judge in relation to an onslag (acquittal) verdict, using the case study of the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 41/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst. The research method employed is normative juridical, utilizing the theories of abuse of power, legal accountability, and corruption. The findings show that the onslag decision rendered by the judge was proven to have been influenced by the bribe received. The study concludes that the act of corruption committed by the judge in the cooking oil export case constitutes a systemic and structured crime involving abuse of authority, bribery, and self-enrichment. The legal consequences include imprisonment, fines, revocation of certain rights, dishonorable dismissal, and the loss of public trust in the judiciary. The study recommends that the Supreme Court, the Judicial Commission, and the House of Representatives strengthen judicial oversight, reform the legal system, and impose stricter sanctions on corrupt judges. Keywords: legal consequences, corruption crime, judge, cooking oil export.   Abstrak Fenomena maraknya tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia menunjukkan persoalan serius dalam penegakan hukum. Ironisnya, pelaku korupsi tidak hanya berasal dari kalangan eksekutif atau legislatif, tetapi juga dari lembaga peradilan yang seharusnya menjadi benteng terakhir pencari keadilan. Kasus suap ekspor minyak goreng yang melibatkan hakim merupakan salah satu contoh nyata bagaimana integritas hakim dipertaruhkan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akibat hukum dari suap yang dilakukan oleh Hakim terhadap putusan onslag studi kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 41/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan menggunakan teori penyagunaan wewenang, teori pertanggungjawaban hukum, dan teori tentang korupsi. Akibat hukumnya hakim yang memberikan putusan onslaag tersebut terbukti bahwa putusannya itu karena dipengaruhi faktor suap yang diterimanya. Kesimpulan bahwa tindak pidana korupsi yang dilakukan hakim dalam perkara ekspor minyak goreng merupakan kejahatan sistemik dan terstruktur yang meliputi penyalahgunaan wewenang, penerimaan suap, dan upaya memperkaya diri. Akibat hukumnya tidak hanya berupa pidana penjara, denda, dan pencabutan hak tertentu, tetapi juga pemberhentian tidak dengan hormat serta hilangnya kepercayaan publik terhadap lembaga peradilan. Sarannya agar Mahkamah Agung, Komisi Yudisial, DPR perlu memperkuat pengawasan hakim, mereformasi sistem hukum, memperketat sanksi bagi hakim korup.   Kata kunci: akibat hukum, tindak pidana korupsi, hakim, ekspor minyak goreng.
Pembagian Harta Gono Gini Dari Hasil Royalti Hak Cipta Lagu Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Distributif (Studi Putusan Kasasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 479 K/Ag/2024) Widiawati, Widiawati; Nazah, Farida Nurun; Fitria, Annisa; Khantika, I Made
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/eljbn.284

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal considerations of the Supreme Court Justices in Decision Number 479 K/Ag/2024 concerning the division of song copyright royalties as part of community property after divorce, viewed from the perspective of distributive justice. The background of this research arises from a new legal phenomenon in Indonesia, in which royalties derived from intellectual property—previously considered purely immaterial rights—have begun to be recognized as part of joint marital assets  in family law disputes. The research adopts a normative juridical method using statutory and case approaches, focusing on an in-depth examination of judicial reasoning and relevant legal instruments governing copyright, marriage, and Islamic family law. The findings reveal that Supreme Court Decision No. 479 K/Ag/2024 serves as a significant precedent in the Indonesian legal system, marking the first recognition of song royalties as divisible community property between spouses following divorce. The judgment not only reaffirms the protection of the creator’s economic rights but also expands the concept of justice in family law through the application of Aristotelian distributive justice, whereby division is made according to the proportional contribution and involvement of each party in the creation of the work. A normative and philosophical analysis of the decision indicates that substantive justice prevails over formal justice, taking into account the continuous nature of royalty income as a dynamic asset. Consequently, this study contributes to the development of intellectual property and Islamic family law in Indonesia, particularly in integrating the principles of distributive justice into the jurisprudence of religious courts. Keywords: Royalty, Community Property, Copyright, Distributive Justice. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hukum Hakim Agung dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 479 K/Ag/2024 mengenai pembagian royalti hak cipta lagu sebagai bagian dari harta gono gini pasca perceraian, ditinjau dari perspektif keadilan distributif. Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari fenomena hukum baru di Indonesia, di mana royalti hak cipta yang bersifat immateriil mulai diakui sebagai bagian dari harta bersama (community property) dalam sengketa perceraian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach dan case approach, berfokus pada analisis putusan pengadilan serta peraturan perundang-undangan terkait hak cipta, perkawinan, dan hukum Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Putusan MA No. 479 K/Ag/2024 menjadi preseden penting dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, karena untuk pertama kalinya royalti lagu dinyatakan sebagai harta bersama yang dapat dibagi secara proporsional antara suami dan istri setelah perceraian. Putusan ini tidak hanya menegaskan perlindungan terhadap hak ekonomi pencipta, tetapi juga memperluas makna keadilan dalam hukum keluarga melalui penerapan prinsip keadilan distributif Aristoteles, di mana pembagian dilakukan berdasarkan kontribusi dan proporsi keterlibatan masing-masing pihak dalam penciptaan karya. Analisis normatif dan filosofis terhadap putusan tersebut menunjukkan bahwa keadilan substantif lebih diutamakan daripada keadilan formal, dengan mempertimbangkan nilai manfaat berkelanjutan (continuous income) dari royalti sebagai aset dinamis. Dengan demikian, penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi terhadap pengembangan hukum kekayaan intelektual dan hukum keluarga Islam di Indonesia, khususnya dalam mengintegrasikan nilai keadilan distributif dalam praktik peradilan agama. Kata Kunci : Royalti, Harta Gono Gini, Hak Cipta Lagu, Keadilan Distributif
Perbuatan Melawan Hukum sebagai Upaya Perlindungan terhadap Hak Subjektif Kennedy, Alexander
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/eljbn.287

Abstract

The concept of Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) or tort in Indonesian civil law functions not only as a legal basis for claims of compensation but also as a mechanism to protect individuals’ subjective rights. Initially, “unlawful act” was narrowly interpreted as a violation of written laws; however, jurisprudential development, particularly since the landmark Lindenbaum vs Cohen (1919) case, has broadened its scope to include violations of propriety, morality, and rights recognized by society. This study examines the regulation of PMH under the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and its jurisprudential development, as well as its role in protecting subjective rights. Using a normative juridical method with statute and case approaches, the research draws on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that PMH serves a dual function, remedial (restoring losses) and preventive (deterring violations) and can protect subjective rights even when no specific legislation exists. However, challenges remain in proving fault, causation, and avoiding inconsistency in judicial decisions. The study recommends clear judicial guidelines, adaptive civil law reform, and enhanced judicial capacity to ensure consistent application of PMH as an instrument of rights protection within the framework of the rule of law. Keywords: Unlawful Act; Subjective Rights; Civil Law; Jurisprudence; Legal Protection. Abstrak Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (PMH) merupakan instrumen penting dalam hukum perdata Indonesia yang berfungsi tidak hanya sebagai dasar tuntutan ganti rugi, tetapi juga sebagai mekanisme perlindungan hak subjektif individu. Awalnya, konsep “melawan hukum” diartikan secara sempit sebagai pelanggaran terhadap peraturan tertulis, namun perkembangan yurisprudensi, khususnya sejak perkara Lindenbaum vs Cohen (1919), memperluas cakupannya hingga mencakup pelanggaran norma kepatutan, kesusilaan, dan hak yang diakui masyarakat. Permasalahan yang dikaji meliputi pengaturan PMH dalam KUHPerdata dan perkembangan penerapannya melalui yurisprudensi, serta perannya dalam melindungi hak subjektif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan dan kasus, didukung analisis bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil pembahasan menunjukkan bahwa PMH memiliki fungsi ganda, yaitu remedial (pemulihan kerugian) dan preventif (pencegahan pelanggaran), serta mampu melindungi hak subjektif meski belum diatur khusus dalam undang-undang. Namun, tantangan muncul pada pembuktian unsur kesalahan, hubungan kausal, dan potensi inkonsistensi putusan hakim. Disarankan adanya pedoman yudisial yang jelas, pembaruan hukum perdata yang adaptif, dan peningkatan kapasitas hakim untuk memastikan konsistensi penerapan PMH sebagai instrumen perlindungan hak dalam kerangka negara hukum.
Vicarious Liability dalam Pertanggungjawaban Perusahaan Otobus atas Kelalaian Sopir: Studi Kasus Putusan Kennedy, Alexander
Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : CV. Lenggogeni Data Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61292/eljbn.288

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes the application of vicarious liability in Indonesian civil law through Article 1367 of the Civil Code (KUHPer) as a derivation of Article 1365, using District Court of Sidoarjo Judgment No. 331/Pdt.G/2022/PN Sda as a case study. Using a normative juridical method and statutory, case, and conceptual approaches, the study underscores the “gatekeeping” role of the unlawful act (PMH) before liability can be attributed to the employer. To interpret the scope of employment, the article applies three practical lenses: control-benefit, functional integration, and foreseeability and proposes using criminal judgments as facts in civil proceedings. The novelty lies in turning principles into measurable evidentiary indicators (safety SOPs, fatigue management, telematics, operational documentation) to distinguish enterprise risk from personal negligence. The findings show the driver acted within the scope, making the bus company jointly liable; the framework improves predictability, strengthens victim protection, and promotes compliance by design. Keywords: Tort, Vicarious Liability, Private Law. Abstrak Artikel ini menganalisis penerapan vicarious liability dalam hukum perdata Indonesia melalui Pasal 1367 KUHPer sebagai derivasi Pasal 1365 KUHPer, dengan studi kasus Putusan PN Sidoarjo No. 331/Pdt.G/2022/PN Sda. Berbasis metode yuridis normatif dan pendekatan perundang-undangan, kasus, serta konseptual, penelitian menegaskan peran “gatekeeping” PMH sebelum atribusi tanggung jawab pada majikan. Untuk menafsirkan ruang lingkup pekerjaan, artikel menerapkan secara praktis tiga lensa: kontrol-manfaat, integrasi fungsional, dan keterkiraan risiko, serta mengusulkan pemanfaatan putusan pidana sebagai fakta di ranah perdata. Kebaruan terletak pada transformasi asas menjadi indikator pembuktian yang terukur (SOP keselamatan, manajemen kelelahan, telematika, dokumentasi operasional) guna membedakan risiko usaha dari kelalaian pribadi. Temuan menunjukkan tindakan sopir berada dalam jabatan sehingga PO bus bertanggung renteng; kerangka ini meningkatkan prediktabilitas putusan, memperkuat perlindungan korban, dan mendorong compliance by design.

Page 1 of 1 | Total Record : 4

 1 

Filter by Year

2025 2025


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue 2025: ELJBN Volume 3 Issue 1 Year 2025 (In Progress Issue) Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025) Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024) Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023) Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023)